Consanguinity decreases risk of breast cancer - cervical cancer unaffected
Marriages between third-degree and more distant relatives are common in many parts of the world. Offspring of consanguineous parents have increased morbidity and mortality related to recessive gene disorders. In a population with a high frequency of consanguinity, we examined the frequency of breast...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of cancer 2001-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1675-1679 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1679 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1675 |
container_title | British journal of cancer |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Denic, S Bener, A |
description | Marriages between third-degree and more distant relatives are common in many parts of the world. Offspring of consanguineous parents have increased morbidity and mortality related to recessive gene disorders. In a population with a high frequency of consanguinity, we examined the frequency of breast cancer (related in part to tumour genes) and cervical cancers (related to virus infection) among offspring of consanguineous and non-consanguineous parents. Study was done prospectively in the United Arab Emirates. Selected were married female citizens, ages 40–65, who attended 12 primary health care clinics for whatever reason. In a face-to-face interview, subjects were asked: (a) about consanguineous marriages in family; (b) if they have or have had breast or cervical cancer; (c) about family history of cancer, cancer screening and other parameters. Tumour diagnosis was confirmed by review of medical records. Of 1750 women invited into study, 1445 (79%) could be used in analysis. Among 579 (40%) women of consanguineous and 866 (60%) of non-consanguineous parents there were 24 and 54 with breast cancer, respectively (RR = 0.66, CI 0.42 – 1.06). In the 40 to 50 age group, breast cancer reported 13 of 446 women of consanguineous and 37 of 633 of non-consanguineous parents (RR = 0.50, Cl 0.27 – 0.93). Cervical cancer had 15 women in consanguineous and 32 in non-consanguineous group (RR = 0.70, Cl 0.38 – 1.28). Number of families with history of breast cancer in consanguineous and non-consanguineous group was 21 and 23, respectively (
P
= 0.29). The cancer screening rates and other variable values had fairly balanced distribution between the 2 groups. Having consanguineous parents decreases the risk of breast cancer especially in younger women, risk of cervical cancer being unaffected. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign
http://www.bjcancer.com |
doi_str_mv | 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2131 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2363968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>762271957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-681993c5e9162a321892ff2424d836b9b3a5aa80830ac359985062e406349553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EoqFw5QZaIUFPm9rj7wsSioCCKnHp3fI63uCwsYu9W6n_Hm8TGooEF1vjeeadGb8IvSR4STBn5902uSVgTJZAKHmEFoRTaIkC-RgtMMayxRrwCXpWyraGGiv5FJ0QIhkwJRfo6yrFYuNmCjGMt83au-xt8aXJofxoUt90czw2zkbnc9M29bwJzg6_X6Zo-9670a-foye9HYp_cbhP0dWnj1eri_by2-cvqw-XreNUjq1QRGvquNdEgKVAlIa-hzrPWlHR6Y5abq3CimLrKNdacSzAMywo05zTU_R-L3s9dTu_dj6O2Q7mOoedzbcm2WAeZmL4bjbpxgAVVAtVBc4OAjn9nHwZzS4U54fBRp-mYqQAkERzWcl3_yeBclCCVfDNX-A2TTnWXzAAdQNd5Sq03EMup1Ky7-9nJtjMZprZTDObaWYza8HrPzc94gf3KvD2ANhSLelztSSUI0cZYwTmzud7rtRU3Ph8HO-frV_tK6Idp-zvJYXQd_lfEYC_Rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229989195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consanguinity decreases risk of breast cancer - cervical cancer unaffected</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Denic, S ; Bener, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Denic, S ; Bener, A</creatorcontrib><description>Marriages between third-degree and more distant relatives are common in many parts of the world. Offspring of consanguineous parents have increased morbidity and mortality related to recessive gene disorders. In a population with a high frequency of consanguinity, we examined the frequency of breast cancer (related in part to tumour genes) and cervical cancers (related to virus infection) among offspring of consanguineous and non-consanguineous parents. Study was done prospectively in the United Arab Emirates. Selected were married female citizens, ages 40–65, who attended 12 primary health care clinics for whatever reason. In a face-to-face interview, subjects were asked: (a) about consanguineous marriages in family; (b) if they have or have had breast or cervical cancer; (c) about family history of cancer, cancer screening and other parameters. Tumour diagnosis was confirmed by review of medical records. Of 1750 women invited into study, 1445 (79%) could be used in analysis. Among 579 (40%) women of consanguineous and 866 (60%) of non-consanguineous parents there were 24 and 54 with breast cancer, respectively (RR = 0.66, CI 0.42 – 1.06). In the 40 to 50 age group, breast cancer reported 13 of 446 women of consanguineous and 37 of 633 of non-consanguineous parents (RR = 0.50, Cl 0.27 – 0.93). Cervical cancer had 15 women in consanguineous and 32 in non-consanguineous group (RR = 0.70, Cl 0.38 – 1.28). Number of families with history of breast cancer in consanguineous and non-consanguineous group was 21 and 23, respectively (
P
= 0.29). The cancer screening rates and other variable values had fairly balanced distribution between the 2 groups. Having consanguineous parents decreases the risk of breast cancer especially in younger women, risk of cervical cancer being unaffected. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign
http://www.bjcancer.com</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11742487</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCAAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Cancer Research ; Cervical cancer ; Consanguinity ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug Resistance ; Epidemiology ; Family Health ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Molecular Medicine ; Oncology ; Regular ; regular-article ; Risk Factors ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Tropical medicine ; Tumors ; United Arab Emirates ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics</subject><ispartof>British journal of cancer, 2001-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1675-1679</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2001</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2001 Cancer Research Campaign</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Nov 2001</rights><rights>Copyright © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign 2001 Cancer Research Campaign</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-681993c5e9162a321892ff2424d836b9b3a5aa80830ac359985062e406349553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-681993c5e9162a321892ff2424d836b9b3a5aa80830ac359985062e406349553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363968/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363968/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,2727,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13444125$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11742487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denic, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bener, A</creatorcontrib><title>Consanguinity decreases risk of breast cancer - cervical cancer unaffected</title><title>British journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><description>Marriages between third-degree and more distant relatives are common in many parts of the world. Offspring of consanguineous parents have increased morbidity and mortality related to recessive gene disorders. In a population with a high frequency of consanguinity, we examined the frequency of breast cancer (related in part to tumour genes) and cervical cancers (related to virus infection) among offspring of consanguineous and non-consanguineous parents. Study was done prospectively in the United Arab Emirates. Selected were married female citizens, ages 40–65, who attended 12 primary health care clinics for whatever reason. In a face-to-face interview, subjects were asked: (a) about consanguineous marriages in family; (b) if they have or have had breast or cervical cancer; (c) about family history of cancer, cancer screening and other parameters. Tumour diagnosis was confirmed by review of medical records. Of 1750 women invited into study, 1445 (79%) could be used in analysis. Among 579 (40%) women of consanguineous and 866 (60%) of non-consanguineous parents there were 24 and 54 with breast cancer, respectively (RR = 0.66, CI 0.42 – 1.06). In the 40 to 50 age group, breast cancer reported 13 of 446 women of consanguineous and 37 of 633 of non-consanguineous parents (RR = 0.50, Cl 0.27 – 0.93). Cervical cancer had 15 women in consanguineous and 32 in non-consanguineous group (RR = 0.70, Cl 0.38 – 1.28). Number of families with history of breast cancer in consanguineous and non-consanguineous group was 21 and 23, respectively (
P
= 0.29). The cancer screening rates and other variable values had fairly balanced distribution between the 2 groups. Having consanguineous parents decreases the risk of breast cancer especially in younger women, risk of cervical cancer being unaffected. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign
http://www.bjcancer.com</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Consanguinity</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Family Health</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Regular</subject><subject>regular-article</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>United Arab Emirates</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics</subject><issn>0007-0920</issn><issn>1532-1827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EoqFw5QZaIUFPm9rj7wsSioCCKnHp3fI63uCwsYu9W6n_Hm8TGooEF1vjeeadGb8IvSR4STBn5902uSVgTJZAKHmEFoRTaIkC-RgtMMayxRrwCXpWyraGGiv5FJ0QIhkwJRfo6yrFYuNmCjGMt83au-xt8aXJofxoUt90czw2zkbnc9M29bwJzg6_X6Zo-9670a-foye9HYp_cbhP0dWnj1eri_by2-cvqw-XreNUjq1QRGvquNdEgKVAlIa-hzrPWlHR6Y5abq3CimLrKNdacSzAMywo05zTU_R-L3s9dTu_dj6O2Q7mOoedzbcm2WAeZmL4bjbpxgAVVAtVBc4OAjn9nHwZzS4U54fBRp-mYqQAkERzWcl3_yeBclCCVfDNX-A2TTnWXzAAdQNd5Sq03EMup1Ky7-9nJtjMZprZTDObaWYza8HrPzc94gf3KvD2ANhSLelztSSUI0cZYwTmzud7rtRU3Ph8HO-frV_tK6Idp-zvJYXQd_lfEYC_Rw</recordid><startdate>20011130</startdate><enddate>20011130</enddate><creator>Denic, S</creator><creator>Bener, A</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011130</creationdate><title>Consanguinity decreases risk of breast cancer - cervical cancer unaffected</title><author>Denic, S ; Bener, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-681993c5e9162a321892ff2424d836b9b3a5aa80830ac359985062e406349553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Consanguinity</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Family Health</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Regular</topic><topic>regular-article</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>United Arab Emirates</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denic, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bener, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denic, S</au><au>Bener, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consanguinity decreases risk of breast cancer - cervical cancer unaffected</atitle><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle><stitle>Br J Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><date>2001-11-30</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1675</spage><epage>1679</epage><pages>1675-1679</pages><issn>0007-0920</issn><eissn>1532-1827</eissn><coden>BJCAAI</coden><abstract>Marriages between third-degree and more distant relatives are common in many parts of the world. Offspring of consanguineous parents have increased morbidity and mortality related to recessive gene disorders. In a population with a high frequency of consanguinity, we examined the frequency of breast cancer (related in part to tumour genes) and cervical cancers (related to virus infection) among offspring of consanguineous and non-consanguineous parents. Study was done prospectively in the United Arab Emirates. Selected were married female citizens, ages 40–65, who attended 12 primary health care clinics for whatever reason. In a face-to-face interview, subjects were asked: (a) about consanguineous marriages in family; (b) if they have or have had breast or cervical cancer; (c) about family history of cancer, cancer screening and other parameters. Tumour diagnosis was confirmed by review of medical records. Of 1750 women invited into study, 1445 (79%) could be used in analysis. Among 579 (40%) women of consanguineous and 866 (60%) of non-consanguineous parents there were 24 and 54 with breast cancer, respectively (RR = 0.66, CI 0.42 – 1.06). In the 40 to 50 age group, breast cancer reported 13 of 446 women of consanguineous and 37 of 633 of non-consanguineous parents (RR = 0.50, Cl 0.27 – 0.93). Cervical cancer had 15 women in consanguineous and 32 in non-consanguineous group (RR = 0.70, Cl 0.38 – 1.28). Number of families with history of breast cancer in consanguineous and non-consanguineous group was 21 and 23, respectively (
P
= 0.29). The cancer screening rates and other variable values had fairly balanced distribution between the 2 groups. Having consanguineous parents decreases the risk of breast cancer especially in younger women, risk of cervical cancer being unaffected. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign
http://www.bjcancer.com</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>11742487</pmid><doi>10.1054/bjoc.2001.2131</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0920 |
ispartof | British journal of cancer, 2001-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1675-1679 |
issn | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2363968 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - genetics Cancer Research Cervical cancer Consanguinity Cross-Sectional Studies Drug Resistance Epidemiology Family Health Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Health Surveys Humans Male Mammary gland diseases Medical sciences Middle Aged Molecular Medicine Oncology Regular regular-article Risk Factors Socioeconomic Factors Tropical medicine Tumors United Arab Emirates Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - genetics |
title | Consanguinity decreases risk of breast cancer - cervical cancer unaffected |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T12%3A25%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consanguinity%20decreases%20risk%20of%20breast%20cancer%20-%20cervical%20cancer%20unaffected&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Denic,%20S&rft.date=2001-11-30&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1675&rft.epage=1679&rft.pages=1675-1679&rft.issn=0007-0920&rft.eissn=1532-1827&rft.coden=BJCAAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E762271957%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229989195&rft_id=info:pmid/11742487&rfr_iscdi=true |