A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss

Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight. I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of family medicine 2008-01, Vol.6 (1), p.69-77
Hauptverfasser: Richardson, Caroline R, Newton, Tiffany L, Abraham, Jobby J, Sen, Ananda, Jimbo, Masahito, Swartz, Ann M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Annals of family medicine
container_volume 6
creator Richardson, Caroline R
Newton, Tiffany L
Abraham, Jobby J
Sen, Ananda
Jimbo, Masahito
Swartz, Ann M
description Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight. In this meta-analysis, we searched 6 electronic databases and contacted pedometer experts to identify pedometer-based walking studies without a dietary intervention that reported weight change as an outcome. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published after January 1, 1995, in either English or Japanese, with 5 or more adult participants and at least 1 cohort enrolled in a pedometer-based walking intervention lasting at least 4 weeks. Nine studies met the study inclusion criteria. Cohort sample size ranged from 15 to 106, for a total of 307 participants, 73% of whom were women and 27% of whom were men. The duration of the intervention ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with a median duration of 16 weeks. The pooled estimate of mean weight change from baseline using a fixed-effects model and combining data from all 9 cohorts was -1.27 kg (95% confidence interval, -1.85 to -0.70 kg). Longer intervention duration was associated with greater weight change. On average, participants lost 0.05 kg per week during the interventions. Pedometer-based walking programs result in a modest amount of weight loss. Longer programs lead to more weight loss than shorter programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1370/afm.761
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2203404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70204287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-29d92870a67bb550565cd64ca4f6a3660165536e811667b200383d5dcc9c51213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMotlbxG8ie9LQ1k7_diyBFrVDwoueQzWbb6G5SN9tKv72RlqqnGWZ-vHnzELoEPAYq8a2u27EUcISGwBnLQYI8PvS4GKCzGN8xJkAoOUUDmEDBKcghmt1nre11rr1uttHFLNTZylYhDW2XlzraKvvSzYfzi8z5NNtY37vgY6Z92li3WPZZE2I8Rye1bqK92NcRent8eJ3O8vnL0_P0fp4bJqDPSVEVZCKxFrIsOcdccFMJZjSrhaZCYBCcU2EnACIhBGM6oRWvjCkMBwJ0hO52uqt12drKJDudbtSqc63utipop_5vvFuqRdgoQjBlmCWB671AFz7XNvaqddHYptHehnVUEhPMksUE3uxA06X_OlsfjgBWP6mrlLpKqSfy6q-nX24fM_0Gl3J9RA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70204287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Richardson, Caroline R ; Newton, Tiffany L ; Abraham, Jobby J ; Sen, Ananda ; Jimbo, Masahito ; Swartz, Ann M</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline R ; Newton, Tiffany L ; Abraham, Jobby J ; Sen, Ananda ; Jimbo, Masahito ; Swartz, Ann M</creatorcontrib><description>Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight. In this meta-analysis, we searched 6 electronic databases and contacted pedometer experts to identify pedometer-based walking studies without a dietary intervention that reported weight change as an outcome. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published after January 1, 1995, in either English or Japanese, with 5 or more adult participants and at least 1 cohort enrolled in a pedometer-based walking intervention lasting at least 4 weeks. Nine studies met the study inclusion criteria. Cohort sample size ranged from 15 to 106, for a total of 307 participants, 73% of whom were women and 27% of whom were men. The duration of the intervention ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with a median duration of 16 weeks. The pooled estimate of mean weight change from baseline using a fixed-effects model and combining data from all 9 cohorts was -1.27 kg (95% confidence interval, -1.85 to -0.70 kg). Longer intervention duration was associated with greater weight change. On average, participants lost 0.05 kg per week during the interventions. Pedometer-based walking programs result in a modest amount of weight loss. Longer programs lead to more weight loss than shorter programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-1709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-1717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1370/afm.761</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18195317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Family Physicians</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bibliometrics ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Databases, Bibliographic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation ; Obesity - therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Systematic Reviews ; Walking - physiology ; Walking - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Weight Loss - physiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of family medicine, 2008-01, Vol.6 (1), p.69-77</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Copyright 2008 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-29d92870a67bb550565cd64ca4f6a3660165536e811667b200383d5dcc9c51213</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2203404/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2203404/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18195317$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Tiffany L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Jobby J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Ann M</creatorcontrib><title>A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss</title><title>Annals of family medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Fam Med</addtitle><description>Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight. In this meta-analysis, we searched 6 electronic databases and contacted pedometer experts to identify pedometer-based walking studies without a dietary intervention that reported weight change as an outcome. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published after January 1, 1995, in either English or Japanese, with 5 or more adult participants and at least 1 cohort enrolled in a pedometer-based walking intervention lasting at least 4 weeks. Nine studies met the study inclusion criteria. Cohort sample size ranged from 15 to 106, for a total of 307 participants, 73% of whom were women and 27% of whom were men. The duration of the intervention ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with a median duration of 16 weeks. The pooled estimate of mean weight change from baseline using a fixed-effects model and combining data from all 9 cohorts was -1.27 kg (95% confidence interval, -1.85 to -0.70 kg). Longer intervention duration was associated with greater weight change. On average, participants lost 0.05 kg per week during the interventions. Pedometer-based walking programs result in a modest amount of weight loss. Longer programs lead to more weight loss than shorter programs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Databases, Bibliographic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Obesity - therapy</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><subject>Walking - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Weight Loss - physiology</subject><issn>1544-1709</issn><issn>1544-1717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE9LAzEQxYMotlbxG8ie9LQ1k7_diyBFrVDwoueQzWbb6G5SN9tKv72RlqqnGWZ-vHnzELoEPAYq8a2u27EUcISGwBnLQYI8PvS4GKCzGN8xJkAoOUUDmEDBKcghmt1nre11rr1uttHFLNTZylYhDW2XlzraKvvSzYfzi8z5NNtY37vgY6Z92li3WPZZE2I8Rye1bqK92NcRent8eJ3O8vnL0_P0fp4bJqDPSVEVZCKxFrIsOcdccFMJZjSrhaZCYBCcU2EnACIhBGM6oRWvjCkMBwJ0hO52uqt12drKJDudbtSqc63utipop_5vvFuqRdgoQjBlmCWB671AFz7XNvaqddHYptHehnVUEhPMksUE3uxA06X_OlsfjgBWP6mrlLpKqSfy6q-nX24fM_0Gl3J9RA</recordid><startdate>200801</startdate><enddate>200801</enddate><creator>Richardson, Caroline R</creator><creator>Newton, Tiffany L</creator><creator>Abraham, Jobby J</creator><creator>Sen, Ananda</creator><creator>Jimbo, Masahito</creator><creator>Swartz, Ann M</creator><general>American Academy of Family Physicians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200801</creationdate><title>A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss</title><author>Richardson, Caroline R ; Newton, Tiffany L ; Abraham, Jobby J ; Sen, Ananda ; Jimbo, Masahito ; Swartz, Ann M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-29d92870a67bb550565cd64ca4f6a3660165536e811667b200383d5dcc9c51213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Databases, Bibliographic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Obesity - therapy</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><topic>Walking - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Weight Loss - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Tiffany L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Jobby J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Ann M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Caroline R</au><au>Newton, Tiffany L</au><au>Abraham, Jobby J</au><au>Sen, Ananda</au><au>Jimbo, Masahito</au><au>Swartz, Ann M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss</atitle><jtitle>Annals of family medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Fam Med</addtitle><date>2008-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>69-77</pages><issn>1544-1709</issn><eissn>1544-1717</eissn><abstract>Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight. In this meta-analysis, we searched 6 electronic databases and contacted pedometer experts to identify pedometer-based walking studies without a dietary intervention that reported weight change as an outcome. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published after January 1, 1995, in either English or Japanese, with 5 or more adult participants and at least 1 cohort enrolled in a pedometer-based walking intervention lasting at least 4 weeks. Nine studies met the study inclusion criteria. Cohort sample size ranged from 15 to 106, for a total of 307 participants, 73% of whom were women and 27% of whom were men. The duration of the intervention ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with a median duration of 16 weeks. The pooled estimate of mean weight change from baseline using a fixed-effects model and combining data from all 9 cohorts was -1.27 kg (95% confidence interval, -1.85 to -0.70 kg). Longer intervention duration was associated with greater weight change. On average, participants lost 0.05 kg per week during the interventions. Pedometer-based walking programs result in a modest amount of weight loss. Longer programs lead to more weight loss than shorter programs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Family Physicians</pub><pmid>18195317</pmid><doi>10.1370/afm.761</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1544-1709
ispartof Annals of family medicine, 2008-01, Vol.6 (1), p.69-77
issn 1544-1709
1544-1717
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2203404
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Bibliometrics
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation
Obesity - therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Systematic Reviews
Walking - physiology
Walking - statistics & numerical data
Weight Loss - physiology
title A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A01%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20meta-analysis%20of%20pedometer-based%20walking%20interventions%20and%20weight%20loss&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20family%20medicine&rft.au=Richardson,%20Caroline%20R&rft.date=2008-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=69-77&rft.issn=1544-1709&rft.eissn=1544-1717&rft_id=info:doi/10.1370/afm.761&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70204287%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70204287&rft_id=info:pmid/18195317&rfr_iscdi=true