Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification

Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evalua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of occupational hygiene 2008-07, Vol.52 (5), p.405-412
Hauptverfasser: Oppliger, Anne, Charrière, Nicole, Droz, Pierre-Olivier, Rinsoz, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 412
container_issue 5
container_start_page 405
container_title The Annals of occupational hygiene
container_volume 52
creator Oppliger, Anne
Charrière, Nicole
Droz, Pierre-Olivier
Rinsoz, Thomas
description Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evaluate the evolution of bioaerosol concentration during the fattening period, bioaerosol parameters (inhalable dust, endotoxin and bacteria) were measured in 12 poultry confinement buildings in Switzerland, at three different stages of the birds’ growth; samples of air taken from within the breathing zones of individual poultry house employees as they caught the chickens ready to be transported for slaughter were also analysed. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) was used to assess the quantity of total airborne bacteria and total airborne Staphylococcus species. Bioaerosol levels increased significantly during the fattening period of the chickens. During the task of catching mature birds, the mean inhalable dust concentration for a worker was 26 ± 1.9 mg m−3 and endotoxin concentration was 6198 ± 2.3 EU m−3 air, >6-fold higher than the Swiss occupational recommended value (1000 EU m−3). The mean exposure level of bird catchers to total bacteria and Staphylococcus species measured by Q-PCR is also very high, respectively, reaching values of 53 (±2.6) × 107 cells m−3 air and 62 (±1.9) × 106 m−3 air. It was concluded that in the absence of wearing protective breathing apparatus, chicken catchers in Switzerland risk exposure beyond recommended limits for all measured bioaerosol parameters. Moreover, the use of Q-PCR to estimate total and specific numbers of airborne bacteria is a promising tool for evaluating any modifications intended to improve the safety of current working practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/annhyg/men021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2488377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/annhyg/men021</oup_id><sourcerecordid>19601745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5bda193a109a253d0fa6186c7818a9c1b319e204b93a448323bd3afc8b3f73bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhyBX5AuISasdJ7AgJqd22LLASpWwF4mJNvPbWkNhb20HdP8DvxlWiBU6cRjPz6J2PN8ueEvyK4IYegbXXu81RrywuyL1sRkpW5ZTUxf1shjGmeckZP8gehfA9pSVtyMPsgPCyYSUls-zX2e3WhcErFB06MQ6Ud8F1ARmLLtzQRb9DCzcEFRBEdGq0Vl7ZiD5H2KSa0-gcYlTW2M1rdBXUXeVSQZdH0yt0Mb9E2nl0bHzrvFXoBGRU3kCHPg1go9FGQjTOPs4eaOiCejLFw-zq_Gw1X-TLj2_fzY-XuawIi3nVroE0FNLlUFR0jTXUhNeSccKhkaSlpFEFLtvElCWnBW3XFLTkLdWMtpoeZm9G3e3Q9mot0ykeOrH1pge_Ew6M-LdjzbXYuJ-iKDmnjCWBF5OAdzeDClH0JkjVdWBVepMgTY0JK6sE5iMo00ODV3o_hGBx55wYnROjc4l_9vdmf-jJqgQ8nwAIEjrtwUoT9lyBK1zwqkncy5Fzw_a_M6cdTYjqdg-D_yFqRlklFl-_iSVdFc37Lyvxgf4G-vHDNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19601745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Oppliger, Anne ; Charrière, Nicole ; Droz, Pierre-Olivier ; Rinsoz, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Oppliger, Anne ; Charrière, Nicole ; Droz, Pierre-Olivier ; Rinsoz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evaluate the evolution of bioaerosol concentration during the fattening period, bioaerosol parameters (inhalable dust, endotoxin and bacteria) were measured in 12 poultry confinement buildings in Switzerland, at three different stages of the birds’ growth; samples of air taken from within the breathing zones of individual poultry house employees as they caught the chickens ready to be transported for slaughter were also analysed. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) was used to assess the quantity of total airborne bacteria and total airborne Staphylococcus species. Bioaerosol levels increased significantly during the fattening period of the chickens. During the task of catching mature birds, the mean inhalable dust concentration for a worker was 26 ± 1.9 mg m−3 and endotoxin concentration was 6198 ± 2.3 EU m−3 air, &gt;6-fold higher than the Swiss occupational recommended value (1000 EU m−3). The mean exposure level of bird catchers to total bacteria and Staphylococcus species measured by Q-PCR is also very high, respectively, reaching values of 53 (±2.6) × 107 cells m−3 air and 62 (±1.9) × 106 m−3 air. It was concluded that in the absence of wearing protective breathing apparatus, chicken catchers in Switzerland risk exposure beyond recommended limits for all measured bioaerosol parameters. Moreover, the use of Q-PCR to estimate total and specific numbers of airborne bacteria is a promising tool for evaluating any modifications intended to improve the safety of current working practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4878</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1475-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/men021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18497431</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AOHYA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aerosols - analysis ; Air ; Air Microbiology ; Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis ; airborne bacteria ; Animal Husbandry ; Animals ; Aves ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Bacterial diseases ; bioaerosols ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chickens - growth &amp; development ; endotoxin ; Endotoxins - analysis ; Environment. Living conditions ; Environmental pollutants toxicology ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Inhalation Exposure - analysis ; Medical sciences ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; occupational health ; Original ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; poultry farm ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections ; Staphylococcus ; Staphylococcus xylosus ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>The Annals of occupational hygiene, 2008-07, Vol.52 (5), p.405-412</ispartof><rights>2008 The Author(s). 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5bda193a109a253d0fa6186c7818a9c1b319e204b93a448323bd3afc8b3f73bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5bda193a109a253d0fa6186c7818a9c1b319e204b93a448323bd3afc8b3f73bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20502859$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18497431$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oppliger, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charrière, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droz, Pierre-Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinsoz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification</title><title>The Annals of occupational hygiene</title><addtitle>Ann Occup Hyg</addtitle><description>Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evaluate the evolution of bioaerosol concentration during the fattening period, bioaerosol parameters (inhalable dust, endotoxin and bacteria) were measured in 12 poultry confinement buildings in Switzerland, at three different stages of the birds’ growth; samples of air taken from within the breathing zones of individual poultry house employees as they caught the chickens ready to be transported for slaughter were also analysed. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) was used to assess the quantity of total airborne bacteria and total airborne Staphylococcus species. Bioaerosol levels increased significantly during the fattening period of the chickens. During the task of catching mature birds, the mean inhalable dust concentration for a worker was 26 ± 1.9 mg m−3 and endotoxin concentration was 6198 ± 2.3 EU m−3 air, &gt;6-fold higher than the Swiss occupational recommended value (1000 EU m−3). The mean exposure level of bird catchers to total bacteria and Staphylococcus species measured by Q-PCR is also very high, respectively, reaching values of 53 (±2.6) × 107 cells m−3 air and 62 (±1.9) × 106 m−3 air. It was concluded that in the absence of wearing protective breathing apparatus, chicken catchers in Switzerland risk exposure beyond recommended limits for all measured bioaerosol parameters. Moreover, the use of Q-PCR to estimate total and specific numbers of airborne bacteria is a promising tool for evaluating any modifications intended to improve the safety of current working practices.</description><subject>Aerosols - analysis</subject><subject>Air</subject><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis</subject><subject>airborne bacteria</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>bioaerosols</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chickens - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>endotoxin</subject><subject>Endotoxins - analysis</subject><subject>Environment. Living conditions</subject><subject>Environmental pollutants toxicology</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Inhalation Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>occupational health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>poultry farm</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</subject><subject>Staphylococcus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus xylosus</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0003-4878</issn><issn>1475-3162</issn><issn>1475-3162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhyBX5AuISasdJ7AgJqd22LLASpWwF4mJNvPbWkNhb20HdP8DvxlWiBU6cRjPz6J2PN8ueEvyK4IYegbXXu81RrywuyL1sRkpW5ZTUxf1shjGmeckZP8gehfA9pSVtyMPsgPCyYSUls-zX2e3WhcErFB06MQ6Ud8F1ARmLLtzQRb9DCzcEFRBEdGq0Vl7ZiD5H2KSa0-gcYlTW2M1rdBXUXeVSQZdH0yt0Mb9E2nl0bHzrvFXoBGRU3kCHPg1go9FGQjTOPs4eaOiCejLFw-zq_Gw1X-TLj2_fzY-XuawIi3nVroE0FNLlUFR0jTXUhNeSccKhkaSlpFEFLtvElCWnBW3XFLTkLdWMtpoeZm9G3e3Q9mot0ykeOrH1pge_Ew6M-LdjzbXYuJ-iKDmnjCWBF5OAdzeDClH0JkjVdWBVepMgTY0JK6sE5iMo00ODV3o_hGBx55wYnROjc4l_9vdmf-jJqgQ8nwAIEjrtwUoT9lyBK1zwqkncy5Fzw_a_M6cdTYjqdg-D_yFqRlklFl-_iSVdFc37Lyvxgf4G-vHDNg</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Oppliger, Anne</creator><creator>Charrière, Nicole</creator><creator>Droz, Pierre-Olivier</creator><creator>Rinsoz, Thomas</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification</title><author>Oppliger, Anne ; Charrière, Nicole ; Droz, Pierre-Olivier ; Rinsoz, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5bda193a109a253d0fa6186c7818a9c1b319e204b93a448323bd3afc8b3f73bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aerosols - analysis</topic><topic>Air</topic><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis</topic><topic>airborne bacteria</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>bioaerosols</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chickens - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>endotoxin</topic><topic>Endotoxins - analysis</topic><topic>Environment. Living conditions</topic><topic>Environmental pollutants toxicology</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Inhalation Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>occupational health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>poultry farm</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</topic><topic>Staphylococcus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus xylosus</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oppliger, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charrière, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droz, Pierre-Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinsoz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Annals of occupational hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oppliger, Anne</au><au>Charrière, Nicole</au><au>Droz, Pierre-Olivier</au><au>Rinsoz, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of occupational hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Occup Hyg</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>405-412</pages><issn>0003-4878</issn><issn>1475-3162</issn><eissn>1475-3162</eissn><coden>AOHYA3</coden><abstract>Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evaluate the evolution of bioaerosol concentration during the fattening period, bioaerosol parameters (inhalable dust, endotoxin and bacteria) were measured in 12 poultry confinement buildings in Switzerland, at three different stages of the birds’ growth; samples of air taken from within the breathing zones of individual poultry house employees as they caught the chickens ready to be transported for slaughter were also analysed. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) was used to assess the quantity of total airborne bacteria and total airborne Staphylococcus species. Bioaerosol levels increased significantly during the fattening period of the chickens. During the task of catching mature birds, the mean inhalable dust concentration for a worker was 26 ± 1.9 mg m−3 and endotoxin concentration was 6198 ± 2.3 EU m−3 air, &gt;6-fold higher than the Swiss occupational recommended value (1000 EU m−3). The mean exposure level of bird catchers to total bacteria and Staphylococcus species measured by Q-PCR is also very high, respectively, reaching values of 53 (±2.6) × 107 cells m−3 air and 62 (±1.9) × 106 m−3 air. It was concluded that in the absence of wearing protective breathing apparatus, chicken catchers in Switzerland risk exposure beyond recommended limits for all measured bioaerosol parameters. Moreover, the use of Q-PCR to estimate total and specific numbers of airborne bacteria is a promising tool for evaluating any modifications intended to improve the safety of current working practices.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18497431</pmid><doi>10.1093/annhyg/men021</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4878
ispartof The Annals of occupational hygiene, 2008-07, Vol.52 (5), p.405-412
issn 0003-4878
1475-3162
1475-3162
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2488377
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aerosols - analysis
Air
Air Microbiology
Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis
airborne bacteria
Animal Husbandry
Animals
Aves
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Bacterial diseases
bioaerosols
Biological and medical sciences
Chickens - growth & development
endotoxin
Endotoxins - analysis
Environment. Living conditions
Environmental pollutants toxicology
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
Inhalation Exposure - analysis
Medical sciences
Occupational Exposure - analysis
occupational health
Original
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
poultry farm
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections
Staphylococcus
Staphylococcus xylosus
Toxicology
title Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T04%3A48%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exposure%20to%20Bioaerosols%20in%20Poultry%20Houses%20at%20Different%20Stages%20of%20Fattening;%20Use%20of%20Real-time%20PCR%20for%20Airborne%20Bacterial%20Quantification&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20occupational%20hygiene&rft.au=Oppliger,%20Anne&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=405-412&rft.issn=0003-4878&rft.eissn=1475-3162&rft.coden=AOHYA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/annhyg/men021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E19601745%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19601745&rft_id=info:pmid/18497431&rft_oup_id=10.1093/annhyg/men021&rfr_iscdi=true