Delisting of drugs in Ontario. How attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians in the Kingston area changed
To assess how attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians changed when drugs were delisted from the Ontario Drug Benefit formulary. Mailed, self-administered survey. Family physicians' offices in Ontario. All family physicians practising in the Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox, and Add...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian family physician 1996-07, Vol.42, p.1309-1316 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1316 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1309 |
container_title | Canadian family physician |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Godwin, M Chapman, J Mowat, D Racz, W McBride, J Tang, J |
description | To assess how attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians changed when drugs were delisted from the Ontario Drug Benefit formulary.
Mailed, self-administered survey.
Family physicians' offices in Ontario.
All family physicians practising in the Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox, and Addington Health District.
Physicians were presented with six vignettes involving patients receiving a delisted drug. The choices were to recommend the patient pay for the medication, to substitute a drug still listed on the formulary, to make a special request that the medication be covered for this patient, or to offer another option. As well, the physicians were asked to indicate, on a 5-point Likert scale, their opinions regarding the effect of delisting on themselves and their patients.
Physicians were most likely to change to a medication that was still on the formulary. Patient sex and ability to pay were factors in physicians' decisions. Physicians believe that the delistings are not likely to have adversely affected patients' health, that noncompliance is a problem because many once-daily formulations have been removed, that suitable alternatives are not always available, and that physicians should have been consulted more before the changes were made.
Physicians usually substitute listed medications for medications that have been delisted. This is especially true for female patients and patients who are unable to pay. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2146792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78200050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p203t-de2d2c7bcb6ac4c5f3eec421c799b1dfc43e13c3f1f609fa4400c0ba13b2f9743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtPwzAQhCMEKqXwE5AsDtyC_ErTXJBQeRRRqReQuEWOs05dpXawHVD-PS5UCDjtYb4Zze4eJGOSkyzNaDY7TMYY41nKMvx6nJx4v8GYTjkjo2Q0yzOeYzxOhltotQ_aNMgqVLu-8UgbtDJBOG2v0MJ-IBGCDn0NHglTo86Bl05XO4sPTgRodJSiW4mtbgfUrQevpRbmKymsAT1F1gdrkHAgkFwL00B9mhwp0Xo4289J8nJ_9zxfpMvVw-P8Zpl2FLOQ1kBrKvNKVlMhucwUA5CcEpkXRUVqJTkDwiRTRE1xoQTnGEtcCcIqqoqcs0ly_Z3b9dUWagkmlm7LzumtcENphS7_Kkavy8a-l5TwaV7QGHC5D3D2rQcfyq32EtpWGLC9L_MZjXfOcAQv_oEb2zsTlyspzuJfCr6Dzn_X-emx_wj7BPUUi_U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205171940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delisting of drugs in Ontario. How attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians in the Kingston area changed</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Godwin, M ; Chapman, J ; Mowat, D ; Racz, W ; McBride, J ; Tang, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Godwin, M ; Chapman, J ; Mowat, D ; Racz, W ; McBride, J ; Tang, J</creatorcontrib><description>To assess how attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians changed when drugs were delisted from the Ontario Drug Benefit formulary.
Mailed, self-administered survey.
Family physicians' offices in Ontario.
All family physicians practising in the Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox, and Addington Health District.
Physicians were presented with six vignettes involving patients receiving a delisted drug. The choices were to recommend the patient pay for the medication, to substitute a drug still listed on the formulary, to make a special request that the medication be covered for this patient, or to offer another option. As well, the physicians were asked to indicate, on a 5-point Likert scale, their opinions regarding the effect of delisting on themselves and their patients.
Physicians were most likely to change to a medication that was still on the formulary. Patient sex and ability to pay were factors in physicians' decisions. Physicians believe that the delistings are not likely to have adversely affected patients' health, that noncompliance is a problem because many once-daily formulations have been removed, that suitable alternatives are not always available, and that physicians should have been consulted more before the changes were made.
Physicians usually substitute listed medications for medications that have been delisted. This is especially true for female patients and patients who are unable to pay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-350X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-5258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8754700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: College of Family Physicians of Canada</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Drug Costs ; Drug Prescriptions ; Drug Utilization ; Family Practice ; Female ; Formularies as Topic ; Health Care Reform ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ontario ; Physicians ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Prescription drugs ; Reimbursement Mechanisms ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Canadian family physician, 1996-07, Vol.42, p.1309-1316</ispartof><rights>Copyright College of Family Physicians of Canada Jul 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2146792/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2146792/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8754700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Godwin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mowat, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racz, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, J</creatorcontrib><title>Delisting of drugs in Ontario. How attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians in the Kingston area changed</title><title>Canadian family physician</title><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><description>To assess how attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians changed when drugs were delisted from the Ontario Drug Benefit formulary.
Mailed, self-administered survey.
Family physicians' offices in Ontario.
All family physicians practising in the Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox, and Addington Health District.
Physicians were presented with six vignettes involving patients receiving a delisted drug. The choices were to recommend the patient pay for the medication, to substitute a drug still listed on the formulary, to make a special request that the medication be covered for this patient, or to offer another option. As well, the physicians were asked to indicate, on a 5-point Likert scale, their opinions regarding the effect of delisting on themselves and their patients.
Physicians were most likely to change to a medication that was still on the formulary. Patient sex and ability to pay were factors in physicians' decisions. Physicians believe that the delistings are not likely to have adversely affected patients' health, that noncompliance is a problem because many once-daily formulations have been removed, that suitable alternatives are not always available, and that physicians should have been consulted more before the changes were made.
Physicians usually substitute listed medications for medications that have been delisted. This is especially true for female patients and patients who are unable to pay.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Drug Costs</subject><subject>Drug Prescriptions</subject><subject>Drug Utilization</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Formularies as Topic</subject><subject>Health Care Reform</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Reimbursement Mechanisms</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0008-350X</issn><issn>1715-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtPwzAQhCMEKqXwE5AsDtyC_ErTXJBQeRRRqReQuEWOs05dpXawHVD-PS5UCDjtYb4Zze4eJGOSkyzNaDY7TMYY41nKMvx6nJx4v8GYTjkjo2Q0yzOeYzxOhltotQ_aNMgqVLu-8UgbtDJBOG2v0MJ-IBGCDn0NHglTo86Bl05XO4sPTgRodJSiW4mtbgfUrQevpRbmKymsAT1F1gdrkHAgkFwL00B9mhwp0Xo4289J8nJ_9zxfpMvVw-P8Zpl2FLOQ1kBrKvNKVlMhucwUA5CcEpkXRUVqJTkDwiRTRE1xoQTnGEtcCcIqqoqcs0ly_Z3b9dUWagkmlm7LzumtcENphS7_Kkavy8a-l5TwaV7QGHC5D3D2rQcfyq32EtpWGLC9L_MZjXfOcAQv_oEb2zsTlyspzuJfCr6Dzn_X-emx_wj7BPUUi_U</recordid><startdate>199607</startdate><enddate>199607</enddate><creator>Godwin, M</creator><creator>Chapman, J</creator><creator>Mowat, D</creator><creator>Racz, W</creator><creator>McBride, J</creator><creator>Tang, J</creator><general>College of Family Physicians of Canada</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199607</creationdate><title>Delisting of drugs in Ontario. How attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians in the Kingston area changed</title><author>Godwin, M ; Chapman, J ; Mowat, D ; Racz, W ; McBride, J ; Tang, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p203t-de2d2c7bcb6ac4c5f3eec421c799b1dfc43e13c3f1f609fa4400c0ba13b2f9743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Drug Costs</topic><topic>Drug Prescriptions</topic><topic>Drug Utilization</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Formularies as Topic</topic><topic>Health Care Reform</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Reimbursement Mechanisms</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Godwin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mowat, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racz, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Godwin, M</au><au>Chapman, J</au><au>Mowat, D</au><au>Racz, W</au><au>McBride, J</au><au>Tang, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delisting of drugs in Ontario. How attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians in the Kingston area changed</atitle><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><date>1996-07</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>42</volume><spage>1309</spage><epage>1316</epage><pages>1309-1316</pages><issn>0008-350X</issn><eissn>1715-5258</eissn><abstract>To assess how attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians changed when drugs were delisted from the Ontario Drug Benefit formulary.
Mailed, self-administered survey.
Family physicians' offices in Ontario.
All family physicians practising in the Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox, and Addington Health District.
Physicians were presented with six vignettes involving patients receiving a delisted drug. The choices were to recommend the patient pay for the medication, to substitute a drug still listed on the formulary, to make a special request that the medication be covered for this patient, or to offer another option. As well, the physicians were asked to indicate, on a 5-point Likert scale, their opinions regarding the effect of delisting on themselves and their patients.
Physicians were most likely to change to a medication that was still on the formulary. Patient sex and ability to pay were factors in physicians' decisions. Physicians believe that the delistings are not likely to have adversely affected patients' health, that noncompliance is a problem because many once-daily formulations have been removed, that suitable alternatives are not always available, and that physicians should have been consulted more before the changes were made.
Physicians usually substitute listed medications for medications that have been delisted. This is especially true for female patients and patients who are unable to pay.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>College of Family Physicians of Canada</pub><pmid>8754700</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-350X |
ispartof | Canadian family physician, 1996-07, Vol.42, p.1309-1316 |
issn | 0008-350X 1715-5258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2146792 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Drug Costs Drug Prescriptions Drug Utilization Family Practice Female Formularies as Topic Health Care Reform Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Male Middle Aged Ontario Physicians Practice Patterns, Physicians Prescription drugs Reimbursement Mechanisms Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Delisting of drugs in Ontario. How attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians in the Kingston area changed |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A06%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delisting%20of%20drugs%20in%20Ontario.%20How%20attitudes%20and%20prescribing%20strategies%20of%20family%20physicians%20in%20the%20Kingston%20area%20changed&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20family%20physician&rft.au=Godwin,%20M&rft.date=1996-07&rft.volume=42&rft.spage=1309&rft.epage=1316&rft.pages=1309-1316&rft.issn=0008-350X&rft.eissn=1715-5258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78200050%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205171940&rft_id=info:pmid/8754700&rfr_iscdi=true |