Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans

Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epidemiology and infection 1989-12, Vol.103 (3), p.513-522
1. Verfasser: Ojeniyi, A. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 522
container_issue 3
container_start_page 513
container_title Epidemiology and infection
container_volume 103
creator Ojeniyi, A. A.
description Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contrast, all 576 and 288 E. coli isolates from village fowls and from villagers respectively were sensitive to these drugs. Isolates from birds in a modern university poultry unit (3744) exhibited the same resistance patterns as those isolated from workers who were in direct contact with the birds. No nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli was isolated from farm workers prior to their assignment to the experimental pen. Following experimental oral infection of birds with E. coli K12 J5 NA Lac, the organism was recovered from the workers who manned the experimental pen. Neither before nor after the experimental infection was any nalidixic acid resistant E. coli isolated from workers who manned the pen from which birds used in the experiment were selected. Similarly, no drug resistant organisms were isolated from workers outside the poultry unit of the university or commercial farm. The MIC of the drugs against the avian and human E. coli isolates at the university and commercial poultry farms were similar.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0950268800030910
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2249531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0950268800030910</cupid><jstor_id>3863472</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3863472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-f7b5cdff915b07d90154692a2fdc2bb7df17e04e7013afd00451795e6514fd813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1r1TAYxoM4tuP0DxAc9GJ415nvNDeDuW-ciEyvQ5omOzm2zTFph_vvTTmlbAheBfJ73jfP8wSA9wieIIjEp3soGcS8qiCEBEoEX4EVolyWlEL5GqwmXE78ALxJaZNVEldiH-xjLlG-X4HTCx-tGYoh6j51PiUf-iK44jKZtY3erL0uTGh94WLoim0Y2yE-FUMo1mOXJ96CPafbZN_N5yH4eXX54_ymvPt2fXt-dlcaxsRQOlEz0zgnEauhaCRELLvEGrvG4LoWjUPCQmoFRES7BkLKkJDMcoaoaypEDsHpbu92rDvbGNtnw63aRt_p-KSC9uol6f1aPYRHhTGVjEwLPs4LYvg92jSoHNbYttW9DWNS2RCTDJEsRDuhiSGlaN3yCIJqKl39U3qeOXrubpmYW878eOY6Gd263LXxaZHxCmHBaZZ92Mk2aQhxwaTihAqccbnDPg32z4J1_KW4IIIpfv1dfeVfPt8zXKnJFZmT6K6OvnmwahPG2Od_-k-Wv2DYsXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15459513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contrast, all 576 and 288 E. coli isolates from village fowls and from villagers respectively were sensitive to these drugs. Isolates from birds in a modern university poultry unit (3744) exhibited the same resistance patterns as those isolated from workers who were in direct contact with the birds. No nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli was isolated from farm workers prior to their assignment to the experimental pen. Following experimental oral infection of birds with E. coli K12 J5 NA Lac, the organism was recovered from the workers who manned the experimental pen. Neither before nor after the experimental infection was any nalidixic acid resistant E. coli isolated from workers who manned the pen from which birds used in the experiment were selected. Similarly, no drug resistant organisms were isolated from workers outside the poultry unit of the university or commercial farm. The MIC of the drugs against the avian and human E. coli isolates at the university and commercial poultry farms were similar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-2688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0950268800030910</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2691268</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPINEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibiotics ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Chickens ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Epidemiology ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - classification ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - transmission ; Experimental farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Inoculation ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Microbiology ; Occupational Diseases - microbiology ; Poultry ; Poultry Diseases - microbiology ; Poultry Diseases - transmission ; Streptomycin - pharmacology ; Sulfisoxazole - pharmacology ; Tetracycline Resistance ; Universities ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and infection, 1989-12, Vol.103 (3), p.513-522</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989</rights><rights>Copyright 1989 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-f7b5cdff915b07d90154692a2fdc2bb7df17e04e7013afd00451795e6514fd813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-f7b5cdff915b07d90154692a2fdc2bb7df17e04e7013afd00451795e6514fd813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3863472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3863472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27923,27924,53790,53792,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6812764$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2691268$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans</title><title>Epidemiology and infection</title><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><description>Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contrast, all 576 and 288 E. coli isolates from village fowls and from villagers respectively were sensitive to these drugs. Isolates from birds in a modern university poultry unit (3744) exhibited the same resistance patterns as those isolated from workers who were in direct contact with the birds. No nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli was isolated from farm workers prior to their assignment to the experimental pen. Following experimental oral infection of birds with E. coli K12 J5 NA Lac, the organism was recovered from the workers who manned the experimental pen. Neither before nor after the experimental infection was any nalidixic acid resistant E. coli isolated from workers who manned the pen from which birds used in the experiment were selected. Similarly, no drug resistant organisms were isolated from workers outside the poultry unit of the university or commercial farm. The MIC of the drugs against the avian and human E. coli isolates at the university and commercial poultry farms were similar.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - classification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Experimental farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - transmission</subject><subject>Streptomycin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Sulfisoxazole - pharmacology</subject><subject>Tetracycline Resistance</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>0950-2688</issn><issn>1469-4409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1r1TAYxoM4tuP0DxAc9GJ415nvNDeDuW-ciEyvQ5omOzm2zTFph_vvTTmlbAheBfJ73jfP8wSA9wieIIjEp3soGcS8qiCEBEoEX4EVolyWlEL5GqwmXE78ALxJaZNVEldiH-xjLlG-X4HTCx-tGYoh6j51PiUf-iK44jKZtY3erL0uTGh94WLoim0Y2yE-FUMo1mOXJ96CPafbZN_N5yH4eXX54_ymvPt2fXt-dlcaxsRQOlEz0zgnEauhaCRELLvEGrvG4LoWjUPCQmoFRES7BkLKkJDMcoaoaypEDsHpbu92rDvbGNtnw63aRt_p-KSC9uol6f1aPYRHhTGVjEwLPs4LYvg92jSoHNbYttW9DWNS2RCTDJEsRDuhiSGlaN3yCIJqKl39U3qeOXrubpmYW878eOY6Gd263LXxaZHxCmHBaZZ92Mk2aQhxwaTihAqccbnDPg32z4J1_KW4IIIpfv1dfeVfPt8zXKnJFZmT6K6OvnmwahPG2Od_-k-Wv2DYsXM</recordid><startdate>19891201</startdate><enddate>19891201</enddate><creator>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891201</creationdate><title>Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans</title><author>Ojeniyi, A. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-f7b5cdff915b07d90154692a2fdc2bb7df17e04e7013afd00451795e6514fd813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - classification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Experimental farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - transmission</topic><topic>Streptomycin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Sulfisoxazole - pharmacology</topic><topic>Tetracycline Resistance</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ojeniyi, A. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><date>1989-12-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>513-522</pages><issn>0950-2688</issn><eissn>1469-4409</eissn><coden>EPINEU</coden><abstract>Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contrast, all 576 and 288 E. coli isolates from village fowls and from villagers respectively were sensitive to these drugs. Isolates from birds in a modern university poultry unit (3744) exhibited the same resistance patterns as those isolated from workers who were in direct contact with the birds. No nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli was isolated from farm workers prior to their assignment to the experimental pen. Following experimental oral infection of birds with E. coli K12 J5 NA Lac, the organism was recovered from the workers who manned the experimental pen. Neither before nor after the experimental infection was any nalidixic acid resistant E. coli isolated from workers who manned the pen from which birds used in the experiment were selected. Similarly, no drug resistant organisms were isolated from workers outside the poultry unit of the university or commercial farm. The MIC of the drugs against the avian and human E. coli isolates at the university and commercial poultry farms were similar.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>2691268</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0950268800030910</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-2688
ispartof Epidemiology and infection, 1989-12, Vol.103 (3), p.513-522
issn 0950-2688
1469-4409
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2249531
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Antibiotics
Bacteriology
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Chickens
Drug resistance
Drug Resistance, Microbial
Epidemiology
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli - classification
Escherichia coli - drug effects
Escherichia coli - isolation & purification
Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology
Escherichia coli Infections - transmission
Experimental farms
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Inoculation
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Microbiology
Occupational Diseases - microbiology
Poultry
Poultry Diseases - microbiology
Poultry Diseases - transmission
Streptomycin - pharmacology
Sulfisoxazole - pharmacology
Tetracycline Resistance
Universities
Zoonoses
title Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A14%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20transmission%20of%20Escherichia%20coli%20from%20poultry%20to%20humans&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20infection&rft.au=Ojeniyi,%20A.%20A.&rft.date=1989-12-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=513-522&rft.issn=0950-2688&rft.eissn=1469-4409&rft.coden=EPINEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0950268800030910&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E3863472%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15459513&rft_id=info:pmid/2691268&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0950268800030910&rft_jstor_id=3863472&rfr_iscdi=true