Retraining the injured spinal cord
The present review presents a series of concepts that may be useful in developing rehabilitative strategies to enhance recovery of posture and locomotion following spinal cord injury. First, the loss of supraspinal input results in a marked change in the functional efficacy of the remaining synapses...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of physiology 2001-05, Vol.533 (1), p.15-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The present review presents a series of concepts that may be useful in developing rehabilitative strategies to enhance recovery
of posture and locomotion following spinal cord injury. First, the loss of supraspinal input results in a marked change in
the functional efficacy of the remaining synapses and neurons of intraspinal and peripheral afferent (dorsal root ganglion)
origin. Second, following a complete transection the lumbrosacral spinal cord can recover greater levels of motor performance
if it has been exposed to the afferent and intraspinal activation patterns that are associated with standing and stepping.
Third, the spinal cord can more readily reacquire the ability to stand and step following spinal cord transection with repetitive
exposure to standing and stepping. Fourth, robotic assistive devices can be used to guide the kinematics of the limbs and
thus expose the spinal cord to the new normal activity patterns associated with a particular motor task following spinal cord
injury. In addition, such robotic assistive devices can provide immediate quantification of the limb kinematics. Fifth, the
behavioural and physiological effects of spinal cord transection are reflected in adaptations in most, if not all, neurotransmitter
systems in the lumbosacral spinal cord. Evidence is presented that both the GABAergic and glycinergic inhibitory systems are
up-regulated following complete spinal cord transection and that step training results in some aspects of these transmitter
systems being down-regulated towards control levels. These concepts and observations demonstrate that (a) the spinal cord
can interpret complex afferent information and generate the appropriate motor task; and (b) motor ability can be defined to
a large degree by training. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3751 1469-7793 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0015b.x |