Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network
The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diab...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes care 2004-03, Vol.27 (3), p.722-726 |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 726 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 722 |
container_title | Diabetes care |
container_volume | 27 |
description | The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (aged 3.5-17.7 years) wore one or two CGMSs, and 89 of these subjects wore one or two GW2Bs. Frequent serum glucose determinations were made during the day, overnight, and during insulin-induced hypoglycemia resulting in 192 GW2B reference pairs and 401 CGMS reference pairs during hypoglycemia (reference glucose < or =60 mg/dl).
During hypoglycemia, the median absolute difference between the 192 GW2B reference glucose pairs was 26 mg/dl and between the 401 CGMS reference glucose pairs was 19 mg/dl with 31 and 42%, respectively, of the sensor values within 15 mg/dl of the reference glucose. Sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia when the GW2B alarm level was set to 60 mg/dl was 23% with a false-alarm rate of 51%. Analyses suggested that modified CGMS sensors that became available in November 2002 might be more accurate than the original CGMS sensors (median absolute difference 15 vs. 20 mg/dl).
These data show that the GW2B and the CGMS do not reliably detect hypoglycemia. Both of these devices perform better at higher glucose levels, suggesting they may be more useful in reducing HbA1c levels than in detecting hypoglycemia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2337/diacare.27.3.722 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2365475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A114283999</galeid><sourcerecordid>A114283999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g369t-1ae55adae144e02867ec4553a0130d71bc7f805396c0db513809a5964309e8733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcuO1TAMhisEYg4De1YoG5YtaS5twgLpaDQckEZiA2JZuanbBtqkSlqgr8OTEubCRRp5Ydn-8vtXnGXPS1owzutXnQUDAQtWF7yoGXuQHUrNZS6lUA-zAy2FzqXW7Cx7EuMXSqkQSj3OzlJfKabZIft5NGYLYHbie7KOSE7TZvxnWM1IToy01g8BlhEDAdddA8a71brNb5EMv9mIZPbOrj5YN5C4xxVn0m3X1bgvfph2g7OF1-Tyx4LBojN4tyz5b3HFSAJGhJB2WkfMaKcuoCMO1-8-fH2aPephivjsNp9nn95efrx4l199OL2_OF7lA6_0mpeAUkIHWAqBlKmqRiOk5EBLTru6bE3dKyq5rgztWllyRTVIXQlONaqa8_PszY3usrUzdgbdGmBqlmBnCHvjwTb_T5wdm8F_axivpKhlEshvBAaYsLGu9wkzAzpMtHfY29Q-lqVgimutE1_cw6fo0n-Zex-8-NfhH2t350zAy1sAooGpD-CMjX85KZlgXPFfURiz4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creatorcontrib>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (aged 3.5-17.7 years) wore one or two CGMSs, and 89 of these subjects wore one or two GW2Bs. Frequent serum glucose determinations were made during the day, overnight, and during insulin-induced hypoglycemia resulting in 192 GW2B reference pairs and 401 CGMS reference pairs during hypoglycemia (reference glucose < or =60 mg/dl).
During hypoglycemia, the median absolute difference between the 192 GW2B reference glucose pairs was 26 mg/dl and between the 401 CGMS reference glucose pairs was 19 mg/dl with 31 and 42%, respectively, of the sensor values within 15 mg/dl of the reference glucose. Sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia when the GW2B alarm level was set to 60 mg/dl was 23% with a false-alarm rate of 51%. Analyses suggested that modified CGMS sensors that became available in November 2002 might be more accurate than the original CGMS sensors (median absolute difference 15 vs. 20 mg/dl).
These data show that the GW2B and the CGMS do not reliably detect hypoglycemia. Both of these devices perform better at higher glucose levels, suggesting they may be more useful in reducing HbA1c levels than in detecting hypoglycemia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-5992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-5548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.722</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14988292</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICAD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: American Diabetes Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Case studies ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - blood ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy ; Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance ; Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases) ; Endocrinopathies ; False Positive Reactions ; Glucose monitors ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia ; Hypoglycemia - blood ; Hypoglycemia - chemically induced ; Hypoglycemia - prevention & control ; Hypoglycemic Agents - adverse effects ; Insulin - adverse effects ; Medical sciences ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Type 1 diabetes</subject><ispartof>Diabetes care, 2004-03, Vol.27 (3), p.722-726</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 American Diabetes Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15524238$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14988292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network</title><title>Diabetes care</title><addtitle>Diabetes Care</addtitle><description>The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (aged 3.5-17.7 years) wore one or two CGMSs, and 89 of these subjects wore one or two GW2Bs. Frequent serum glucose determinations were made during the day, overnight, and during insulin-induced hypoglycemia resulting in 192 GW2B reference pairs and 401 CGMS reference pairs during hypoglycemia (reference glucose < or =60 mg/dl).
During hypoglycemia, the median absolute difference between the 192 GW2B reference glucose pairs was 26 mg/dl and between the 401 CGMS reference glucose pairs was 19 mg/dl with 31 and 42%, respectively, of the sensor values within 15 mg/dl of the reference glucose. Sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia when the GW2B alarm level was set to 60 mg/dl was 23% with a false-alarm rate of 51%. Analyses suggested that modified CGMS sensors that became available in November 2002 might be more accurate than the original CGMS sensors (median absolute difference 15 vs. 20 mg/dl).
These data show that the GW2B and the CGMS do not reliably detect hypoglycemia. Both of these devices perform better at higher glucose levels, suggesting they may be more useful in reducing HbA1c levels than in detecting hypoglycemia.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - blood</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</subject><subject>Endocrinopathies</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Glucose monitors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - blood</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - chemically induced</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - prevention & control</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Insulin - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Type 1 diabetes</subject><issn>0149-5992</issn><issn>1935-5548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkcuO1TAMhisEYg4De1YoG5YtaS5twgLpaDQckEZiA2JZuanbBtqkSlqgr8OTEubCRRp5Ydn-8vtXnGXPS1owzutXnQUDAQtWF7yoGXuQHUrNZS6lUA-zAy2FzqXW7Cx7EuMXSqkQSj3OzlJfKabZIft5NGYLYHbie7KOSE7TZvxnWM1IToy01g8BlhEDAdddA8a71brNb5EMv9mIZPbOrj5YN5C4xxVn0m3X1bgvfph2g7OF1-Tyx4LBojN4tyz5b3HFSAJGhJB2WkfMaKcuoCMO1-8-fH2aPephivjsNp9nn95efrx4l199OL2_OF7lA6_0mpeAUkIHWAqBlKmqRiOk5EBLTru6bE3dKyq5rgztWllyRTVIXQlONaqa8_PszY3usrUzdgbdGmBqlmBnCHvjwTb_T5wdm8F_axivpKhlEshvBAaYsLGu9wkzAzpMtHfY29Q-lqVgimutE1_cw6fo0n-Zex-8-NfhH2t350zAy1sAooGpD-CMjX85KZlgXPFfURiz4g</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</creator><general>American Diabetes Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g369t-1ae55adae144e02867ec4553a0130d71bc7f805396c0db513809a5964309e8733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - blood</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</topic><topic>Endocrinopathies</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Glucose monitors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - blood</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - chemically induced</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - prevention & control</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Insulin - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Type 1 diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diabetes care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><aucorp>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes care</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Care</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>722</spage><epage>726</epage><pages>722-726</pages><issn>0149-5992</issn><eissn>1935-5548</eissn><coden>DICAD2</coden><abstract>The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (aged 3.5-17.7 years) wore one or two CGMSs, and 89 of these subjects wore one or two GW2Bs. Frequent serum glucose determinations were made during the day, overnight, and during insulin-induced hypoglycemia resulting in 192 GW2B reference pairs and 401 CGMS reference pairs during hypoglycemia (reference glucose < or =60 mg/dl).
During hypoglycemia, the median absolute difference between the 192 GW2B reference glucose pairs was 26 mg/dl and between the 401 CGMS reference glucose pairs was 19 mg/dl with 31 and 42%, respectively, of the sensor values within 15 mg/dl of the reference glucose. Sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia when the GW2B alarm level was set to 60 mg/dl was 23% with a false-alarm rate of 51%. Analyses suggested that modified CGMS sensors that became available in November 2002 might be more accurate than the original CGMS sensors (median absolute difference 15 vs. 20 mg/dl).
These data show that the GW2B and the CGMS do not reliably detect hypoglycemia. Both of these devices perform better at higher glucose levels, suggesting they may be more useful in reducing HbA1c levels than in detecting hypoglycemia.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>American Diabetes Association</pub><pmid>14988292</pmid><doi>10.2337/diacare.27.3.722</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-5992 |
ispartof | Diabetes care, 2004-03, Vol.27 (3), p.722-726 |
issn | 0149-5992 1935-5548 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2365475 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adolescent Biological and medical sciences Blood Glucose - analysis Case studies Child Child, Preschool Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - blood Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases) Endocrinopathies False Positive Reactions Glucose monitors Humans Hypoglycemia Hypoglycemia - blood Hypoglycemia - chemically induced Hypoglycemia - prevention & control Hypoglycemic Agents - adverse effects Insulin - adverse effects Medical sciences Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods Reproducibility of Results Type 1 diabetes |
title | Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T01%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20the%20GlucoWatch%20G2%20biographer%20and%20the%20continuous%20glucose%20monitoring%20system%20during%20hypoglycemia:%20Experience%20of%20the%20diabetes%20research%20in%20children%20network&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20care&rft.aucorp=Diabetes%20Research%20in%20Children%20Network%20(DirecNet)%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=722&rft.epage=726&rft.pages=722-726&rft.issn=0149-5992&rft.eissn=1935-5548&rft.coden=DICAD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.2337/diacare.27.3.722&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA114283999%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/14988292&rft_galeid=A114283999&rfr_iscdi=true |