Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10
This tenth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) antenatal testing in pregnant women; (ii) estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation; (iii) safety testing for methotrexate; and (iv) blood glucose measurement in diabetes. The rev...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical pathology 2007-11, Vol.60 (11), p.1195-1204 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1204 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1195 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical pathology |
| container_volume | 60 |
| creator | Smellie, W S A Shaw, N Bowley, R Stewart, M F Kelly, A M Twomey, P J Chadwick, P R Houghton, J B Ng, J P McCulloch, A J |
| description | This tenth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) antenatal testing in pregnant women; (ii) estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation; (iii) safety testing for methotrexate; and (iv) blood glucose measurement in diabetes. The review is presented in question–answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jcp.2007.048512 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2095485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4022545621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-54b67e51c55425786a092a10ac578d3369bc78d1727a727d86c8b15dc2c73d8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PGzEQxS1UBIH2zK1aqeKCtMHjb_eAVCK-qqgcSLlaXq9DNk12U3sTyH-Po11BOfVgeUbz85vnh9AJ4CEAFedztxoSjOUQM8WB7KEBMElyBkx8QgOMCeRaMnGIjmKcYwxUAj1AhyCZFqDkAJFLH9tsFaxrK-ezqk51tbRhmzkbfLay7axZNE_b71nwm8o_Z4A_o_2pXUT_pb-P0e_rq8noNh_f39yNfozzghPS5pwVQnoOjnNGuFTCYk0sYOtSU1IqdOFSAZJIm06phFMF8NIRJ2mpPD1GF53ual0sfel83Qa7ML0_09jKfJzU1cw8NRtDsOYpjiTwrRcIzd91-qeZN-tQJ88GpAJMFBciUecd5UITY_DTtw2AzS5kk0I2u5BNF3J68fVfY-98n2oCTnvARmcX02BrV8V3ToOmmunE5R1Xxda_vM1t-GOEpJKbX48j80AmPyfq5tLsFp91fLGc_9flKyAen2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781028566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Smellie, W S A ; Shaw, N ; Bowley, R ; Stewart, M F ; Kelly, A M ; Twomey, P J ; Chadwick, P R ; Houghton, J B ; Ng, J P ; McCulloch, A J</creator><creatorcontrib>Smellie, W S A ; Shaw, N ; Bowley, R ; Stewart, M F ; Kelly, A M ; Twomey, P J ; Chadwick, P R ; Houghton, J B ; Ng, J P ; McCulloch, A J</creatorcontrib><description>This tenth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) antenatal testing in pregnant women; (ii) estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation; (iii) safety testing for methotrexate; and (iv) blood glucose measurement in diabetes. The review is presented in question–answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2007.048512</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17496187</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPAAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</publisher><subject>best practice ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis ; Down syndrome ; Drug Monitoring - methods ; evidence-based medicine ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Hematology ; Hepatitis ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects ; Insulin ; interdisciplinary ; Intervention ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laboratories ; Medical sciences ; Methotrexate - adverse effects ; Mortality ; Pathology ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Patient Selection ; Physiology ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Care - methods ; primary care ; Primary Health Care - methods ; Proteins ; Review ; Urinalysis ; Urine ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical pathology, 2007-11, Vol.60 (11), p.1195-1204</ispartof><rights>2007 The BMJ Publishing Group and the Association of Clinical Pathologists</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2007 2007 The BMJ Publishing Group and the Association of Clinical Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 The BMJ Publishing Group and the Association of Clinical Pathologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-54b67e51c55425786a092a10ac578d3369bc78d1727a727d86c8b15dc2c73d8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-54b67e51c55425786a092a10ac578d3369bc78d1727a727d86c8b15dc2c73d8e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jcp.bmj.com/content/60/11/1195.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jcp.bmj.com/content/60/11/1195.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,313,314,723,776,780,788,881,3183,23550,27899,27901,27902,53766,53768,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19193949$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17496187$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smellie, W S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowley, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twomey, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, P R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, J B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCulloch, A J</creatorcontrib><title>Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10</title><title>Journal of clinical pathology</title><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>This tenth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) antenatal testing in pregnant women; (ii) estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation; (iii) safety testing for methotrexate; and (iv) blood glucose measurement in diabetes. The review is presented in question–answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.</description><subject>best practice</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</subject><subject>Down syndrome</subject><subject>Drug Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>interdisciplinary</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methotrexate - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Care - methods</subject><subject>primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Urinalysis</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0021-9746</issn><issn>1472-4146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1PGzEQxS1UBIH2zK1aqeKCtMHjb_eAVCK-qqgcSLlaXq9DNk12U3sTyH-Po11BOfVgeUbz85vnh9AJ4CEAFedztxoSjOUQM8WB7KEBMElyBkx8QgOMCeRaMnGIjmKcYwxUAj1AhyCZFqDkAJFLH9tsFaxrK-ezqk51tbRhmzkbfLay7axZNE_b71nwm8o_Z4A_o_2pXUT_pb-P0e_rq8noNh_f39yNfozzghPS5pwVQnoOjnNGuFTCYk0sYOtSU1IqdOFSAZJIm06phFMF8NIRJ2mpPD1GF53ual0sfel83Qa7ML0_09jKfJzU1cw8NRtDsOYpjiTwrRcIzd91-qeZN-tQJ88GpAJMFBciUecd5UITY_DTtw2AzS5kk0I2u5BNF3J68fVfY-98n2oCTnvARmcX02BrV8V3ToOmmunE5R1Xxda_vM1t-GOEpJKbX48j80AmPyfq5tLsFp91fLGc_9flKyAen2A</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Smellie, W S A</creator><creator>Shaw, N</creator><creator>Bowley, R</creator><creator>Stewart, M F</creator><creator>Kelly, A M</creator><creator>Twomey, P J</creator><creator>Chadwick, P R</creator><creator>Houghton, J B</creator><creator>Ng, J P</creator><creator>McCulloch, A J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10</title><author>Smellie, W S A ; Shaw, N ; Bowley, R ; Stewart, M F ; Kelly, A M ; Twomey, P J ; Chadwick, P R ; Houghton, J B ; Ng, J P ; McCulloch, A J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-54b67e51c55425786a092a10ac578d3369bc78d1727a727d86c8b15dc2c73d8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>best practice</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</topic><topic>Down syndrome</topic><topic>Drug Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>interdisciplinary</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methotrexate - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Care - methods</topic><topic>primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Urinalysis</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smellie, W S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowley, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, M F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twomey, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, P R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, J B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCulloch, A J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smellie, W S A</au><au>Shaw, N</au><au>Bowley, R</au><au>Stewart, M F</au><au>Kelly, A M</au><au>Twomey, P J</au><au>Chadwick, P R</au><au>Houghton, J B</au><au>Ng, J P</au><au>McCulloch, A J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1195</spage><epage>1204</epage><pages>1195-1204</pages><issn>0021-9746</issn><eissn>1472-4146</eissn><coden>JCPAAK</coden><abstract>This tenth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) antenatal testing in pregnant women; (ii) estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation; (iii) safety testing for methotrexate; and (iv) blood glucose measurement in diabetes. The review is presented in question–answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</pub><pmid>17496187</pmid><doi>10.1136/jcp.2007.048512</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9746 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical pathology, 2007-11, Vol.60 (11), p.1195-1204 |
| issn | 0021-9746 1472-4146 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2095485 |
| source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | best practice Biological and medical sciences Blood Glucose - analysis Diabetes Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis Down syndrome Drug Monitoring - methods evidence-based medicine Female Glomerular Filtration Rate Hematology Hepatitis Humans Hypertension Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects Insulin interdisciplinary Intervention Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Laboratories Medical sciences Methotrexate - adverse effects Mortality Pathology Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Patient Selection Physiology Pregnancy Prenatal Care - methods primary care Primary Health Care - methods Proteins Review Urinalysis Urine Womens health |
| title | Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A32%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20practice%20in%20primary%20care%20pathology:%20review%2010&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Smellie,%20W%20S%20A&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1195&rft.epage=1204&rft.pages=1195-1204&rft.issn=0021-9746&rft.eissn=1472-4146&rft.coden=JCPAAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jcp.2007.048512&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4022545621%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781028566&rft_id=info:pmid/17496187&rfr_iscdi=true |