Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network

The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes care 2004-03, Vol.27 (3), p.722-726
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 726
container_issue 3
container_start_page 722
container_title Diabetes care
container_volume 27
description The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (aged 3.5-17.7 years) wore one or two CGMSs, and 89 of these subjects wore one or two GW2Bs. Frequent serum glucose determinations were made during the day, overnight, and during insulin-induced hypoglycemia resulting in 192 GW2B reference pairs and 401 CGMS reference pairs during hypoglycemia (reference glucose < or =60 mg/dl). During hypoglycemia, the median absolute difference between the 192 GW2B reference glucose pairs was 26 mg/dl and between the 401 CGMS reference glucose pairs was 19 mg/dl with 31 and 42%, respectively, of the sensor values within 15 mg/dl of the reference glucose. Sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia when the GW2B alarm level was set to 60 mg/dl was 23% with a false-alarm rate of 51%. Analyses suggested that modified CGMS sensors that became available in November 2002 might be more accurate than the original CGMS sensors (median absolute difference 15 vs. 20 mg/dl). These data show that the GW2B and the CGMS do not reliably detect hypoglycemia. Both of these devices perform better at higher glucose levels, suggesting they may be more useful in reducing HbA1c levels than in detecting hypoglycemia.
doi_str_mv 10.2337/diacare.27.3.722
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2365475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A114283999</galeid><sourcerecordid>A114283999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g369t-1ae55adae144e02867ec4553a0130d71bc7f805396c0db513809a5964309e8733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcuO1TAMhisEYg4De1YoG5YtaS5twgLpaDQckEZiA2JZuanbBtqkSlqgr8OTEubCRRp5Ydn-8vtXnGXPS1owzutXnQUDAQtWF7yoGXuQHUrNZS6lUA-zAy2FzqXW7Cx7EuMXSqkQSj3OzlJfKabZIft5NGYLYHbie7KOSE7TZvxnWM1IToy01g8BlhEDAdddA8a71brNb5EMv9mIZPbOrj5YN5C4xxVn0m3X1bgvfph2g7OF1-Tyx4LBojN4tyz5b3HFSAJGhJB2WkfMaKcuoCMO1-8-fH2aPephivjsNp9nn95efrx4l199OL2_OF7lA6_0mpeAUkIHWAqBlKmqRiOk5EBLTru6bE3dKyq5rgztWllyRTVIXQlONaqa8_PszY3usrUzdgbdGmBqlmBnCHvjwTb_T5wdm8F_axivpKhlEshvBAaYsLGu9wkzAzpMtHfY29Q-lqVgimutE1_cw6fo0n-Zex-8-NfhH2t350zAy1sAooGpD-CMjX85KZlgXPFfURiz4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creatorcontrib>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (aged 3.5-17.7 years) wore one or two CGMSs, and 89 of these subjects wore one or two GW2Bs. Frequent serum glucose determinations were made during the day, overnight, and during insulin-induced hypoglycemia resulting in 192 GW2B reference pairs and 401 CGMS reference pairs during hypoglycemia (reference glucose &lt; or =60 mg/dl). During hypoglycemia, the median absolute difference between the 192 GW2B reference glucose pairs was 26 mg/dl and between the 401 CGMS reference glucose pairs was 19 mg/dl with 31 and 42%, respectively, of the sensor values within 15 mg/dl of the reference glucose. Sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia when the GW2B alarm level was set to 60 mg/dl was 23% with a false-alarm rate of 51%. Analyses suggested that modified CGMS sensors that became available in November 2002 might be more accurate than the original CGMS sensors (median absolute difference 15 vs. 20 mg/dl). These data show that the GW2B and the CGMS do not reliably detect hypoglycemia. Both of these devices perform better at higher glucose levels, suggesting they may be more useful in reducing HbA1c levels than in detecting hypoglycemia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-5992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-5548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.722</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14988292</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICAD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: American Diabetes Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Case studies ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - blood ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy ; Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance ; Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases) ; Endocrinopathies ; False Positive Reactions ; Glucose monitors ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia ; Hypoglycemia - blood ; Hypoglycemia - chemically induced ; Hypoglycemia - prevention &amp; control ; Hypoglycemic Agents - adverse effects ; Insulin - adverse effects ; Medical sciences ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Type 1 diabetes</subject><ispartof>Diabetes care, 2004-03, Vol.27 (3), p.722-726</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 American Diabetes Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15524238$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14988292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network</title><title>Diabetes care</title><addtitle>Diabetes Care</addtitle><description>The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (aged 3.5-17.7 years) wore one or two CGMSs, and 89 of these subjects wore one or two GW2Bs. Frequent serum glucose determinations were made during the day, overnight, and during insulin-induced hypoglycemia resulting in 192 GW2B reference pairs and 401 CGMS reference pairs during hypoglycemia (reference glucose &lt; or =60 mg/dl). During hypoglycemia, the median absolute difference between the 192 GW2B reference glucose pairs was 26 mg/dl and between the 401 CGMS reference glucose pairs was 19 mg/dl with 31 and 42%, respectively, of the sensor values within 15 mg/dl of the reference glucose. Sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia when the GW2B alarm level was set to 60 mg/dl was 23% with a false-alarm rate of 51%. Analyses suggested that modified CGMS sensors that became available in November 2002 might be more accurate than the original CGMS sensors (median absolute difference 15 vs. 20 mg/dl). These data show that the GW2B and the CGMS do not reliably detect hypoglycemia. Both of these devices perform better at higher glucose levels, suggesting they may be more useful in reducing HbA1c levels than in detecting hypoglycemia.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - blood</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</subject><subject>Endocrinopathies</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Glucose monitors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - blood</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - chemically induced</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Insulin - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Type 1 diabetes</subject><issn>0149-5992</issn><issn>1935-5548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkcuO1TAMhisEYg4De1YoG5YtaS5twgLpaDQckEZiA2JZuanbBtqkSlqgr8OTEubCRRp5Ydn-8vtXnGXPS1owzutXnQUDAQtWF7yoGXuQHUrNZS6lUA-zAy2FzqXW7Cx7EuMXSqkQSj3OzlJfKabZIft5NGYLYHbie7KOSE7TZvxnWM1IToy01g8BlhEDAdddA8a71brNb5EMv9mIZPbOrj5YN5C4xxVn0m3X1bgvfph2g7OF1-Tyx4LBojN4tyz5b3HFSAJGhJB2WkfMaKcuoCMO1-8-fH2aPephivjsNp9nn95efrx4l199OL2_OF7lA6_0mpeAUkIHWAqBlKmqRiOk5EBLTru6bE3dKyq5rgztWllyRTVIXQlONaqa8_PszY3usrUzdgbdGmBqlmBnCHvjwTb_T5wdm8F_axivpKhlEshvBAaYsLGu9wkzAzpMtHfY29Q-lqVgimutE1_cw6fo0n-Zex-8-NfhH2t350zAy1sAooGpD-CMjX85KZlgXPFfURiz4g</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</creator><general>American Diabetes Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g369t-1ae55adae144e02867ec4553a0130d71bc7f805396c0db513809a5964309e8733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - blood</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</topic><topic>Endocrinopathies</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Glucose monitors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - blood</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - chemically induced</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Insulin - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Type 1 diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diabetes care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><aucorp>Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes care</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Care</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>722</spage><epage>726</epage><pages>722-726</pages><issn>0149-5992</issn><eissn>1935-5548</eissn><coden>DICAD2</coden><abstract>The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (aged 3.5-17.7 years) wore one or two CGMSs, and 89 of these subjects wore one or two GW2Bs. Frequent serum glucose determinations were made during the day, overnight, and during insulin-induced hypoglycemia resulting in 192 GW2B reference pairs and 401 CGMS reference pairs during hypoglycemia (reference glucose &lt; or =60 mg/dl). During hypoglycemia, the median absolute difference between the 192 GW2B reference glucose pairs was 26 mg/dl and between the 401 CGMS reference glucose pairs was 19 mg/dl with 31 and 42%, respectively, of the sensor values within 15 mg/dl of the reference glucose. Sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia when the GW2B alarm level was set to 60 mg/dl was 23% with a false-alarm rate of 51%. Analyses suggested that modified CGMS sensors that became available in November 2002 might be more accurate than the original CGMS sensors (median absolute difference 15 vs. 20 mg/dl). These data show that the GW2B and the CGMS do not reliably detect hypoglycemia. Both of these devices perform better at higher glucose levels, suggesting they may be more useful in reducing HbA1c levels than in detecting hypoglycemia.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>American Diabetes Association</pub><pmid>14988292</pmid><doi>10.2337/diacare.27.3.722</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-5992
ispartof Diabetes care, 2004-03, Vol.27 (3), p.722-726
issn 0149-5992
1935-5548
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2365475
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adolescent
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Glucose - analysis
Case studies
Child
Child, Preschool
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - blood
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy
Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance
Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)
Endocrinopathies
False Positive Reactions
Glucose monitors
Humans
Hypoglycemia
Hypoglycemia - blood
Hypoglycemia - chemically induced
Hypoglycemia - prevention & control
Hypoglycemic Agents - adverse effects
Insulin - adverse effects
Medical sciences
Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation
Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Type 1 diabetes
title Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: Experience of the diabetes research in children network
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T01%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20the%20GlucoWatch%20G2%20biographer%20and%20the%20continuous%20glucose%20monitoring%20system%20during%20hypoglycemia:%20Experience%20of%20the%20diabetes%20research%20in%20children%20network&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20care&rft.aucorp=Diabetes%20Research%20in%20Children%20Network%20(DirecNet)%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=722&rft.epage=726&rft.pages=722-726&rft.issn=0149-5992&rft.eissn=1935-5548&rft.coden=DICAD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.2337/diacare.27.3.722&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA114283999%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/14988292&rft_galeid=A114283999&rfr_iscdi=true