An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE
This study compared features and determined which of four end-user systems (PaperChase, GRATEFUL MED, Med-Base, or Compact Cambridge: MEDLINE) would best serve the Medical Sciences and Optometry Libraries of Indiana University in providing biomedical information to faculty and graduate students thro...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 1988-04, Vol.76 (2), p.171-180 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 180 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 171 |
| container_title | Bulletin of the Medical Library Association |
| container_volume | 76 |
| creator | BONHAM, M. D NELSON, L. L |
| description | This study compared features and determined which of four end-user systems (PaperChase, GRATEFUL MED, Med-Base, or Compact Cambridge: MEDLINE) would best serve the Medical Sciences and Optometry Libraries of Indiana University in providing biomedical information to faculty and graduate students through MEDLINE. Cost, ease of use, retrieval, training needs, equipment requirements, and adequacy of documentation were examined. The study consisted of a comparison of the features of each system based on available documentation; a controlled search performed by the investigators on each system and on regular NLM MEDLINE; and a user study based on observations, questionnaires, and interviews with eleven library patrons who performed the same search of their choice on each of the four systems. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_227172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57129506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-22d4e729eece686e93249fffa98736caf47878b35b675ba2e4ec6a05f6a6b5403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1Lw0AUzEGptfoThBzEW2C7m_0I6KHUVgtVL3peXrZv20iyqbtJof_eBUPRk6d5vJl5M7yzZEwI5ZlkTF0klyF8EjKVihejZMRoRKbGyf3MpXiAuoeual3a2tS2vU_RbbI-oE_DMXTYhLiNM4I3u8pt05fF43r1urhKzi3UAa8HnCQfy8X7_Dlbvz2t5rN1tqeMdxmlmxwlLRANCiWwYDQvrLVQKMmEAZtLJVXJeCkkL4FijkYA4VaAKHlO2CR5-Lm778sGNwZd56HWe1814I-6hUr_ZVy109v2oCmVU0mj_27w-_arx9DppgoG6xoctn3QUlFGcpH_K-RySgtORBTe_G50qjL8NfK3Aw_BQG09OFOFk0xKxWTM-wa8XoAZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57129506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>BONHAM, M. D ; NELSON, L. L</creator><creatorcontrib>BONHAM, M. D ; NELSON, L. L</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared features and determined which of four end-user systems (PaperChase, GRATEFUL MED, Med-Base, or Compact Cambridge: MEDLINE) would best serve the Medical Sciences and Optometry Libraries of Indiana University in providing biomedical information to faculty and graduate students through MEDLINE. Cost, ease of use, retrieval, training needs, equipment requirements, and adequacy of documentation were examined. The study consisted of a comparison of the features of each system based on available documentation; a controlled search performed by the investigators on each system and on regular NLM MEDLINE; and a user study based on observations, questionnaires, and interviews with eleven library patrons who performed the same search of their choice on each of the four systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3285938</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMLAAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: Medical Library Association</publisher><subject>Comparative studies ; Computer User Training ; Computerised information retrieval ; Computerized information services ; Computerized information storage and retrieval ; Exact sciences and technology ; General aspects ; Indiana ; Indiana University at Bloomington Libraries ; Information and communication sciences ; Information processing and retrieval ; Information retrieval. Man machine relationship ; Information science. Documentation ; Information services ; Information storage and retrieval ; Information Systems - economics ; Information work ; Libraries, Medical ; Magnetic tape ; Medical libraries ; Medicine ; MEDLARS ; Online information retrieval ; Research process. Evaluation ; Sciences and techniques of general use ; Searching ; Subject indexing ; Technical services ; United States ; University libraries</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 1988-04, Vol.76 (2), p.171-180</ispartof><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC227172/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC227172/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7783764$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3285938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BONHAM, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NELSON, L. L</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE</title><title>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association</title><addtitle>Bull Med Libr Assoc</addtitle><description>This study compared features and determined which of four end-user systems (PaperChase, GRATEFUL MED, Med-Base, or Compact Cambridge: MEDLINE) would best serve the Medical Sciences and Optometry Libraries of Indiana University in providing biomedical information to faculty and graduate students through MEDLINE. Cost, ease of use, retrieval, training needs, equipment requirements, and adequacy of documentation were examined. The study consisted of a comparison of the features of each system based on available documentation; a controlled search performed by the investigators on each system and on regular NLM MEDLINE; and a user study based on observations, questionnaires, and interviews with eleven library patrons who performed the same search of their choice on each of the four systems.</description><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Computer User Training</subject><subject>Computerised information retrieval</subject><subject>Computerized information services</subject><subject>Computerized information storage and retrieval</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>Indiana University at Bloomington Libraries</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information processing and retrieval</subject><subject>Information retrieval. Man machine relationship</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Information services</subject><subject>Information storage and retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems - economics</subject><subject>Information work</subject><subject>Libraries, Medical</subject><subject>Magnetic tape</subject><subject>Medical libraries</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>MEDLARS</subject><subject>Online information retrieval</subject><subject>Research process. Evaluation</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>Subject indexing</subject><subject>Technical services</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>University libraries</subject><issn>0025-7338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1Lw0AUzEGptfoThBzEW2C7m_0I6KHUVgtVL3peXrZv20iyqbtJof_eBUPRk6d5vJl5M7yzZEwI5ZlkTF0klyF8EjKVihejZMRoRKbGyf3MpXiAuoeual3a2tS2vU_RbbI-oE_DMXTYhLiNM4I3u8pt05fF43r1urhKzi3UAa8HnCQfy8X7_Dlbvz2t5rN1tqeMdxmlmxwlLRANCiWwYDQvrLVQKMmEAZtLJVXJeCkkL4FijkYA4VaAKHlO2CR5-Lm778sGNwZd56HWe1814I-6hUr_ZVy109v2oCmVU0mj_27w-_arx9DppgoG6xoctn3QUlFGcpH_K-RySgtORBTe_G50qjL8NfK3Aw_BQG09OFOFk0xKxWTM-wa8XoAZ</recordid><startdate>19880401</startdate><enddate>19880401</enddate><creator>BONHAM, M. D</creator><creator>NELSON, L. L</creator><general>Medical Library Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880401</creationdate><title>An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE</title><author>BONHAM, M. D ; NELSON, L. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-22d4e729eece686e93249fffa98736caf47878b35b675ba2e4ec6a05f6a6b5403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Computer User Training</topic><topic>Computerised information retrieval</topic><topic>Computerized information services</topic><topic>Computerized information storage and retrieval</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>Indiana University at Bloomington Libraries</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information processing and retrieval</topic><topic>Information retrieval. Man machine relationship</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Information services</topic><topic>Information storage and retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems - economics</topic><topic>Information work</topic><topic>Libraries, Medical</topic><topic>Magnetic tape</topic><topic>Medical libraries</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>MEDLARS</topic><topic>Online information retrieval</topic><topic>Research process. Evaluation</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>Subject indexing</topic><topic>Technical services</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>University libraries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BONHAM, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NELSON, L. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BONHAM, M. D</au><au>NELSON, L. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association</jtitle><addtitle>Bull Med Libr Assoc</addtitle><date>1988-04-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>171-180</pages><issn>0025-7338</issn><coden>BMLAAG</coden><abstract>This study compared features and determined which of four end-user systems (PaperChase, GRATEFUL MED, Med-Base, or Compact Cambridge: MEDLINE) would best serve the Medical Sciences and Optometry Libraries of Indiana University in providing biomedical information to faculty and graduate students through MEDLINE. Cost, ease of use, retrieval, training needs, equipment requirements, and adequacy of documentation were examined. The study consisted of a comparison of the features of each system based on available documentation; a controlled search performed by the investigators on each system and on regular NLM MEDLINE; and a user study based on observations, questionnaires, and interviews with eleven library patrons who performed the same search of their choice on each of the four systems.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>Medical Library Association</pub><pmid>3285938</pmid><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0025-7338 |
| ispartof | Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 1988-04, Vol.76 (2), p.171-180 |
| issn | 0025-7338 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_227172 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Comparative studies Computer User Training Computerised information retrieval Computerized information services Computerized information storage and retrieval Exact sciences and technology General aspects Indiana Indiana University at Bloomington Libraries Information and communication sciences Information processing and retrieval Information retrieval. Man machine relationship Information science. Documentation Information services Information storage and retrieval Information Systems - economics Information work Libraries, Medical Magnetic tape Medical libraries Medicine MEDLARS Online information retrieval Research process. Evaluation Sciences and techniques of general use Searching Subject indexing Technical services United States University libraries |
| title | An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A16%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20four%20end-user%20systems%20for%20searching%20MEDLINE&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20the%20Medical%20Library%20Association&rft.au=BONHAM,%20M.%20D&rft.date=1988-04-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=171-180&rft.issn=0025-7338&rft.coden=BMLAAG&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E57129506%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57129506&rft_id=info:pmid/3285938&rfr_iscdi=true |