A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism
Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning show...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Postgraduate medical journal 1993-05, Vol.69 (811), p.376-380 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 380 |
---|---|
container_issue | 811 |
container_start_page | 376 |
container_title | Postgraduate medical journal |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Gallacher, S. J. Kelly, P. Shand, J. Logue, F. C. Cooke, T. Boyle, I. T. McKillop, J. H. |
description | Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning showed a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 97%. By comparison, sensitivity of ultrasound was 38% and specificity 89%. Both techniques were positive together in nine instances and correctly localized the parathyroid adenoma in eight of these. In 44% of cases, however, both methods together failed to localize any abnormal parathyroid tissue. The ability of these modalities to localize abnormal parathyroid tissue correctly tended to vary with gland size. Where both ultrasound and Tl/Tc scans were negative, median gland size was smaller at 170 mg (range 50-2,500 mg), compared with where Tl/Tc scanning was correct (750 mg, 150-6,820 mg; P < 0.03), ultrasound was correct (960 mg, 100-6,820 mg; P < 0.03) and both techniques together were correct (980 mg, 600-6,820 mg; P = 0.002). These results suggest that neither Tl/Tc scanning or ultrasound has sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used routinely in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/pgmj.69.811.376 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2399814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3972451241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b518t-8744f7ceb98af2fbdb71383f7fe16af193da647c53e8576cad82dc71967691413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-L1DAcxYso6-zq2ZNQUDwIncm3aX5dFtZBXXFXD6teQ5qm04xtMibt4vjXm2HKoF48hBDeJ-_7kpdlzwAtATBd7TbDdknFkgMsMaMPsgVUVBSIEfowWyCEy4JUDD_OzmPcIgSYVXCWnXFcUcB4kU1XufbDTgUbvct9mwPKb69_5VM_BhX95JpcpVUiKMZO9b2dhpUQQzEa3TkzpmMepzqxerTJIGrlnHWb3Lp8F-ygwj7v9jsT0gQ1dvvgbWPj8CR71Ko-mqfzfpF9fff2y_q6uPn8_sP66qaoCfCx4KyqWqZNLbhqy7ZuagaY45a1BqhqQeBG0Yppgg0njGrV8LLRDARlVEAF-CK7PPrupnowjTYuJe3lnEx6ZeXfirOd3Ph7WWIhOFTJ4NVsEPyPycRRDjZq0_fKGT9FyQhnJcFlAl_8A279FFx6nATGEMcECEnU6kjp4GMMpj1FASQPfcpDn5IKmfqUqc904_mfLzjxc4FJfznrKv193wbltI0nrEqzS3TAiiNm42h-nmQVvkvKMCPy07e1vFu_IeuPd7fywL8-8nWK87-MvwFrPsdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770835155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gallacher, S. J. ; Kelly, P. ; Shand, J. ; Logue, F. C. ; Cooke, T. ; Boyle, I. T. ; McKillop, J. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallacher, S. J. ; Kelly, P. ; Shand, J. ; Logue, F. C. ; Cooke, T. ; Boyle, I. T. ; McKillop, J. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning showed a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 97%. By comparison, sensitivity of ultrasound was 38% and specificity 89%. Both techniques were positive together in nine instances and correctly localized the parathyroid adenoma in eight of these. In 44% of cases, however, both methods together failed to localize any abnormal parathyroid tissue. The ability of these modalities to localize abnormal parathyroid tissue correctly tended to vary with gland size. Where both ultrasound and Tl/Tc scans were negative, median gland size was smaller at 170 mg (range 50-2,500 mg), compared with where Tl/Tc scanning was correct (750 mg, 150-6,820 mg; P < 0.03), ultrasound was correct (960 mg, 100-6,820 mg; P < 0.03) and both techniques together were correct (980 mg, 600-6,820 mg; P = 0.002). These results suggest that neither Tl/Tc scanning or ultrasound has sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used routinely in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.69.811.376</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8346133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Endocrinopathies ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms ; Parathyroid Glands - diagnostic imaging ; Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Technetium ; Thallium Radioisotopes ; Thyroid. Thyroid axis (diseases) ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Postgraduate medical journal, 1993-05, Vol.69 (811), p.376-380</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD May 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b518t-8744f7ceb98af2fbdb71383f7fe16af193da647c53e8576cad82dc71967691413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b518t-8744f7ceb98af2fbdb71383f7fe16af193da647c53e8576cad82dc71967691413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2399814/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2399814/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4770203$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8346133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallacher, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shand, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logue, F. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, I. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKillop, J. H.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism</title><title>Postgraduate medical journal</title><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><description>Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning showed a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 97%. By comparison, sensitivity of ultrasound was 38% and specificity 89%. Both techniques were positive together in nine instances and correctly localized the parathyroid adenoma in eight of these. In 44% of cases, however, both methods together failed to localize any abnormal parathyroid tissue. The ability of these modalities to localize abnormal parathyroid tissue correctly tended to vary with gland size. Where both ultrasound and Tl/Tc scans were negative, median gland size was smaller at 170 mg (range 50-2,500 mg), compared with where Tl/Tc scanning was correct (750 mg, 150-6,820 mg; P < 0.03), ultrasound was correct (960 mg, 100-6,820 mg; P < 0.03) and both techniques together were correct (980 mg, 600-6,820 mg; P = 0.002). These results suggest that neither Tl/Tc scanning or ultrasound has sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used routinely in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Endocrinopathies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms</subject><subject>Parathyroid Glands - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Technetium</subject><subject>Thallium Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Thyroid. Thyroid axis (diseases)</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0032-5473</issn><issn>1469-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc-L1DAcxYso6-zq2ZNQUDwIncm3aX5dFtZBXXFXD6teQ5qm04xtMibt4vjXm2HKoF48hBDeJ-_7kpdlzwAtATBd7TbDdknFkgMsMaMPsgVUVBSIEfowWyCEy4JUDD_OzmPcIgSYVXCWnXFcUcB4kU1XufbDTgUbvct9mwPKb69_5VM_BhX95JpcpVUiKMZO9b2dhpUQQzEa3TkzpmMepzqxerTJIGrlnHWb3Lp8F-ygwj7v9jsT0gQ1dvvgbWPj8CR71Ko-mqfzfpF9fff2y_q6uPn8_sP66qaoCfCx4KyqWqZNLbhqy7ZuagaY45a1BqhqQeBG0Yppgg0njGrV8LLRDARlVEAF-CK7PPrupnowjTYuJe3lnEx6ZeXfirOd3Ph7WWIhOFTJ4NVsEPyPycRRDjZq0_fKGT9FyQhnJcFlAl_8A279FFx6nATGEMcECEnU6kjp4GMMpj1FASQPfcpDn5IKmfqUqc904_mfLzjxc4FJfznrKv193wbltI0nrEqzS3TAiiNm42h-nmQVvkvKMCPy07e1vFu_IeuPd7fywL8-8nWK87-MvwFrPsdw</recordid><startdate>19930501</startdate><enddate>19930501</enddate><creator>Gallacher, S. J.</creator><creator>Kelly, P.</creator><creator>Shand, J.</creator><creator>Logue, F. C.</creator><creator>Cooke, T.</creator><creator>Boyle, I. T.</creator><creator>McKillop, J. H.</creator><general>The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</general><general>BMJ</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930501</creationdate><title>A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism</title><author>Gallacher, S. J. ; Kelly, P. ; Shand, J. ; Logue, F. C. ; Cooke, T. ; Boyle, I. T. ; McKillop, J. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b518t-8744f7ceb98af2fbdb71383f7fe16af193da647c53e8576cad82dc71967691413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Endocrinopathies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms</topic><topic>Parathyroid Glands - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Technetium</topic><topic>Thallium Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Thyroid. Thyroid axis (diseases)</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallacher, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shand, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logue, F. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, I. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKillop, J. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallacher, S. J.</au><au>Kelly, P.</au><au>Shand, J.</au><au>Logue, F. C.</au><au>Cooke, T.</au><au>Boyle, I. T.</au><au>McKillop, J. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism</atitle><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><date>1993-05-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>811</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>376-380</pages><issn>0032-5473</issn><eissn>1469-0756</eissn><abstract>Both high resolution (10 MHz) ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning (Tl/Tc) were carried out preoperatively in 25 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Operative findings were the standard against which these two imaging methodologies were compared. Tl/Tc scanning showed a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 97%. By comparison, sensitivity of ultrasound was 38% and specificity 89%. Both techniques were positive together in nine instances and correctly localized the parathyroid adenoma in eight of these. In 44% of cases, however, both methods together failed to localize any abnormal parathyroid tissue. The ability of these modalities to localize abnormal parathyroid tissue correctly tended to vary with gland size. Where both ultrasound and Tl/Tc scans were negative, median gland size was smaller at 170 mg (range 50-2,500 mg), compared with where Tl/Tc scanning was correct (750 mg, 150-6,820 mg; P < 0.03), ultrasound was correct (960 mg, 100-6,820 mg; P < 0.03) and both techniques together were correct (980 mg, 600-6,820 mg; P = 0.002). These results suggest that neither Tl/Tc scanning or ultrasound has sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used routinely in the preoperative evaluation of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</pub><pmid>8346133</pmid><doi>10.1136/pgmj.69.811.376</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-5473 |
ispartof | Postgraduate medical journal, 1993-05, Vol.69 (811), p.376-380 |
issn | 0032-5473 1469-0756 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2399814 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Endocrinopathies Female Humans Hyperparathyroidism - diagnostic imaging Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Non tumoral diseases. Target tissue resistance. Benign neoplasms Parathyroid Glands - diagnostic imaging Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Preoperative Care Prospective Studies Radionuclide Imaging Sensitivity and Specificity Technetium Thallium Radioisotopes Thyroid. Thyroid axis (diseases) Ultrasonography |
title | A comparison of 10 MHz ultrasound and 201-thallium/99m-technetium subtraction scanning in primary hyperparathyroidism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A57%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%2010%20MHz%20ultrasound%20and%20201-thallium/99m-technetium%20subtraction%20scanning%20in%20primary%20hyperparathyroidism&rft.jtitle=Postgraduate%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Gallacher,%20S.%20J.&rft.date=1993-05-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=811&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=376-380&rft.issn=0032-5473&rft.eissn=1469-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/pgmj.69.811.376&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3972451241%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770835155&rft_id=info:pmid/8346133&rfr_iscdi=true |