A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism

Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning show...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Postgraduate medical journal 1993-05, Vol.69 (811), p.376-380
Hauptverfasser: Gallacher, S. J., Kelly, P., Shand, J., Logue, F. C., Cooke, T., Boyle, I. T., McKillop, J. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 380
container_issue 811
container_start_page 376
container_title Postgraduate medical journal
container_volume 69
creator Gallacher, S. J.
Kelly, P.
Shand, J.
Logue, F. C.
Cooke, T.
Boyle, I. T.
McKillop, J. H.
description Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning showed a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 97%. By comparison, sensitivity of ultrasound was 38% and specificity 89%. Both techniques were positive together in nine instances and correctly localized the parathyroid adenoma in eight of these. In 44% of cases, however, both methods together failed to localize any abnormal parathyroid tissue. The ability of these modalities to localize abnormal parathyroid tissue correctly tended to vary with gland size. Where both ultrasound and Tl/Tc scans were negative, median gland size was smaller at 170 mg (range 50-2,500 mg), compared with where Tl/Tc scanning was correct (750 mg, 150-6,820 mg; P < 0.03), ultrasound was correct (960 mg, 100-6,820 mg; P < 0.03) and both techniques together were correct (980 mg, 600-6,820 mg; P = 0.002). These results suggest that neither Tl/Tc scanning or ultrasound has sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used routinely in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/pgmj.69.811.376
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2399814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3972451241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b518t-8744f7ceb98af2fbdb71383f7fe16af193da647c53e8576cad82dc71967691413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-L1DAcxYso6-zq2ZNQUDwIncm3aX5dFtZBXXFXD6teQ5qm04xtMibt4vjXm2HKoF48hBDeJ-_7kpdlzwAtATBd7TbDdknFkgMsMaMPsgVUVBSIEfowWyCEy4JUDD_OzmPcIgSYVXCWnXFcUcB4kU1XufbDTgUbvct9mwPKb69_5VM_BhX95JpcpVUiKMZO9b2dhpUQQzEa3TkzpmMepzqxerTJIGrlnHWb3Lp8F-ygwj7v9jsT0gQ1dvvgbWPj8CR71Ko-mqfzfpF9fff2y_q6uPn8_sP66qaoCfCx4KyqWqZNLbhqy7ZuagaY45a1BqhqQeBG0Yppgg0njGrV8LLRDARlVEAF-CK7PPrupnowjTYuJe3lnEx6ZeXfirOd3Ph7WWIhOFTJ4NVsEPyPycRRDjZq0_fKGT9FyQhnJcFlAl_8A279FFx6nATGEMcECEnU6kjp4GMMpj1FASQPfcpDn5IKmfqUqc904_mfLzjxc4FJfznrKv193wbltI0nrEqzS3TAiiNm42h-nmQVvkvKMCPy07e1vFu_IeuPd7fywL8-8nWK87-MvwFrPsdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770835155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gallacher, S. J. ; Kelly, P. ; Shand, J. ; Logue, F. C. ; Cooke, T. ; Boyle, I. T. ; McKillop, J. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallacher, S. J. ; Kelly, P. ; Shand, J. ; Logue, F. C. ; Cooke, T. ; Boyle, I. T. ; McKillop, J. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning showed a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 97%. By comparison, sensitivity of ultrasound was 38% and specificity 89%. Both techniques were positive together in nine instances and correctly localized the parathyroid adenoma in eight of these. In 44% of cases, however, both methods together failed to localize any abnormal parathyroid tissue. The ability of these modalities to localize abnormal parathyroid tissue correctly tended to vary with gland size. Where both ultrasound and Tl/Tc scans were negative, median gland size was smaller at 170 mg (range 50-2,500 mg), compared with where Tl/Tc scanning was correct (750 mg, 150-6,820 mg; P &lt; 0.03), ultrasound was correct (960 mg, 100-6,820 mg; P &lt; 0.03) and both techniques together were correct (980 mg, 600-6,820 mg; P = 0.002). These results suggest that neither Tl/Tc scanning or ultrasound has sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used routinely in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.69.811.376</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8346133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Endocrinopathies ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms ; Parathyroid Glands - diagnostic imaging ; Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Technetium ; Thallium Radioisotopes ; Thyroid. Thyroid axis (diseases) ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Postgraduate medical journal, 1993-05, Vol.69 (811), p.376-380</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD May 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b518t-8744f7ceb98af2fbdb71383f7fe16af193da647c53e8576cad82dc71967691413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b518t-8744f7ceb98af2fbdb71383f7fe16af193da647c53e8576cad82dc71967691413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2399814/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2399814/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4770203$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8346133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallacher, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shand, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logue, F. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, I. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKillop, J. H.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism</title><title>Postgraduate medical journal</title><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><description>Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning showed a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 97%. By comparison, sensitivity of ultrasound was 38% and specificity 89%. Both techniques were positive together in nine instances and correctly localized the parathyroid adenoma in eight of these. In 44% of cases, however, both methods together failed to localize any abnormal parathyroid tissue. The ability of these modalities to localize abnormal parathyroid tissue correctly tended to vary with gland size. Where both ultrasound and Tl/Tc scans were negative, median gland size was smaller at 170 mg (range 50-2,500 mg), compared with where Tl/Tc scanning was correct (750 mg, 150-6,820 mg; P &lt; 0.03), ultrasound was correct (960 mg, 100-6,820 mg; P &lt; 0.03) and both techniques together were correct (980 mg, 600-6,820 mg; P = 0.002). These results suggest that neither Tl/Tc scanning or ultrasound has sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used routinely in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Endocrinopathies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms</subject><subject>Parathyroid Glands - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Technetium</subject><subject>Thallium Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Thyroid. Thyroid axis (diseases)</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0032-5473</issn><issn>1469-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc-L1DAcxYso6-zq2ZNQUDwIncm3aX5dFtZBXXFXD6teQ5qm04xtMibt4vjXm2HKoF48hBDeJ-_7kpdlzwAtATBd7TbDdknFkgMsMaMPsgVUVBSIEfowWyCEy4JUDD_OzmPcIgSYVXCWnXFcUcB4kU1XufbDTgUbvct9mwPKb69_5VM_BhX95JpcpVUiKMZO9b2dhpUQQzEa3TkzpmMepzqxerTJIGrlnHWb3Lp8F-ygwj7v9jsT0gQ1dvvgbWPj8CR71Ko-mqfzfpF9fff2y_q6uPn8_sP66qaoCfCx4KyqWqZNLbhqy7ZuagaY45a1BqhqQeBG0Yppgg0njGrV8LLRDARlVEAF-CK7PPrupnowjTYuJe3lnEx6ZeXfirOd3Ph7WWIhOFTJ4NVsEPyPycRRDjZq0_fKGT9FyQhnJcFlAl_8A279FFx6nATGEMcECEnU6kjp4GMMpj1FASQPfcpDn5IKmfqUqc904_mfLzjxc4FJfznrKv193wbltI0nrEqzS3TAiiNm42h-nmQVvkvKMCPy07e1vFu_IeuPd7fywL8-8nWK87-MvwFrPsdw</recordid><startdate>19930501</startdate><enddate>19930501</enddate><creator>Gallacher, S. J.</creator><creator>Kelly, P.</creator><creator>Shand, J.</creator><creator>Logue, F. C.</creator><creator>Cooke, T.</creator><creator>Boyle, I. T.</creator><creator>McKillop, J. H.</creator><general>The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</general><general>BMJ</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930501</creationdate><title>A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism</title><author>Gallacher, S. J. ; Kelly, P. ; Shand, J. ; Logue, F. C. ; Cooke, T. ; Boyle, I. T. ; McKillop, J. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b518t-8744f7ceb98af2fbdb71383f7fe16af193da647c53e8576cad82dc71967691413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Endocrinopathies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms</topic><topic>Parathyroid Glands - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Technetium</topic><topic>Thallium Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Thyroid. Thyroid axis (diseases)</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallacher, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shand, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logue, F. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, I. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKillop, J. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallacher, S. J.</au><au>Kelly, P.</au><au>Shand, J.</au><au>Logue, F. C.</au><au>Cooke, T.</au><au>Boyle, I. T.</au><au>McKillop, J. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism</atitle><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><date>1993-05-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>811</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>376-380</pages><issn>0032-5473</issn><eissn>1469-0756</eissn><abstract>Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning showed a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 97%. By comparison, sensitivity of ultrasound was 38% and specificity 89%. Both techniques were positive together in nine instances and correctly localized the parathyroid adenoma in eight of these. In 44% of cases, however, both methods together failed to localize any abnormal parathyroid tissue. The ability of these modalities to localize abnormal parathyroid tissue correctly tended to vary with gland size. Where both ultrasound and Tl/Tc scans were negative, median gland size was smaller at 170 mg (range 50-2,500 mg), compared with where Tl/Tc scanning was correct (750 mg, 150-6,820 mg; P &lt; 0.03), ultrasound was correct (960 mg, 100-6,820 mg; P &lt; 0.03) and both techniques together were correct (980 mg, 600-6,820 mg; P = 0.002). These results suggest that neither Tl/Tc scanning or ultrasound has sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used routinely in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</pub><pmid>8346133</pmid><doi>10.1136/pgmj.69.811.376</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5473
ispartof Postgraduate medical journal, 1993-05, Vol.69 (811), p.376-380
issn 0032-5473
1469-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2399814
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Endocrinopathies
Female
Humans
Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms
Parathyroid Glands - diagnostic imaging
Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Preoperative Care
Prospective Studies
Radionuclide Imaging
Sensitivity and Specificity
Technetium
Thallium Radioisotopes
Thyroid. Thyroid axis (diseases)
Ultrasonography
title A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A57%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%2010%20MHz%20ultrasound%20and%20201-thallium/99m-technetium%20subtraction%20scanning%20in%20primary%20hyperparathyroidism&rft.jtitle=Postgraduate%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Gallacher,%20S.%20J.&rft.date=1993-05-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=811&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=376-380&rft.issn=0032-5473&rft.eissn=1469-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/pgmj.69.811.376&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3972451241%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770835155&rft_id=info:pmid/8346133&rfr_iscdi=true