The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial

Summary Background The international standard radiotherapy schedule for breast cancer treatment delivers a high total dose in 25 small daily doses (fractions). However, a lower total dose delivered in fewer, larger fractions (hypofractionation) is hypothesised to be at least as safe and effective as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The lancet oncology 2008-04, Vol.9 (4), p.331-341
Hauptverfasser: Bentzen, S M, Agrawal, R K, Aird, E G A, Barrett, J M, Barrett-Lee, P J, Bliss, J M, Brown, J, Dewar, J A, Dobbs, H J, Haviland, J S, Hoskin, P J, Hopwood, P, Lawton, P A, Magee, B J, Mills, J, Morgan, D A L, Owen, J R, Simmons, S, Sumo, G, Sydenham, M A, Venables, K, Yarnold, J R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 341
container_issue 4
container_start_page 331
container_title The lancet oncology
container_volume 9
creator Bentzen, S M
Agrawal, R K
Aird, E G A
Barrett, J M
Barrett-Lee, P J
Bliss, J M
Brown, J
Dewar, J A
Dobbs, H J
Haviland, J S
Hoskin, P J
Hopwood, P
Lawton, P A
Magee, B J
Mills, J
Morgan, D A L
Owen, J R
Simmons, S
Sumo, G
Sydenham, M A
Venables, K
Yarnold, J R
description Summary Background The international standard radiotherapy schedule for breast cancer treatment delivers a high total dose in 25 small daily doses (fractions). However, a lower total dose delivered in fewer, larger fractions (hypofractionation) is hypothesised to be at least as safe and effective as the standard treatment. We tested two dose levels of a 13-fraction schedule against the standard regimen with the aim of measuring the sensitivity of normal and malignant tissues to fraction size. Methods Between 1998 and 2002, 2236 women with early breast cancer (pT1-3a pN0-1 M0) at 17 centres in the UK were randomly assigned after primary surgery to receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2·0 Gy versus 41·6 Gy or 39 Gy in 13 fractions of 3·2 Gy or 3·0 Gy over 5 weeks. Women were eligible if they were aged over 18 years, did not have an immediate surgical reconstruction, and were available for follow-up. Randomisation method was computer generated and was not blinded. The protocol-specified principal endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse, defined as reappearance of cancer at irradiated sites, late normal tissue effects, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779. Findings 749 women were assigned to the 50 Gy group, 750 to the 41·6 Gy group, and 737 to the 39 Gy group. After a median follow up of 5·1 years (IQR 4·4–6·0) the rate of local-regional tumour relapse at 5 years was 3·6% (95% CI 2·2–5·1) after 50 Gy, 3·5% (95% CI 2·1–4·3) after 41·6 Gy, and 5·2% (95% CI 3·5–6·9) after 39 Gy. The estimated absolute differences in 5-year local-regional relapse rates compared with 50 Gy were 0·2% (95% CI −1·3% to 2·6%) after 41·6 Gy and 0·9% (95% CI −0·8% to 3·7%) after 39 Gy. Photographic and patient self-assessments suggested lower rates of late adverse effects after 39 Gy than with 50 Gy, with an HR for late change in breast appearance (photographic) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·52–0·91, p=0·01). From a planned meta-analysis with the pilot trial, the adjusted estimates of α/β value for tumour control was 4·6 Gy (95% CI 1·1–8·1) and for late change in breast appearance (photographic) was 3·4 Gy (95% CI 2·3–4·5). Interpretation The data are consistent with the hypothesis that breast cancer and the dose-limiting normal tissues respond similarly to change in radiotherapy fraction size. 41·6 Gy in 13 fractions was similar to the control regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractio
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70077-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2323709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1470204508700779</els_id><sourcerecordid>1666582241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5149-3d8a49171131fd234000128a9d59d6293efee573dfef0ad6ba96bc6ec2cd991d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1u1DAQhSMEoqXwCCCLq_YiMI7zZy6Kloo_UQmpm15bs_aEdcnGWztbKW_C4-JsVqVww5Utz_E3Z-YkyUsObzjw8u2S5xWkGeTFKdRnFUBVpfJRchyf87TI6_rx_j5LjpJnIdwA8IpD8TQ54rUoSg7yOPnVrIldf2PLAXuD3tiAg3U9cy374AnDwK7QWDesyeN2ZKfLZnHVnLHGW-zYYpL5h_X1uHWtRz0xZlDrPBsiadhQP0x6Qt-NbDXDNfaa_DuGEdMbt7GBTJRH-PPkSYtdoBeH8yS5_vSxufiSXn7__PVicZnqgucyFabGXMa5uOCtyUQOccqsRmkKacpMCmqJikqYllpAU65Qlitdks60kZIbcZKcz9ztbrUho6NLj53aertBPyqHVv1d6e1a_XB3KhOZqEBGwOsDwLvbHYVB3bid76NnlQGHyU8RRcUs0t6F4Km9b8BBTXmqfZ5qCktBrfZ5qgn-6qG7P78OAUbB-1lAcUd3lrwK2lJcqrGe9KCMs_9tcf4PQXe2txq7nzRSuB-Gq5ApmCETA-o9QYrfUhXHbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201000015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bentzen, S M ; Agrawal, R K ; Aird, E G A ; Barrett, J M ; Barrett-Lee, P J ; Bliss, J M ; Brown, J ; Dewar, J A ; Dobbs, H J ; Haviland, J S ; Hoskin, P J ; Hopwood, P ; Lawton, P A ; Magee, B J ; Mills, J ; Morgan, D A L ; Owen, J R ; Simmons, S ; Sumo, G ; Sydenham, M A ; Venables, K ; Yarnold, J R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bentzen, S M ; Agrawal, R K ; Aird, E G A ; Barrett, J M ; Barrett-Lee, P J ; Bliss, J M ; Brown, J ; Dewar, J A ; Dobbs, H J ; Haviland, J S ; Hoskin, P J ; Hopwood, P ; Lawton, P A ; Magee, B J ; Mills, J ; Morgan, D A L ; Owen, J R ; Simmons, S ; Sumo, G ; Sydenham, M A ; Venables, K ; Yarnold, J R ; The START Trialists' Group ; START Trialists' Group</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background The international standard radiotherapy schedule for breast cancer treatment delivers a high total dose in 25 small daily doses (fractions). However, a lower total dose delivered in fewer, larger fractions (hypofractionation) is hypothesised to be at least as safe and effective as the standard treatment. We tested two dose levels of a 13-fraction schedule against the standard regimen with the aim of measuring the sensitivity of normal and malignant tissues to fraction size. Methods Between 1998 and 2002, 2236 women with early breast cancer (pT1-3a pN0-1 M0) at 17 centres in the UK were randomly assigned after primary surgery to receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2·0 Gy versus 41·6 Gy or 39 Gy in 13 fractions of 3·2 Gy or 3·0 Gy over 5 weeks. Women were eligible if they were aged over 18 years, did not have an immediate surgical reconstruction, and were available for follow-up. Randomisation method was computer generated and was not blinded. The protocol-specified principal endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse, defined as reappearance of cancer at irradiated sites, late normal tissue effects, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779. Findings 749 women were assigned to the 50 Gy group, 750 to the 41·6 Gy group, and 737 to the 39 Gy group. After a median follow up of 5·1 years (IQR 4·4–6·0) the rate of local-regional tumour relapse at 5 years was 3·6% (95% CI 2·2–5·1) after 50 Gy, 3·5% (95% CI 2·1–4·3) after 41·6 Gy, and 5·2% (95% CI 3·5–6·9) after 39 Gy. The estimated absolute differences in 5-year local-regional relapse rates compared with 50 Gy were 0·2% (95% CI −1·3% to 2·6%) after 41·6 Gy and 0·9% (95% CI −0·8% to 3·7%) after 39 Gy. Photographic and patient self-assessments suggested lower rates of late adverse effects after 39 Gy than with 50 Gy, with an HR for late change in breast appearance (photographic) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·52–0·91, p=0·01). From a planned meta-analysis with the pilot trial, the adjusted estimates of α/β value for tumour control was 4·6 Gy (95% CI 1·1–8·1) and for late change in breast appearance (photographic) was 3·4 Gy (95% CI 2·3–4·5). Interpretation The data are consistent with the hypothesis that breast cancer and the dose-limiting normal tissues respond similarly to change in radiotherapy fraction size. 41·6 Gy in 13 fractions was similar to the control regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions in terms of local-regional tumour control and late normal tissue effects, a result consistent with the result of START Trial B. A lower total dose in a smaller number of fractions could offer similar rates of tumour control and normal tissue damage as the international standard fractionation schedule of 50 Gy in 25 fractions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70077-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18356109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Confidence Intervals ; Dose Fractionation ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Fast track ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Mastectomy, Segmental - methods ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Pilot Projects ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Radiotherapy Dosage - standards ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Reference Values ; Risk Assessment ; Sex Factors ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>The lancet oncology, 2008-04, Vol.9 (4), p.331-341</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 2008</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5149-3d8a49171131fd234000128a9d59d6293efee573dfef0ad6ba96bc6ec2cd991d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5149-3d8a49171131fd234000128a9d59d6293efee573dfef0ad6ba96bc6ec2cd991d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470204508700779$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18356109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bentzen, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aird, E G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett-Lee, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliss, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobbs, H J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haviland, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopwood, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawton, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magee, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, D A L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumo, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydenham, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venables, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarnold, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The START Trialists' Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>START Trialists' Group</creatorcontrib><title>The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial</title><title>The lancet oncology</title><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><description>Summary Background The international standard radiotherapy schedule for breast cancer treatment delivers a high total dose in 25 small daily doses (fractions). However, a lower total dose delivered in fewer, larger fractions (hypofractionation) is hypothesised to be at least as safe and effective as the standard treatment. We tested two dose levels of a 13-fraction schedule against the standard regimen with the aim of measuring the sensitivity of normal and malignant tissues to fraction size. Methods Between 1998 and 2002, 2236 women with early breast cancer (pT1-3a pN0-1 M0) at 17 centres in the UK were randomly assigned after primary surgery to receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2·0 Gy versus 41·6 Gy or 39 Gy in 13 fractions of 3·2 Gy or 3·0 Gy over 5 weeks. Women were eligible if they were aged over 18 years, did not have an immediate surgical reconstruction, and were available for follow-up. Randomisation method was computer generated and was not blinded. The protocol-specified principal endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse, defined as reappearance of cancer at irradiated sites, late normal tissue effects, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779. Findings 749 women were assigned to the 50 Gy group, 750 to the 41·6 Gy group, and 737 to the 39 Gy group. After a median follow up of 5·1 years (IQR 4·4–6·0) the rate of local-regional tumour relapse at 5 years was 3·6% (95% CI 2·2–5·1) after 50 Gy, 3·5% (95% CI 2·1–4·3) after 41·6 Gy, and 5·2% (95% CI 3·5–6·9) after 39 Gy. The estimated absolute differences in 5-year local-regional relapse rates compared with 50 Gy were 0·2% (95% CI −1·3% to 2·6%) after 41·6 Gy and 0·9% (95% CI −0·8% to 3·7%) after 39 Gy. Photographic and patient self-assessments suggested lower rates of late adverse effects after 39 Gy than with 50 Gy, with an HR for late change in breast appearance (photographic) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·52–0·91, p=0·01). From a planned meta-analysis with the pilot trial, the adjusted estimates of α/β value for tumour control was 4·6 Gy (95% CI 1·1–8·1) and for late change in breast appearance (photographic) was 3·4 Gy (95% CI 2·3–4·5). Interpretation The data are consistent with the hypothesis that breast cancer and the dose-limiting normal tissues respond similarly to change in radiotherapy fraction size. 41·6 Gy in 13 fractions was similar to the control regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions in terms of local-regional tumour control and late normal tissue effects, a result consistent with the result of START Trial B. A lower total dose in a smaller number of fractions could offer similar rates of tumour control and normal tissue damage as the international standard fractionation schedule of 50 Gy in 25 fractions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Fast track</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage - standards</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1470-2045</issn><issn>1474-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd1u1DAQhSMEoqXwCCCLq_YiMI7zZy6Kloo_UQmpm15bs_aEdcnGWztbKW_C4-JsVqVww5Utz_E3Z-YkyUsObzjw8u2S5xWkGeTFKdRnFUBVpfJRchyf87TI6_rx_j5LjpJnIdwA8IpD8TQ54rUoSg7yOPnVrIldf2PLAXuD3tiAg3U9cy374AnDwK7QWDesyeN2ZKfLZnHVnLHGW-zYYpL5h_X1uHWtRz0xZlDrPBsiadhQP0x6Qt-NbDXDNfaa_DuGEdMbt7GBTJRH-PPkSYtdoBeH8yS5_vSxufiSXn7__PVicZnqgucyFabGXMa5uOCtyUQOccqsRmkKacpMCmqJikqYllpAU65Qlitdks60kZIbcZKcz9ztbrUho6NLj53aertBPyqHVv1d6e1a_XB3KhOZqEBGwOsDwLvbHYVB3bid76NnlQGHyU8RRcUs0t6F4Km9b8BBTXmqfZ5qCktBrfZ5qgn-6qG7P78OAUbB-1lAcUd3lrwK2lJcqrGe9KCMs_9tcf4PQXe2txq7nzRSuB-Gq5ApmCETA-o9QYrfUhXHbg</recordid><startdate>200804</startdate><enddate>200804</enddate><creator>Bentzen, S M</creator><creator>Agrawal, R K</creator><creator>Aird, E G A</creator><creator>Barrett, J M</creator><creator>Barrett-Lee, P J</creator><creator>Bliss, J M</creator><creator>Brown, J</creator><creator>Dewar, J A</creator><creator>Dobbs, H J</creator><creator>Haviland, J S</creator><creator>Hoskin, P J</creator><creator>Hopwood, P</creator><creator>Lawton, P A</creator><creator>Magee, B J</creator><creator>Mills, J</creator><creator>Morgan, D A L</creator><creator>Owen, J R</creator><creator>Simmons, S</creator><creator>Sumo, G</creator><creator>Sydenham, M A</creator><creator>Venables, K</creator><creator>Yarnold, J R</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Lancet Pub. Group</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200804</creationdate><title>The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial</title><author>Bentzen, S M ; Agrawal, R K ; Aird, E G A ; Barrett, J M ; Barrett-Lee, P J ; Bliss, J M ; Brown, J ; Dewar, J A ; Dobbs, H J ; Haviland, J S ; Hoskin, P J ; Hopwood, P ; Lawton, P A ; Magee, B J ; Mills, J ; Morgan, D A L ; Owen, J R ; Simmons, S ; Sumo, G ; Sydenham, M A ; Venables, K ; Yarnold, J R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5149-3d8a49171131fd234000128a9d59d6293efee573dfef0ad6ba96bc6ec2cd991d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Fast track</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage - standards</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bentzen, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aird, E G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett-Lee, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliss, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobbs, H J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haviland, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopwood, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawton, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magee, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, D A L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumo, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydenham, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venables, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarnold, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The START Trialists' Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>START Trialists' Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bentzen, S M</au><au>Agrawal, R K</au><au>Aird, E G A</au><au>Barrett, J M</au><au>Barrett-Lee, P J</au><au>Bliss, J M</au><au>Brown, J</au><au>Dewar, J A</au><au>Dobbs, H J</au><au>Haviland, J S</au><au>Hoskin, P J</au><au>Hopwood, P</au><au>Lawton, P A</au><au>Magee, B J</au><au>Mills, J</au><au>Morgan, D A L</au><au>Owen, J R</au><au>Simmons, S</au><au>Sumo, G</au><au>Sydenham, M A</au><au>Venables, K</au><au>Yarnold, J R</au><aucorp>The START Trialists' Group</aucorp><aucorp>START Trialists' Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial</atitle><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><date>2008-04</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>331-341</pages><issn>1470-2045</issn><eissn>1474-5488</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background The international standard radiotherapy schedule for breast cancer treatment delivers a high total dose in 25 small daily doses (fractions). However, a lower total dose delivered in fewer, larger fractions (hypofractionation) is hypothesised to be at least as safe and effective as the standard treatment. We tested two dose levels of a 13-fraction schedule against the standard regimen with the aim of measuring the sensitivity of normal and malignant tissues to fraction size. Methods Between 1998 and 2002, 2236 women with early breast cancer (pT1-3a pN0-1 M0) at 17 centres in the UK were randomly assigned after primary surgery to receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2·0 Gy versus 41·6 Gy or 39 Gy in 13 fractions of 3·2 Gy or 3·0 Gy over 5 weeks. Women were eligible if they were aged over 18 years, did not have an immediate surgical reconstruction, and were available for follow-up. Randomisation method was computer generated and was not blinded. The protocol-specified principal endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse, defined as reappearance of cancer at irradiated sites, late normal tissue effects, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779. Findings 749 women were assigned to the 50 Gy group, 750 to the 41·6 Gy group, and 737 to the 39 Gy group. After a median follow up of 5·1 years (IQR 4·4–6·0) the rate of local-regional tumour relapse at 5 years was 3·6% (95% CI 2·2–5·1) after 50 Gy, 3·5% (95% CI 2·1–4·3) after 41·6 Gy, and 5·2% (95% CI 3·5–6·9) after 39 Gy. The estimated absolute differences in 5-year local-regional relapse rates compared with 50 Gy were 0·2% (95% CI −1·3% to 2·6%) after 41·6 Gy and 0·9% (95% CI −0·8% to 3·7%) after 39 Gy. Photographic and patient self-assessments suggested lower rates of late adverse effects after 39 Gy than with 50 Gy, with an HR for late change in breast appearance (photographic) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·52–0·91, p=0·01). From a planned meta-analysis with the pilot trial, the adjusted estimates of α/β value for tumour control was 4·6 Gy (95% CI 1·1–8·1) and for late change in breast appearance (photographic) was 3·4 Gy (95% CI 2·3–4·5). Interpretation The data are consistent with the hypothesis that breast cancer and the dose-limiting normal tissues respond similarly to change in radiotherapy fraction size. 41·6 Gy in 13 fractions was similar to the control regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions in terms of local-regional tumour control and late normal tissue effects, a result consistent with the result of START Trial B. A lower total dose in a smaller number of fractions could offer similar rates of tumour control and normal tissue damage as the international standard fractionation schedule of 50 Gy in 25 fractions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18356109</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70077-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-2045
ispartof The lancet oncology, 2008-04, Vol.9 (4), p.331-341
issn 1470-2045
1474-5488
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2323709
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast Neoplasms - mortality
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Confidence Intervals
Dose Fractionation
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Fast track
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Mastectomy, Segmental - methods
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Pilot Projects
Proportional Hazards Models
Radiotherapy Dosage - standards
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Reference Values
Risk Assessment
Sex Factors
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
title The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T04%3A31%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20UK%20Standardisation%20of%20Breast%20Radiotherapy%20(START)%20Trial%20A%20of%20radiotherapy%20hypofractionation%20for%20treatment%20of%20early%20breast%20cancer:%20a%20randomised%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20lancet%20oncology&rft.au=Bentzen,%20S%20M&rft.aucorp=The%20START%20Trialists'%20Group&rft.date=2008-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=331-341&rft.issn=1470-2045&rft.eissn=1474-5488&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70077-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1666582241%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201000015&rft_id=info:pmid/18356109&rft_els_id=S1470204508700779&rfr_iscdi=true