Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence

Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychologia 2008, Vol.46 (1), p.3-11
Hauptverfasser: Richards, Lorie G., Stewart, Kim C., Woodbury, Michelle L., Senesac, Claudia, Cauraugh, James H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 46
creator Richards, Lorie G.
Stewart, Kim C.
Woodbury, Michelle L.
Senesac, Claudia
Cauraugh, James H.
description Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have studied changes in the primary sensorimotor cortex with motor rehabilitation. Whether changes in engagement in the sensorimotor cortex occur in humans after stroke currently is an area of much interest. The present study conducted a meta-analysis on stroke studies examining changes in neural representations following therapy specifically targeting the upper extremity to determine if rehabilitation-related motor recovery is associated with neural plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere. Twenty-eight studies investigating upper extremity neural representations (e.g., TMS, fMRI, PET, or SPECT) were identified, and 13 met inclusion criteria as upper extremity intervention training studies. Common outcome variables representing changes in the primary motor and sensorimotor cortices were used in calculating standardized effect sizes for each study. The primary fixed effects model meta-analysis revealed a large overall effect size (ES = 0.84, S.D. = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.76–0.93). Moreover, a fail-safe analysis indicated that 42 null effect studies would be necessary to lower the overall effect size to an insignificant level. These results indicate that neural changes in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere accompany functional paretic upper extremity motor gains achieved with targeted rehabilitation interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2248459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ918283</ericid><els_id>S0028393207002965</els_id><sourcerecordid>70243611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4923-b7accc606740518c1bec63a9b651aa0843b203d267b4f9e18448c512637f3d8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyCUC70l9VcShwNSVZV-qCskKGdr4kxaL0m8tbOL8u_xttEWeurJI7-v3xnPQ8gRoxmjrDheZQNuvFuHydy5zt1ayDilZUZVRpl4RRZMlSIVOZOvyYJSrlJRCX5A3oWwopTKnKu35ICVVSwruSD10m2xx2FMG1zj0MQqCaN3vzHxaKLmpy_JSRKmMGIPozXxemvxTwJDk_Q4QgoDdFOwIXFtcrP8-SC0yx-XSfTFOIPvyZsWuoAf5vOQ_Pp2dnN6kV5_P788PblOjay4SOsSjDEFLUpJc6YMq9EUAqq6yBkAVVLUnIqGF2Ut2wqZklKZnPFClK1oFIhD8vUxd72pe2xM_IqHTq-97cFP2oHV_yuDvdO3bqs5lypuIwYczQHe3W8wjLq3wWDXwYBuE3RJuRQFY0-djHcheGz3TRjVO0x6pZ9j0jtMmiodMcWAT_-O-vR85hINn2cDBANd62EwNux9MUuUsU_0fXz0obdmL59dVUxxtetzMctx7xGb18HYHZPGRrqjbpx96ch_Aac_xlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70243611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Richards, Lorie G. ; Stewart, Kim C. ; Woodbury, Michelle L. ; Senesac, Claudia ; Cauraugh, James H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Richards, Lorie G. ; Stewart, Kim C. ; Woodbury, Michelle L. ; Senesac, Claudia ; Cauraugh, James H.</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have studied changes in the primary sensorimotor cortex with motor rehabilitation. Whether changes in engagement in the sensorimotor cortex occur in humans after stroke currently is an area of much interest. The present study conducted a meta-analysis on stroke studies examining changes in neural representations following therapy specifically targeting the upper extremity to determine if rehabilitation-related motor recovery is associated with neural plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere. Twenty-eight studies investigating upper extremity neural representations (e.g., TMS, fMRI, PET, or SPECT) were identified, and 13 met inclusion criteria as upper extremity intervention training studies. Common outcome variables representing changes in the primary motor and sensorimotor cortices were used in calculating standardized effect sizes for each study. The primary fixed effects model meta-analysis revealed a large overall effect size (ES = 0.84, S.D. = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.76–0.93). Moreover, a fail-safe analysis indicated that 42 null effect studies would be necessary to lower the overall effect size to an insignificant level. These results indicate that neural changes in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere accompany functional paretic upper extremity motor gains achieved with targeted rehabilitation interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17904594</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain ; Brain Hemisphere Functions ; Cerebral Cortex - blood supply ; Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology ; Diagnostic Tests ; Effect Size ; fMRI ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medical sciences ; Meta Analysis ; Motor recovery ; Movement - physiology ; Neural plasticity ; Neurological Impairments ; Neurology ; Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychomotor Skills ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; PubMed - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Rehabilitation ; Stroke ; Stroke - pathology ; Stroke - physiopathology ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Therapy ; TMS ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2008, Vol.46 (1), p.3-11</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4923-b7accc606740518c1bec63a9b651aa0843b203d267b4f9e18448c512637f3d8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4923-b7accc606740518c1bec63a9b651aa0843b203d267b4f9e18448c512637f3d8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393207002965$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ918283$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20037016$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17904594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richards, Lorie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Kim C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, Michelle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senesac, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauraugh, James H.</creatorcontrib><title>Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have studied changes in the primary sensorimotor cortex with motor rehabilitation. Whether changes in engagement in the sensorimotor cortex occur in humans after stroke currently is an area of much interest. The present study conducted a meta-analysis on stroke studies examining changes in neural representations following therapy specifically targeting the upper extremity to determine if rehabilitation-related motor recovery is associated with neural plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere. Twenty-eight studies investigating upper extremity neural representations (e.g., TMS, fMRI, PET, or SPECT) were identified, and 13 met inclusion criteria as upper extremity intervention training studies. Common outcome variables representing changes in the primary motor and sensorimotor cortices were used in calculating standardized effect sizes for each study. The primary fixed effects model meta-analysis revealed a large overall effect size (ES = 0.84, S.D. = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.76–0.93). Moreover, a fail-safe analysis indicated that 42 null effect studies would be necessary to lower the overall effect size to an insignificant level. These results indicate that neural changes in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere accompany functional paretic upper extremity motor gains achieved with targeted rehabilitation interventions.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Hemisphere Functions</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - blood supply</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Motor recovery</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Neural plasticity</subject><subject>Neurological Impairments</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychomotor Skills</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>PubMed - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - pathology</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>TMS</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</subject><subject>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyCUC70l9VcShwNSVZV-qCskKGdr4kxaL0m8tbOL8u_xttEWeurJI7-v3xnPQ8gRoxmjrDheZQNuvFuHydy5zt1ayDilZUZVRpl4RRZMlSIVOZOvyYJSrlJRCX5A3oWwopTKnKu35ICVVSwruSD10m2xx2FMG1zj0MQqCaN3vzHxaKLmpy_JSRKmMGIPozXxemvxTwJDk_Q4QgoDdFOwIXFtcrP8-SC0yx-XSfTFOIPvyZsWuoAf5vOQ_Pp2dnN6kV5_P788PblOjay4SOsSjDEFLUpJc6YMq9EUAqq6yBkAVVLUnIqGF2Ut2wqZklKZnPFClK1oFIhD8vUxd72pe2xM_IqHTq-97cFP2oHV_yuDvdO3bqs5lypuIwYczQHe3W8wjLq3wWDXwYBuE3RJuRQFY0-djHcheGz3TRjVO0x6pZ9j0jtMmiodMcWAT_-O-vR85hINn2cDBANd62EwNux9MUuUsU_0fXz0obdmL59dVUxxtetzMctx7xGb18HYHZPGRrqjbpx96ch_Aac_xlc</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Richards, Lorie G.</creator><creator>Stewart, Kim C.</creator><creator>Woodbury, Michelle L.</creator><creator>Senesac, Claudia</creator><creator>Cauraugh, James H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence</title><author>Richards, Lorie G. ; Stewart, Kim C. ; Woodbury, Michelle L. ; Senesac, Claudia ; Cauraugh, James H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4923-b7accc606740518c1bec63a9b651aa0843b203d267b4f9e18448c512637f3d8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Hemisphere Functions</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - blood supply</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Motor recovery</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Neural plasticity</topic><topic>Neurological Impairments</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychomotor Skills</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>PubMed - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - pathology</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>TMS</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</topic><topic>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richards, Lorie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Kim C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, Michelle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senesac, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauraugh, James H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richards, Lorie G.</au><au>Stewart, Kim C.</au><au>Woodbury, Michelle L.</au><au>Senesac, Claudia</au><au>Cauraugh, James H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ918283</ericid><atitle>Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>3-11</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><coden>NUPSA6</coden><abstract>Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have studied changes in the primary sensorimotor cortex with motor rehabilitation. Whether changes in engagement in the sensorimotor cortex occur in humans after stroke currently is an area of much interest. The present study conducted a meta-analysis on stroke studies examining changes in neural representations following therapy specifically targeting the upper extremity to determine if rehabilitation-related motor recovery is associated with neural plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere. Twenty-eight studies investigating upper extremity neural representations (e.g., TMS, fMRI, PET, or SPECT) were identified, and 13 met inclusion criteria as upper extremity intervention training studies. Common outcome variables representing changes in the primary motor and sensorimotor cortices were used in calculating standardized effect sizes for each study. The primary fixed effects model meta-analysis revealed a large overall effect size (ES = 0.84, S.D. = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.76–0.93). Moreover, a fail-safe analysis indicated that 42 null effect studies would be necessary to lower the overall effect size to an insignificant level. These results indicate that neural changes in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere accompany functional paretic upper extremity motor gains achieved with targeted rehabilitation interventions.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17904594</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.013</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 2008, Vol.46 (1), p.3-11
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2248459
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
Brain
Brain Hemisphere Functions
Cerebral Cortex - blood supply
Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology
Diagnostic Tests
Effect Size
fMRI
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical sciences
Meta Analysis
Motor recovery
Movement - physiology
Neural plasticity
Neurological Impairments
Neurology
Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychomotor Skills
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
PubMed - statistics & numerical data
Recovery of Function - physiology
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Stroke - pathology
Stroke - physiopathology
Stroke Rehabilitation
Therapy
TMS
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system
title Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T17%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Movement-dependent%20stroke%20recovery:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20TMS%20and%20fMRI%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Richards,%20Lorie%20G.&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=3-11&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft.coden=NUPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70243611%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70243611&rft_id=info:pmid/17904594&rft_ericid=EJ918283&rft_els_id=S0028393207002965&rfr_iscdi=true