A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss
Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight. I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of family medicine 2008-01, Vol.6 (1), p.69-77 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 77 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | Annals of family medicine |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Richardson, Caroline R Newton, Tiffany L Abraham, Jobby J Sen, Ananda Jimbo, Masahito Swartz, Ann M |
description | Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight.
In this meta-analysis, we searched 6 electronic databases and contacted pedometer experts to identify pedometer-based walking studies without a dietary intervention that reported weight change as an outcome. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published after January 1, 1995, in either English or Japanese, with 5 or more adult participants and at least 1 cohort enrolled in a pedometer-based walking intervention lasting at least 4 weeks.
Nine studies met the study inclusion criteria. Cohort sample size ranged from 15 to 106, for a total of 307 participants, 73% of whom were women and 27% of whom were men. The duration of the intervention ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with a median duration of 16 weeks. The pooled estimate of mean weight change from baseline using a fixed-effects model and combining data from all 9 cohorts was -1.27 kg (95% confidence interval, -1.85 to -0.70 kg). Longer intervention duration was associated with greater weight change. On average, participants lost 0.05 kg per week during the interventions.
Pedometer-based walking programs result in a modest amount of weight loss. Longer programs lead to more weight loss than shorter programs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1370/afm.761 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2203404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70204287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-29d92870a67bb550565cd64ca4f6a3660165536e811667b200383d5dcc9c51213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMotlbxG8ie9LQ1k7_diyBFrVDwoueQzWbb6G5SN9tKv72RlqqnGWZ-vHnzELoEPAYq8a2u27EUcISGwBnLQYI8PvS4GKCzGN8xJkAoOUUDmEDBKcghmt1nre11rr1uttHFLNTZylYhDW2XlzraKvvSzYfzi8z5NNtY37vgY6Z92li3WPZZE2I8Rye1bqK92NcRent8eJ3O8vnL0_P0fp4bJqDPSVEVZCKxFrIsOcdccFMJZjSrhaZCYBCcU2EnACIhBGM6oRWvjCkMBwJ0hO52uqt12drKJDudbtSqc63utipop_5vvFuqRdgoQjBlmCWB671AFz7XNvaqddHYptHehnVUEhPMksUE3uxA06X_OlsfjgBWP6mrlLpKqSfy6q-nX24fM_0Gl3J9RA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70204287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Richardson, Caroline R ; Newton, Tiffany L ; Abraham, Jobby J ; Sen, Ananda ; Jimbo, Masahito ; Swartz, Ann M</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline R ; Newton, Tiffany L ; Abraham, Jobby J ; Sen, Ananda ; Jimbo, Masahito ; Swartz, Ann M</creatorcontrib><description>Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight.
In this meta-analysis, we searched 6 electronic databases and contacted pedometer experts to identify pedometer-based walking studies without a dietary intervention that reported weight change as an outcome. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published after January 1, 1995, in either English or Japanese, with 5 or more adult participants and at least 1 cohort enrolled in a pedometer-based walking intervention lasting at least 4 weeks.
Nine studies met the study inclusion criteria. Cohort sample size ranged from 15 to 106, for a total of 307 participants, 73% of whom were women and 27% of whom were men. The duration of the intervention ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with a median duration of 16 weeks. The pooled estimate of mean weight change from baseline using a fixed-effects model and combining data from all 9 cohorts was -1.27 kg (95% confidence interval, -1.85 to -0.70 kg). Longer intervention duration was associated with greater weight change. On average, participants lost 0.05 kg per week during the interventions.
Pedometer-based walking programs result in a modest amount of weight loss. Longer programs lead to more weight loss than shorter programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-1709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-1717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1370/afm.761</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18195317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Family Physicians</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bibliometrics ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation ; Obesity - therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Systematic Reviews ; Walking - physiology ; Walking - statistics & numerical data ; Weight Loss - physiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of family medicine, 2008-01, Vol.6 (1), p.69-77</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Copyright 2008 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-29d92870a67bb550565cd64ca4f6a3660165536e811667b200383d5dcc9c51213</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2203404/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2203404/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18195317$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Tiffany L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Jobby J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Ann M</creatorcontrib><title>A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss</title><title>Annals of family medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Fam Med</addtitle><description>Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight.
In this meta-analysis, we searched 6 electronic databases and contacted pedometer experts to identify pedometer-based walking studies without a dietary intervention that reported weight change as an outcome. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published after January 1, 1995, in either English or Japanese, with 5 or more adult participants and at least 1 cohort enrolled in a pedometer-based walking intervention lasting at least 4 weeks.
Nine studies met the study inclusion criteria. Cohort sample size ranged from 15 to 106, for a total of 307 participants, 73% of whom were women and 27% of whom were men. The duration of the intervention ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with a median duration of 16 weeks. The pooled estimate of mean weight change from baseline using a fixed-effects model and combining data from all 9 cohorts was -1.27 kg (95% confidence interval, -1.85 to -0.70 kg). Longer intervention duration was associated with greater weight change. On average, participants lost 0.05 kg per week during the interventions.
Pedometer-based walking programs result in a modest amount of weight loss. Longer programs lead to more weight loss than shorter programs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Obesity - therapy</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><subject>Walking - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Weight Loss - physiology</subject><issn>1544-1709</issn><issn>1544-1717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMotlbxG8ie9LQ1k7_diyBFrVDwoueQzWbb6G5SN9tKv72RlqqnGWZ-vHnzELoEPAYq8a2u27EUcISGwBnLQYI8PvS4GKCzGN8xJkAoOUUDmEDBKcghmt1nre11rr1uttHFLNTZylYhDW2XlzraKvvSzYfzi8z5NNtY37vgY6Z92li3WPZZE2I8Rye1bqK92NcRent8eJ3O8vnL0_P0fp4bJqDPSVEVZCKxFrIsOcdccFMJZjSrhaZCYBCcU2EnACIhBGM6oRWvjCkMBwJ0hO52uqt12drKJDudbtSqc63utipop_5vvFuqRdgoQjBlmCWB671AFz7XNvaqddHYptHehnVUEhPMksUE3uxA06X_OlsfjgBWP6mrlLpKqSfy6q-nX24fM_0Gl3J9RA</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Richardson, Caroline R</creator><creator>Newton, Tiffany L</creator><creator>Abraham, Jobby J</creator><creator>Sen, Ananda</creator><creator>Jimbo, Masahito</creator><creator>Swartz, Ann M</creator><general>American Academy of Family Physicians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss</title><author>Richardson, Caroline R ; Newton, Tiffany L ; Abraham, Jobby J ; Sen, Ananda ; Jimbo, Masahito ; Swartz, Ann M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-29d92870a67bb550565cd64ca4f6a3660165536e811667b200383d5dcc9c51213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Obesity - therapy</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><topic>Walking - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Weight Loss - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Tiffany L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Jobby J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Ann M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Caroline R</au><au>Newton, Tiffany L</au><au>Abraham, Jobby J</au><au>Sen, Ananda</au><au>Jimbo, Masahito</au><au>Swartz, Ann M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss</atitle><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Fam Med</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>69-77</pages><issn>1544-1709</issn><eissn>1544-1717</eissn><abstract>Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight.
In this meta-analysis, we searched 6 electronic databases and contacted pedometer experts to identify pedometer-based walking studies without a dietary intervention that reported weight change as an outcome. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published after January 1, 1995, in either English or Japanese, with 5 or more adult participants and at least 1 cohort enrolled in a pedometer-based walking intervention lasting at least 4 weeks.
Nine studies met the study inclusion criteria. Cohort sample size ranged from 15 to 106, for a total of 307 participants, 73% of whom were women and 27% of whom were men. The duration of the intervention ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with a median duration of 16 weeks. The pooled estimate of mean weight change from baseline using a fixed-effects model and combining data from all 9 cohorts was -1.27 kg (95% confidence interval, -1.85 to -0.70 kg). Longer intervention duration was associated with greater weight change. On average, participants lost 0.05 kg per week during the interventions.
Pedometer-based walking programs result in a modest amount of weight loss. Longer programs lead to more weight loss than shorter programs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Family Physicians</pub><pmid>18195317</pmid><doi>10.1370/afm.761</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1544-1709 |
ispartof | Annals of family medicine, 2008-01, Vol.6 (1), p.69-77 |
issn | 1544-1709 1544-1717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2203404 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Bibliometrics Cohort Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data Female Humans Male Middle Aged Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation Obesity - therapy Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Systematic Reviews Walking - physiology Walking - statistics & numerical data Weight Loss - physiology |
title | A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A01%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20meta-analysis%20of%20pedometer-based%20walking%20interventions%20and%20weight%20loss&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20family%20medicine&rft.au=Richardson,%20Caroline%20R&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=69-77&rft.issn=1544-1709&rft.eissn=1544-1717&rft_id=info:doi/10.1370/afm.761&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70204287%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70204287&rft_id=info:pmid/18195317&rfr_iscdi=true |