Optimization of Electrostatic Interactions in Protein-Protein Complexes

In this article, we present a statistical analysis of the electrostatic properties of 298 protein-protein complexes and 356 domain-domain structures extracted from the previously developed database of protein complexes ( ProtCom, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/compbio/protcom). For each structure in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biophysical journal 2007-11, Vol.93 (10), p.3340-3352
Hauptverfasser: Brock, Kelly, Talley, Kemper, Coley, Kacey, Kundrotas, Petras, Alexov, Emil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3352
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3340
container_title Biophysical journal
container_volume 93
creator Brock, Kelly
Talley, Kemper
Coley, Kacey
Kundrotas, Petras
Alexov, Emil
description In this article, we present a statistical analysis of the electrostatic properties of 298 protein-protein complexes and 356 domain-domain structures extracted from the previously developed database of protein complexes ( ProtCom, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/compbio/protcom). For each structure in the dataset we calculated the total electrostatic energy of the binding and its two components, Coulombic and reaction field energy. It was found that in a vast majority of the cases (>90%), the total electrostatic component of the binding energy was unfavorable. At the same time, the Coulombic component of the binding energy was found to favor the complex formation while the reaction field component of the binding energy opposed the binding. It was also demonstrated that the components in a wild-type (WT) structure are optimized/anti-optimized with respect to the corresponding distributions, arising from random shuffling of the charged side chains. The degree of this optimization was assessed through the Z-score of WT energy in respect to the random distribution. It was found that the Z-scores of Coulombic interactions peak at a considerably negative value for all 654 cases considered while the Z-score of the reaction field energy varied among different types of complexes. All these findings indicate that the Coulombic interactions within WT protein-protein complexes are optimized to favor the complex formation while the total electrostatic energy predominantly opposes the binding. This observation was used to discriminate WT structures among sets of structural decoys and showed that the electrostatic component of the binding energy is not a good discriminator of the WT; while, Coulombic or reaction field energies perform better depending upon the decoy set used.
doi_str_mv 10.1529/biophysj.107.112367
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2072065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006349507715886</els_id><sourcerecordid>68461508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-580ee1188a336392766919309ffc9ac949a515969281f452359093587a3a97003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvLJ0BCEQc4ZTu2438HkNCqtJUqlQM9W653Qr1K4mB7K8qnx9UuUHroaaSZ3zyP3yPkDYUlFcwcX4c439zlzZKCWlLKuFTPyIKKjrUAWj4nCwCQLe-MOCCvct4AUCaAviQHVEnDO6kX5PRyLmEMv1wJcWpi35wM6EuKudSOb86ngsn5-2FuwtR8TbFgmNp9bVZxnAf8ifmIvOjdkPH1vh6Sqy8n31Zn7cXl6fnq80XrhWalFRoQKdXacS65YUpKQw0H0_feOG864wQVRhqmad8JxoUBw4VWjjujAPgh-bTTnbfXI649TiW5wc4pjC7d2eiC_X8yhRv7Pd5aBoqBFFXgw14gxR9bzMWOIXscBjdh3GarZddVm4yq5PsnSak7SQXoCr57BG7iNk3VBsuoqFdXqkJ8B_lqbk7Y_72Zgr3P0_7JszaU3eVZt94-_O6_nX2AFfi4A7Cafhsw2ewDTh7XIdUg7TqGJx_4DVD_sig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215700150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of Electrostatic Interactions in Protein-Protein Complexes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cell Press Free Archives</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Brock, Kelly ; Talley, Kemper ; Coley, Kacey ; Kundrotas, Petras ; Alexov, Emil</creator><creatorcontrib>Brock, Kelly ; Talley, Kemper ; Coley, Kacey ; Kundrotas, Petras ; Alexov, Emil</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we present a statistical analysis of the electrostatic properties of 298 protein-protein complexes and 356 domain-domain structures extracted from the previously developed database of protein complexes ( ProtCom, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/compbio/protcom). For each structure in the dataset we calculated the total electrostatic energy of the binding and its two components, Coulombic and reaction field energy. It was found that in a vast majority of the cases (&gt;90%), the total electrostatic component of the binding energy was unfavorable. At the same time, the Coulombic component of the binding energy was found to favor the complex formation while the reaction field component of the binding energy opposed the binding. It was also demonstrated that the components in a wild-type (WT) structure are optimized/anti-optimized with respect to the corresponding distributions, arising from random shuffling of the charged side chains. The degree of this optimization was assessed through the Z-score of WT energy in respect to the random distribution. It was found that the Z-scores of Coulombic interactions peak at a considerably negative value for all 654 cases considered while the Z-score of the reaction field energy varied among different types of complexes. All these findings indicate that the Coulombic interactions within WT protein-protein complexes are optimized to favor the complex formation while the total electrostatic energy predominantly opposes the binding. This observation was used to discriminate WT structures among sets of structural decoys and showed that the electrostatic component of the binding energy is not a good discriminator of the WT; while, Coulombic or reaction field energies perform better depending upon the decoy set used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-0086</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.112367</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17693468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Binding energy ; Binding Sites ; Biophysical Theory and Modeling ; Biophysics ; Biophysics - methods ; Carrier Proteins - chemistry ; Complex formation ; Computer Simulation ; Databases, Protein ; Decoys ; Electrostatics ; Energy use ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Mathematical analysis ; Models, Molecular ; Models, Statistical ; Optimization ; Protein Binding ; Protein Conformation ; Protein Interaction Mapping ; Protein Structure, Tertiary ; Proteins ; Proteins - chemistry ; Software ; Static Electricity ; Statistical analysis ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Biophysical journal, 2007-11, Vol.93 (10), p.3340-3352</ispartof><rights>2007 The Biophysical Society</rights><rights>Copyright Biophysical Society Nov 15, 2007</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007, Biophysical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-580ee1188a336392766919309ffc9ac949a515969281f452359093587a3a97003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-580ee1188a336392766919309ffc9ac949a515969281f452359093587a3a97003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2072065/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.112367$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3541,27915,27916,45986,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17693468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brock, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talley, Kemper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coley, Kacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundrotas, Petras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexov, Emil</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of Electrostatic Interactions in Protein-Protein Complexes</title><title>Biophysical journal</title><addtitle>Biophys J</addtitle><description>In this article, we present a statistical analysis of the electrostatic properties of 298 protein-protein complexes and 356 domain-domain structures extracted from the previously developed database of protein complexes ( ProtCom, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/compbio/protcom). For each structure in the dataset we calculated the total electrostatic energy of the binding and its two components, Coulombic and reaction field energy. It was found that in a vast majority of the cases (&gt;90%), the total electrostatic component of the binding energy was unfavorable. At the same time, the Coulombic component of the binding energy was found to favor the complex formation while the reaction field component of the binding energy opposed the binding. It was also demonstrated that the components in a wild-type (WT) structure are optimized/anti-optimized with respect to the corresponding distributions, arising from random shuffling of the charged side chains. The degree of this optimization was assessed through the Z-score of WT energy in respect to the random distribution. It was found that the Z-scores of Coulombic interactions peak at a considerably negative value for all 654 cases considered while the Z-score of the reaction field energy varied among different types of complexes. All these findings indicate that the Coulombic interactions within WT protein-protein complexes are optimized to favor the complex formation while the total electrostatic energy predominantly opposes the binding. This observation was used to discriminate WT structures among sets of structural decoys and showed that the electrostatic component of the binding energy is not a good discriminator of the WT; while, Coulombic or reaction field energies perform better depending upon the decoy set used.</description><subject>Binding energy</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Biophysical Theory and Modeling</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Biophysics - methods</subject><subject>Carrier Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Complex formation</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Databases, Protein</subject><subject>Decoys</subject><subject>Electrostatics</subject><subject>Energy use</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Protein Conformation</subject><subject>Protein Interaction Mapping</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Tertiary</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Static Electricity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0006-3495</issn><issn>1542-0086</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvLJ0BCEQc4ZTu2438HkNCqtJUqlQM9W653Qr1K4mB7K8qnx9UuUHroaaSZ3zyP3yPkDYUlFcwcX4c439zlzZKCWlLKuFTPyIKKjrUAWj4nCwCQLe-MOCCvct4AUCaAviQHVEnDO6kX5PRyLmEMv1wJcWpi35wM6EuKudSOb86ngsn5-2FuwtR8TbFgmNp9bVZxnAf8ifmIvOjdkPH1vh6Sqy8n31Zn7cXl6fnq80XrhWalFRoQKdXacS65YUpKQw0H0_feOG864wQVRhqmad8JxoUBw4VWjjujAPgh-bTTnbfXI649TiW5wc4pjC7d2eiC_X8yhRv7Pd5aBoqBFFXgw14gxR9bzMWOIXscBjdh3GarZddVm4yq5PsnSak7SQXoCr57BG7iNk3VBsuoqFdXqkJ8B_lqbk7Y_72Zgr3P0_7JszaU3eVZt94-_O6_nX2AFfi4A7Cafhsw2ewDTh7XIdUg7TqGJx_4DVD_sig</recordid><startdate>20071115</startdate><enddate>20071115</enddate><creator>Brock, Kelly</creator><creator>Talley, Kemper</creator><creator>Coley, Kacey</creator><creator>Kundrotas, Petras</creator><creator>Alexov, Emil</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Biophysical Society</general><general>The Biophysical Society</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071115</creationdate><title>Optimization of Electrostatic Interactions in Protein-Protein Complexes</title><author>Brock, Kelly ; Talley, Kemper ; Coley, Kacey ; Kundrotas, Petras ; Alexov, Emil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-580ee1188a336392766919309ffc9ac949a515969281f452359093587a3a97003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Binding energy</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Biophysical Theory and Modeling</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Biophysics - methods</topic><topic>Carrier Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Complex formation</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Databases, Protein</topic><topic>Decoys</topic><topic>Electrostatics</topic><topic>Energy use</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Protein Conformation</topic><topic>Protein Interaction Mapping</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Tertiary</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Static Electricity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brock, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talley, Kemper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coley, Kacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundrotas, Petras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexov, Emil</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brock, Kelly</au><au>Talley, Kemper</au><au>Coley, Kacey</au><au>Kundrotas, Petras</au><au>Alexov, Emil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of Electrostatic Interactions in Protein-Protein Complexes</atitle><jtitle>Biophysical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Biophys J</addtitle><date>2007-11-15</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3340</spage><epage>3352</epage><pages>3340-3352</pages><issn>0006-3495</issn><eissn>1542-0086</eissn><abstract>In this article, we present a statistical analysis of the electrostatic properties of 298 protein-protein complexes and 356 domain-domain structures extracted from the previously developed database of protein complexes ( ProtCom, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/compbio/protcom). For each structure in the dataset we calculated the total electrostatic energy of the binding and its two components, Coulombic and reaction field energy. It was found that in a vast majority of the cases (&gt;90%), the total electrostatic component of the binding energy was unfavorable. At the same time, the Coulombic component of the binding energy was found to favor the complex formation while the reaction field component of the binding energy opposed the binding. It was also demonstrated that the components in a wild-type (WT) structure are optimized/anti-optimized with respect to the corresponding distributions, arising from random shuffling of the charged side chains. The degree of this optimization was assessed through the Z-score of WT energy in respect to the random distribution. It was found that the Z-scores of Coulombic interactions peak at a considerably negative value for all 654 cases considered while the Z-score of the reaction field energy varied among different types of complexes. All these findings indicate that the Coulombic interactions within WT protein-protein complexes are optimized to favor the complex formation while the total electrostatic energy predominantly opposes the binding. This observation was used to discriminate WT structures among sets of structural decoys and showed that the electrostatic component of the binding energy is not a good discriminator of the WT; while, Coulombic or reaction field energies perform better depending upon the decoy set used.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17693468</pmid><doi>10.1529/biophysj.107.112367</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3495
ispartof Biophysical journal, 2007-11, Vol.93 (10), p.3340-3352
issn 0006-3495
1542-0086
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2072065
source MEDLINE; Cell Press Free Archives; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Binding energy
Binding Sites
Biophysical Theory and Modeling
Biophysics
Biophysics - methods
Carrier Proteins - chemistry
Complex formation
Computer Simulation
Databases, Protein
Decoys
Electrostatics
Energy use
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Mathematical analysis
Models, Molecular
Models, Statistical
Optimization
Protein Binding
Protein Conformation
Protein Interaction Mapping
Protein Structure, Tertiary
Proteins
Proteins - chemistry
Software
Static Electricity
Statistical analysis
Thermodynamics
title Optimization of Electrostatic Interactions in Protein-Protein Complexes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A39%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20Electrostatic%20Interactions%20in%20Protein-Protein%20Complexes&rft.jtitle=Biophysical%20journal&rft.au=Brock,%20Kelly&rft.date=2007-11-15&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3340&rft.epage=3352&rft.pages=3340-3352&rft.issn=0006-3495&rft.eissn=1542-0086&rft_id=info:doi/10.1529/biophysj.107.112367&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68461508%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215700150&rft_id=info:pmid/17693468&rft_els_id=S0006349507715886&rfr_iscdi=true