Attendance at a London casualty department

Patients who attended the casualty department of the Middlesex Hospital during one week in 1973 were interviewed. A predominantly young and working population used the department. Relatively few patients lived close to the hospital but many worked nearby. One third of all attendances were by patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1977-12, Vol.27 (185), p.727-733
Hauptverfasser: Wilkinson, A, Kazantzis, G, Williams, D J, Dewar, R A, Bristow, K M, Miller, D L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 733
container_issue 185
container_start_page 727
container_title Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
container_volume 27
creator Wilkinson, A
Kazantzis, G
Williams, D J
Dewar, R A
Bristow, K M
Miller, D L
description Patients who attended the casualty department of the Middlesex Hospital during one week in 1973 were interviewed. A predominantly young and working population used the department. Relatively few patients lived close to the hospital but many worked nearby. One third of all attendances were by patients who had been asked to return by casualty doctors. About half the new patients came of their own accord; the next largest group had been sent directly from work by an employer or occupational health service. Half the patients came with injuries, many of them superficial, although there were also serious accident cases. One fifth of the patients had no general practitioner whom they could consult. Age and geographical mobility were related to whether or not patients were registered with a general practitioner. The main reasons for not consulting a general practitioner were that patients felt they needed hospital treatment or that it was more convenient to attend the casualty department. It is suggested that the view that casual attenders with relatively trivial complaints should be encouraged to go to a general practitioner is not always applicable since social as well as medical circumstances determine whether or not patients decide to visit casualty.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2158656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>83808681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p175t-ce8f2d654b121a8971567701fa9b6bdd52e102a5e424e248020a03c89877c35a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkDtLxEAUhafwta7-A4tUFkJgHplHGmFZdBUCNloPNzM3GkkmMTMR9t8b2EW0OsU5fB-cE7KiVMjc6FJfkMsYPymVhWb6nJwppoziK3K3SQmDh-Awg5RBVg3BDyFzEGfo0j7zOMKUegzpipw20EW8PuaavD0-vG6f8upl97zdVPnItEy5Q9Nwr2RRM87AlJpJpTVlDZS1qr2XHBnlILHgBfLCUE6BCmdKo7UTEsSa3B-441z36N2inqCz49T2MO3tAK3934T2w74P35YzaZRUC-D2CJiGrxljsn0bHXYdBBzmaI0w1CjDluHNX9Ov4nCO-AE6kF8G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>83808681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attendance at a London casualty department</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wilkinson, A ; Kazantzis, G ; Williams, D J ; Dewar, R A ; Bristow, K M ; Miller, D L</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, A ; Kazantzis, G ; Williams, D J ; Dewar, R A ; Bristow, K M ; Miller, D L</creatorcontrib><description>Patients who attended the casualty department of the Middlesex Hospital during one week in 1973 were interviewed. A predominantly young and working population used the department. Relatively few patients lived close to the hospital but many worked nearby. One third of all attendances were by patients who had been asked to return by casualty doctors. About half the new patients came of their own accord; the next largest group had been sent directly from work by an employer or occupational health service. Half the patients came with injuries, many of them superficial, although there were also serious accident cases. One fifth of the patients had no general practitioner whom they could consult. Age and geographical mobility were related to whether or not patients were registered with a general practitioner. The main reasons for not consulting a general practitioner were that patients felt they needed hospital treatment or that it was more convenient to attend the casualty department. It is suggested that the view that casual attenders with relatively trivial complaints should be encouraged to go to a general practitioner is not always applicable since social as well as medical circumstances determine whether or not patients decide to visit casualty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8797</identifier><identifier>PMID: 616862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Accident and Emergency Departments ; Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization ; Family Practice ; Humans ; London</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1977-12, Vol.27 (185), p.727-733</ispartof><rights>Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2158656/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2158656/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/616862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazantzis, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bristow, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D L</creatorcontrib><title>Attendance at a London casualty department</title><title>Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners</title><addtitle>J R Coll Gen Pract</addtitle><description>Patients who attended the casualty department of the Middlesex Hospital during one week in 1973 were interviewed. A predominantly young and working population used the department. Relatively few patients lived close to the hospital but many worked nearby. One third of all attendances were by patients who had been asked to return by casualty doctors. About half the new patients came of their own accord; the next largest group had been sent directly from work by an employer or occupational health service. Half the patients came with injuries, many of them superficial, although there were also serious accident cases. One fifth of the patients had no general practitioner whom they could consult. Age and geographical mobility were related to whether or not patients were registered with a general practitioner. The main reasons for not consulting a general practitioner were that patients felt they needed hospital treatment or that it was more convenient to attend the casualty department. It is suggested that the view that casual attenders with relatively trivial complaints should be encouraged to go to a general practitioner is not always applicable since social as well as medical circumstances determine whether or not patients decide to visit casualty.</description><subject>Accident and Emergency Departments</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>London</subject><issn>0035-8797</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkDtLxEAUhafwta7-A4tUFkJgHplHGmFZdBUCNloPNzM3GkkmMTMR9t8b2EW0OsU5fB-cE7KiVMjc6FJfkMsYPymVhWb6nJwppoziK3K3SQmDh-Awg5RBVg3BDyFzEGfo0j7zOMKUegzpipw20EW8PuaavD0-vG6f8upl97zdVPnItEy5Q9Nwr2RRM87AlJpJpTVlDZS1qr2XHBnlILHgBfLCUE6BCmdKo7UTEsSa3B-441z36N2inqCz49T2MO3tAK3934T2w74P35YzaZRUC-D2CJiGrxljsn0bHXYdBBzmaI0w1CjDluHNX9Ov4nCO-AE6kF8G</recordid><startdate>197712</startdate><enddate>197712</enddate><creator>Wilkinson, A</creator><creator>Kazantzis, G</creator><creator>Williams, D J</creator><creator>Dewar, R A</creator><creator>Bristow, K M</creator><creator>Miller, D L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197712</creationdate><title>Attendance at a London casualty department</title><author>Wilkinson, A ; Kazantzis, G ; Williams, D J ; Dewar, R A ; Bristow, K M ; Miller, D L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p175t-ce8f2d654b121a8971567701fa9b6bdd52e102a5e424e248020a03c89877c35a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Accident and Emergency Departments</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>London</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazantzis, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bristow, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilkinson, A</au><au>Kazantzis, G</au><au>Williams, D J</au><au>Dewar, R A</au><au>Bristow, K M</au><au>Miller, D L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attendance at a London casualty department</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners</jtitle><addtitle>J R Coll Gen Pract</addtitle><date>1977-12</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>185</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>733</epage><pages>727-733</pages><issn>0035-8797</issn><abstract>Patients who attended the casualty department of the Middlesex Hospital during one week in 1973 were interviewed. A predominantly young and working population used the department. Relatively few patients lived close to the hospital but many worked nearby. One third of all attendances were by patients who had been asked to return by casualty doctors. About half the new patients came of their own accord; the next largest group had been sent directly from work by an employer or occupational health service. Half the patients came with injuries, many of them superficial, although there were also serious accident cases. One fifth of the patients had no general practitioner whom they could consult. Age and geographical mobility were related to whether or not patients were registered with a general practitioner. The main reasons for not consulting a general practitioner were that patients felt they needed hospital treatment or that it was more convenient to attend the casualty department. It is suggested that the view that casual attenders with relatively trivial complaints should be encouraged to go to a general practitioner is not always applicable since social as well as medical circumstances determine whether or not patients decide to visit casualty.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>616862</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-8797
ispartof Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1977-12, Vol.27 (185), p.727-733
issn 0035-8797
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2158656
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Accident and Emergency Departments
Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization
Family Practice
Humans
London
title Attendance at a London casualty department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A14%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attendance%20at%20a%20London%20casualty%20department&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20General%20Practitioners&rft.au=Wilkinson,%20A&rft.date=1977-12&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=185&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=733&rft.pages=727-733&rft.issn=0035-8797&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E83808681%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=83808681&rft_id=info:pmid/616862&rfr_iscdi=true