Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different methods of demonstrating right iliac fossa peritonism in appendicitis. The methods used were cat's eye symptom (pain on going over a bump in the road), cough sign, right iliac fossa tenderness, percussion tenderness, rebound tender...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1996-01, Vol.78 (1), p.11-14
Hauptverfasser: Golledge, J, Toms, A P, Franklin, I J, Scriven, M W, Galland, R B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
container_volume 78
creator Golledge, J
Toms, A P
Franklin, I J
Scriven, M W
Galland, R B
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different methods of demonstrating right iliac fossa peritonism in appendicitis. The methods used were cat's eye symptom (pain on going over a bump in the road), cough sign, right iliac fossa tenderness, percussion tenderness, rebound tenderness and guarding. A series of 100 consecutive patients with a median age of 25 years (range 4-81 years), presenting with right iliac fossa pain were studied prospectively; the male:female ratio was 39:61. In all, 58 patients underwent operation, 44 had appendicitis confirmed on histology. Fourteen patients had a normal appendix removed; 11 were women aged between 16 and 45 years. Cat's eye symptom and cough sign were sensitive indicators of appendicitis (sensitivity 0.80 and 0.82, respectively), but were not specific (specificity 0.52 and 0.50, respectively) and therefore inaccurate (accuracy 64%). Percussion tenderness was less sensitive (sensitivity 0.57) but more specific (specificity 0.86). Rebound tenderness proved to be sensitive (sensitivity 0.82), specific (specificity 0.89) and accurate (accuracy 86%). Thus, rebound tenderness had a positive predictive value of 86% compared with 56% and 57% for cough sign and cat's eye symptom, respectively. In the difficult diagnostic group of young women, the positive predictive value of rebound tenderness was 88% compared with 58% and 56% for cat's eye symptom and cough sign. Appendicitis remains a difficult diagnosis, particularly in young women. Rebound tenderness still has an important role to play in clinical assessment.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2502643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78122953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p261t-ef546085256264b3b367e49e803cf7f19f51e4c6b23e7619f6e9ce2c28267f573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtKxEAQRRtRxjj6CUJW4ibQj_RrIwyDjsKAG103SU-1tiSdmEoE_96IQXRVFHU5p7hHJGOlNoWmRhyTjFIhC2NKcUrOEN8oZVYbtiIro6S1SmbkeoMIiC2kMe9C3sMQxy5FbPOY8qrvIR2ij2PEc3ISqgbhYplr8nx3-7S9L_aPu4ftZl_0XLGxgCBLRY3kUnFV1qIWSkNpwVDhgw7MBsmg9KrmArSaVwXWA_fccKWD1GJNbn64_VS3cPDzY0PVuH6IbTV8uq6K7v8lxVf30n04LulsFDPgagEM3fsEOLo2ooemqRJ0E7q5AM6t_A5e_jX9KpZuxBf73mFK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78122953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Golledge, J ; Toms, A P ; Franklin, I J ; Scriven, M W ; Galland, R B</creator><creatorcontrib>Golledge, J ; Toms, A P ; Franklin, I J ; Scriven, M W ; Galland, R B</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different methods of demonstrating right iliac fossa peritonism in appendicitis. The methods used were cat's eye symptom (pain on going over a bump in the road), cough sign, right iliac fossa tenderness, percussion tenderness, rebound tenderness and guarding. A series of 100 consecutive patients with a median age of 25 years (range 4-81 years), presenting with right iliac fossa pain were studied prospectively; the male:female ratio was 39:61. In all, 58 patients underwent operation, 44 had appendicitis confirmed on histology. Fourteen patients had a normal appendix removed; 11 were women aged between 16 and 45 years. Cat's eye symptom and cough sign were sensitive indicators of appendicitis (sensitivity 0.80 and 0.82, respectively), but were not specific (specificity 0.52 and 0.50, respectively) and therefore inaccurate (accuracy 64%). Percussion tenderness was less sensitive (sensitivity 0.57) but more specific (specificity 0.86). Rebound tenderness proved to be sensitive (sensitivity 0.82), specific (specificity 0.89) and accurate (accuracy 86%). Thus, rebound tenderness had a positive predictive value of 86% compared with 56% and 57% for cough sign and cat's eye symptom, respectively. In the difficult diagnostic group of young women, the positive predictive value of rebound tenderness was 88% compared with 58% and 56% for cat's eye symptom and cough sign. Appendicitis remains a difficult diagnosis, particularly in young women. Rebound tenderness still has an important role to play in clinical assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8659965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal College of Surgeons of England</publisher><subject>Abdominal Pain - etiology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis - complications ; Appendicitis - diagnosis ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physical Examination - methods ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pressure ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sex Factors</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1996-01, Vol.78 (1), p.11-14</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2502643/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2502643/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8659965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Golledge, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toms, A P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, I J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scriven, M W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galland, R B</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different methods of demonstrating right iliac fossa peritonism in appendicitis. The methods used were cat's eye symptom (pain on going over a bump in the road), cough sign, right iliac fossa tenderness, percussion tenderness, rebound tenderness and guarding. A series of 100 consecutive patients with a median age of 25 years (range 4-81 years), presenting with right iliac fossa pain were studied prospectively; the male:female ratio was 39:61. In all, 58 patients underwent operation, 44 had appendicitis confirmed on histology. Fourteen patients had a normal appendix removed; 11 were women aged between 16 and 45 years. Cat's eye symptom and cough sign were sensitive indicators of appendicitis (sensitivity 0.80 and 0.82, respectively), but were not specific (specificity 0.52 and 0.50, respectively) and therefore inaccurate (accuracy 64%). Percussion tenderness was less sensitive (sensitivity 0.57) but more specific (specificity 0.86). Rebound tenderness proved to be sensitive (sensitivity 0.82), specific (specificity 0.89) and accurate (accuracy 86%). Thus, rebound tenderness had a positive predictive value of 86% compared with 56% and 57% for cough sign and cat's eye symptom, respectively. In the difficult diagnostic group of young women, the positive predictive value of rebound tenderness was 88% compared with 58% and 56% for cat's eye symptom and cough sign. Appendicitis remains a difficult diagnosis, particularly in young women. Rebound tenderness still has an important role to play in clinical assessment.</description><subject>Abdominal Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Appendectomy</subject><subject>Appendicitis - complications</subject><subject>Appendicitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physical Examination - methods</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtKxEAQRRtRxjj6CUJW4ibQj_RrIwyDjsKAG103SU-1tiSdmEoE_96IQXRVFHU5p7hHJGOlNoWmRhyTjFIhC2NKcUrOEN8oZVYbtiIro6S1SmbkeoMIiC2kMe9C3sMQxy5FbPOY8qrvIR2ij2PEc3ISqgbhYplr8nx3-7S9L_aPu4ftZl_0XLGxgCBLRY3kUnFV1qIWSkNpwVDhgw7MBsmg9KrmArSaVwXWA_fccKWD1GJNbn64_VS3cPDzY0PVuH6IbTV8uq6K7v8lxVf30n04LulsFDPgagEM3fsEOLo2ooemqRJ0E7q5AM6t_A5e_jX9KpZuxBf73mFK</recordid><startdate>199601</startdate><enddate>199601</enddate><creator>Golledge, J</creator><creator>Toms, A P</creator><creator>Franklin, I J</creator><creator>Scriven, M W</creator><creator>Galland, R B</creator><general>Royal College of Surgeons of England</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199601</creationdate><title>Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis</title><author>Golledge, J ; Toms, A P ; Franklin, I J ; Scriven, M W ; Galland, R B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p261t-ef546085256264b3b367e49e803cf7f19f51e4c6b23e7619f6e9ce2c28267f573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Appendectomy</topic><topic>Appendicitis - complications</topic><topic>Appendicitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physical Examination - methods</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Golledge, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toms, A P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, I J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scriven, M W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galland, R B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Golledge, J</au><au>Toms, A P</au><au>Franklin, I J</au><au>Scriven, M W</au><au>Galland, R B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>1996-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>11-14</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different methods of demonstrating right iliac fossa peritonism in appendicitis. The methods used were cat's eye symptom (pain on going over a bump in the road), cough sign, right iliac fossa tenderness, percussion tenderness, rebound tenderness and guarding. A series of 100 consecutive patients with a median age of 25 years (range 4-81 years), presenting with right iliac fossa pain were studied prospectively; the male:female ratio was 39:61. In all, 58 patients underwent operation, 44 had appendicitis confirmed on histology. Fourteen patients had a normal appendix removed; 11 were women aged between 16 and 45 years. Cat's eye symptom and cough sign were sensitive indicators of appendicitis (sensitivity 0.80 and 0.82, respectively), but were not specific (specificity 0.52 and 0.50, respectively) and therefore inaccurate (accuracy 64%). Percussion tenderness was less sensitive (sensitivity 0.57) but more specific (specificity 0.86). Rebound tenderness proved to be sensitive (sensitivity 0.82), specific (specificity 0.89) and accurate (accuracy 86%). Thus, rebound tenderness had a positive predictive value of 86% compared with 56% and 57% for cough sign and cat's eye symptom, respectively. In the difficult diagnostic group of young women, the positive predictive value of rebound tenderness was 88% compared with 58% and 56% for cat's eye symptom and cough sign. Appendicitis remains a difficult diagnosis, particularly in young women. Rebound tenderness still has an important role to play in clinical assessment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal College of Surgeons of England</pub><pmid>8659965</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-8843
ispartof Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1996-01, Vol.78 (1), p.11-14
issn 0035-8843
1478-7083
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2502643
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abdominal Pain - etiology
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Appendectomy
Appendicitis - complications
Appendicitis - diagnosis
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physical Examination - methods
Predictive Value of Tests
Pressure
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sex Factors
title Assessment of peritonism in appendicitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T05%3A58%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20peritonism%20in%20appendicitis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Golledge,%20J&rft.date=1996-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=11-14&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78122953%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78122953&rft_id=info:pmid/8659965&rfr_iscdi=true