Chest pain in family practice. Diagnosis and long-term outcome in a community setting

To describe diagnostic distribution and outcome of chest pain among patients attending an urban family practice. Retrospective, descriptive chart review. Primary care practice. All patients contacts for chest pain at Fossvogur Health Centre in the years 1989 and 1990 (193 contacts with 189 patients)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian family physician 1996-06, Vol.42, p.1122-1128
Hauptverfasser: Svavarsdóttir, A E, Jónasson, M R, Gudmundsson, G H, Fjeldsted, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1128
container_issue
container_start_page 1122
container_title Canadian family physician
container_volume 42
creator Svavarsdóttir, A E
Jónasson, M R
Gudmundsson, G H
Fjeldsted, K
description To describe diagnostic distribution and outcome of chest pain among patients attending an urban family practice. Retrospective, descriptive chart review. Primary care practice. All patients contacts for chest pain at Fossvogur Health Centre in the years 1989 and 1990 (193 contacts with 189 patients) were examined. One patient died before follow up and two could not be reached for follow up; they were excluded from the study. Of the 190 contacts and 186 patients studied, one patient who had two contacts with the clinic died during the study. Age and sex distribution, physical examination, investigations, diagnosis, and treatment; well-being of every patient was checked 3 to 4 years after initial contact. We asked about evolution of symptoms and looked for possible misdiagnosis. Musculoskeletal pain was diagnosed in 48.9% of contacts, heart diseases in 17.9% and 9.5% had undiagnosed chest pain. The history was the main diagnostic tool for patients with musculoskeletal diseases, while patients with heart diseases were examined more carefully and underwent more diagnostic procedures. Follow up showed that no serious disease had been missed in spite of restrictive use of laboratory investigations. The working methods of family doctors who examined patients with chest pain in this health centre can differentiate between patients with serious diseases and those with benign conditions.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2146490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78123542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p288t-68333241a8ce9e8ceaaf0c9eb08d9342ad95d64ae19d97635ad3c673ceb482963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUE1LAzEQDaLUWv0JQvDgbSWfu9mLIPUTCl4seAvTbNpGdpN1kxX6741YRIVh5sG8ebx5B2hKKyoLyaQ6RFNCiCq4JK_H6CTGN0JYKTidoImqiBBKTdFyvrUx4R6cx7nW0Ll2h_sBTHLGXuFbBxsfoosYfIPb4DdFskOHw5hM6OzXDeCMutG7tMPRpuT85hQdraGN9mw_Z2h5f_cyfywWzw9P85tF0TOlUlEqzjkTFJSxtc0NYE1MbVdENTUXDJpaNqUAS-umrkouoeGmrLixK6FYXfIZuv7W7cdVZxtjfRqg1f3gOhh2OoDTfzfebfUmfGhGRSlqkgUu9wJDeB9zErpz0di2BW_DGHWlKONSsEy8-Ed8C-Pg83OaEUkrQajMpPPfdn587NPmn6j3fZ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205174015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chest pain in family practice. Diagnosis and long-term outcome in a community setting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Svavarsdóttir, A E ; Jónasson, M R ; Gudmundsson, G H ; Fjeldsted, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Svavarsdóttir, A E ; Jónasson, M R ; Gudmundsson, G H ; Fjeldsted, K</creatorcontrib><description>To describe diagnostic distribution and outcome of chest pain among patients attending an urban family practice. Retrospective, descriptive chart review. Primary care practice. All patients contacts for chest pain at Fossvogur Health Centre in the years 1989 and 1990 (193 contacts with 189 patients) were examined. One patient died before follow up and two could not be reached for follow up; they were excluded from the study. Of the 190 contacts and 186 patients studied, one patient who had two contacts with the clinic died during the study. Age and sex distribution, physical examination, investigations, diagnosis, and treatment; well-being of every patient was checked 3 to 4 years after initial contact. We asked about evolution of symptoms and looked for possible misdiagnosis. Musculoskeletal pain was diagnosed in 48.9% of contacts, heart diseases in 17.9% and 9.5% had undiagnosed chest pain. The history was the main diagnostic tool for patients with musculoskeletal diseases, while patients with heart diseases were examined more carefully and underwent more diagnostic procedures. Follow up showed that no serious disease had been missed in spite of restrictive use of laboratory investigations. The working methods of family doctors who examined patients with chest pain in this health centre can differentiate between patients with serious diseases and those with benign conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-350X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-5258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8704488</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: College of Family Physicians of Canada</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Chest Pain - etiology ; Chest Pain - therapy ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Family medicine ; Family Practice ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart disease ; Heart Diseases - complications ; Heart Diseases - diagnosis ; Heart Diseases - therapy ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Patient Admission ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Canadian family physician, 1996-06, Vol.42, p.1122-1128</ispartof><rights>Copyright College of Family Physicians of Canada Jun 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2146490/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2146490/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8704488$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Svavarsdóttir, A E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jónasson, M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudmundsson, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fjeldsted, K</creatorcontrib><title>Chest pain in family practice. Diagnosis and long-term outcome in a community setting</title><title>Canadian family physician</title><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><description>To describe diagnostic distribution and outcome of chest pain among patients attending an urban family practice. Retrospective, descriptive chart review. Primary care practice. All patients contacts for chest pain at Fossvogur Health Centre in the years 1989 and 1990 (193 contacts with 189 patients) were examined. One patient died before follow up and two could not be reached for follow up; they were excluded from the study. Of the 190 contacts and 186 patients studied, one patient who had two contacts with the clinic died during the study. Age and sex distribution, physical examination, investigations, diagnosis, and treatment; well-being of every patient was checked 3 to 4 years after initial contact. We asked about evolution of symptoms and looked for possible misdiagnosis. Musculoskeletal pain was diagnosed in 48.9% of contacts, heart diseases in 17.9% and 9.5% had undiagnosed chest pain. The history was the main diagnostic tool for patients with musculoskeletal diseases, while patients with heart diseases were examined more carefully and underwent more diagnostic procedures. Follow up showed that no serious disease had been missed in spite of restrictive use of laboratory investigations. The working methods of family doctors who examined patients with chest pain in this health centre can differentiate between patients with serious diseases and those with benign conditions.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Chest Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Chest Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Family medicine</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart disease</subject><subject>Heart Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Heart Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0008-350X</issn><issn>1715-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUE1LAzEQDaLUWv0JQvDgbSWfu9mLIPUTCl4seAvTbNpGdpN1kxX6741YRIVh5sG8ebx5B2hKKyoLyaQ6RFNCiCq4JK_H6CTGN0JYKTidoImqiBBKTdFyvrUx4R6cx7nW0Ll2h_sBTHLGXuFbBxsfoosYfIPb4DdFskOHw5hM6OzXDeCMutG7tMPRpuT85hQdraGN9mw_Z2h5f_cyfywWzw9P85tF0TOlUlEqzjkTFJSxtc0NYE1MbVdENTUXDJpaNqUAS-umrkouoeGmrLixK6FYXfIZuv7W7cdVZxtjfRqg1f3gOhh2OoDTfzfebfUmfGhGRSlqkgUu9wJDeB9zErpz0di2BW_DGHWlKONSsEy8-Ed8C-Pg83OaEUkrQajMpPPfdn587NPmn6j3fZ4</recordid><startdate>199606</startdate><enddate>199606</enddate><creator>Svavarsdóttir, A E</creator><creator>Jónasson, M R</creator><creator>Gudmundsson, G H</creator><creator>Fjeldsted, K</creator><general>College of Family Physicians of Canada</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199606</creationdate><title>Chest pain in family practice. Diagnosis and long-term outcome in a community setting</title><author>Svavarsdóttir, A E ; Jónasson, M R ; Gudmundsson, G H ; Fjeldsted, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p288t-68333241a8ce9e8ceaaf0c9eb08d9342ad95d64ae19d97635ad3c673ceb482963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Chest Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Chest Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Family medicine</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart disease</topic><topic>Heart Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Heart Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Svavarsdóttir, A E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jónasson, M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudmundsson, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fjeldsted, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Svavarsdóttir, A E</au><au>Jónasson, M R</au><au>Gudmundsson, G H</au><au>Fjeldsted, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chest pain in family practice. Diagnosis and long-term outcome in a community setting</atitle><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><date>1996-06</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>42</volume><spage>1122</spage><epage>1128</epage><pages>1122-1128</pages><issn>0008-350X</issn><eissn>1715-5258</eissn><abstract>To describe diagnostic distribution and outcome of chest pain among patients attending an urban family practice. Retrospective, descriptive chart review. Primary care practice. All patients contacts for chest pain at Fossvogur Health Centre in the years 1989 and 1990 (193 contacts with 189 patients) were examined. One patient died before follow up and two could not be reached for follow up; they were excluded from the study. Of the 190 contacts and 186 patients studied, one patient who had two contacts with the clinic died during the study. Age and sex distribution, physical examination, investigations, diagnosis, and treatment; well-being of every patient was checked 3 to 4 years after initial contact. We asked about evolution of symptoms and looked for possible misdiagnosis. Musculoskeletal pain was diagnosed in 48.9% of contacts, heart diseases in 17.9% and 9.5% had undiagnosed chest pain. The history was the main diagnostic tool for patients with musculoskeletal diseases, while patients with heart diseases were examined more carefully and underwent more diagnostic procedures. Follow up showed that no serious disease had been missed in spite of restrictive use of laboratory investigations. The working methods of family doctors who examined patients with chest pain in this health centre can differentiate between patients with serious diseases and those with benign conditions.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>College of Family Physicians of Canada</pub><pmid>8704488</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-350X
ispartof Canadian family physician, 1996-06, Vol.42, p.1122-1128
issn 0008-350X
1715-5258
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2146490
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Chest Pain - etiology
Chest Pain - therapy
Child
Child, Preschool
Diagnosis, Differential
Family medicine
Family Practice
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart disease
Heart Diseases - complications
Heart Diseases - diagnosis
Heart Diseases - therapy
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Pain
Patient Admission
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Chest pain in family practice. Diagnosis and long-term outcome in a community setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A22%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chest%20pain%20in%20family%20practice.%20Diagnosis%20and%20long-term%20outcome%20in%20a%20community%20setting&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20family%20physician&rft.au=Svavarsd%C3%B3ttir,%20A%20E&rft.date=1996-06&rft.volume=42&rft.spage=1122&rft.epage=1128&rft.pages=1122-1128&rft.issn=0008-350X&rft.eissn=1715-5258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78123542%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205174015&rft_id=info:pmid/8704488&rfr_iscdi=true