Agent-based modelling as scientific method: a case study analysing primate social behaviour

A scientific methodology in general should provide two things: first, a means of explanation and, second, a mechanism for improving that explanation. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is a method that facilitates exploring the collective effects of individual action selection. The explanatory force of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2007-09, Vol.362 (1485), p.1685-1699
Hauptverfasser: Bryson, Joanna J, Ando, Yasushi, Lehmann, Hagen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1699
container_issue 1485
container_start_page 1685
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 362
creator Bryson, Joanna J
Ando, Yasushi
Lehmann, Hagen
description A scientific methodology in general should provide two things: first, a means of explanation and, second, a mechanism for improving that explanation. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is a method that facilitates exploring the collective effects of individual action selection. The explanatory force of the model is the extent to which an observed meta-level phenomenon can be accounted for by the behaviour of its micro-level actors. This article demonstrates that this methodology can be applied to the biological sciences; agent-based models, like any other scientific hypotheses, can be tested, critiqued, generalized or specified. We review the state of the art for ABM as a methodology for biology and then present a case study based on the most widely published agent-based model in the biological sciences: Hemelrijk's DomWorld, a model of primate social behaviour. Our analysis shows some significant discrepancies between this model and the behaviour of the macaques, the genus used for our analysis. We also demonstrate that the model is not fragile: its other results are still valid and can be extended to compensate for these problems. This robustness is a standard advantage of experiment-based artificial intelligence modelling techniques over analytic modelling.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2007.2061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2440780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20209971</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20209971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-407e68a25bfe16a6bd63eec2adb7d0c6200dce33f4e8ba17fcfa54fb828a2f9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuP0zAUhSMEYoaBLTtQVuxS_IrtsECMRsyANAIJ8ZBgYTmO3bqkcbGdgf57bkhV6AJQpETJ-c7xzT1F8RCjBUaNfBpTbhcEIQE3jm8Vp5gJXJFGoNvFKWo4qSSj_KS4l9IaIdTUgt0tTrBglMmanBZfzpd2yFWrk-3KTehs3_thWepUJuNB8c6bcmPzKnTPSl0a4MqUx25X6kH3uzTB2-g3OsP3YLzuy9au9I0PY7xf3HG6T_bB_nlWfLh8-f7iVXX99ur1xfl1ZTghuWJIWC41qVtnMde87Ti11hDdtaJDwCDUGUupY1a2GgtnnK6ZayUBk2scPSuez7nbsd1YYIccda9-jRV3KmivjpXBr9Qy3CjC4GyJIODJPiCGb6NNWW18MrAKPdgwJsUlhgvR_4IEGN4gAuBiBk0MKUXrDtNgpKbi1FScmopTU3FgePznP_zG900BQGcghh0sE1Zt806tYc3QQ_p77KPZtU45xEMqQQQ1jZj0atZ9yvbHQdfxq-KCilp9lEwx-enyHb36rN4Aj2d-5Zer7z5adTQOvGzhfMqJwjC1wlzW4HnxT880sQlDhnKOncqNPdTYOfoTfNLqgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20336902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agent-based modelling as scientific method: a case study analysing primate social behaviour</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bryson, Joanna J ; Ando, Yasushi ; Lehmann, Hagen</creator><creatorcontrib>Bryson, Joanna J ; Ando, Yasushi ; Lehmann, Hagen</creatorcontrib><description>A scientific methodology in general should provide two things: first, a means of explanation and, second, a mechanism for improving that explanation. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is a method that facilitates exploring the collective effects of individual action selection. The explanatory force of the model is the extent to which an observed meta-level phenomenon can be accounted for by the behaviour of its micro-level actors. This article demonstrates that this methodology can be applied to the biological sciences; agent-based models, like any other scientific hypotheses, can be tested, critiqued, generalized or specified. We review the state of the art for ABM as a methodology for biology and then present a case study based on the most widely published agent-based model in the biological sciences: Hemelrijk's DomWorld, a model of primate social behaviour. Our analysis shows some significant discrepancies between this model and the behaviour of the macaques, the genus used for our analysis. We also demonstrate that the model is not fragile: its other results are still valid and can be extended to compensate for these problems. This robustness is a standard advantage of experiment-based artificial intelligence modelling techniques over analytic modelling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17434852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Agent-Based Modelling ; Animals ; Behavior modeling ; Behavior, Animal ; Despotism ; DomWorld ; Female ; Female animals ; Hemelrijk ; Macaca ; Macaca - psychology ; Male ; Male animals ; Modeling ; Models, Psychological ; Primate Social Behaviour ; Primates ; Research Article ; Scientific method ; Social Behavior ; Social interaction ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2007-09, Vol.362 (1485), p.1685-1699</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2007 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2007 The Royal Society 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-407e68a25bfe16a6bd63eec2adb7d0c6200dce33f4e8ba17fcfa54fb828a2f9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-407e68a25bfe16a6bd63eec2adb7d0c6200dce33f4e8ba17fcfa54fb828a2f9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20209971$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20209971$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17434852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bryson, Joanna J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Hagen</creatorcontrib><title>Agent-based modelling as scientific method: a case study analysing primate social behaviour</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>A scientific methodology in general should provide two things: first, a means of explanation and, second, a mechanism for improving that explanation. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is a method that facilitates exploring the collective effects of individual action selection. The explanatory force of the model is the extent to which an observed meta-level phenomenon can be accounted for by the behaviour of its micro-level actors. This article demonstrates that this methodology can be applied to the biological sciences; agent-based models, like any other scientific hypotheses, can be tested, critiqued, generalized or specified. We review the state of the art for ABM as a methodology for biology and then present a case study based on the most widely published agent-based model in the biological sciences: Hemelrijk's DomWorld, a model of primate social behaviour. Our analysis shows some significant discrepancies between this model and the behaviour of the macaques, the genus used for our analysis. We also demonstrate that the model is not fragile: its other results are still valid and can be extended to compensate for these problems. This robustness is a standard advantage of experiment-based artificial intelligence modelling techniques over analytic modelling.</description><subject>Agent-Based Modelling</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior modeling</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Despotism</subject><subject>DomWorld</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Hemelrijk</subject><subject>Macaca</subject><subject>Macaca - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Primate Social Behaviour</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Scientific method</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuP0zAUhSMEYoaBLTtQVuxS_IrtsECMRsyANAIJ8ZBgYTmO3bqkcbGdgf57bkhV6AJQpETJ-c7xzT1F8RCjBUaNfBpTbhcEIQE3jm8Vp5gJXJFGoNvFKWo4qSSj_KS4l9IaIdTUgt0tTrBglMmanBZfzpd2yFWrk-3KTehs3_thWepUJuNB8c6bcmPzKnTPSl0a4MqUx25X6kH3uzTB2-g3OsP3YLzuy9au9I0PY7xf3HG6T_bB_nlWfLh8-f7iVXX99ur1xfl1ZTghuWJIWC41qVtnMde87Ti11hDdtaJDwCDUGUupY1a2GgtnnK6ZayUBk2scPSuez7nbsd1YYIccda9-jRV3KmivjpXBr9Qy3CjC4GyJIODJPiCGb6NNWW18MrAKPdgwJsUlhgvR_4IEGN4gAuBiBk0MKUXrDtNgpKbi1FScmopTU3FgePznP_zG900BQGcghh0sE1Zt806tYc3QQ_p77KPZtU45xEMqQQQ1jZj0atZ9yvbHQdfxq-KCilp9lEwx-enyHb36rN4Aj2d-5Zer7z5adTQOvGzhfMqJwjC1wlzW4HnxT880sQlDhnKOncqNPdTYOfoTfNLqgQ</recordid><startdate>20070929</startdate><enddate>20070929</enddate><creator>Bryson, Joanna J</creator><creator>Ando, Yasushi</creator><creator>Lehmann, Hagen</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070929</creationdate><title>Agent-based modelling as scientific method: a case study analysing primate social behaviour</title><author>Bryson, Joanna J ; Ando, Yasushi ; Lehmann, Hagen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-407e68a25bfe16a6bd63eec2adb7d0c6200dce33f4e8ba17fcfa54fb828a2f9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agent-Based Modelling</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior modeling</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Despotism</topic><topic>DomWorld</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Hemelrijk</topic><topic>Macaca</topic><topic>Macaca - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Primate Social Behaviour</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Scientific method</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bryson, Joanna J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Hagen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bryson, Joanna J</au><au>Ando, Yasushi</au><au>Lehmann, Hagen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agent-based modelling as scientific method: a case study analysing primate social behaviour</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2007-09-29</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>362</volume><issue>1485</issue><spage>1685</spage><epage>1699</epage><pages>1685-1699</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>A scientific methodology in general should provide two things: first, a means of explanation and, second, a mechanism for improving that explanation. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is a method that facilitates exploring the collective effects of individual action selection. The explanatory force of the model is the extent to which an observed meta-level phenomenon can be accounted for by the behaviour of its micro-level actors. This article demonstrates that this methodology can be applied to the biological sciences; agent-based models, like any other scientific hypotheses, can be tested, critiqued, generalized or specified. We review the state of the art for ABM as a methodology for biology and then present a case study based on the most widely published agent-based model in the biological sciences: Hemelrijk's DomWorld, a model of primate social behaviour. Our analysis shows some significant discrepancies between this model and the behaviour of the macaques, the genus used for our analysis. We also demonstrate that the model is not fragile: its other results are still valid and can be extended to compensate for these problems. This robustness is a standard advantage of experiment-based artificial intelligence modelling techniques over analytic modelling.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>17434852</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2007.2061</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2007-09, Vol.362 (1485), p.1685-1699
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2440780
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central
subjects Agent-Based Modelling
Animals
Behavior modeling
Behavior, Animal
Despotism
DomWorld
Female
Female animals
Hemelrijk
Macaca
Macaca - psychology
Male
Male animals
Modeling
Models, Psychological
Primate Social Behaviour
Primates
Research Article
Scientific method
Social Behavior
Social interaction
Validation
title Agent-based modelling as scientific method: a case study analysing primate social behaviour
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A53%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agent-based%20modelling%20as%20scientific%20method:%20a%20case%20study%20analysing%20primate%20social%20behaviour&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Bryson,%20Joanna%20J&rft.date=2007-09-29&rft.volume=362&rft.issue=1485&rft.spage=1685&rft.epage=1699&rft.pages=1685-1699&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2007.2061&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E20209971%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20336902&rft_id=info:pmid/17434852&rft_jstor_id=20209971&rfr_iscdi=true