How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?
Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the diff...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian family physician 1985-08, Vol.31, p.1473-1474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1474 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1473 |
container_title | Canadian family physician |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Hoogewerf, P E Allingham, J D |
description | Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the differences between a group of volunteers and non-volunteers, using several variables. The only statistically significant difference was in place of practice: volunteers were far more likely to come from small towns than from metropolitan or rural areas. Discriminate analysis showed it was possible to predict correctly to which group the physician belonged in only 62% of cases. Further study must be done on other potentially sensitive variables. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2327377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>848317573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p195t-b51d31362aab836f4fec28655953295b17ae8bf13317d3bfac6cdf09a0076c593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCqg3TpWSuGnSCwhNwJAm7QIStypJXZapa0rSDu3tKdpAcPLBv7_P9gmZMslEKrhQp2RKKVUpCPo2IRcxbijleQbsnEw44zKjwKZktfCfScAuYMS2173bYaIDJjvfDG2PGJJuvY_OOt3GxLWJ9U2jjQ-H5PeUDnaddMFv0Pbx7pKc1bqJeHWsM_L6-PAyX6TL1dPz_H6ZdqwQfWoEq4BBzrU2CvI6q9FylQtRCOCFMExqVKZmAExWYGptc1vVtNCUytyKAmbk9sDtBrPFyo7LB92UXXBbHfal167832ndunz3u5IDlyDlCLg5AoL_GDD25dZFi-N1LfohlipTo1tIGJPXf1W_jp8nwhe7JnGU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>848317573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hoogewerf, P E ; Allingham, J D</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoogewerf, P E ; Allingham, J D</creatorcontrib><description>Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the differences between a group of volunteers and non-volunteers, using several variables. The only statistically significant difference was in place of practice: volunteers were far more likely to come from small towns than from metropolitan or rural areas. Discriminate analysis showed it was possible to predict correctly to which group the physician belonged in only 62% of cases. Further study must be done on other potentially sensitive variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-350X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-5258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21274031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada</publisher><ispartof>Canadian family physician, 1985-08, Vol.31, p.1473-1474</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2327377/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2327377/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21274031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoogewerf, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allingham, J D</creatorcontrib><title>How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?</title><title>Canadian family physician</title><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><description>Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the differences between a group of volunteers and non-volunteers, using several variables. The only statistically significant difference was in place of practice: volunteers were far more likely to come from small towns than from metropolitan or rural areas. Discriminate analysis showed it was possible to predict correctly to which group the physician belonged in only 62% of cases. Further study must be done on other potentially sensitive variables.</description><issn>0008-350X</issn><issn>1715-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCqg3TpWSuGnSCwhNwJAm7QIStypJXZapa0rSDu3tKdpAcPLBv7_P9gmZMslEKrhQp2RKKVUpCPo2IRcxbijleQbsnEw44zKjwKZktfCfScAuYMS2173bYaIDJjvfDG2PGJJuvY_OOt3GxLWJ9U2jjQ-H5PeUDnaddMFv0Pbx7pKc1bqJeHWsM_L6-PAyX6TL1dPz_H6ZdqwQfWoEq4BBzrU2CvI6q9FylQtRCOCFMExqVKZmAExWYGptc1vVtNCUytyKAmbk9sDtBrPFyo7LB92UXXBbHfal167832ndunz3u5IDlyDlCLg5AoL_GDD25dZFi-N1LfohlipTo1tIGJPXf1W_jp8nwhe7JnGU</recordid><startdate>19850801</startdate><enddate>19850801</enddate><creator>Hoogewerf, P E</creator><creator>Allingham, J D</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850801</creationdate><title>How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?</title><author>Hoogewerf, P E ; Allingham, J D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p195t-b51d31362aab836f4fec28655953295b17ae8bf13317d3bfac6cdf09a0076c593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoogewerf, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allingham, J D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoogewerf, P E</au><au>Allingham, J D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?</atitle><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><date>1985-08-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>31</volume><spage>1473</spage><epage>1474</epage><pages>1473-1474</pages><issn>0008-350X</issn><eissn>1715-5258</eissn><abstract>Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the differences between a group of volunteers and non-volunteers, using several variables. The only statistically significant difference was in place of practice: volunteers were far more likely to come from small towns than from metropolitan or rural areas. Discriminate analysis showed it was possible to predict correctly to which group the physician belonged in only 62% of cases. Further study must be done on other potentially sensitive variables.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pmid>21274031</pmid><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-350X |
ispartof | Canadian family physician, 1985-08, Vol.31, p.1473-1474 |
issn | 0008-350X 1715-5258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2327377 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
title | How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20representative%20are%20volunteer%20physicians%20in%20collaborative%20research%20projects?&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20family%20physician&rft.au=Hoogewerf,%20P%20E&rft.date=1985-08-01&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=1473&rft.epage=1474&rft.pages=1473-1474&rft.issn=0008-350X&rft.eissn=1715-5258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E848317573%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=848317573&rft_id=info:pmid/21274031&rfr_iscdi=true |