Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Ci...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European spine journal 2008-07, Vol.17 (7), p.905-921 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 921 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 905 |
| container_title | European spine journal |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | de Koning, Chantal H. P. van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. Staal, J. Bart Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. Hendriks, Erik J. M. |
| description | The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2443270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69288271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-a40180b9d20498a89e0b82a35b6380f7cb06714a9eb4aa207b6dd79af3b18383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xI8OCttfLR6cSDIINfsOBl7yGdqd7N2p2MSXcv--_NOIOrgngKxfvUm6p6CXnO4DUD6N4UgFarBkA3oFrViAdkw6TgDRjBH5INGAmN6pg5I09KuQFgrQH1mJwxLXmnpdiQdTuGGCacc_AUVzcubg4p0jRQ5-ewIs0uXuGhntJPZUJXloyFhkj3FcY4F3ob5msaU2zKHn0YqldE_63qIb6ljpa7MuNUYU8zrgFvn5JHgxsLPju95-Ty44fL7efm4uunL9v3F42XRs-Nk8A09GbHodZOG4RecyfaXgkNQ-d7qOtJZ7CXznHoerXbdcYNomdaaHFO3h1t90s_4c7XWbMb7T6HyeU7m1ywfyoxXNurtFou6xk7qAavTgY5fV-wzHYKxeM4uohpKVYZrjXv2H9BzoBzKboKvvwLvElLjvUIlguQSvP2ALEj5HMqJePwa2QG9hC9PUZva_T2EL0VtefF77ved5yyrgA_AqVKNdN8__O_XX8AFim7eg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230468257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>de Koning, Chantal H. P. ; van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. ; Staal, J. Bart ; Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. ; Hendriks, Erik J. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Koning, Chantal H. P. ; van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. ; Staal, J. Bart ; Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. ; Hendriks, Erik J. M.</creatorcontrib><description>The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18427843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation ; Arthrometry, Articular - methods ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neck Pain - diagnosis ; Neurosurgery ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Review ; Review Article ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2008-07, Vol.17 (7), p.905-921</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2008</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-a40180b9d20498a89e0b82a35b6380f7cb06714a9eb4aa207b6dd79af3b18383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-a40180b9d20498a89e0b82a35b6380f7cb06714a9eb4aa207b6dd79af3b18383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443270/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2443270/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18427843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Koning, Chantal H. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Heuvel, Sylvia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staal, J. Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, Erik J. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently.</description><subject>Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthrometry, Articular - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neck Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xI8OCttfLR6cSDIINfsOBl7yGdqd7N2p2MSXcv--_NOIOrgngKxfvUm6p6CXnO4DUD6N4UgFarBkA3oFrViAdkw6TgDRjBH5INGAmN6pg5I09KuQFgrQH1mJwxLXmnpdiQdTuGGCacc_AUVzcubg4p0jRQ5-ewIs0uXuGhntJPZUJXloyFhkj3FcY4F3ob5msaU2zKHn0YqldE_63qIb6ljpa7MuNUYU8zrgFvn5JHgxsLPju95-Ty44fL7efm4uunL9v3F42XRs-Nk8A09GbHodZOG4RecyfaXgkNQ-d7qOtJZ7CXznHoerXbdcYNomdaaHFO3h1t90s_4c7XWbMb7T6HyeU7m1ywfyoxXNurtFou6xk7qAavTgY5fV-wzHYKxeM4uohpKVYZrjXv2H9BzoBzKboKvvwLvElLjvUIlguQSvP2ALEj5HMqJePwa2QG9hC9PUZva_T2EL0VtefF77ved5yyrgA_AqVKNdN8__O_XX8AFim7eg</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>de Koning, Chantal H. P.</creator><creator>van den Heuvel, Sylvia P.</creator><creator>Staal, J. Bart</creator><creator>Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M.</creator><creator>Hendriks, Erik J. M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review</title><author>de Koning, Chantal H. P. ; van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. ; Staal, J. Bart ; Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. ; Hendriks, Erik J. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-a40180b9d20498a89e0b82a35b6380f7cb06714a9eb4aa207b6dd79af3b18383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthrometry, Articular - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neck Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Koning, Chantal H. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Heuvel, Sylvia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staal, J. Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, Erik J. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Koning, Chantal H. P.</au><au>van den Heuvel, Sylvia P.</au><au>Staal, J. Bart</au><au>Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M.</au><au>Hendriks, Erik J. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>905</spage><epage>921</epage><pages>905-921</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18427843</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0940-6719 |
| ispartof | European spine journal, 2008-07, Vol.17 (7), p.905-921 |
| issn | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2443270 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Arthrometry, Articular - instrumentation Arthrometry, Articular - methods Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neck Pain - diagnosis Neurosurgery Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Reproducibility of Results Review Review Article Surgical Orthopedics |
| title | Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A15%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinimetric%20evaluation%20of%20active%20range%20of%20motion%20measures%20in%20patients%20with%20non-specific%20neck%20pain:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=de%20Koning,%20Chantal%20H.%20P.&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=905&rft.epage=921&rft.pages=905-921&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69288271%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230468257&rft_id=info:pmid/18427843&rfr_iscdi=true |