The V-Quick patch versus the standard 12-lead ECG system: time is the essence

Introduction The V-Quick patch template system is compared with the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition technique in this paper. The objectives of the study were: (a) to study and compare the time taken to produce the printed 12-lead ECG and (b) to look at the level of agreement whe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of emergency medicine 2008-04, Vol.1 (1), p.43-48
Hauptverfasser: Lateef, F., Annathurai, A., Loh, T. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 48
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
container_title International journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 1
creator Lateef, F.
Annathurai, A.
Loh, T. T.
description Introduction The V-Quick patch template system is compared with the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition technique in this paper. The objectives of the study were: (a) to study and compare the time taken to produce the printed 12-lead ECG and (b) to look at the level of agreement when the ECGs were compared by two blinded, independent assessors. Methods One hundred and fifty each of male and female volunteers signed an informed consent form to participate in the clinical study. Nurses were put through a 4-h training session to familiarise themselves with the V-Quick patch system. The timings were measured with a stopwatch with the specific start and end points defined. The final ECG printouts were then compared by two blinded, independent assessors for several set criteria. Results The V-Quick patch system was proved to be significantly faster than the standard 12-lead system in the acquisition of the ECG in both male and female volunteers. The time taken in male volunteers was also noted to be significantly faster than in female volunteers. Conclusion The two assessors shared a 100% agreement level when comparing the ECGs acquired by both techniques in the same individual (intra-assessor agreement) and when each ECG was read by the two assessors separately (inter-assessor agreement).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12245-008-0008-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2536187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2666826011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d15a3728c3a7eb0d13cd35f4f456117de7cce5d480371a55448c01e55d63fe983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVtrFEEQhRtRTIj5Ab5Iow8-Tezqy3SvD4IsMREiIkRfm97umuzoXNaumUD-vb3MEqOQh77A-epUFYexlyDOQAj7jkBKbSohXDnl0k_YMbjaVKCceHr_t_KInRK1G6G11cI6_ZwdwUo5bYQ4Zl-ut8h_VN_mNv7iuzDFLb_FTDPxqQg0hSGFnDjIqsOQ-Pn6gtMdTdi_51PbI28XEIlwiPiCPWtCR3h6eE_Y90_n1-vL6urrxef1x6sqallPVQITymAuqmBxIxKomJRpdKNNDWAT2hjRJO2EshCM0dpFAWhMqlWDK6dO2IfFdzdvekwRhymHzu9y24d858fQ-n-Vod36m_HWS6NqcLYYvD0Y5PH3jDT5vqWIXRcGHGfyViklrVitCvn6P_LnOOehbOddLVUtha0L9OYxCAQYMM6ovRUsVMwjUcbmfmAQfp-pXzL1JU6_z9TrUvPq4aZ_Kw4JFkAuABVpuMH8sPVjrn8AHduppQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1015158539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The V-Quick patch versus the standard 12-lead ECG system: time is the essence</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Access via BioMed Central</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lateef, F. ; Annathurai, A. ; Loh, T. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lateef, F. ; Annathurai, A. ; Loh, T. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The V-Quick patch template system is compared with the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition technique in this paper. The objectives of the study were: (a) to study and compare the time taken to produce the printed 12-lead ECG and (b) to look at the level of agreement when the ECGs were compared by two blinded, independent assessors. Methods One hundred and fifty each of male and female volunteers signed an informed consent form to participate in the clinical study. Nurses were put through a 4-h training session to familiarise themselves with the V-Quick patch system. The timings were measured with a stopwatch with the specific start and end points defined. The final ECG printouts were then compared by two blinded, independent assessors for several set criteria. Results The V-Quick patch system was proved to be significantly faster than the standard 12-lead system in the acquisition of the ECG in both male and female volunteers. The time taken in male volunteers was also noted to be significantly faster than in female volunteers. Conclusion The two assessors shared a 100% agreement level when comparing the ECGs acquired by both techniques in the same individual (intra-assessor agreement) and when each ECG was read by the two assessors separately (inter-assessor agreement).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1372</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-1380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12245-008-0008-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19384500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers ; Agreements ; Angiology ; Cardiology ; Electrocardiography ; Electrodes ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine ; Hypotheses ; Informed consent ; Internal Medicine ; Medical technology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Skin</subject><ispartof>International journal of emergency medicine, 2008-04, Vol.1 (1), p.43-48</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2008</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2008. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d15a3728c3a7eb0d13cd35f4f456117de7cce5d480371a55448c01e55d63fe983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d15a3728c3a7eb0d13cd35f4f456117de7cce5d480371a55448c01e55d63fe983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2536187/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2536187/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41120,41488,42189,42557,51319,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lateef, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annathurai, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loh, T. T.</creatorcontrib><title>The V-Quick patch versus the standard 12-lead ECG system: time is the essence</title><title>International journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Emerg Med</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Introduction The V-Quick patch template system is compared with the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition technique in this paper. The objectives of the study were: (a) to study and compare the time taken to produce the printed 12-lead ECG and (b) to look at the level of agreement when the ECGs were compared by two blinded, independent assessors. Methods One hundred and fifty each of male and female volunteers signed an informed consent form to participate in the clinical study. Nurses were put through a 4-h training session to familiarise themselves with the V-Quick patch system. The timings were measured with a stopwatch with the specific start and end points defined. The final ECG printouts were then compared by two blinded, independent assessors for several set criteria. Results The V-Quick patch system was proved to be significantly faster than the standard 12-lead system in the acquisition of the ECG in both male and female volunteers. The time taken in male volunteers was also noted to be significantly faster than in female volunteers. Conclusion The two assessors shared a 100% agreement level when comparing the ECGs acquired by both techniques in the same individual (intra-assessor agreement) and when each ECG was read by the two assessors separately (inter-assessor agreement).</description><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Angiology</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Skin</subject><issn>1865-1372</issn><issn>1865-1380</issn><issn>1865-1380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVtrFEEQhRtRTIj5Ab5Iow8-Tezqy3SvD4IsMREiIkRfm97umuzoXNaumUD-vb3MEqOQh77A-epUFYexlyDOQAj7jkBKbSohXDnl0k_YMbjaVKCceHr_t_KInRK1G6G11cI6_ZwdwUo5bYQ4Zl-ut8h_VN_mNv7iuzDFLb_FTDPxqQg0hSGFnDjIqsOQ-Pn6gtMdTdi_51PbI28XEIlwiPiCPWtCR3h6eE_Y90_n1-vL6urrxef1x6sqallPVQITymAuqmBxIxKomJRpdKNNDWAT2hjRJO2EshCM0dpFAWhMqlWDK6dO2IfFdzdvekwRhymHzu9y24d858fQ-n-Vod36m_HWS6NqcLYYvD0Y5PH3jDT5vqWIXRcGHGfyViklrVitCvn6P_LnOOehbOddLVUtha0L9OYxCAQYMM6ovRUsVMwjUcbmfmAQfp-pXzL1JU6_z9TrUvPq4aZ_Kw4JFkAuABVpuMH8sPVjrn8AHduppQ</recordid><startdate>200804</startdate><enddate>200804</enddate><creator>Lateef, F.</creator><creator>Annathurai, A.</creator><creator>Loh, T. T.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200804</creationdate><title>The V-Quick patch versus the standard 12-lead ECG system: time is the essence</title><author>Lateef, F. ; Annathurai, A. ; Loh, T. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-d15a3728c3a7eb0d13cd35f4f456117de7cce5d480371a55448c01e55d63fe983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Angiology</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Skin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lateef, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annathurai, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loh, T. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lateef, F.</au><au>Annathurai, A.</au><au>Loh, T. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The V-Quick patch versus the standard 12-lead ECG system: time is the essence</atitle><jtitle>International journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><stitle>Int J Emerg Med</stitle><addtitle>Int J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2008-04</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>43-48</pages><issn>1865-1372</issn><issn>1865-1380</issn><eissn>1865-1380</eissn><abstract>Introduction The V-Quick patch template system is compared with the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) acquisition technique in this paper. The objectives of the study were: (a) to study and compare the time taken to produce the printed 12-lead ECG and (b) to look at the level of agreement when the ECGs were compared by two blinded, independent assessors. Methods One hundred and fifty each of male and female volunteers signed an informed consent form to participate in the clinical study. Nurses were put through a 4-h training session to familiarise themselves with the V-Quick patch system. The timings were measured with a stopwatch with the specific start and end points defined. The final ECG printouts were then compared by two blinded, independent assessors for several set criteria. Results The V-Quick patch system was proved to be significantly faster than the standard 12-lead system in the acquisition of the ECG in both male and female volunteers. The time taken in male volunteers was also noted to be significantly faster than in female volunteers. Conclusion The two assessors shared a 100% agreement level when comparing the ECGs acquired by both techniques in the same individual (intra-assessor agreement) and when each ECG was read by the two assessors separately (inter-assessor agreement).</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>19384500</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12245-008-0008-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1865-1372
ispartof International journal of emergency medicine, 2008-04, Vol.1 (1), p.43-48
issn 1865-1372
1865-1380
1865-1380
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2536187
source SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Access via BioMed Central; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acquisitions & mergers
Agreements
Angiology
Cardiology
Electrocardiography
Electrodes
Emergency medical care
Emergency Medicine
Hypotheses
Informed consent
Internal Medicine
Medical technology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original
Original Article
Patients
Pediatrics
Skin
title The V-Quick patch versus the standard 12-lead ECG system: time is the essence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A36%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20V-Quick%20patch%20versus%20the%20standard%2012-lead%20ECG%20system:%20time%20is%20the%20essence&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Lateef,%20F.&rft.date=2008-04&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=43-48&rft.issn=1865-1372&rft.eissn=1865-1380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12245-008-0008-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2666826011%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1015158539&rft_id=info:pmid/19384500&rfr_iscdi=true