The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study

The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care (London, England) England), 2007-01, Vol.11 Suppl 5 (Suppl 5), p.S4-S4
Hauptverfasser: Vangerow, Burkhard, Shorr, Andrew F, Wyncoll, Duncan, Janes, Jonathan, Nelson, David R, Reinhart, Konrad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S4
container_issue Suppl 5
container_start_page S4
container_title Critical care (London, England)
container_volume 11 Suppl 5
creator Vangerow, Burkhard
Shorr, Andrew F
Wyncoll, Duncan
Janes, Jonathan
Nelson, David R
Reinhart, Konrad
description The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 mug/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/cc6155
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2230608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70098942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-61ff62788e7dced8a33ec40a037ad4676163d9d4296a856019b55d3fb6e514f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtP3DAQha0KVC4tPwFFPPQt4OvE5gGp2nKTVqVqtxJvlpM4rFESp3YC2n9Pll2xgIT65LHmzDdHZxA6IPiYEAknRQFEiE9ol3CAFLC63RprBjyVgokdtBfjPcYkk8A-ox0iKShQZBddzuY26YLvrWuTSdKZfv5oFqeJa7raFaZ3vo1J5UPSj7rSRnfXJr56_v0-__Pr5uePJPZDufiCtitTR_t1_e6jvxfns8lVOr25vJ58n6Y5z2ifAqkqoJmUNisLW0rDmC04NphlpuSQAQFWqpJTBUYKwETlQpSsysEKwivK9tHZitsNeWNHRtsHU-suuMaEhfbG6bed1s31nX_QlDIMWI4AtQLkzn8AeNspfKNX6Y6z39bLg_832NjrxsXC1rVprR-izjBWUnH6XyHFDBinS-LRO-G9H0I7JqiJElwsXW9oRfAxBlu9uCVYL6-_8Xf4OpyNbH1u9gTi9apK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195452230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Vangerow, Burkhard ; Shorr, Andrew F ; Wyncoll, Duncan ; Janes, Jonathan ; Nelson, David R ; Reinhart, Konrad</creator><creatorcontrib>Vangerow, Burkhard ; Shorr, Andrew F ; Wyncoll, Duncan ; Janes, Jonathan ; Nelson, David R ; Reinhart, Konrad</creatorcontrib><description>The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 mug/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc6155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18269691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts</publisher><subject>Biomarkers - blood ; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Protein C - administration &amp; dosage ; Protein C - analysis ; Recombinant Proteins - administration &amp; dosage ; Recombinant Proteins - blood ; Research Design ; Review ; Sepsis - blood ; Sepsis - drug therapy ; Sepsis - mortality ; Survival Analysis ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2007-01, Vol.11 Suppl 5 (Suppl 5), p.S4-S4</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts 2007</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd 2007 BioMed Central Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-61ff62788e7dced8a33ec40a037ad4676163d9d4296a856019b55d3fb6e514f23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2230608/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2230608/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18269691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vangerow, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorr, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyncoll, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janes, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Konrad</creatorcontrib><title>The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 mug/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA.</description><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Protein C - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Protein C - analysis</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sepsis - blood</subject><subject>Sepsis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Sepsis - mortality</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtP3DAQha0KVC4tPwFFPPQt4OvE5gGp2nKTVqVqtxJvlpM4rFESp3YC2n9Pll2xgIT65LHmzDdHZxA6IPiYEAknRQFEiE9ol3CAFLC63RprBjyVgokdtBfjPcYkk8A-ox0iKShQZBddzuY26YLvrWuTSdKZfv5oFqeJa7raFaZ3vo1J5UPSj7rSRnfXJr56_v0-__Pr5uePJPZDufiCtitTR_t1_e6jvxfns8lVOr25vJ58n6Y5z2ifAqkqoJmUNisLW0rDmC04NphlpuSQAQFWqpJTBUYKwETlQpSsysEKwivK9tHZitsNeWNHRtsHU-suuMaEhfbG6bed1s31nX_QlDIMWI4AtQLkzn8AeNspfKNX6Y6z39bLg_832NjrxsXC1rVprR-izjBWUnH6XyHFDBinS-LRO-G9H0I7JqiJElwsXW9oRfAxBlu9uCVYL6-_8Xf4OpyNbH1u9gTi9apK</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Vangerow, Burkhard</creator><creator>Shorr, Andrew F</creator><creator>Wyncoll, Duncan</creator><creator>Janes, Jonathan</creator><creator>Nelson, David R</creator><creator>Reinhart, Konrad</creator><general>National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study</title><author>Vangerow, Burkhard ; Shorr, Andrew F ; Wyncoll, Duncan ; Janes, Jonathan ; Nelson, David R ; Reinhart, Konrad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-61ff62788e7dced8a33ec40a037ad4676163d9d4296a856019b55d3fb6e514f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Protein C - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Protein C - analysis</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sepsis - blood</topic><topic>Sepsis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Sepsis - mortality</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vangerow, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorr, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyncoll, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janes, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Konrad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vangerow, Burkhard</au><au>Shorr, Andrew F</au><au>Wyncoll, Duncan</au><au>Janes, Jonathan</au><au>Nelson, David R</au><au>Reinhart, Konrad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>11 Suppl 5</volume><issue>Suppl 5</issue><spage>S4</spage><epage>S4</epage><pages>S4-S4</pages><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><abstract>The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 mug/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts</pub><pmid>18269691</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc6155</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-8535
ispartof Critical care (London, England), 2007-01, Vol.11 Suppl 5 (Suppl 5), p.S4-S4
issn 1364-8535
1466-609X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2230608
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biomarkers - blood
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods
Humans
Infusions, Intravenous
Predictive Value of Tests
Protein C - administration & dosage
Protein C - analysis
Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage
Recombinant Proteins - blood
Research Design
Review
Sepsis - blood
Sepsis - drug therapy
Sepsis - mortality
Survival Analysis
Survival Rate
title The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A41%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20protein%20C%20pathway:%20implications%20for%20the%20design%20of%20the%20RESPOND%20study&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Vangerow,%20Burkhard&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=11%20Suppl%205&rft.issue=Suppl%205&rft.spage=S4&rft.epage=S4&rft.pages=S4-S4&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc6155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70098942%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195452230&rft_id=info:pmid/18269691&rfr_iscdi=true