On the Relative Efficacy of the Doulton, Berkefeld and Brownlow Filters

In a previous communication (1906) it was shown by Bulloch and Craw that the Doulton “white filter” prevented the direct transimmission of micro-organisms, and that the filtrates from highly contaminated waters were germ free until sufficient time had been given for the bacteria to grow through the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hygiene 1908-01, Vol.8 (1), p.63-69
Hauptverfasser: Bulloch, William, Craw, J. Anderson, Atkin, E. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title The Journal of hygiene
container_volume 8
creator Bulloch, William
Craw, J. Anderson
Atkin, E. E.
description In a previous communication (1906) it was shown by Bulloch and Craw that the Doulton “white filter” prevented the direct transimmission of micro-organisms, and that the filtrates from highly contaminated waters were germ free until sufficient time had been given for the bacteria to grow through the filter mass. It was demonstrated, in fact, that the Doulton filter was at least as efficient in the retention of micro-organisms as the best material on the market, viz. the Pasteur-Chamberland filter, and excelled the latter in its rate of filtration. It was pointed out that, with the possible exception of Kieselguhr, filters, only porcelain bougies could be relied upon to prevent direct transmission of germs. During the past year we have tested the relative efficiency of porcelain and Kieselguhr filters, in particular the Doulton porcelain filter and the Berkefeld Kieselguhr filter. A few samples of the Slack and Brownlow filter (sand and porcelain mixture?) were also tested.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S002217240000694X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2167131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S002217240000694X</cupid><jstor_id>4619364</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4619364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-d3bd725c3729225ed0431b944a96ab0a73c887fe63eda0adce4c2380c7d315833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEYhYNY7Fr9AYLI3Hnj2HxNMnMjtGu7FgrFLxBvQiZ5p802O6lJprX_3qy7XRTB3OTiOe95T04QekHwW4KJPPyMMaVEUo7LER3_9gjNKOtE3ZKWP0azNa7XfB89TWmJccMlYU_QPsVccsbbGVpcjFW-guoTeJ3dLVQnw-CMNvdVGH6D92HyOYxvqmOI1zCAt5UebXUcw93ow1116nyGmJ6hvUH7BM-39wH6enryZf6hPr9YnM2PzmvTYJJry3oraWOYpB2lDVjMGek7znUndI-1ZKZt5QCCgdVYWwPcUNZiIy0jTcvYAXq38b2Z-hUUPuaovbqJbqXjvQraqb_J6K7UZbhVlIjydlIMXm8NYvgxQcpq5ZIB7_UIYUpKMlb20aYrSrJRmhhSijDsthCs1v2rf_ovM6_-jLebeCi8CF5uBMuUQ9xxLkjHBC-43mCXMvzcYR2vlZBMNkosPpbdVMxp9101Rc-2GfWqj85eglqGKY7lC_6T8hfKeKeJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733380259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Relative Efficacy of the Doulton, Berkefeld and Brownlow Filters</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bulloch, William ; Craw, J. Anderson ; Atkin, E. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bulloch, William ; Craw, J. Anderson ; Atkin, E. E.</creatorcontrib><description>In a previous communication (1906) it was shown by Bulloch and Craw that the Doulton “white filter” prevented the direct transimmission of micro-organisms, and that the filtrates from highly contaminated waters were germ free until sufficient time had been given for the bacteria to grow through the filter mass. It was demonstrated, in fact, that the Doulton filter was at least as efficient in the retention of micro-organisms as the best material on the market, viz. the Pasteur-Chamberland filter, and excelled the latter in its rate of filtration. It was pointed out that, with the possible exception of Kieselguhr, filters, only porcelain bougies could be relied upon to prevent direct transmission of germs. During the past year we have tested the relative efficiency of porcelain and Kieselguhr filters, in particular the Doulton porcelain filter and the Berkefeld Kieselguhr filter. A few samples of the Slack and Brownlow filter (sand and porcelain mixture?) were also tested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2396-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S002217240000694X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20474348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Diatomaceous earth ; Water filtration</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hygiene, 1908-01, Vol.8 (1), p.63-69</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1908</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-d3bd725c3729225ed0431b944a96ab0a73c887fe63eda0adce4c2380c7d315833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-d3bd725c3729225ed0431b944a96ab0a73c887fe63eda0adce4c2380c7d315833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4619364$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4619364$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20474348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bulloch, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craw, J. Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkin, E. E.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Relative Efficacy of the Doulton, Berkefeld and Brownlow Filters</title><title>The Journal of hygiene</title><addtitle>J. Hyg</addtitle><description>In a previous communication (1906) it was shown by Bulloch and Craw that the Doulton “white filter” prevented the direct transimmission of micro-organisms, and that the filtrates from highly contaminated waters were germ free until sufficient time had been given for the bacteria to grow through the filter mass. It was demonstrated, in fact, that the Doulton filter was at least as efficient in the retention of micro-organisms as the best material on the market, viz. the Pasteur-Chamberland filter, and excelled the latter in its rate of filtration. It was pointed out that, with the possible exception of Kieselguhr, filters, only porcelain bougies could be relied upon to prevent direct transmission of germs. During the past year we have tested the relative efficiency of porcelain and Kieselguhr filters, in particular the Doulton porcelain filter and the Berkefeld Kieselguhr filter. A few samples of the Slack and Brownlow filter (sand and porcelain mixture?) were also tested.</description><subject>Diatomaceous earth</subject><subject>Water filtration</subject><issn>0022-1724</issn><issn>2396-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1908</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEYhYNY7Fr9AYLI3Hnj2HxNMnMjtGu7FgrFLxBvQiZ5p802O6lJprX_3qy7XRTB3OTiOe95T04QekHwW4KJPPyMMaVEUo7LER3_9gjNKOtE3ZKWP0azNa7XfB89TWmJccMlYU_QPsVccsbbGVpcjFW-guoTeJ3dLVQnw-CMNvdVGH6D92HyOYxvqmOI1zCAt5UebXUcw93ow1116nyGmJ6hvUH7BM-39wH6enryZf6hPr9YnM2PzmvTYJJry3oraWOYpB2lDVjMGek7znUndI-1ZKZt5QCCgdVYWwPcUNZiIy0jTcvYAXq38b2Z-hUUPuaovbqJbqXjvQraqb_J6K7UZbhVlIjydlIMXm8NYvgxQcpq5ZIB7_UIYUpKMlb20aYrSrJRmhhSijDsthCs1v2rf_ovM6_-jLebeCi8CF5uBMuUQ9xxLkjHBC-43mCXMvzcYR2vlZBMNkosPpbdVMxp9101Rc-2GfWqj85eglqGKY7lC_6T8hfKeKeJ</recordid><startdate>190801</startdate><enddate>190801</enddate><creator>Bulloch, William</creator><creator>Craw, J. Anderson</creator><creator>Atkin, E. E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>190801</creationdate><title>On the Relative Efficacy of the Doulton, Berkefeld and Brownlow Filters</title><author>Bulloch, William ; Craw, J. Anderson ; Atkin, E. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-d3bd725c3729225ed0431b944a96ab0a73c887fe63eda0adce4c2380c7d315833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1908</creationdate><topic>Diatomaceous earth</topic><topic>Water filtration</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bulloch, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craw, J. Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkin, E. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bulloch, William</au><au>Craw, J. Anderson</au><au>Atkin, E. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Relative Efficacy of the Doulton, Berkefeld and Brownlow Filters</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>J. Hyg</addtitle><date>1908-01</date><risdate>1908</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>63-69</pages><issn>0022-1724</issn><eissn>2396-8184</eissn><abstract>In a previous communication (1906) it was shown by Bulloch and Craw that the Doulton “white filter” prevented the direct transimmission of micro-organisms, and that the filtrates from highly contaminated waters were germ free until sufficient time had been given for the bacteria to grow through the filter mass. It was demonstrated, in fact, that the Doulton filter was at least as efficient in the retention of micro-organisms as the best material on the market, viz. the Pasteur-Chamberland filter, and excelled the latter in its rate of filtration. It was pointed out that, with the possible exception of Kieselguhr, filters, only porcelain bougies could be relied upon to prevent direct transmission of germs. During the past year we have tested the relative efficiency of porcelain and Kieselguhr filters, in particular the Doulton porcelain filter and the Berkefeld Kieselguhr filter. A few samples of the Slack and Brownlow filter (sand and porcelain mixture?) were also tested.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>20474348</pmid><doi>10.1017/S002217240000694X</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1724
ispartof The Journal of hygiene, 1908-01, Vol.8 (1), p.63-69
issn 0022-1724
2396-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2167131
source Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central
subjects Diatomaceous earth
Water filtration
title On the Relative Efficacy of the Doulton, Berkefeld and Brownlow Filters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Relative%20Efficacy%20of%20the%20Doulton,%20Berkefeld%20and%20Brownlow%20Filters&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hygiene&rft.au=Bulloch,%20William&rft.date=1908-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=63-69&rft.issn=0022-1724&rft.eissn=2396-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S002217240000694X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E4619364%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733380259&rft_id=info:pmid/20474348&rft_cupid=10_1017_S002217240000694X&rft_jstor_id=4619364&rfr_iscdi=true