Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms
Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation befor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care (London, England) England), 2008-01, Vol.12 (1), p.R24-R24, Article R24 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | R24 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | R24 |
container_title | Critical care (London, England) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Van Herpe, Tom De Brabanter, Jos Beullens, Martine De Moor, Bart Van den Berghe, Greet |
description | Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation before they can replace the currently used algorithms. Existing methods for objectively comparing different insulin titration algorithms show weaknesses. In the current study, a new approach for appropriately assessing the adequacy of different algorithms is proposed.
Two ICU patient populations (with different baseline characteristics) were studied, both treated with a similar 'nurse-driven' insulin titration algorithm targeting BG levels of 80 to 110 mg/dl. A new method for objectively evaluating BG deviations from normoglycemia was founded on a smooth penalty function. Next, the performance of this new evaluation tool was compared with the current standard assessment methods, on an individual as well as a population basis. Finally, the impact of four selected parameters (the average BG sampling frequency, the duration of algorithm application, the severity of disease, and the type of illness) on the performance of an insulin titration algorithm was determined by multiple regression analysis.
The glycemic penalty index (GPI) was proposed as a tool for assessing the overall glycemic control behavior in ICU patients. The GPI of a patient is the average of all penalties that are individually assigned to each measured BG value based on the optimized smooth penalty function. The computation of this index returns a number between 0 (no penalty) and 100 (the highest penalty). For some patients, the assessment of the BG control behavior using the traditional standard evaluation methods was different from the evaluation with GPI. Two parameters were found to have a significant impact on GPI: the BG sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application. A higher BG sampling frequency and a longer algorithm application duration resulted in an apparently better performance, as indicated by a lower GPI.
The GPI is an alternative method for evaluating the performance of BG control algorithms. The blood glucose sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application should be similar when comparing algorithms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/cc6800 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2374580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A177198141</galeid><sourcerecordid>A177198141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b480t-a57331e64cc734fe8763634a3e95021b50b43e75998ad303a589485f78b611d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1v1DAUjBAVLQV-ArI4cEtrr78vSFUFBalSL0XiZjn2S9aVE2_tpGL_PV5lRekB-eCPNzPveaZpPhB8QYgSl84JhfGr5owwIVqB9a_X9UwFaxWn_LR5W8oDxkQqQd80p0RRvJF0c9Zsb-LewRgc2sFk47xHYfLwG_UpI-vhcbEzxD2ypUApYRqQnTxyadzZfLj50PeQYZpRF1PyaIiLSwUqYppzisjGIeUwb8fyrjnpbSzw_rifNz-_fb2__t7e3t38uL66bTum8NxaLiklIJhzkrIelBRUUGYpaI43pOO4YxQk11pZTzG1XGmmeC9VJwjxnJ43X1bd3dKN4F2dLdtodjmMNu9NssG8rExha4b0ZDZUMq5wFdCrQBfSfwReVqobZrW_cj8dm-f0uECZzUNacvW1GKI541pKXUEXK2iwEUyY-lRlXF3-kEOaoA_1_YpISbQijFTC55XgciolQ_93GILNIf3n9h___fsz7Bg3_QM3cK0e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195459779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Van Herpe, Tom ; De Brabanter, Jos ; Beullens, Martine ; De Moor, Bart ; Van den Berghe, Greet</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Herpe, Tom ; De Brabanter, Jos ; Beullens, Martine ; De Moor, Bart ; Van den Berghe, Greet</creatorcontrib><description>Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation before they can replace the currently used algorithms. Existing methods for objectively comparing different insulin titration algorithms show weaknesses. In the current study, a new approach for appropriately assessing the adequacy of different algorithms is proposed.
Two ICU patient populations (with different baseline characteristics) were studied, both treated with a similar 'nurse-driven' insulin titration algorithm targeting BG levels of 80 to 110 mg/dl. A new method for objectively evaluating BG deviations from normoglycemia was founded on a smooth penalty function. Next, the performance of this new evaluation tool was compared with the current standard assessment methods, on an individual as well as a population basis. Finally, the impact of four selected parameters (the average BG sampling frequency, the duration of algorithm application, the severity of disease, and the type of illness) on the performance of an insulin titration algorithm was determined by multiple regression analysis.
The glycemic penalty index (GPI) was proposed as a tool for assessing the overall glycemic control behavior in ICU patients. The GPI of a patient is the average of all penalties that are individually assigned to each measured BG value based on the optimized smooth penalty function. The computation of this index returns a number between 0 (no penalty) and 100 (the highest penalty). For some patients, the assessment of the BG control behavior using the traditional standard evaluation methods was different from the evaluation with GPI. Two parameters were found to have a significant impact on GPI: the BG sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application. A higher BG sampling frequency and a longer algorithm application duration resulted in an apparently better performance, as indicated by a lower GPI.
The GPI is an alternative method for evaluating the performance of BG control algorithms. The blood glucose sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application should be similar when comparing algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc6800</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18302732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Blood Glucose - drug effects ; Blood sugar ; Comparative analysis ; Control ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Glycemic Index ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia - drug therapy ; Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage ; Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use ; Insulin - administration & dosage ; Insulin - therapeutic use ; Intensive Care Units ; Linear Models ; Medical protocols ; Nurse's Role</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2008-01, Vol.12 (1), p.R24-R24, Article R24</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts 2008</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 Van Herpe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008 Van Herpe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b480t-a57331e64cc734fe8763634a3e95021b50b43e75998ad303a589485f78b611d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b480t-a57331e64cc734fe8763634a3e95021b50b43e75998ad303a589485f78b611d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374580/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2374580/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18302732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Herpe, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Brabanter, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moor, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Berghe, Greet</creatorcontrib><title>Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation before they can replace the currently used algorithms. Existing methods for objectively comparing different insulin titration algorithms show weaknesses. In the current study, a new approach for appropriately assessing the adequacy of different algorithms is proposed.
Two ICU patient populations (with different baseline characteristics) were studied, both treated with a similar 'nurse-driven' insulin titration algorithm targeting BG levels of 80 to 110 mg/dl. A new method for objectively evaluating BG deviations from normoglycemia was founded on a smooth penalty function. Next, the performance of this new evaluation tool was compared with the current standard assessment methods, on an individual as well as a population basis. Finally, the impact of four selected parameters (the average BG sampling frequency, the duration of algorithm application, the severity of disease, and the type of illness) on the performance of an insulin titration algorithm was determined by multiple regression analysis.
The glycemic penalty index (GPI) was proposed as a tool for assessing the overall glycemic control behavior in ICU patients. The GPI of a patient is the average of all penalties that are individually assigned to each measured BG value based on the optimized smooth penalty function. The computation of this index returns a number between 0 (no penalty) and 100 (the highest penalty). For some patients, the assessment of the BG control behavior using the traditional standard evaluation methods was different from the evaluation with GPI. Two parameters were found to have a significant impact on GPI: the BG sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application. A higher BG sampling frequency and a longer algorithm application duration resulted in an apparently better performance, as indicated by a lower GPI.
The GPI is an alternative method for evaluating the performance of BG control algorithms. The blood glucose sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application should be similar when comparing algorithms.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - drug effects</subject><subject>Blood sugar</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Glycemic Index</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Insulin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Insulin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Medical protocols</subject><subject>Nurse's Role</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><issn>1364-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1v1DAUjBAVLQV-ArI4cEtrr78vSFUFBalSL0XiZjn2S9aVE2_tpGL_PV5lRekB-eCPNzPveaZpPhB8QYgSl84JhfGr5owwIVqB9a_X9UwFaxWn_LR5W8oDxkQqQd80p0RRvJF0c9Zsb-LewRgc2sFk47xHYfLwG_UpI-vhcbEzxD2ypUApYRqQnTxyadzZfLj50PeQYZpRF1PyaIiLSwUqYppzisjGIeUwb8fyrjnpbSzw_rifNz-_fb2__t7e3t38uL66bTum8NxaLiklIJhzkrIelBRUUGYpaI43pOO4YxQk11pZTzG1XGmmeC9VJwjxnJ43X1bd3dKN4F2dLdtodjmMNu9NssG8rExha4b0ZDZUMq5wFdCrQBfSfwReVqobZrW_cj8dm-f0uECZzUNacvW1GKI541pKXUEXK2iwEUyY-lRlXF3-kEOaoA_1_YpISbQijFTC55XgciolQ_93GILNIf3n9h___fsz7Bg3_QM3cK0e</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Van Herpe, Tom</creator><creator>De Brabanter, Jos</creator><creator>Beullens, Martine</creator><creator>De Moor, Bart</creator><creator>Van den Berghe, Greet</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms</title><author>Van Herpe, Tom ; De Brabanter, Jos ; Beullens, Martine ; De Moor, Bart ; Van den Berghe, Greet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b480t-a57331e64cc734fe8763634a3e95021b50b43e75998ad303a589485f78b611d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - drug effects</topic><topic>Blood sugar</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Glycemic Index</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Insulin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Insulin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Medical protocols</topic><topic>Nurse's Role</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Herpe, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Brabanter, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Moor, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Berghe, Greet</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Herpe, Tom</au><au>De Brabanter, Jos</au><au>Beullens, Martine</au><au>De Moor, Bart</au><au>Van den Berghe, Greet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>R24</spage><epage>R24</epage><pages>R24-R24</pages><artnum>R24</artnum><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><eissn>1364-8535</eissn><abstract>Blood glucose (BG) control performed by intensive care unit (ICU) nurses is becoming standard practice for critically ill patients. New (semi-automated) 'BG control' algorithms (or 'insulin titration' algorithms) are under development, but these require stringent validation before they can replace the currently used algorithms. Existing methods for objectively comparing different insulin titration algorithms show weaknesses. In the current study, a new approach for appropriately assessing the adequacy of different algorithms is proposed.
Two ICU patient populations (with different baseline characteristics) were studied, both treated with a similar 'nurse-driven' insulin titration algorithm targeting BG levels of 80 to 110 mg/dl. A new method for objectively evaluating BG deviations from normoglycemia was founded on a smooth penalty function. Next, the performance of this new evaluation tool was compared with the current standard assessment methods, on an individual as well as a population basis. Finally, the impact of four selected parameters (the average BG sampling frequency, the duration of algorithm application, the severity of disease, and the type of illness) on the performance of an insulin titration algorithm was determined by multiple regression analysis.
The glycemic penalty index (GPI) was proposed as a tool for assessing the overall glycemic control behavior in ICU patients. The GPI of a patient is the average of all penalties that are individually assigned to each measured BG value based on the optimized smooth penalty function. The computation of this index returns a number between 0 (no penalty) and 100 (the highest penalty). For some patients, the assessment of the BG control behavior using the traditional standard evaluation methods was different from the evaluation with GPI. Two parameters were found to have a significant impact on GPI: the BG sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application. A higher BG sampling frequency and a longer algorithm application duration resulted in an apparently better performance, as indicated by a lower GPI.
The GPI is an alternative method for evaluating the performance of BG control algorithms. The blood glucose sampling frequency and the duration of algorithm application should be similar when comparing algorithms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>18302732</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc6800</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-8535 |
ispartof | Critical care (London, England), 2008-01, Vol.12 (1), p.R24-R24, Article R24 |
issn | 1364-8535 1466-609X 1364-8535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2374580 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Blood Glucose - drug effects Blood sugar Comparative analysis Control Evaluation Studies as Topic Glycemic Index Humans Hyperglycemia - drug therapy Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use Insulin - administration & dosage Insulin - therapeutic use Intensive Care Units Linear Models Medical protocols Nurse's Role |
title | Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A40%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glycemic%20penalty%20index%20for%20adequately%20assessing%20and%20comparing%20different%20blood%20glucose%20control%20algorithms&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Van%20Herpe,%20Tom&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=R24&rft.epage=R24&rft.pages=R24-R24&rft.artnum=R24&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc6800&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA177198141%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195459779&rft_id=info:pmid/18302732&rft_galeid=A177198141&rfr_iscdi=true |