Orthopaedic audit: one year's experience in a district general hospital
In 1982 a prospective Audit of complications and mortality and a quarterly retrospective analysis of work done were undertaken on the orthopaedic unit of Southmead Hospital, Bristol. Since no account has been presented of Orthopaedic Audit it was felt that a discussion of the method, results and whe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1984-11, Vol.66 (6), p.428-431 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 431 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 428 |
container_title | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Bunker, T D Ackroyd, C E Griffiths, H E |
description | In 1982 a prospective Audit of complications and mortality and a quarterly retrospective analysis of work done were undertaken on the orthopaedic unit of Southmead Hospital, Bristol. Since no account has been presented of Orthopaedic Audit it was felt that a discussion of the method, results and whether the aims had been achieved and at what cost would be of interest to other surgeons, and to orthopaedic surgeons in particular. Two orthopaedic surgeons treated 1811 inpatients during the year; 73.7% of the patients undergoing surgery at Southmead Hospital were emergencies. Mortality, excluding fractures of the neck of femur, was 0.22% and total mortality 1.8%; 16.7% of patients had a recorded complication of which the largest group was technical failure (2.7%) followed by wound infection (2.4%). |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2494445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75812689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p261t-d9ae4e148897cd8cc7f23a97400c4007d9c2fb6aa97dd29104d81210d2d033413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_gpCTnhbytZvEgyBFq1DoRc9LmkzbyDZZk6zYf--CRfQwDMw7PM8wJ2hKhVSVJIqfoikhvK6UEvwcXeT8TgjVUtEJmjQ1UbRppmixSmUXewPOW2wG58sdjgHwAUy6zRi-ekgeggXsAzbY-VyStwVvIUAyHd7F3Ptiukt0tjFdhqtjn6G3p8fX-XO1XC1e5g_LqmcNLZXTBgRQoZSW1ilr5YZxo6UgxI4lnbZss27MOHKOaUqEU5RR4pgjnAvKZ-j-h9sP6z04C6GMZ7R98nuTDm00vv2fBL9rt_GzZUILIeoRcHMEpPgxQC7t3mcLXWcCxCG3sh6FjdLj4vVf06_i-Dr-DQmUbGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75812689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orthopaedic audit: one year's experience in a district general hospital</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bunker, T D ; Ackroyd, C E ; Griffiths, H E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bunker, T D ; Ackroyd, C E ; Griffiths, H E</creatorcontrib><description>In 1982 a prospective Audit of complications and mortality and a quarterly retrospective analysis of work done were undertaken on the orthopaedic unit of Southmead Hospital, Bristol. Since no account has been presented of Orthopaedic Audit it was felt that a discussion of the method, results and whether the aims had been achieved and at what cost would be of interest to other surgeons, and to orthopaedic surgeons in particular. Two orthopaedic surgeons treated 1811 inpatients during the year; 73.7% of the patients undergoing surgery at Southmead Hospital were emergencies. Mortality, excluding fractures of the neck of femur, was 0.22% and total mortality 1.8%; 16.7% of patients had a recorded complication of which the largest group was technical failure (2.7%) followed by wound infection (2.4%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6508166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal College of Surgeons of England</publisher><subject>England ; Hospital Departments - standards ; Humans ; Medical Audit ; Orthopedics - standards ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery Department, Hospital - standards</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1984-11, Vol.66 (6), p.428-431</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2494445/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2494445/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6508166$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bunker, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackroyd, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, H E</creatorcontrib><title>Orthopaedic audit: one year's experience in a district general hospital</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>In 1982 a prospective Audit of complications and mortality and a quarterly retrospective analysis of work done were undertaken on the orthopaedic unit of Southmead Hospital, Bristol. Since no account has been presented of Orthopaedic Audit it was felt that a discussion of the method, results and whether the aims had been achieved and at what cost would be of interest to other surgeons, and to orthopaedic surgeons in particular. Two orthopaedic surgeons treated 1811 inpatients during the year; 73.7% of the patients undergoing surgery at Southmead Hospital were emergencies. Mortality, excluding fractures of the neck of femur, was 0.22% and total mortality 1.8%; 16.7% of patients had a recorded complication of which the largest group was technical failure (2.7%) followed by wound infection (2.4%).</description><subject>England</subject><subject>Hospital Departments - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Orthopedics - standards</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery Department, Hospital - standards</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_gpCTnhbytZvEgyBFq1DoRc9LmkzbyDZZk6zYf--CRfQwDMw7PM8wJ2hKhVSVJIqfoikhvK6UEvwcXeT8TgjVUtEJmjQ1UbRppmixSmUXewPOW2wG58sdjgHwAUy6zRi-ekgeggXsAzbY-VyStwVvIUAyHd7F3Ptiukt0tjFdhqtjn6G3p8fX-XO1XC1e5g_LqmcNLZXTBgRQoZSW1ilr5YZxo6UgxI4lnbZss27MOHKOaUqEU5RR4pgjnAvKZ-j-h9sP6z04C6GMZ7R98nuTDm00vv2fBL9rt_GzZUILIeoRcHMEpPgxQC7t3mcLXWcCxCG3sh6FjdLj4vVf06_i-Dr-DQmUbGk</recordid><startdate>19841101</startdate><enddate>19841101</enddate><creator>Bunker, T D</creator><creator>Ackroyd, C E</creator><creator>Griffiths, H E</creator><general>Royal College of Surgeons of England</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19841101</creationdate><title>Orthopaedic audit: one year's experience in a district general hospital</title><author>Bunker, T D ; Ackroyd, C E ; Griffiths, H E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p261t-d9ae4e148897cd8cc7f23a97400c4007d9c2fb6aa97dd29104d81210d2d033413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>England</topic><topic>Hospital Departments - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Orthopedics - standards</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery Department, Hospital - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bunker, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackroyd, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, H E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bunker, T D</au><au>Ackroyd, C E</au><au>Griffiths, H E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Orthopaedic audit: one year's experience in a district general hospital</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>1984-11-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>428</spage><epage>431</epage><pages>428-431</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract>In 1982 a prospective Audit of complications and mortality and a quarterly retrospective analysis of work done were undertaken on the orthopaedic unit of Southmead Hospital, Bristol. Since no account has been presented of Orthopaedic Audit it was felt that a discussion of the method, results and whether the aims had been achieved and at what cost would be of interest to other surgeons, and to orthopaedic surgeons in particular. Two orthopaedic surgeons treated 1811 inpatients during the year; 73.7% of the patients undergoing surgery at Southmead Hospital were emergencies. Mortality, excluding fractures of the neck of femur, was 0.22% and total mortality 1.8%; 16.7% of patients had a recorded complication of which the largest group was technical failure (2.7%) followed by wound infection (2.4%).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal College of Surgeons of England</pub><pmid>6508166</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-8843 |
ispartof | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1984-11, Vol.66 (6), p.428-431 |
issn | 0035-8843 1478-7083 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2494445 |
source | PubMed Central Free; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | England Hospital Departments - standards Humans Medical Audit Orthopedics - standards Postoperative Complications - mortality Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies Surgery Department, Hospital - standards |
title | Orthopaedic audit: one year's experience in a district general hospital |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A40%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orthopaedic%20audit:%20one%20year's%20experience%20in%20a%20district%20general%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Bunker,%20T%20D&rft.date=1984-11-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=428&rft.epage=431&rft.pages=428-431&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E75812689%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75812689&rft_id=info:pmid/6508166&rfr_iscdi=true |