Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification
Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evalua...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Annals of occupational hygiene 2008-07, Vol.52 (5), p.405-412 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 412 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | The Annals of occupational hygiene |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Oppliger, Anne Charrière, Nicole Droz, Pierre-Olivier Rinsoz, Thomas |
description | Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evaluate the evolution of bioaerosol concentration during the fattening period, bioaerosol parameters (inhalable dust, endotoxin and bacteria) were measured in 12 poultry confinement buildings in Switzerland, at three different stages of the birds’ growth; samples of air taken from within the breathing zones of individual poultry house employees as they caught the chickens ready to be transported for slaughter were also analysed. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) was used to assess the quantity of total airborne bacteria and total airborne Staphylococcus species. Bioaerosol levels increased significantly during the fattening period of the chickens. During the task of catching mature birds, the mean inhalable dust concentration for a worker was 26 ± 1.9 mg m−3 and endotoxin concentration was 6198 ± 2.3 EU m−3 air, >6-fold higher than the Swiss occupational recommended value (1000 EU m−3). The mean exposure level of bird catchers to total bacteria and Staphylococcus species measured by Q-PCR is also very high, respectively, reaching values of 53 (±2.6) × 107 cells m−3 air and 62 (±1.9) × 106 m−3 air. It was concluded that in the absence of wearing protective breathing apparatus, chicken catchers in Switzerland risk exposure beyond recommended limits for all measured bioaerosol parameters. Moreover, the use of Q-PCR to estimate total and specific numbers of airborne bacteria is a promising tool for evaluating any modifications intended to improve the safety of current working practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/annhyg/men021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2488377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/annhyg/men021</oup_id><sourcerecordid>19601745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5bda193a109a253d0fa6186c7818a9c1b319e204b93a448323bd3afc8b3f73bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhyBX5AuISasdJ7AgJqd22LLASpWwF4mJNvPbWkNhb20HdP8DvxlWiBU6cRjPz6J2PN8ueEvyK4IYegbXXu81RrywuyL1sRkpW5ZTUxf1shjGmeckZP8gehfA9pSVtyMPsgPCyYSUls-zX2e3WhcErFB06MQ6Ud8F1ARmLLtzQRb9DCzcEFRBEdGq0Vl7ZiD5H2KSa0-gcYlTW2M1rdBXUXeVSQZdH0yt0Mb9E2nl0bHzrvFXoBGRU3kCHPg1go9FGQjTOPs4eaOiCejLFw-zq_Gw1X-TLj2_fzY-XuawIi3nVroE0FNLlUFR0jTXUhNeSccKhkaSlpFEFLtvElCWnBW3XFLTkLdWMtpoeZm9G3e3Q9mot0ykeOrH1pge_Ew6M-LdjzbXYuJ-iKDmnjCWBF5OAdzeDClH0JkjVdWBVepMgTY0JK6sE5iMo00ODV3o_hGBx55wYnROjc4l_9vdmf-jJqgQ8nwAIEjrtwUoT9lyBK1zwqkncy5Fzw_a_M6cdTYjqdg-D_yFqRlklFl-_iSVdFc37Lyvxgf4G-vHDNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19601745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Oppliger, Anne ; Charrière, Nicole ; Droz, Pierre-Olivier ; Rinsoz, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Oppliger, Anne ; Charrière, Nicole ; Droz, Pierre-Olivier ; Rinsoz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evaluate the evolution of bioaerosol concentration during the fattening period, bioaerosol parameters (inhalable dust, endotoxin and bacteria) were measured in 12 poultry confinement buildings in Switzerland, at three different stages of the birds’ growth; samples of air taken from within the breathing zones of individual poultry house employees as they caught the chickens ready to be transported for slaughter were also analysed. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) was used to assess the quantity of total airborne bacteria and total airborne Staphylococcus species. Bioaerosol levels increased significantly during the fattening period of the chickens. During the task of catching mature birds, the mean inhalable dust concentration for a worker was 26 ± 1.9 mg m−3 and endotoxin concentration was 6198 ± 2.3 EU m−3 air, >6-fold higher than the Swiss occupational recommended value (1000 EU m−3). The mean exposure level of bird catchers to total bacteria and Staphylococcus species measured by Q-PCR is also very high, respectively, reaching values of 53 (±2.6) × 107 cells m−3 air and 62 (±1.9) × 106 m−3 air. It was concluded that in the absence of wearing protective breathing apparatus, chicken catchers in Switzerland risk exposure beyond recommended limits for all measured bioaerosol parameters. Moreover, the use of Q-PCR to estimate total and specific numbers of airborne bacteria is a promising tool for evaluating any modifications intended to improve the safety of current working practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4878</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1475-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/men021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18497431</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AOHYA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aerosols - analysis ; Air ; Air Microbiology ; Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis ; airborne bacteria ; Animal Husbandry ; Animals ; Aves ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Bacterial diseases ; bioaerosols ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chickens - growth & development ; endotoxin ; Endotoxins - analysis ; Environment. Living conditions ; Environmental pollutants toxicology ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Inhalation Exposure - analysis ; Medical sciences ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; occupational health ; Original ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; poultry farm ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections ; Staphylococcus ; Staphylococcus xylosus ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>The Annals of occupational hygiene, 2008-07, Vol.52 (5), p.405-412</ispartof><rights>2008 The Author(s). 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5bda193a109a253d0fa6186c7818a9c1b319e204b93a448323bd3afc8b3f73bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5bda193a109a253d0fa6186c7818a9c1b319e204b93a448323bd3afc8b3f73bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20502859$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18497431$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oppliger, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charrière, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droz, Pierre-Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinsoz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification</title><title>The Annals of occupational hygiene</title><addtitle>Ann Occup Hyg</addtitle><description>Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evaluate the evolution of bioaerosol concentration during the fattening period, bioaerosol parameters (inhalable dust, endotoxin and bacteria) were measured in 12 poultry confinement buildings in Switzerland, at three different stages of the birds’ growth; samples of air taken from within the breathing zones of individual poultry house employees as they caught the chickens ready to be transported for slaughter were also analysed. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) was used to assess the quantity of total airborne bacteria and total airborne Staphylococcus species. Bioaerosol levels increased significantly during the fattening period of the chickens. During the task of catching mature birds, the mean inhalable dust concentration for a worker was 26 ± 1.9 mg m−3 and endotoxin concentration was 6198 ± 2.3 EU m−3 air, >6-fold higher than the Swiss occupational recommended value (1000 EU m−3). The mean exposure level of bird catchers to total bacteria and Staphylococcus species measured by Q-PCR is also very high, respectively, reaching values of 53 (±2.6) × 107 cells m−3 air and 62 (±1.9) × 106 m−3 air. It was concluded that in the absence of wearing protective breathing apparatus, chicken catchers in Switzerland risk exposure beyond recommended limits for all measured bioaerosol parameters. Moreover, the use of Q-PCR to estimate total and specific numbers of airborne bacteria is a promising tool for evaluating any modifications intended to improve the safety of current working practices.</description><subject>Aerosols - analysis</subject><subject>Air</subject><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis</subject><subject>airborne bacteria</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>bioaerosols</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chickens - growth & development</subject><subject>endotoxin</subject><subject>Endotoxins - analysis</subject><subject>Environment. Living conditions</subject><subject>Environmental pollutants toxicology</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Inhalation Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>occupational health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>poultry farm</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</subject><subject>Staphylococcus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus xylosus</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0003-4878</issn><issn>1475-3162</issn><issn>1475-3162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhyBX5AuISasdJ7AgJqd22LLASpWwF4mJNvPbWkNhb20HdP8DvxlWiBU6cRjPz6J2PN8ueEvyK4IYegbXXu81RrywuyL1sRkpW5ZTUxf1shjGmeckZP8gehfA9pSVtyMPsgPCyYSUls-zX2e3WhcErFB06MQ6Ud8F1ARmLLtzQRb9DCzcEFRBEdGq0Vl7ZiD5H2KSa0-gcYlTW2M1rdBXUXeVSQZdH0yt0Mb9E2nl0bHzrvFXoBGRU3kCHPg1go9FGQjTOPs4eaOiCejLFw-zq_Gw1X-TLj2_fzY-XuawIi3nVroE0FNLlUFR0jTXUhNeSccKhkaSlpFEFLtvElCWnBW3XFLTkLdWMtpoeZm9G3e3Q9mot0ykeOrH1pge_Ew6M-LdjzbXYuJ-iKDmnjCWBF5OAdzeDClH0JkjVdWBVepMgTY0JK6sE5iMo00ODV3o_hGBx55wYnROjc4l_9vdmf-jJqgQ8nwAIEjrtwUoT9lyBK1zwqkncy5Fzw_a_M6cdTYjqdg-D_yFqRlklFl-_iSVdFc37Lyvxgf4G-vHDNg</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Oppliger, Anne</creator><creator>Charrière, Nicole</creator><creator>Droz, Pierre-Olivier</creator><creator>Rinsoz, Thomas</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification</title><author>Oppliger, Anne ; Charrière, Nicole ; Droz, Pierre-Olivier ; Rinsoz, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-5bda193a109a253d0fa6186c7818a9c1b319e204b93a448323bd3afc8b3f73bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aerosols - analysis</topic><topic>Air</topic><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis</topic><topic>airborne bacteria</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>bioaerosols</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chickens - growth & development</topic><topic>endotoxin</topic><topic>Endotoxins - analysis</topic><topic>Environment. Living conditions</topic><topic>Environmental pollutants toxicology</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Inhalation Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>occupational health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>poultry farm</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</topic><topic>Staphylococcus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus xylosus</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oppliger, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charrière, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droz, Pierre-Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinsoz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Annals of occupational hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oppliger, Anne</au><au>Charrière, Nicole</au><au>Droz, Pierre-Olivier</au><au>Rinsoz, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of occupational hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Occup Hyg</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>405-412</pages><issn>0003-4878</issn><issn>1475-3162</issn><eissn>1475-3162</eissn><coden>AOHYA3</coden><abstract>Previous studies have demonstrated that poultry house workers are exposed to very high levels of organic dust and consequently have an increased prevalence of adverse respiratory symptoms. However, the influence of the age of broilers on bioaerosol concentrations has not been investigated. To evaluate the evolution of bioaerosol concentration during the fattening period, bioaerosol parameters (inhalable dust, endotoxin and bacteria) were measured in 12 poultry confinement buildings in Switzerland, at three different stages of the birds’ growth; samples of air taken from within the breathing zones of individual poultry house employees as they caught the chickens ready to be transported for slaughter were also analysed. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) was used to assess the quantity of total airborne bacteria and total airborne Staphylococcus species. Bioaerosol levels increased significantly during the fattening period of the chickens. During the task of catching mature birds, the mean inhalable dust concentration for a worker was 26 ± 1.9 mg m−3 and endotoxin concentration was 6198 ± 2.3 EU m−3 air, >6-fold higher than the Swiss occupational recommended value (1000 EU m−3). The mean exposure level of bird catchers to total bacteria and Staphylococcus species measured by Q-PCR is also very high, respectively, reaching values of 53 (±2.6) × 107 cells m−3 air and 62 (±1.9) × 106 m−3 air. It was concluded that in the absence of wearing protective breathing apparatus, chicken catchers in Switzerland risk exposure beyond recommended limits for all measured bioaerosol parameters. Moreover, the use of Q-PCR to estimate total and specific numbers of airborne bacteria is a promising tool for evaluating any modifications intended to improve the safety of current working practices.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18497431</pmid><doi>10.1093/annhyg/men021</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4878 |
ispartof | The Annals of occupational hygiene, 2008-07, Vol.52 (5), p.405-412 |
issn | 0003-4878 1475-3162 1475-3162 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2488377 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerosols - analysis Air Air Microbiology Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis airborne bacteria Animal Husbandry Animals Aves Bacteria - isolation & purification Bacterial diseases bioaerosols Biological and medical sciences Chickens - growth & development endotoxin Endotoxins - analysis Environment. Living conditions Environmental pollutants toxicology Human bacterial diseases Humans Infectious diseases Inhalation Exposure - analysis Medical sciences Occupational Exposure - analysis occupational health Original Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods poultry farm Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections Staphylococcus Staphylococcus xylosus Toxicology |
title | Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T04%3A48%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exposure%20to%20Bioaerosols%20in%20Poultry%20Houses%20at%20Different%20Stages%20of%20Fattening;%20Use%20of%20Real-time%20PCR%20for%20Airborne%20Bacterial%20Quantification&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20occupational%20hygiene&rft.au=Oppliger,%20Anne&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=405-412&rft.issn=0003-4878&rft.eissn=1475-3162&rft.coden=AOHYA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/annhyg/men021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E19601745%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19601745&rft_id=info:pmid/18497431&rft_oup_id=10.1093/annhyg/men021&rfr_iscdi=true |