Distinct interaction modes of an AKAP bound to two regulatory subunit isoforms of protein kinase A revealed by amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange

The structure of an AKAP docked to the dimerization/docking (D/D) domain of the type II (RIIα) isoform of protein kinase A (PKA) has been well characterized, but there currently is no detailed structural information of an AKAP docked to the type I (RIα) isoform. Dual‐specific AKAP2 (D‐AKAP2) binds i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Protein science 2005-12, Vol.14 (12), p.2982-2992
Hauptverfasser: Burns‐Hamuro, Lora L., Hamuro, Yoshitomo, Kim, Jack S., Sigala, Paul, Fayos, Rosa, Stranz, David D., Jennings, Patricia A., Taylor, Susan S., Woods, Virgil L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The structure of an AKAP docked to the dimerization/docking (D/D) domain of the type II (RIIα) isoform of protein kinase A (PKA) has been well characterized, but there currently is no detailed structural information of an AKAP docked to the type I (RIα) isoform. Dual‐specific AKAP2 (D‐AKAP2) binds in the nanomolar range to both isoforms and provided us with an opportunity to characterize the isoform‐selective nature of AKAP binding using a common docked ligand. Hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange combined with mass spectrometry (DXMS) was used to probe backbone structural changes of an α‐helical A‐kinase binding (AKB) motif from D‐AKAP2 docked to both RIα and RIIα D/D domains. The region of protection upon complex formation and the magnitude of protection from H/D exchange were determined for both interacting partners in each complex. The backbone of the AKB ligand was more protected when bound to RIα compared to RIIα, suggesting an increased helical stabilization of the docked AKB ligand. This combined with a broader region of backbone protection induced by the AKAP on the docking surface of RIα indicated that there were more binding constraints for the AKB ligand when bound to RIα. This was in contrast to RIIα, which has a preformed, localized binding surface. These distinct modes of AKAP binding may contribute to the more discriminating nature of the RIα AKAP‐docking surface. DXMS provides valuable structural information for understanding binding specificity in the absence of a high‐resolution structure, and can readily be applied to other protein–ligand and protein–protein interactions.
ISSN:0961-8368
1469-896X
DOI:10.1110/ps.051687305