Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence
Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuropsychologia 2008, Vol.46 (1), p.3-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Neuropsychologia |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Richards, Lorie G. Stewart, Kim C. Woodbury, Michelle L. Senesac, Claudia Cauraugh, James H. |
description | Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have studied changes in the primary sensorimotor cortex with motor rehabilitation. Whether changes in engagement in the sensorimotor cortex occur in humans after stroke currently is an area of much interest. The present study conducted a meta-analysis on stroke studies examining changes in neural representations following therapy specifically targeting the upper extremity to determine if rehabilitation-related motor recovery is associated with neural plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere. Twenty-eight studies investigating upper extremity neural representations (e.g., TMS, fMRI, PET, or SPECT) were identified, and 13 met inclusion criteria as upper extremity intervention training studies. Common outcome variables representing changes in the primary motor and sensorimotor cortices were used in calculating standardized effect sizes for each study. The primary fixed effects model meta-analysis revealed a large overall effect size (ES
=
0.84, S.D.
=
0.15, 95% CI
=
0.76–0.93). Moreover, a fail-safe analysis indicated that 42 null effect studies would be necessary to lower the overall effect size to an insignificant level. These results indicate that neural changes in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere accompany functional paretic upper extremity motor gains achieved with targeted rehabilitation interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2248459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ918283</ericid><els_id>S0028393207002965</els_id><sourcerecordid>70243611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4923-b7accc606740518c1bec63a9b651aa0843b203d267b4f9e18448c512637f3d8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyCUC70l9VcShwNSVZV-qCskKGdr4kxaL0m8tbOL8u_xttEWeurJI7-v3xnPQ8gRoxmjrDheZQNuvFuHydy5zt1ayDilZUZVRpl4RRZMlSIVOZOvyYJSrlJRCX5A3oWwopTKnKu35ICVVSwruSD10m2xx2FMG1zj0MQqCaN3vzHxaKLmpy_JSRKmMGIPozXxemvxTwJDk_Q4QgoDdFOwIXFtcrP8-SC0yx-XSfTFOIPvyZsWuoAf5vOQ_Pp2dnN6kV5_P788PblOjay4SOsSjDEFLUpJc6YMq9EUAqq6yBkAVVLUnIqGF2Ut2wqZklKZnPFClK1oFIhD8vUxd72pe2xM_IqHTq-97cFP2oHV_yuDvdO3bqs5lypuIwYczQHe3W8wjLq3wWDXwYBuE3RJuRQFY0-djHcheGz3TRjVO0x6pZ9j0jtMmiodMcWAT_-O-vR85hINn2cDBANd62EwNux9MUuUsU_0fXz0obdmL59dVUxxtetzMctx7xGb18HYHZPGRrqjbpx96ch_Aac_xlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70243611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Richards, Lorie G. ; Stewart, Kim C. ; Woodbury, Michelle L. ; Senesac, Claudia ; Cauraugh, James H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Richards, Lorie G. ; Stewart, Kim C. ; Woodbury, Michelle L. ; Senesac, Claudia ; Cauraugh, James H.</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have studied changes in the primary sensorimotor cortex with motor rehabilitation. Whether changes in engagement in the sensorimotor cortex occur in humans after stroke currently is an area of much interest. The present study conducted a meta-analysis on stroke studies examining changes in neural representations following therapy specifically targeting the upper extremity to determine if rehabilitation-related motor recovery is associated with neural plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere. Twenty-eight studies investigating upper extremity neural representations (e.g., TMS, fMRI, PET, or SPECT) were identified, and 13 met inclusion criteria as upper extremity intervention training studies. Common outcome variables representing changes in the primary motor and sensorimotor cortices were used in calculating standardized effect sizes for each study. The primary fixed effects model meta-analysis revealed a large overall effect size (ES
=
0.84, S.D.
=
0.15, 95% CI
=
0.76–0.93). Moreover, a fail-safe analysis indicated that 42 null effect studies would be necessary to lower the overall effect size to an insignificant level. These results indicate that neural changes in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere accompany functional paretic upper extremity motor gains achieved with targeted rehabilitation interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17904594</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain ; Brain Hemisphere Functions ; Cerebral Cortex - blood supply ; Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology ; Diagnostic Tests ; Effect Size ; fMRI ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medical sciences ; Meta Analysis ; Motor recovery ; Movement - physiology ; Neural plasticity ; Neurological Impairments ; Neurology ; Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychomotor Skills ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; PubMed - statistics & numerical data ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Rehabilitation ; Stroke ; Stroke - pathology ; Stroke - physiopathology ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Therapy ; TMS ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2008, Vol.46 (1), p.3-11</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4923-b7accc606740518c1bec63a9b651aa0843b203d267b4f9e18448c512637f3d8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4923-b7accc606740518c1bec63a9b651aa0843b203d267b4f9e18448c512637f3d8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393207002965$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ918283$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20037016$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17904594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richards, Lorie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Kim C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, Michelle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senesac, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauraugh, James H.</creatorcontrib><title>Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have studied changes in the primary sensorimotor cortex with motor rehabilitation. Whether changes in engagement in the sensorimotor cortex occur in humans after stroke currently is an area of much interest. The present study conducted a meta-analysis on stroke studies examining changes in neural representations following therapy specifically targeting the upper extremity to determine if rehabilitation-related motor recovery is associated with neural plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere. Twenty-eight studies investigating upper extremity neural representations (e.g., TMS, fMRI, PET, or SPECT) were identified, and 13 met inclusion criteria as upper extremity intervention training studies. Common outcome variables representing changes in the primary motor and sensorimotor cortices were used in calculating standardized effect sizes for each study. The primary fixed effects model meta-analysis revealed a large overall effect size (ES
=
0.84, S.D.
=
0.15, 95% CI
=
0.76–0.93). Moreover, a fail-safe analysis indicated that 42 null effect studies would be necessary to lower the overall effect size to an insignificant level. These results indicate that neural changes in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere accompany functional paretic upper extremity motor gains achieved with targeted rehabilitation interventions.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Hemisphere Functions</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - blood supply</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Motor recovery</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Neural plasticity</subject><subject>Neurological Impairments</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychomotor Skills</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>PubMed - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - pathology</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>TMS</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</subject><subject>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyCUC70l9VcShwNSVZV-qCskKGdr4kxaL0m8tbOL8u_xttEWeurJI7-v3xnPQ8gRoxmjrDheZQNuvFuHydy5zt1ayDilZUZVRpl4RRZMlSIVOZOvyYJSrlJRCX5A3oWwopTKnKu35ICVVSwruSD10m2xx2FMG1zj0MQqCaN3vzHxaKLmpy_JSRKmMGIPozXxemvxTwJDk_Q4QgoDdFOwIXFtcrP8-SC0yx-XSfTFOIPvyZsWuoAf5vOQ_Pp2dnN6kV5_P788PblOjay4SOsSjDEFLUpJc6YMq9EUAqq6yBkAVVLUnIqGF2Ut2wqZklKZnPFClK1oFIhD8vUxd72pe2xM_IqHTq-97cFP2oHV_yuDvdO3bqs5lypuIwYczQHe3W8wjLq3wWDXwYBuE3RJuRQFY0-djHcheGz3TRjVO0x6pZ9j0jtMmiodMcWAT_-O-vR85hINn2cDBANd62EwNux9MUuUsU_0fXz0obdmL59dVUxxtetzMctx7xGb18HYHZPGRrqjbpx96ch_Aac_xlc</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Richards, Lorie G.</creator><creator>Stewart, Kim C.</creator><creator>Woodbury, Michelle L.</creator><creator>Senesac, Claudia</creator><creator>Cauraugh, James H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence</title><author>Richards, Lorie G. ; Stewart, Kim C. ; Woodbury, Michelle L. ; Senesac, Claudia ; Cauraugh, James H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4923-b7accc606740518c1bec63a9b651aa0843b203d267b4f9e18448c512637f3d8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Hemisphere Functions</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - blood supply</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Motor recovery</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Neural plasticity</topic><topic>Neurological Impairments</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychomotor Skills</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>PubMed - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - pathology</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>TMS</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</topic><topic>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richards, Lorie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Kim C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, Michelle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senesac, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauraugh, James H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richards, Lorie G.</au><au>Stewart, Kim C.</au><au>Woodbury, Michelle L.</au><au>Senesac, Claudia</au><au>Cauraugh, James H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ918283</ericid><atitle>Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>3-11</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><coden>NUPSA6</coden><abstract>Evidence indicates that experience-dependent cortical plasticity underlies post-stroke motor recovery of the impaired upper extremity. Motor skill learning in neurologically intact individuals is thought to involve the primary motor cortex, and the majority of studies in the animal literature have studied changes in the primary sensorimotor cortex with motor rehabilitation. Whether changes in engagement in the sensorimotor cortex occur in humans after stroke currently is an area of much interest. The present study conducted a meta-analysis on stroke studies examining changes in neural representations following therapy specifically targeting the upper extremity to determine if rehabilitation-related motor recovery is associated with neural plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere. Twenty-eight studies investigating upper extremity neural representations (e.g., TMS, fMRI, PET, or SPECT) were identified, and 13 met inclusion criteria as upper extremity intervention training studies. Common outcome variables representing changes in the primary motor and sensorimotor cortices were used in calculating standardized effect sizes for each study. The primary fixed effects model meta-analysis revealed a large overall effect size (ES
=
0.84, S.D.
=
0.15, 95% CI
=
0.76–0.93). Moreover, a fail-safe analysis indicated that 42 null effect studies would be necessary to lower the overall effect size to an insignificant level. These results indicate that neural changes in the sensorimotor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere accompany functional paretic upper extremity motor gains achieved with targeted rehabilitation interventions.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17904594</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.013</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-3932 |
ispartof | Neuropsychologia, 2008, Vol.46 (1), p.3-11 |
issn | 0028-3932 1873-3514 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2248459 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Brain Brain Hemisphere Functions Cerebral Cortex - blood supply Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology Diagnostic Tests Effect Size fMRI Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Medical sciences Meta Analysis Motor recovery Movement - physiology Neural plasticity Neurological Impairments Neurology Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychomotor Skills Psychopathology. Psychiatry PubMed - statistics & numerical data Recovery of Function - physiology Rehabilitation Stroke Stroke - pathology Stroke - physiopathology Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy TMS Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system |
title | Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T17%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Movement-dependent%20stroke%20recovery:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20TMS%20and%20fMRI%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Richards,%20Lorie%20G.&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=3-11&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft.coden=NUPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70243611%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70243611&rft_id=info:pmid/17904594&rft_ericid=EJ918283&rft_els_id=S0028393207002965&rfr_iscdi=true |