Collection development and outsourcing in academic health sciences libraries : a survey of current practices
Academic health sciences libraries in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding collection development trends, including their effect on approval plan and blanket order use, and use of outsourcing over the past four years. Results of the survey indicate that serials market forces, budgeta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 1999-04, Vol.87 (2), p.178-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 178 |
container_title | Bulletin of the Medical Library Association |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | BLECIC, D. D HOLLANDER, S LANIER, D |
description | Academic health sciences libraries in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding collection development trends, including their effect on approval plan and blanket order use, and use of outsourcing over the past four years. Results of the survey indicate that serials market forces, budgetary constraints, and growth in electronic resources purchasing have resulted in a decline in the acquisition of print items. As a result, approval plan use is being curtailed in many academic health sciences libraries. Although use of blanket orders is more stable, fewer than one-third of academic health sciences libraries report using them currently. The decline of print collections suggests that libraries should explore cooperative collection development of print materials to ensure access and preservation. The decline of approval plan use and the need for cooperative collection development may require additional effort for sound collection development. Libraries were also surveyed about their use of outsourcing. Some libraries reported outsourcing cataloging and shelf preparation of books, but none reported using outsourcing for resource selection. The reason given most often for outsourcing was that it resulted in cost savings. As expected, economic factors are driving both collection development and outsourcing practices. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_226556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69717958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p321t-1ec75572156aeb4b3a8429d81e1dc67faa2136b64341c9fc817487f035fb601b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhntQ3HX1L0gO4m2hSZqkETzI4hcIXvRcpul0N5ImNWkX9t9bcf06eZqBed533mEOsnmeM7FUnJez7Dil1zynqhT6KJvRnFFdKDXP3Co4h2awwZMGt-hC36EfCPiGhHFIYYzG-jWxnoCBBjtryAbBDRuSjEVvMBFn6wjRTt0lAZLGuMUdCS0xY4wfXn2EacFEnmSHLbiEp_u6yF5ub55X98vHp7uH1fXjsueMDkuKRgmhGBUSsC5qDmXBdFNSpI2RqgVglMtaFrygRrempKooVZtz0dYypzVfZFefvv1Yd9iYKUQEV_XRdhB3VQBb_Z14u6nWYVsxJoWQk_5ir4_hbcQ0VJ1NBp0Dj2FMldSKKi3Kf0GhiukOLibw7Hei7yhfj5iA8z0AyYBrI3hj0w-ntOaF5u91mJMP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57457235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collection development and outsourcing in academic health sciences libraries : a survey of current practices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>BLECIC, D. D ; HOLLANDER, S ; LANIER, D</creator><creatorcontrib>BLECIC, D. D ; HOLLANDER, S ; LANIER, D</creatorcontrib><description>Academic health sciences libraries in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding collection development trends, including their effect on approval plan and blanket order use, and use of outsourcing over the past four years. Results of the survey indicate that serials market forces, budgetary constraints, and growth in electronic resources purchasing have resulted in a decline in the acquisition of print items. As a result, approval plan use is being curtailed in many academic health sciences libraries. Although use of blanket orders is more stable, fewer than one-third of academic health sciences libraries report using them currently. The decline of print collections suggests that libraries should explore cooperative collection development of print materials to ensure access and preservation. The decline of approval plan use and the need for cooperative collection development may require additional effort for sound collection development. Libraries were also surveyed about their use of outsourcing. Some libraries reported outsourcing cataloging and shelf preparation of books, but none reported using outsourcing for resource selection. The reason given most often for outsourcing was that it resulted in cost savings. As expected, economic factors are driving both collection development and outsourcing practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10219477</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMLAAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: Medical Library Association</publisher><subject>Acquisition and access: development policy, licenses, censorship ; Budgets ; Canada ; Collection development ; Collection management ; Contracting out ; Exact sciences and technology ; Information and communication sciences ; Information science. Documentation ; Information service management ; Libraries, Medical - economics ; Libraries, Medical - trends ; Library and documentation centre management ; Library Associations ; Library Collection Development - economics ; Library Collection Development - trends ; Library Surveys ; Medical libraries ; Outsourced Services - economics ; Outsourced Services - trends ; Sciences and techniques of general use ; Surveys ; United States ; USA</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 1999-04, Vol.87 (2), p.178-186</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC226556/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC226556/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1799349$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10219477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BLECIC, D. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLLANDER, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANIER, D</creatorcontrib><title>Collection development and outsourcing in academic health sciences libraries : a survey of current practices</title><title>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association</title><addtitle>Bull Med Libr Assoc</addtitle><description>Academic health sciences libraries in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding collection development trends, including their effect on approval plan and blanket order use, and use of outsourcing over the past four years. Results of the survey indicate that serials market forces, budgetary constraints, and growth in electronic resources purchasing have resulted in a decline in the acquisition of print items. As a result, approval plan use is being curtailed in many academic health sciences libraries. Although use of blanket orders is more stable, fewer than one-third of academic health sciences libraries report using them currently. The decline of print collections suggests that libraries should explore cooperative collection development of print materials to ensure access and preservation. The decline of approval plan use and the need for cooperative collection development may require additional effort for sound collection development. Libraries were also surveyed about their use of outsourcing. Some libraries reported outsourcing cataloging and shelf preparation of books, but none reported using outsourcing for resource selection. The reason given most often for outsourcing was that it resulted in cost savings. As expected, economic factors are driving both collection development and outsourcing practices.</description><subject>Acquisition and access: development policy, licenses, censorship</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Collection development</subject><subject>Collection management</subject><subject>Contracting out</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Information service management</subject><subject>Libraries, Medical - economics</subject><subject>Libraries, Medical - trends</subject><subject>Library and documentation centre management</subject><subject>Library Associations</subject><subject>Library Collection Development - economics</subject><subject>Library Collection Development - trends</subject><subject>Library Surveys</subject><subject>Medical libraries</subject><subject>Outsourced Services - economics</subject><subject>Outsourced Services - trends</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0025-7338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhntQ3HX1L0gO4m2hSZqkETzI4hcIXvRcpul0N5ImNWkX9t9bcf06eZqBed533mEOsnmeM7FUnJez7Dil1zynqhT6KJvRnFFdKDXP3Co4h2awwZMGt-hC36EfCPiGhHFIYYzG-jWxnoCBBjtryAbBDRuSjEVvMBFn6wjRTt0lAZLGuMUdCS0xY4wfXn2EacFEnmSHLbiEp_u6yF5ub55X98vHp7uH1fXjsueMDkuKRgmhGBUSsC5qDmXBdFNSpI2RqgVglMtaFrygRrempKooVZtz0dYypzVfZFefvv1Yd9iYKUQEV_XRdhB3VQBb_Z14u6nWYVsxJoWQk_5ir4_hbcQ0VJ1NBp0Dj2FMldSKKi3Kf0GhiukOLibw7Hei7yhfj5iA8z0AyYBrI3hj0w-ntOaF5u91mJMP</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>BLECIC, D. D</creator><creator>HOLLANDER, S</creator><creator>LANIER, D</creator><general>Medical Library Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>Collection development and outsourcing in academic health sciences libraries : a survey of current practices</title><author>BLECIC, D. D ; HOLLANDER, S ; LANIER, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p321t-1ec75572156aeb4b3a8429d81e1dc67faa2136b64341c9fc817487f035fb601b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Acquisition and access: development policy, licenses, censorship</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Collection development</topic><topic>Collection management</topic><topic>Contracting out</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Information service management</topic><topic>Libraries, Medical - economics</topic><topic>Libraries, Medical - trends</topic><topic>Library and documentation centre management</topic><topic>Library Associations</topic><topic>Library Collection Development - economics</topic><topic>Library Collection Development - trends</topic><topic>Library Surveys</topic><topic>Medical libraries</topic><topic>Outsourced Services - economics</topic><topic>Outsourced Services - trends</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BLECIC, D. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLLANDER, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANIER, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BLECIC, D. D</au><au>HOLLANDER, S</au><au>LANIER, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collection development and outsourcing in academic health sciences libraries : a survey of current practices</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association</jtitle><addtitle>Bull Med Libr Assoc</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>178-186</pages><issn>0025-7338</issn><coden>BMLAAG</coden><abstract>Academic health sciences libraries in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding collection development trends, including their effect on approval plan and blanket order use, and use of outsourcing over the past four years. Results of the survey indicate that serials market forces, budgetary constraints, and growth in electronic resources purchasing have resulted in a decline in the acquisition of print items. As a result, approval plan use is being curtailed in many academic health sciences libraries. Although use of blanket orders is more stable, fewer than one-third of academic health sciences libraries report using them currently. The decline of print collections suggests that libraries should explore cooperative collection development of print materials to ensure access and preservation. The decline of approval plan use and the need for cooperative collection development may require additional effort for sound collection development. Libraries were also surveyed about their use of outsourcing. Some libraries reported outsourcing cataloging and shelf preparation of books, but none reported using outsourcing for resource selection. The reason given most often for outsourcing was that it resulted in cost savings. As expected, economic factors are driving both collection development and outsourcing practices.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>Medical Library Association</pub><pmid>10219477</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7338 |
ispartof | Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 1999-04, Vol.87 (2), p.178-186 |
issn | 0025-7338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_226556 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acquisition and access: development policy, licenses, censorship Budgets Canada Collection development Collection management Contracting out Exact sciences and technology Information and communication sciences Information science. Documentation Information service management Libraries, Medical - economics Libraries, Medical - trends Library and documentation centre management Library Associations Library Collection Development - economics Library Collection Development - trends Library Surveys Medical libraries Outsourced Services - economics Outsourced Services - trends Sciences and techniques of general use Surveys United States USA |
title | Collection development and outsourcing in academic health sciences libraries : a survey of current practices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T20%3A46%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collection%20development%20and%20outsourcing%20in%20academic%20health%20sciences%20libraries%20:%20a%20survey%20of%20current%20practices&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20the%20Medical%20Library%20Association&rft.au=BLECIC,%20D.%20D&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=178-186&rft.issn=0025-7338&rft.coden=BMLAAG&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69717958%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57457235&rft_id=info:pmid/10219477&rfr_iscdi=true |