Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms

Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation befor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2008-01, Vol.12 (1), p.R24-R24, Article R24
Hauptverfasser: Van Herpe, Tom, De Brabanter, Jos, Beullens, Martine, De Moor, Bart, Van den Berghe, Greet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page R24
container_issue 1
container_start_page R24
container_title Critical care (London, England)
container_volume 12
creator Van Herpe, Tom
De Brabanter, Jos
Beullens, Martine
De Moor, Bart
Van den Berghe, Greet
description Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation before they can replace the currently used algorithms. Existing methods for objectively comparing different insulin titration algorithms show weaknesses. In the current study, a new approach for appropriately assessing the adequacy of different algorithms is proposed. Two ICU patient populations (with different baseline characteristics) were studied, both treated with a similar 'nurse-driven' insulin titration algorithm targeting BG levels of 80 to 110 mg/dl. A new method for objectively evaluating BG deviations from normoglycemia was founded on a smooth penalty function. Next, the performance of this new evaluation tool was compared with the current standard assessment methods, on an individual as well as a population basis. Finally, the impact of four selected parameters (the average BG sampling frequency, the duration of algorithm application, the severity of disease, and the type of illness) on the performance of an insulin titration algorithm was determined by multiple regression analysis. The glycemic penalty index (GPI) was proposed as a tool for assessing the overall glycemic control behavior in ICU patients. The GPI of a patient is the average of all penalties that are individually assigned to each measured BG value based on the optimized smooth penalty function. The computation of this index returns a number between 0 (no penalty) and 100 (the highest penalty). For some patients, the assessment of the BG control behavior using the traditional standard evaluation methods was different from the evaluation with GPI. Two parameters were found to have a significant impact on GPI: the BG sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application. A higher BG sampling frequency and a longer algorithm application duration resulted in an apparently better performance, as indicated by a lower GPI. The GPI is an alternative method for evaluating the performance of BG control algorithms. The blood glucose sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application should be similar when comparing algorithms.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/cc6800
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2374580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A177198141</galeid><sourcerecordid>A177198141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b480t-a57331e64cc734fe8763634a3e95021b50b43e75998ad303a589485f78b611d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1v1DAUjBAVLQV-ArI4cEtrr78vSFUFBalSL0XiZjn2S9aVE2_tpGL_PV5lRekB-eCPNzPveaZpPhB8QYgSl84JhfGr5owwIVqB9a_X9UwFaxWn_LR5W8oDxkQqQd80p0RRvJF0c9Zsb-LewRgc2sFk47xHYfLwG_UpI-vhcbEzxD2ypUApYRqQnTxyadzZfLj50PeQYZpRF1PyaIiLSwUqYppzisjGIeUwb8fyrjnpbSzw_rifNz-_fb2__t7e3t38uL66bTum8NxaLiklIJhzkrIelBRUUGYpaI43pOO4YxQk11pZTzG1XGmmeC9VJwjxnJ43X1bd3dKN4F2dLdtodjmMNu9NssG8rExha4b0ZDZUMq5wFdCrQBfSfwReVqobZrW_cj8dm-f0uECZzUNacvW1GKI541pKXUEXK2iwEUyY-lRlXF3-kEOaoA_1_YpISbQijFTC55XgciolQ_93GILNIf3n9h___fsz7Bg3_QM3cK0e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195459779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Van Herpe, Tom ; De Brabanter, Jos ; Beullens, Martine ; De Moor, Bart ; Van den Berghe, Greet</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Herpe, Tom ; De Brabanter, Jos ; Beullens, Martine ; De Moor, Bart ; Van den Berghe, Greet</creatorcontrib><description>Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation before they can replace the currently used algorithms. Existing methods for objectively comparing different insulin titration algorithms show weaknesses. In the current study, a new approach for appropriately assessing the adequacy of different algorithms is proposed. Two ICU patient populations (with different baseline characteristics) were studied, both treated with a similar 'nurse-driven' insulin titration algorithm targeting BG levels of 80 to 110 mg/dl. A new method for objectively evaluating BG deviations from normoglycemia was founded on a smooth penalty function. Next, the performance of this new evaluation tool was compared with the current standard assessment methods, on an individual as well as a population basis. Finally, the impact of four selected parameters (the average BG sampling frequency, the duration of algorithm application, the severity of disease, and the type of illness) on the performance of an insulin titration algorithm was determined by multiple regression analysis. The glycemic penalty index (GPI) was proposed as a tool for assessing the overall glycemic control behavior in ICU patients. The GPI of a patient is the average of all penalties that are individually assigned to each measured BG value based on the optimized smooth penalty function. The computation of this index returns a number between 0 (no penalty) and 100 (the highest penalty). For some patients, the assessment of the BG control behavior using the traditional standard evaluation methods was different from the evaluation with GPI. Two parameters were found to have a significant impact on GPI: the BG sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application. A higher BG sampling frequency and a longer algorithm application duration resulted in an apparently better performance, as indicated by a lower GPI. The GPI is an alternative method for evaluating the performance of BG control algorithms. The blood glucose sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application should be similar when comparing algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc6800</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18302732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Blood Glucose - drug effects ; Blood sugar ; Comparative analysis ; Control ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Glycemic Index ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia - drug therapy ; Hypoglycemic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use ; Insulin - administration &amp; dosage ; Insulin - therapeutic use ; Intensive Care Units ; Linear Models ; Medical protocols ; Nurse's Role</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2008-01, Vol.12 (1), p.R24-R24, Article R24</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts 2008</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 Van Herpe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008 Van Herpe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b480t-a57331e64cc734fe8763634a3e95021b50b43e75998ad303a589485f78b611d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b480t-a57331e64cc734fe8763634a3e95021b50b43e75998ad303a589485f78b611d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374580/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374580/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18302732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Herpe, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Brabanter, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moor, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Berghe, Greet</creatorcontrib><title>Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation before they can replace the currently used algorithms. Existing methods for objectively comparing different insulin titration algorithms show weaknesses. In the current study, a new approach for appropriately assessing the adequacy of different algorithms is proposed. Two ICU patient populations (with different baseline characteristics) were studied, both treated with a similar 'nurse-driven' insulin titration algorithm targeting BG levels of 80 to 110 mg/dl. A new method for objectively evaluating BG deviations from normoglycemia was founded on a smooth penalty function. Next, the performance of this new evaluation tool was compared with the current standard assessment methods, on an individual as well as a population basis. Finally, the impact of four selected parameters (the average BG sampling frequency, the duration of algorithm application, the severity of disease, and the type of illness) on the performance of an insulin titration algorithm was determined by multiple regression analysis. The glycemic penalty index (GPI) was proposed as a tool for assessing the overall glycemic control behavior in ICU patients. The GPI of a patient is the average of all penalties that are individually assigned to each measured BG value based on the optimized smooth penalty function. The computation of this index returns a number between 0 (no penalty) and 100 (the highest penalty). For some patients, the assessment of the BG control behavior using the traditional standard evaluation methods was different from the evaluation with GPI. Two parameters were found to have a significant impact on GPI: the BG sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application. A higher BG sampling frequency and a longer algorithm application duration resulted in an apparently better performance, as indicated by a lower GPI. The GPI is an alternative method for evaluating the performance of BG control algorithms. The blood glucose sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application should be similar when comparing algorithms.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - drug effects</subject><subject>Blood sugar</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Glycemic Index</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Insulin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Insulin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Medical protocols</subject><subject>Nurse's Role</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1v1DAUjBAVLQV-ArI4cEtrr78vSFUFBalSL0XiZjn2S9aVE2_tpGL_PV5lRekB-eCPNzPveaZpPhB8QYgSl84JhfGr5owwIVqB9a_X9UwFaxWn_LR5W8oDxkQqQd80p0RRvJF0c9Zsb-LewRgc2sFk47xHYfLwG_UpI-vhcbEzxD2ypUApYRqQnTxyadzZfLj50PeQYZpRF1PyaIiLSwUqYppzisjGIeUwb8fyrjnpbSzw_rifNz-_fb2__t7e3t38uL66bTum8NxaLiklIJhzkrIelBRUUGYpaI43pOO4YxQk11pZTzG1XGmmeC9VJwjxnJ43X1bd3dKN4F2dLdtodjmMNu9NssG8rExha4b0ZDZUMq5wFdCrQBfSfwReVqobZrW_cj8dm-f0uECZzUNacvW1GKI541pKXUEXK2iwEUyY-lRlXF3-kEOaoA_1_YpISbQijFTC55XgciolQ_93GILNIf3n9h___fsz7Bg3_QM3cK0e</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Van Herpe, Tom</creator><creator>De Brabanter, Jos</creator><creator>Beullens, Martine</creator><creator>De Moor, Bart</creator><creator>Van den Berghe, Greet</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms</title><author>Van Herpe, Tom ; De Brabanter, Jos ; Beullens, Martine ; De Moor, Bart ; Van den Berghe, Greet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b480t-a57331e64cc734fe8763634a3e95021b50b43e75998ad303a589485f78b611d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - drug effects</topic><topic>Blood sugar</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Glycemic Index</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Insulin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Insulin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Medical protocols</topic><topic>Nurse's Role</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Herpe, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Brabanter, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moor, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Berghe, Greet</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Herpe, Tom</au><au>De Brabanter, Jos</au><au>Beullens, Martine</au><au>De Moor, Bart</au><au>Van den Berghe, Greet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>R24</spage><epage>R24</epage><pages>R24-R24</pages><artnum>R24</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><abstract>Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation before they can replace the currently used algorithms. Existing methods for objectively comparing different insulin titration algorithms show weaknesses. In the current study, a new approach for appropriately assessing the adequacy of different algorithms is proposed. Two ICU patient populations (with different baseline characteristics) were studied, both treated with a similar 'nurse-driven' insulin titration algorithm targeting BG levels of 80 to 110 mg/dl. A new method for objectively evaluating BG deviations from normoglycemia was founded on a smooth penalty function. Next, the performance of this new evaluation tool was compared with the current standard assessment methods, on an individual as well as a population basis. Finally, the impact of four selected parameters (the average BG sampling frequency, the duration of algorithm application, the severity of disease, and the type of illness) on the performance of an insulin titration algorithm was determined by multiple regression analysis. The glycemic penalty index (GPI) was proposed as a tool for assessing the overall glycemic control behavior in ICU patients. The GPI of a patient is the average of all penalties that are individually assigned to each measured BG value based on the optimized smooth penalty function. The computation of this index returns a number between 0 (no penalty) and 100 (the highest penalty). For some patients, the assessment of the BG control behavior using the traditional standard evaluation methods was different from the evaluation with GPI. Two parameters were found to have a significant impact on GPI: the BG sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application. A higher BG sampling frequency and a longer algorithm application duration resulted in an apparently better performance, as indicated by a lower GPI. The GPI is an alternative method for evaluating the performance of BG control algorithms. The blood glucose sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application should be similar when comparing algorithms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>18302732</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc6800</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-8535
ispartof Critical care (London, England), 2008-01, Vol.12 (1), p.R24-R24, Article R24
issn 1364-8535
1466-609X
1364-8535
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2374580
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Algorithms
Blood Glucose - drug effects
Blood sugar
Comparative analysis
Control
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Glycemic Index
Humans
Hyperglycemia - drug therapy
Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage
Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use
Insulin - administration & dosage
Insulin - therapeutic use
Intensive Care Units
Linear Models
Medical protocols
Nurse's Role
title Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A40%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glycemic%20penalty%20index%20for%20adequately%20assessing%20and%20comparing%20different%20blood%20glucose%20control%20algorithms&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Van%20Herpe,%20Tom&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=R24&rft.epage=R24&rft.pages=R24-R24&rft.artnum=R24&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc6800&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA177198141%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195459779&rft_id=info:pmid/18302732&rft_galeid=A177198141&rfr_iscdi=true