Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing

The effectiveness of various hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient skin bacteria was studied in hospital after dry or moist contamination of the hands when nursing burn patients. The results were compared with those of laboratory tests with volunteers. A fairly good correlation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hygiene 1980-10, Vol.85 (2), p.193-203
1. Verfasser: Ojajaervi, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 203
container_issue 2
container_start_page 193
container_title The Journal of hygiene
container_volume 85
creator Ojajaervi, J
description The effectiveness of various hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient skin bacteria was studied in hospital after dry or moist contamination of the hands when nursing burn patients. The results were compared with those of laboratory tests with volunteers. A fairly good correlation of the bacterial reductions existed between hospital and laboratory tests. All other methods removed Slaph. aureus from the hands more effectively than liquid soap. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed than staphylococci, even with soap wash alone. In hospital, none of the washing and disinfection methods always removed all patient-borne bacteria from the hands. After dry or moist contamination and subsequent washing with soap only, colonies of Staph. aureus were often detected in finger-print samples. Staphylococci wero more often completely removed by a 4% chlorhexidine detergent scrub and alcoholic solutions (either with or without previous soap wash) than by liquid soap, hexachlorophene or iodophor preparations. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed by all the washing and disinfection methods. After moist contamination, Gram-negative bacilli were more often completely removed from the hands by ethanol than by other treatments. The results of the present study emphasize the importance of always using gloves when nursing a profuse spreader of bacteria or one who must be protected from infection.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022172400063221
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2133933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022172400063221</cupid><jstor_id>3862201</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3862201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-d9f71e5c66ae913ad45a9d5413a9d768ba8bca4ab67efc9c63f0e393eec328a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV-L1DAUxYMo67j6AQSFPvlWTZo0aV4EWdZdYf2zuPoabtPbmcxOkzFpR_32pjvDoAj6dC_5nXs44RDylNGXjDL16jOlVcVUJSilkuf1HllUXMuyYY24TxYzLmf-kDxKaU1pLRTjJ-REKtVoJhbk9rzv0Y5uhx5TKkJfrMB3xXdIK-eXxbx3Ljl_Jwq-GHBchS4VzhcRh7CbRWMEnxz6sWjBjhgdFNDnWWxhvHv2U8wWy8fkQQ-bhE8O85R8eXt-c3ZZXn28eHf25qq0tRZj2eleMaytlICacehEDbqrRV51p2TTQtNaENBKhb3VVvKeItcc0fKqgZqfktd73-3UDtjZHCHCxmyjGyD-NAGc-ZN4tzLLsDMV49mHZ4MXB4MYvk2YRjO4ZHGzAY9hSkbVggpa6_8KWc0lbcQcie2FNoaUIvbHNIyauUrzV5X55vnv3zheHLrL_Nmer9MY4hHzRlYVnc_LPXZpxB9HDPE2O3BVG3lxbdTlzYevn_S1eZ_1_BARhja6bolmHaboc1P_CPkLeI_Eww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15360845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ojajaervi, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ojajaervi, J</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of various hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient skin bacteria was studied in hospital after dry or moist contamination of the hands when nursing burn patients. The results were compared with those of laboratory tests with volunteers. A fairly good correlation of the bacterial reductions existed between hospital and laboratory tests. All other methods removed Slaph. aureus from the hands more effectively than liquid soap. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed than staphylococci, even with soap wash alone. In hospital, none of the washing and disinfection methods always removed all patient-borne bacteria from the hands. After dry or moist contamination and subsequent washing with soap only, colonies of Staph. aureus were often detected in finger-print samples. Staphylococci wero more often completely removed by a 4% chlorhexidine detergent scrub and alcoholic solutions (either with or without previous soap wash) than by liquid soap, hexachlorophene or iodophor preparations. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed by all the washing and disinfection methods. After moist contamination, Gram-negative bacilli were more often completely removed from the hands by ethanol than by other treatments. The results of the present study emphasize the importance of always using gloves when nursing a profuse spreader of bacteria or one who must be protected from infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2396-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022172400063221</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6778914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Chlorhexidine - pharmacology ; Detergents ; Disinfection ; Disinfection - methods ; Ethanol ; Ethanol - pharmacology ; Fingers ; Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Hand - microbiology ; Hands ; Hexachlorobenzene - pharmacology ; Humans ; Iodophors ; Iodophors - pharmacology ; Liquids ; Nursing Care ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation &amp; purification ; Soaps ; Soaps - pharmacology ; Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification ; Sterilization - methods ; Washing</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hygiene, 1980-10, Vol.85 (2), p.193-203</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980</rights><rights>Copyright 1980 Cambridge University Press</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-d9f71e5c66ae913ad45a9d5413a9d768ba8bca4ab67efc9c63f0e393eec328a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-d9f71e5c66ae913ad45a9d5413a9d768ba8bca4ab67efc9c63f0e393eec328a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3862201$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3862201$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6778914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ojajaervi, J</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing</title><title>The Journal of hygiene</title><addtitle>J. Hyg</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of various hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient skin bacteria was studied in hospital after dry or moist contamination of the hands when nursing burn patients. The results were compared with those of laboratory tests with volunteers. A fairly good correlation of the bacterial reductions existed between hospital and laboratory tests. All other methods removed Slaph. aureus from the hands more effectively than liquid soap. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed than staphylococci, even with soap wash alone. In hospital, none of the washing and disinfection methods always removed all patient-borne bacteria from the hands. After dry or moist contamination and subsequent washing with soap only, colonies of Staph. aureus were often detected in finger-print samples. Staphylococci wero more often completely removed by a 4% chlorhexidine detergent scrub and alcoholic solutions (either with or without previous soap wash) than by liquid soap, hexachlorophene or iodophor preparations. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed by all the washing and disinfection methods. After moist contamination, Gram-negative bacilli were more often completely removed from the hands by ethanol than by other treatments. The results of the present study emphasize the importance of always using gloves when nursing a profuse spreader of bacteria or one who must be protected from infection.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Detergents</subject><subject>Disinfection</subject><subject>Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Ethanol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Fingers</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Hand - microbiology</subject><subject>Hands</subject><subject>Hexachlorobenzene - pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iodophors</subject><subject>Iodophors - pharmacology</subject><subject>Liquids</subject><subject>Nursing Care</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Soaps</subject><subject>Soaps - pharmacology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Sterilization - methods</subject><subject>Washing</subject><issn>0022-1724</issn><issn>2396-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV-L1DAUxYMo67j6AQSFPvlWTZo0aV4EWdZdYf2zuPoabtPbmcxOkzFpR_32pjvDoAj6dC_5nXs44RDylNGXjDL16jOlVcVUJSilkuf1HllUXMuyYY24TxYzLmf-kDxKaU1pLRTjJ-REKtVoJhbk9rzv0Y5uhx5TKkJfrMB3xXdIK-eXxbx3Ljl_Jwq-GHBchS4VzhcRh7CbRWMEnxz6sWjBjhgdFNDnWWxhvHv2U8wWy8fkQQ-bhE8O85R8eXt-c3ZZXn28eHf25qq0tRZj2eleMaytlICacehEDbqrRV51p2TTQtNaENBKhb3VVvKeItcc0fKqgZqfktd73-3UDtjZHCHCxmyjGyD-NAGc-ZN4tzLLsDMV49mHZ4MXB4MYvk2YRjO4ZHGzAY9hSkbVggpa6_8KWc0lbcQcie2FNoaUIvbHNIyauUrzV5X55vnv3zheHLrL_Nmer9MY4hHzRlYVnc_LPXZpxB9HDPE2O3BVG3lxbdTlzYevn_S1eZ_1_BARhja6bolmHaboc1P_CPkLeI_Eww</recordid><startdate>19801001</startdate><enddate>19801001</enddate><creator>Ojajaervi, J</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19801001</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing</title><author>Ojajaervi, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-d9f71e5c66ae913ad45a9d5413a9d768ba8bca4ab67efc9c63f0e393eec328a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Detergents</topic><topic>Disinfection</topic><topic>Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Ethanol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Fingers</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Hand - microbiology</topic><topic>Hands</topic><topic>Hexachlorobenzene - pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iodophors</topic><topic>Iodophors - pharmacology</topic><topic>Liquids</topic><topic>Nursing Care</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Soaps</topic><topic>Soaps - pharmacology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Sterilization - methods</topic><topic>Washing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ojajaervi, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ojajaervi, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>J. Hyg</addtitle><date>1980-10-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>193-203</pages><issn>0022-1724</issn><eissn>2396-8184</eissn><abstract>The effectiveness of various hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient skin bacteria was studied in hospital after dry or moist contamination of the hands when nursing burn patients. The results were compared with those of laboratory tests with volunteers. A fairly good correlation of the bacterial reductions existed between hospital and laboratory tests. All other methods removed Slaph. aureus from the hands more effectively than liquid soap. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed than staphylococci, even with soap wash alone. In hospital, none of the washing and disinfection methods always removed all patient-borne bacteria from the hands. After dry or moist contamination and subsequent washing with soap only, colonies of Staph. aureus were often detected in finger-print samples. Staphylococci wero more often completely removed by a 4% chlorhexidine detergent scrub and alcoholic solutions (either with or without previous soap wash) than by liquid soap, hexachlorophene or iodophor preparations. Gram-negative bacilli were more easily removed by all the washing and disinfection methods. After moist contamination, Gram-negative bacilli were more often completely removed from the hands by ethanol than by other treatments. The results of the present study emphasize the importance of always using gloves when nursing a profuse spreader of bacteria or one who must be protected from infection.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>6778914</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0022172400063221</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1724
ispartof The Journal of hygiene, 1980-10, Vol.85 (2), p.193-203
issn 0022-1724
2396-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2133933
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central
subjects Bacteria
Chlorhexidine - pharmacology
Detergents
Disinfection
Disinfection - methods
Ethanol
Ethanol - pharmacology
Fingers
Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria - isolation & purification
Hand - microbiology
Hands
Hexachlorobenzene - pharmacology
Humans
Iodophors
Iodophors - pharmacology
Liquids
Nursing Care
Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation & purification
Soaps
Soaps - pharmacology
Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification
Sterilization - methods
Washing
title Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20hand%20washing%20and%20disinfection%20methods%20in%20removing%20transient%20bacteria%20after%20patient%20nursing&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hygiene&rft.au=Ojajaervi,%20J&rft.date=1980-10-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=193-203&rft.issn=0022-1724&rft.eissn=2396-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022172400063221&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E3862201%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15360845&rft_id=info:pmid/6778914&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022172400063221&rft_jstor_id=3862201&rfr_iscdi=true