Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies

Computer-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are often implemented at a cluster level, but standard statistical methods for sample estimation and analysis may not be appropriate for such studies. This review aims to determine whether the design and analysis methods of cluster-based studi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings - AMIA Symposium 2000, p.146-150
Hauptverfasser: Chuang, J H, Hripcsak, G, Jenders, R A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue
container_start_page 146
container_title Proceedings - AMIA Symposium
container_volume
creator Chuang, J H
Hripcsak, G
Jenders, R A
description Computer-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are often implemented at a cluster level, but standard statistical methods for sample estimation and analysis may not be appropriate for such studies. This review aims to determine whether the design and analysis methods of cluster-based studies were adequately addressed in reports of CDSS studies. We retrieved 61 reports of the CDSS controlled trials and identified 24 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, none included sample size calculations that allowed for clustering, while 14 (58%) took account of clustering in the analysis. Although there is increasing recognition of the methodological issues associated with cluster design in health care, many medical informaticians are still not aware of these issues. Investigators should publish estimates of the intracluster correlation coefficients and variance components in their reports to guide the planning of the future studies.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2244041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72532140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p262t-2533393b0fc5774926c755f022f198b50d7865e6a0aa4ed5e933ec43d0730dde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhnNQbK3-BcnJ20I-98ODIMUvKHhREDws2WS2jewma5Kt9N-71Cp6mmHed553mCM0p5LTLCfydYZOY3wnJCdVSU7QjFJSVGXO5uht6V20BoJ1a6y7MaZ9e4UV7iFtvPGdX1utOhxga-ET-3ayWbcfGdA2Wu9wHIfBh4TjbtrvcUyjsRDP0HGrugjnh7pAL3e3z8uHbPV0_7i8WWUDy1nKmOScV7whrZZFISqW60LKljDW0qpsJDFFmUvIFVFKgJFQcQ5acEMKTowBvkDX39xhbHowGlwKqquHYHsVdrVXtv6vOLup135bMyYEEXQCXB4AwX-MEFPd26ih65QDP8a6mE5kVJDJePE36Tfi55_8C1SMc3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72532140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chuang, J H ; Hripcsak, G ; Jenders, R A</creator><creatorcontrib>Chuang, J H ; Hripcsak, G ; Jenders, R A</creatorcontrib><description>Computer-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are often implemented at a cluster level, but standard statistical methods for sample estimation and analysis may not be appropriate for such studies. This review aims to determine whether the design and analysis methods of cluster-based studies were adequately addressed in reports of CDSS studies. We retrieved 61 reports of the CDSS controlled trials and identified 24 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, none included sample size calculations that allowed for clustering, while 14 (58%) took account of clustering in the analysis. Although there is increasing recognition of the methodological issues associated with cluster design in health care, many medical informaticians are still not aware of these issues. Investigators should publish estimates of the intracluster correlation coefficients and variance components in their reports to guide the planning of the future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-605X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11079862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Informatics Association</publisher><subject>Cluster Analysis ; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Linear Models ; Logistic Models</subject><ispartof>Proceedings - AMIA Symposium, 2000, p.146-150</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2244041/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2244041/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4009,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11079862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chuang, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hripcsak, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenders, R A</creatorcontrib><title>Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies</title><title>Proceedings - AMIA Symposium</title><addtitle>Proc AMIA Symp</addtitle><description>Computer-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are often implemented at a cluster level, but standard statistical methods for sample estimation and analysis may not be appropriate for such studies. This review aims to determine whether the design and analysis methods of cluster-based studies were adequately addressed in reports of CDSS studies. We retrieved 61 reports of the CDSS controlled trials and identified 24 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, none included sample size calculations that allowed for clustering, while 14 (58%) took account of clustering in the analysis. Although there is increasing recognition of the methodological issues associated with cluster design in health care, many medical informaticians are still not aware of these issues. Investigators should publish estimates of the intracluster correlation coefficients and variance components in their reports to guide the planning of the future studies.</description><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><issn>1531-605X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhnNQbK3-BcnJ20I-98ODIMUvKHhREDws2WS2jewma5Kt9N-71Cp6mmHed553mCM0p5LTLCfydYZOY3wnJCdVSU7QjFJSVGXO5uht6V20BoJ1a6y7MaZ9e4UV7iFtvPGdX1utOhxga-ET-3ayWbcfGdA2Wu9wHIfBh4TjbtrvcUyjsRDP0HGrugjnh7pAL3e3z8uHbPV0_7i8WWUDy1nKmOScV7whrZZFISqW60LKljDW0qpsJDFFmUvIFVFKgJFQcQ5acEMKTowBvkDX39xhbHowGlwKqquHYHsVdrVXtv6vOLup135bMyYEEXQCXB4AwX-MEFPd26ih65QDP8a6mE5kVJDJePE36Tfi55_8C1SMc3Q</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Chuang, J H</creator><creator>Hripcsak, G</creator><creator>Jenders, R A</creator><general>American Medical Informatics Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies</title><author>Chuang, J H ; Hripcsak, G ; Jenders, R A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p262t-2533393b0fc5774926c755f022f198b50d7865e6a0aa4ed5e933ec43d0730dde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chuang, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hripcsak, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenders, R A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings - AMIA Symposium</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chuang, J H</au><au>Hripcsak, G</au><au>Jenders, R A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings - AMIA Symposium</jtitle><addtitle>Proc AMIA Symp</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><spage>146</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>146-150</pages><issn>1531-605X</issn><abstract>Computer-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are often implemented at a cluster level, but standard statistical methods for sample estimation and analysis may not be appropriate for such studies. This review aims to determine whether the design and analysis methods of cluster-based studies were adequately addressed in reports of CDSS studies. We retrieved 61 reports of the CDSS controlled trials and identified 24 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, none included sample size calculations that allowed for clustering, while 14 (58%) took account of clustering in the analysis. Although there is increasing recognition of the methodological issues associated with cluster design in health care, many medical informaticians are still not aware of these issues. Investigators should publish estimates of the intracluster correlation coefficients and variance components in their reports to guide the planning of the future studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Informatics Association</pub><pmid>11079862</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1531-605X
ispartof Proceedings - AMIA Symposium, 2000, p.146-150
issn 1531-605X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2244041
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Cluster Analysis
Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
Decision Support Systems, Clinical
Linear Models
Logistic Models
title Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T13%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Considering%20clustering:%20a%20methodological%20review%20of%20clinical%20decision%20support%20system%20studies&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20-%20AMIA%20Symposium&rft.au=Chuang,%20J%20H&rft.date=2000&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=146-150&rft.issn=1531-605X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72532140%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72532140&rft_id=info:pmid/11079862&rfr_iscdi=true