The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study
The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care (London, England) England), 2007-01, Vol.11 Suppl 5 (Suppl 5), p.S4-S4 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S4 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 5 |
container_start_page | S4 |
container_title | Critical care (London, England) |
container_volume | 11 Suppl 5 |
creator | Vangerow, Burkhard Shorr, Andrew F Wyncoll, Duncan Janes, Jonathan Nelson, David R Reinhart, Konrad |
description | The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 mug/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/cc6155 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2230608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70098942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-61ff62788e7dced8a33ec40a037ad4676163d9d4296a856019b55d3fb6e514f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtP3DAQha0KVC4tPwFFPPQt4OvE5gGp2nKTVqVqtxJvlpM4rFESp3YC2n9Pll2xgIT65LHmzDdHZxA6IPiYEAknRQFEiE9ol3CAFLC63RprBjyVgokdtBfjPcYkk8A-ox0iKShQZBddzuY26YLvrWuTSdKZfv5oFqeJa7raFaZ3vo1J5UPSj7rSRnfXJr56_v0-__Pr5uePJPZDufiCtitTR_t1_e6jvxfns8lVOr25vJ58n6Y5z2ifAqkqoJmUNisLW0rDmC04NphlpuSQAQFWqpJTBUYKwETlQpSsysEKwivK9tHZitsNeWNHRtsHU-suuMaEhfbG6bed1s31nX_QlDIMWI4AtQLkzn8AeNspfKNX6Y6z39bLg_832NjrxsXC1rVprR-izjBWUnH6XyHFDBinS-LRO-G9H0I7JqiJElwsXW9oRfAxBlu9uCVYL6-_8Xf4OpyNbH1u9gTi9apK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195452230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Vangerow, Burkhard ; Shorr, Andrew F ; Wyncoll, Duncan ; Janes, Jonathan ; Nelson, David R ; Reinhart, Konrad</creator><creatorcontrib>Vangerow, Burkhard ; Shorr, Andrew F ; Wyncoll, Duncan ; Janes, Jonathan ; Nelson, David R ; Reinhart, Konrad</creatorcontrib><description>The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 mug/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-609X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/cc6155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18269691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts</publisher><subject>Biomarkers - blood ; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Protein C - administration & dosage ; Protein C - analysis ; Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage ; Recombinant Proteins - blood ; Research Design ; Review ; Sepsis - blood ; Sepsis - drug therapy ; Sepsis - mortality ; Survival Analysis ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Critical care (London, England), 2007-01, Vol.11 Suppl 5 (Suppl 5), p.S4-S4</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts 2007</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd 2007 BioMed Central Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-61ff62788e7dced8a33ec40a037ad4676163d9d4296a856019b55d3fb6e514f23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2230608/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2230608/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18269691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vangerow, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorr, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyncoll, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janes, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Konrad</creatorcontrib><title>The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study</title><title>Critical care (London, England)</title><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><description>The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 mug/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA.</description><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Protein C - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Protein C - analysis</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sepsis - blood</subject><subject>Sepsis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Sepsis - mortality</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>1364-8535</issn><issn>1466-609X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtP3DAQha0KVC4tPwFFPPQt4OvE5gGp2nKTVqVqtxJvlpM4rFESp3YC2n9Pll2xgIT65LHmzDdHZxA6IPiYEAknRQFEiE9ol3CAFLC63RprBjyVgokdtBfjPcYkk8A-ox0iKShQZBddzuY26YLvrWuTSdKZfv5oFqeJa7raFaZ3vo1J5UPSj7rSRnfXJr56_v0-__Pr5uePJPZDufiCtitTR_t1_e6jvxfns8lVOr25vJ58n6Y5z2ifAqkqoJmUNisLW0rDmC04NphlpuSQAQFWqpJTBUYKwETlQpSsysEKwivK9tHZitsNeWNHRtsHU-suuMaEhfbG6bed1s31nX_QlDIMWI4AtQLkzn8AeNspfKNX6Y6z39bLg_832NjrxsXC1rVprR-izjBWUnH6XyHFDBinS-LRO-G9H0I7JqiJElwsXW9oRfAxBlu9uCVYL6-_8Xf4OpyNbH1u9gTi9apK</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Vangerow, Burkhard</creator><creator>Shorr, Andrew F</creator><creator>Wyncoll, Duncan</creator><creator>Janes, Jonathan</creator><creator>Nelson, David R</creator><creator>Reinhart, Konrad</creator><general>National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study</title><author>Vangerow, Burkhard ; Shorr, Andrew F ; Wyncoll, Duncan ; Janes, Jonathan ; Nelson, David R ; Reinhart, Konrad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-61ff62788e7dced8a33ec40a037ad4676163d9d4296a856019b55d3fb6e514f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Protein C - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Protein C - analysis</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sepsis - blood</topic><topic>Sepsis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Sepsis - mortality</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vangerow, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorr, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyncoll, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janes, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Konrad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vangerow, Burkhard</au><au>Shorr, Andrew F</au><au>Wyncoll, Duncan</au><au>Janes, Jonathan</au><au>Nelson, David R</au><au>Reinhart, Konrad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study</atitle><jtitle>Critical care (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>11 Suppl 5</volume><issue>Suppl 5</issue><spage>S4</spage><epage>S4</epage><pages>S4-S4</pages><issn>1364-8535</issn><eissn>1466-609X</eissn><abstract>The predictive value of plasma protein C level in sepsis has been demonstrated in a number of studies in which depressed protein C levels were associated with increased likelihood of negative outcome. Data from the PROWESS (Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis) trial indicate that administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA) leads to an increase in endogenous protein C levels in severe sepsis patients. In a group as heterogeneous as sepsis patients, the currently approved dose and duration of administration (24 mug/kg per hour for 96 hours) might not be optimal in some individuals. The RESPOND (Research Evaluating Serial Protein C levels in severe sepsis patients ON Drotrecogin alfa [activated]) trial is a phase II study being conducted to explore the use of endogenous protein C level as both a biomarker and a steering parameter for administration of DrotAA. Eligible patients will receive DrotAA either at the normal, currently approved dose and duration of administration ('standard therapy') or at a higher dose with variable infusion duration or variable infusion duration only ('alternative therapy'). The duration of DrotAA infusion in the alternative therapy arm depends on the individual response in terms of sustained increase in endogenous protein C. The ultimate aims of this and potential following studies are as follows: to establish serial plasma protein C measurement as a biomarker that will aid in the identification of severe sepsis patients who are most likely to benefit from DrotAA therapy, to enable adjustment of DrotAA therapy in individual patients (specifically, the possibility to use a higher dose and to adjust the infusion duration), and to provide guidance to the clinician regarding whether the patient is responding to DrotAA.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts</pub><pmid>18269691</pmid><doi>10.1186/cc6155</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-8535 |
ispartof | Critical care (London, England), 2007-01, Vol.11 Suppl 5 (Suppl 5), p.S4-S4 |
issn | 1364-8535 1466-609X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2230608 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biomarkers - blood Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic - methods Humans Infusions, Intravenous Predictive Value of Tests Protein C - administration & dosage Protein C - analysis Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage Recombinant Proteins - blood Research Design Review Sepsis - blood Sepsis - drug therapy Sepsis - mortality Survival Analysis Survival Rate |
title | The protein C pathway: implications for the design of the RESPOND study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A41%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20protein%20C%20pathway:%20implications%20for%20the%20design%20of%20the%20RESPOND%20study&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Vangerow,%20Burkhard&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=11%20Suppl%205&rft.issue=Suppl%205&rft.spage=S4&rft.epage=S4&rft.pages=S4-S4&rft.issn=1364-8535&rft.eissn=1466-609X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/cc6155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70098942%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195452230&rft_id=info:pmid/18269691&rfr_iscdi=true |