The role of microvessel density on the survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
In order to determine whether angiogenesis is a prognostic marker in lung cancer, we performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the prognostic value on survival of microvessel count in patients with lung cancer. Published studies were identified by an electronic search in order to agg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of cancer 2002-09, Vol.87 (7), p.694-701 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 701 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 694 |
container_title | British journal of cancer |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Meert, A-P Paesmans, M Martin, B Delmotte, P Berghmans, T Verdebout, J-M Lafitte, J-J Mascaux, C Sculier, J-P |
description | In order to determine whether angiogenesis is a prognostic marker in lung cancer, we performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the prognostic value on survival of microvessel count in patients with lung cancer. Published studies were identified by an electronic search in order to aggregate survival results, after a methodological assessment using a quality scale designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party. To be eligible, a study had to deal with microvessel count assessment in lung cancer patients on the primary site and to provide survival analysis according to microvessel count expression. Microvessel count has been assessed on surgical samples by immunohistochemistry using factor VIII in 14 studies, CD34 in 10 and CD31 in eight. Respectively 1866, 1440 and 1093 non-small cell lung cancer patients were considered. The overall median quality scores were respectively 52, 59 and 59% for studies assessing microvessel count via factor VIII, CD34 and CD31, without significant difference between studies evaluable or not for meta-analysis nor between studies with significant or non significant results. Seven 'factor VIII' studies, nine 'CD34' and seven 'CD31' provided sufficient data allowing a meta-analysis on survival and were evaluable for results aggregation. This showed that a high microvessel count in the primitive lung tumour was a statistically significant poor prognostic factor for survival in non small cell lung cancer whatever it was assessed by factor VIII (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.16-2.84), CD34 (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.58) or CD31 (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.10-2.96). Variations in survival among the individual studies can be explained in addition to patients selection criteria by the heterogeneous methodologies used to stain and count microvessels: different antibody clones, identification of 'hotspots', Weidner or Chalkey counting method, cut-off selection. Microvessel count, reflecting the angiogenesis, appears to be a poor prognostic factor for survival in surgically treated non small cell lung cancer but standardisation of angiogenesis assessment by the microvessel count is necessary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600551 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2364252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>998023481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7d6a18494a0915a3db64b9cb8e5217be28aa3fa6b53a488bdce49ba0b36119083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUmPEzEQhVsIxISBKzeQxYFbB2-9cUBCIzZpJC7D2Sp3KhO33O7gcvcof4DfjUPCsJwsq7739KpeUTwXfC24at_QsLZDv65rzqtKPChWolKyFK1sHhYrznlT8k7yi-IJ0ZC_HW-bx8WFkFLJRrer4sfNDlmcPLJpy0bXx2lBIvRsg4FcOrApsJQRmuPiFvBHbA_JYUjE7lzaMT-HW9ZD6DG-ZcDoQAnHTPQs4uLw7qg4OniXMEKaI550IyYoIYA_kKOnxaMteMJn5_ey-Pbxw83V5_L666cvV--vy16rKpXNpgbR6k4D70QFamNrbbvetlhJ0ViULYDaQm0rBbpt7aZH3VngVtVC5N3VZfHu5Luf7Yh5HFIEb_bRjRAPZgJn_p0EtzO302KkqrWsZDZ4fTaI0_cZKZnRUY_eQ8BpJtPInEw0IoOv_gOHaY55XTJSdl3daN1laH2C8t2JIm7vkwhujv0aGkzu15z7zYKXf-f_g58LzcCLExB-nfoe-G3wE0ZOrxI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229967449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of microvessel density on the survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Meert, A-P ; Paesmans, M ; Martin, B ; Delmotte, P ; Berghmans, T ; Verdebout, J-M ; Lafitte, J-J ; Mascaux, C ; Sculier, J-P</creator><creatorcontrib>Meert, A-P ; Paesmans, M ; Martin, B ; Delmotte, P ; Berghmans, T ; Verdebout, J-M ; Lafitte, J-J ; Mascaux, C ; Sculier, J-P</creatorcontrib><description>In order to determine whether angiogenesis is a prognostic marker in lung cancer, we performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the prognostic value on survival of microvessel count in patients with lung cancer. Published studies were identified by an electronic search in order to aggregate survival results, after a methodological assessment using a quality scale designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party. To be eligible, a study had to deal with microvessel count assessment in lung cancer patients on the primary site and to provide survival analysis according to microvessel count expression. Microvessel count has been assessed on surgical samples by immunohistochemistry using factor VIII in 14 studies, CD34 in 10 and CD31 in eight. Respectively 1866, 1440 and 1093 non-small cell lung cancer patients were considered. The overall median quality scores were respectively 52, 59 and 59% for studies assessing microvessel count via factor VIII, CD34 and CD31, without significant difference between studies evaluable or not for meta-analysis nor between studies with significant or non significant results. Seven 'factor VIII' studies, nine 'CD34' and seven 'CD31' provided sufficient data allowing a meta-analysis on survival and were evaluable for results aggregation. This showed that a high microvessel count in the primitive lung tumour was a statistically significant poor prognostic factor for survival in non small cell lung cancer whatever it was assessed by factor VIII (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.16-2.84), CD34 (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.58) or CD31 (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.10-2.96). Variations in survival among the individual studies can be explained in addition to patients selection criteria by the heterogeneous methodologies used to stain and count microvessels: different antibody clones, identification of 'hotspots', Weidner or Chalkey counting method, cut-off selection. Microvessel count, reflecting the angiogenesis, appears to be a poor prognostic factor for survival in surgically treated non small cell lung cancer but standardisation of angiogenesis assessment by the microvessel count is necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600551</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12232748</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCAAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Angiogenesis ; Blood ; Blood platelets ; Blood vessels ; Cancer research ; Cell adhesion & migration ; Growth factors ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - blood supply ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - mortality ; Medical prognosis ; Medical research ; Metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neovascularization, Pathologic - diagnosis ; Neovascularization, Pathologic - mortality ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Review ; Survival analysis ; Survival Rate ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>British journal of cancer, 2002-09, Vol.87 (7), p.694-701</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 23, 2002</rights><rights>Copyright © 2002 Cancer Research UK 2002 Cancer Research UK</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7d6a18494a0915a3db64b9cb8e5217be28aa3fa6b53a488bdce49ba0b36119083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7d6a18494a0915a3db64b9cb8e5217be28aa3fa6b53a488bdce49ba0b36119083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364252/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364252/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,2728,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12232748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meert, A-P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paesmans, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmotte, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berghmans, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdebout, J-M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafitte, J-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascaux, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sculier, J-P</creatorcontrib><title>The role of microvessel density on the survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis</title><title>British journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><description>In order to determine whether angiogenesis is a prognostic marker in lung cancer, we performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the prognostic value on survival of microvessel count in patients with lung cancer. Published studies were identified by an electronic search in order to aggregate survival results, after a methodological assessment using a quality scale designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party. To be eligible, a study had to deal with microvessel count assessment in lung cancer patients on the primary site and to provide survival analysis according to microvessel count expression. Microvessel count has been assessed on surgical samples by immunohistochemistry using factor VIII in 14 studies, CD34 in 10 and CD31 in eight. Respectively 1866, 1440 and 1093 non-small cell lung cancer patients were considered. The overall median quality scores were respectively 52, 59 and 59% for studies assessing microvessel count via factor VIII, CD34 and CD31, without significant difference between studies evaluable or not for meta-analysis nor between studies with significant or non significant results. Seven 'factor VIII' studies, nine 'CD34' and seven 'CD31' provided sufficient data allowing a meta-analysis on survival and were evaluable for results aggregation. This showed that a high microvessel count in the primitive lung tumour was a statistically significant poor prognostic factor for survival in non small cell lung cancer whatever it was assessed by factor VIII (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.16-2.84), CD34 (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.58) or CD31 (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.10-2.96). Variations in survival among the individual studies can be explained in addition to patients selection criteria by the heterogeneous methodologies used to stain and count microvessels: different antibody clones, identification of 'hotspots', Weidner or Chalkey counting method, cut-off selection. Microvessel count, reflecting the angiogenesis, appears to be a poor prognostic factor for survival in surgically treated non small cell lung cancer but standardisation of angiogenesis assessment by the microvessel count is necessary.</description><subject>Angiogenesis</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood platelets</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cell adhesion & migration</subject><subject>Growth factors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - blood supply</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neovascularization, Pathologic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neovascularization, Pathologic - mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0007-0920</issn><issn>1532-1827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUmPEzEQhVsIxISBKzeQxYFbB2-9cUBCIzZpJC7D2Sp3KhO33O7gcvcof4DfjUPCsJwsq7739KpeUTwXfC24at_QsLZDv65rzqtKPChWolKyFK1sHhYrznlT8k7yi-IJ0ZC_HW-bx8WFkFLJRrer4sfNDlmcPLJpy0bXx2lBIvRsg4FcOrApsJQRmuPiFvBHbA_JYUjE7lzaMT-HW9ZD6DG-ZcDoQAnHTPQs4uLw7qg4OniXMEKaI550IyYoIYA_kKOnxaMteMJn5_ey-Pbxw83V5_L666cvV--vy16rKpXNpgbR6k4D70QFamNrbbvetlhJ0ViULYDaQm0rBbpt7aZH3VngVtVC5N3VZfHu5Luf7Yh5HFIEb_bRjRAPZgJn_p0EtzO302KkqrWsZDZ4fTaI0_cZKZnRUY_eQ8BpJtPInEw0IoOv_gOHaY55XTJSdl3daN1laH2C8t2JIm7vkwhujv0aGkzu15z7zYKXf-f_g58LzcCLExB-nfoe-G3wE0ZOrxI</recordid><startdate>20020923</startdate><enddate>20020923</enddate><creator>Meert, A-P</creator><creator>Paesmans, M</creator><creator>Martin, B</creator><creator>Delmotte, P</creator><creator>Berghmans, T</creator><creator>Verdebout, J-M</creator><creator>Lafitte, J-J</creator><creator>Mascaux, C</creator><creator>Sculier, J-P</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020923</creationdate><title>The role of microvessel density on the survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis</title><author>Meert, A-P ; Paesmans, M ; Martin, B ; Delmotte, P ; Berghmans, T ; Verdebout, J-M ; Lafitte, J-J ; Mascaux, C ; Sculier, J-P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7d6a18494a0915a3db64b9cb8e5217be28aa3fa6b53a488bdce49ba0b36119083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Angiogenesis</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood platelets</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cell adhesion & migration</topic><topic>Growth factors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - blood supply</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neovascularization, Pathologic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neovascularization, Pathologic - mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meert, A-P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paesmans, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delmotte, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berghmans, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdebout, J-M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafitte, J-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascaux, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sculier, J-P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meert, A-P</au><au>Paesmans, M</au><au>Martin, B</au><au>Delmotte, P</au><au>Berghmans, T</au><au>Verdebout, J-M</au><au>Lafitte, J-J</au><au>Mascaux, C</au><au>Sculier, J-P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of microvessel density on the survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><date>2002-09-23</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>701</epage><pages>694-701</pages><issn>0007-0920</issn><eissn>1532-1827</eissn><coden>BJCAAI</coden><abstract>In order to determine whether angiogenesis is a prognostic marker in lung cancer, we performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the prognostic value on survival of microvessel count in patients with lung cancer. Published studies were identified by an electronic search in order to aggregate survival results, after a methodological assessment using a quality scale designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party. To be eligible, a study had to deal with microvessel count assessment in lung cancer patients on the primary site and to provide survival analysis according to microvessel count expression. Microvessel count has been assessed on surgical samples by immunohistochemistry using factor VIII in 14 studies, CD34 in 10 and CD31 in eight. Respectively 1866, 1440 and 1093 non-small cell lung cancer patients were considered. The overall median quality scores were respectively 52, 59 and 59% for studies assessing microvessel count via factor VIII, CD34 and CD31, without significant difference between studies evaluable or not for meta-analysis nor between studies with significant or non significant results. Seven 'factor VIII' studies, nine 'CD34' and seven 'CD31' provided sufficient data allowing a meta-analysis on survival and were evaluable for results aggregation. This showed that a high microvessel count in the primitive lung tumour was a statistically significant poor prognostic factor for survival in non small cell lung cancer whatever it was assessed by factor VIII (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.16-2.84), CD34 (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.58) or CD31 (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.10-2.96). Variations in survival among the individual studies can be explained in addition to patients selection criteria by the heterogeneous methodologies used to stain and count microvessels: different antibody clones, identification of 'hotspots', Weidner or Chalkey counting method, cut-off selection. Microvessel count, reflecting the angiogenesis, appears to be a poor prognostic factor for survival in surgically treated non small cell lung cancer but standardisation of angiogenesis assessment by the microvessel count is necessary.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub><pmid>12232748</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.bjc.6600551</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0920 |
ispartof | British journal of cancer, 2002-09, Vol.87 (7), p.694-701 |
issn | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2364252 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Angiogenesis Blood Blood platelets Blood vessels Cancer research Cell adhesion & migration Growth factors Humans Literature reviews Lung cancer Lung Neoplasms - blood supply Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis Lung Neoplasms - mortality Medical prognosis Medical research Metastasis Neoplasm Staging Neovascularization, Pathologic - diagnosis Neovascularization, Pathologic - mortality Patients Prognosis Review Survival analysis Survival Rate Systematic review |
title | The role of microvessel density on the survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T23%3A06%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20microvessel%20density%20on%20the%20survival%20of%20patients%20with%20lung%20cancer:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20literature%20with%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Meert,%20A-P&rft.date=2002-09-23&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=701&rft.pages=694-701&rft.issn=0007-0920&rft.eissn=1532-1827&rft.coden=BJCAAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600551&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E998023481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229967449&rft_id=info:pmid/12232748&rfr_iscdi=true |