Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans
Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Epidemiology and infection 1989-12, Vol.103 (3), p.513-522 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 513 |
container_title | Epidemiology and infection |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Ojeniyi, A. A. |
description | Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contrast, all 576 and 288 E. coli isolates from village fowls and from villagers respectively were sensitive to these drugs. Isolates from birds in a modern university poultry unit (3744) exhibited the same resistance patterns as those isolated from workers who were in direct contact with the birds. No nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli was isolated from farm workers prior to their assignment to the experimental pen. Following experimental oral infection of birds with E. coli K12 J5 NA Lac, the organism was recovered from the workers who manned the experimental pen. Neither before nor after the experimental infection was any nalidixic acid resistant E. coli isolated from workers who manned the pen from which birds used in the experiment were selected. Similarly, no drug resistant organisms were isolated from workers outside the poultry unit of the university or commercial farm. The MIC of the drugs against the avian and human E. coli isolates at the university and commercial poultry farms were similar. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0950268800030910 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2249531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0950268800030910</cupid><jstor_id>3863472</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3863472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-f7b5cdff915b07d90154692a2fdc2bb7df17e04e7013afd00451795e6514fd813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1r1TAYxoM4tuP0DxAc9GJ415nvNDeDuW-ciEyvQ5omOzm2zTFph_vvTTmlbAheBfJ73jfP8wSA9wieIIjEp3soGcS8qiCEBEoEX4EVolyWlEL5GqwmXE78ALxJaZNVEldiH-xjLlG-X4HTCx-tGYoh6j51PiUf-iK44jKZtY3erL0uTGh94WLoim0Y2yE-FUMo1mOXJ96CPafbZN_N5yH4eXX54_ymvPt2fXt-dlcaxsRQOlEz0zgnEauhaCRELLvEGrvG4LoWjUPCQmoFRES7BkLKkJDMcoaoaypEDsHpbu92rDvbGNtnw63aRt_p-KSC9uol6f1aPYRHhTGVjEwLPs4LYvg92jSoHNbYttW9DWNS2RCTDJEsRDuhiSGlaN3yCIJqKl39U3qeOXrubpmYW878eOY6Gd263LXxaZHxCmHBaZZ92Mk2aQhxwaTihAqccbnDPg32z4J1_KW4IIIpfv1dfeVfPt8zXKnJFZmT6K6OvnmwahPG2Od_-k-Wv2DYsXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15459513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contrast, all 576 and 288 E. coli isolates from village fowls and from villagers respectively were sensitive to these drugs. Isolates from birds in a modern university poultry unit (3744) exhibited the same resistance patterns as those isolated from workers who were in direct contact with the birds. No nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli was isolated from farm workers prior to their assignment to the experimental pen. Following experimental oral infection of birds with E. coli K12 J5 NA Lac, the organism was recovered from the workers who manned the experimental pen. Neither before nor after the experimental infection was any nalidixic acid resistant E. coli isolated from workers who manned the pen from which birds used in the experiment were selected. Similarly, no drug resistant organisms were isolated from workers outside the poultry unit of the university or commercial farm. The MIC of the drugs against the avian and human E. coli isolates at the university and commercial poultry farms were similar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-2688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0950268800030910</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2691268</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPINEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibiotics ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Chickens ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Epidemiology ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - classification ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - isolation & purification ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - transmission ; Experimental farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Inoculation ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Microbiology ; Occupational Diseases - microbiology ; Poultry ; Poultry Diseases - microbiology ; Poultry Diseases - transmission ; Streptomycin - pharmacology ; Sulfisoxazole - pharmacology ; Tetracycline Resistance ; Universities ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and infection, 1989-12, Vol.103 (3), p.513-522</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989</rights><rights>Copyright 1989 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-f7b5cdff915b07d90154692a2fdc2bb7df17e04e7013afd00451795e6514fd813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-f7b5cdff915b07d90154692a2fdc2bb7df17e04e7013afd00451795e6514fd813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3863472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3863472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27923,27924,53790,53792,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6812764$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2691268$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans</title><title>Epidemiology and infection</title><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><description>Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contrast, all 576 and 288 E. coli isolates from village fowls and from villagers respectively were sensitive to these drugs. Isolates from birds in a modern university poultry unit (3744) exhibited the same resistance patterns as those isolated from workers who were in direct contact with the birds. No nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli was isolated from farm workers prior to their assignment to the experimental pen. Following experimental oral infection of birds with E. coli K12 J5 NA Lac, the organism was recovered from the workers who manned the experimental pen. Neither before nor after the experimental infection was any nalidixic acid resistant E. coli isolated from workers who manned the pen from which birds used in the experiment were selected. Similarly, no drug resistant organisms were isolated from workers outside the poultry unit of the university or commercial farm. The MIC of the drugs against the avian and human E. coli isolates at the university and commercial poultry farms were similar.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - classification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Experimental farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - transmission</subject><subject>Streptomycin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Sulfisoxazole - pharmacology</subject><subject>Tetracycline Resistance</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>0950-2688</issn><issn>1469-4409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1r1TAYxoM4tuP0DxAc9GJ415nvNDeDuW-ciEyvQ5omOzm2zTFph_vvTTmlbAheBfJ73jfP8wSA9wieIIjEp3soGcS8qiCEBEoEX4EVolyWlEL5GqwmXE78ALxJaZNVEldiH-xjLlG-X4HTCx-tGYoh6j51PiUf-iK44jKZtY3erL0uTGh94WLoim0Y2yE-FUMo1mOXJ96CPafbZN_N5yH4eXX54_ymvPt2fXt-dlcaxsRQOlEz0zgnEauhaCRELLvEGrvG4LoWjUPCQmoFRES7BkLKkJDMcoaoaypEDsHpbu92rDvbGNtnw63aRt_p-KSC9uol6f1aPYRHhTGVjEwLPs4LYvg92jSoHNbYttW9DWNS2RCTDJEsRDuhiSGlaN3yCIJqKl39U3qeOXrubpmYW878eOY6Gd263LXxaZHxCmHBaZZ92Mk2aQhxwaTihAqccbnDPg32z4J1_KW4IIIpfv1dfeVfPt8zXKnJFZmT6K6OvnmwahPG2Od_-k-Wv2DYsXM</recordid><startdate>19891201</startdate><enddate>19891201</enddate><creator>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891201</creationdate><title>Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans</title><author>Ojeniyi, A. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-f7b5cdff915b07d90154692a2fdc2bb7df17e04e7013afd00451795e6514fd813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - classification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Experimental farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - transmission</topic><topic>Streptomycin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Sulfisoxazole - pharmacology</topic><topic>Tetracycline Resistance</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ojeniyi, A. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ojeniyi, A. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><date>1989-12-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>513-522</pages><issn>0950-2688</issn><eissn>1469-4409</eissn><coden>EPINEU</coden><abstract>Eight hundred and sixty-four Escherichia coli isolates from workers at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Poultry Farm, and 216 isolates from poultry attendants at a commercial poultry farm in the city were found to be resistant to streptomycin, sulphafurazole and tetracycline. In contrast, all 576 and 288 E. coli isolates from village fowls and from villagers respectively were sensitive to these drugs. Isolates from birds in a modern university poultry unit (3744) exhibited the same resistance patterns as those isolated from workers who were in direct contact with the birds. No nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli was isolated from farm workers prior to their assignment to the experimental pen. Following experimental oral infection of birds with E. coli K12 J5 NA Lac, the organism was recovered from the workers who manned the experimental pen. Neither before nor after the experimental infection was any nalidixic acid resistant E. coli isolated from workers who manned the pen from which birds used in the experiment were selected. Similarly, no drug resistant organisms were isolated from workers outside the poultry unit of the university or commercial farm. The MIC of the drugs against the avian and human E. coli isolates at the university and commercial poultry farms were similar.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>2691268</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0950268800030910</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-2688 |
ispartof | Epidemiology and infection, 1989-12, Vol.103 (3), p.513-522 |
issn | 0950-2688 1469-4409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2249531 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Antibiotics Bacteriology Biological and medical sciences Birds Chickens Drug resistance Drug Resistance, Microbial Epidemiology Escherichia coli Escherichia coli - classification Escherichia coli - drug effects Escherichia coli - isolation & purification Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology Escherichia coli Infections - transmission Experimental farms Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Inoculation Microbial Sensitivity Tests Microbiology Occupational Diseases - microbiology Poultry Poultry Diseases - microbiology Poultry Diseases - transmission Streptomycin - pharmacology Sulfisoxazole - pharmacology Tetracycline Resistance Universities Zoonoses |
title | Direct transmission of Escherichia coli from poultry to humans |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A14%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20transmission%20of%20Escherichia%20coli%20from%20poultry%20to%20humans&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20infection&rft.au=Ojeniyi,%20A.%20A.&rft.date=1989-12-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=513-522&rft.issn=0950-2688&rft.eissn=1469-4409&rft.coden=EPINEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0950268800030910&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E3863472%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15459513&rft_id=info:pmid/2691268&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0950268800030910&rft_jstor_id=3863472&rfr_iscdi=true |