How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?

Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the diff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian family physician 1985-08, Vol.31, p.1473-1474
Hauptverfasser: Hoogewerf, P E, Allingham, J D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1474
container_issue
container_start_page 1473
container_title Canadian family physician
container_volume 31
creator Hoogewerf, P E
Allingham, J D
description Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the differences between a group of volunteers and non-volunteers, using several variables. The only statistically significant difference was in place of practice: volunteers were far more likely to come from small towns than from metropolitan or rural areas. Discriminate analysis showed it was possible to predict correctly to which group the physician belonged in only 62% of cases. Further study must be done on other potentially sensitive variables.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2327377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>848317573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p195t-b51d31362aab836f4fec28655953295b17ae8bf13317d3bfac6cdf09a0076c593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCqg3TpWSuGnSCwhNwJAm7QIStypJXZapa0rSDu3tKdpAcPLBv7_P9gmZMslEKrhQp2RKKVUpCPo2IRcxbijleQbsnEw44zKjwKZktfCfScAuYMS2173bYaIDJjvfDG2PGJJuvY_OOt3GxLWJ9U2jjQ-H5PeUDnaddMFv0Pbx7pKc1bqJeHWsM_L6-PAyX6TL1dPz_H6ZdqwQfWoEq4BBzrU2CvI6q9FylQtRCOCFMExqVKZmAExWYGptc1vVtNCUytyKAmbk9sDtBrPFyo7LB92UXXBbHfal167832ndunz3u5IDlyDlCLg5AoL_GDD25dZFi-N1LfohlipTo1tIGJPXf1W_jp8nwhe7JnGU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>848317573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hoogewerf, P E ; Allingham, J D</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoogewerf, P E ; Allingham, J D</creatorcontrib><description>Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the differences between a group of volunteers and non-volunteers, using several variables. The only statistically significant difference was in place of practice: volunteers were far more likely to come from small towns than from metropolitan or rural areas. Discriminate analysis showed it was possible to predict correctly to which group the physician belonged in only 62% of cases. Further study must be done on other potentially sensitive variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-350X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-5258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21274031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada</publisher><ispartof>Canadian family physician, 1985-08, Vol.31, p.1473-1474</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2327377/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2327377/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21274031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoogewerf, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allingham, J D</creatorcontrib><title>How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?</title><title>Canadian family physician</title><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><description>Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the differences between a group of volunteers and non-volunteers, using several variables. The only statistically significant difference was in place of practice: volunteers were far more likely to come from small towns than from metropolitan or rural areas. Discriminate analysis showed it was possible to predict correctly to which group the physician belonged in only 62% of cases. Further study must be done on other potentially sensitive variables.</description><issn>0008-350X</issn><issn>1715-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCqg3TpWSuGnSCwhNwJAm7QIStypJXZapa0rSDu3tKdpAcPLBv7_P9gmZMslEKrhQp2RKKVUpCPo2IRcxbijleQbsnEw44zKjwKZktfCfScAuYMS2173bYaIDJjvfDG2PGJJuvY_OOt3GxLWJ9U2jjQ-H5PeUDnaddMFv0Pbx7pKc1bqJeHWsM_L6-PAyX6TL1dPz_H6ZdqwQfWoEq4BBzrU2CvI6q9FylQtRCOCFMExqVKZmAExWYGptc1vVtNCUytyKAmbk9sDtBrPFyo7LB92UXXBbHfal167832ndunz3u5IDlyDlCLg5AoL_GDD25dZFi-N1LfohlipTo1tIGJPXf1W_jp8nwhe7JnGU</recordid><startdate>19850801</startdate><enddate>19850801</enddate><creator>Hoogewerf, P E</creator><creator>Allingham, J D</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850801</creationdate><title>How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?</title><author>Hoogewerf, P E ; Allingham, J D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p195t-b51d31362aab836f4fec28655953295b17ae8bf13317d3bfac6cdf09a0076c593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoogewerf, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allingham, J D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoogewerf, P E</au><au>Allingham, J D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?</atitle><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><date>1985-08-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>31</volume><spage>1473</spage><epage>1474</epage><pages>1473-1474</pages><issn>0008-350X</issn><eissn>1715-5258</eissn><abstract>Few family physicians can generate large samples for statistically significant research, which has led to multicentre collaborative studies. Are the volunteers for these studies typical of family physicians as a whole? If they are not, results will be biased. This preliminary study examines the differences between a group of volunteers and non-volunteers, using several variables. The only statistically significant difference was in place of practice: volunteers were far more likely to come from small towns than from metropolitan or rural areas. Discriminate analysis showed it was possible to predict correctly to which group the physician belonged in only 62% of cases. Further study must be done on other potentially sensitive variables.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pmid>21274031</pmid><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-350X
ispartof Canadian family physician, 1985-08, Vol.31, p.1473-1474
issn 0008-350X
1715-5258
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2327377
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
title How representative are volunteer physicians in collaborative research projects?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20representative%20are%20volunteer%20physicians%20in%20collaborative%20research%20projects?&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20family%20physician&rft.au=Hoogewerf,%20P%20E&rft.date=1985-08-01&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=1473&rft.epage=1474&rft.pages=1473-1474&rft.issn=0008-350X&rft.eissn=1715-5258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E848317573%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=848317573&rft_id=info:pmid/21274031&rfr_iscdi=true