Improving the acceptability of high-dose radiotherapy by reducing the duration of treatment : accelerated radiotherapy in high-grade glioma

Radiotherapy, although clearly beneficial in patients with high-grade glioma, is largely palliative, and a protracted course of treatment may not be the most appropriate approach in the context of limited survival. We therefore assessed the feasibility, toxicity and survival results of a short accel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of cancer 1995-06, Vol.71 (6), p.1330-1334
Hauptverfasser: BRADA, M, THOMAS, G, ELYAN, S, JAMES, N, HINES, F, ASHLEY, S, MARSH, H, BELL, B. A, STENNING, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1334
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1330
container_title British journal of cancer
container_volume 71
creator BRADA, M
THOMAS, G
ELYAN, S
JAMES, N
HINES, F
ASHLEY, S
MARSH, H
BELL, B. A
STENNING, S
description Radiotherapy, although clearly beneficial in patients with high-grade glioma, is largely palliative, and a protracted course of treatment may not be the most appropriate approach in the context of limited survival. We therefore assessed the feasibility, toxicity and survival results of a short accelerated radiotherapy regimen given twice daily over a period of 3 weeks. A total of 116 patients with high-grade glioma were treated with radiotherapy in a prospective study using an accelerated fractionation regimen. The total dose of 55 Gy was given in 32-36 fractions of 1.72-1.53 Gy, twice daily 5 days a week, with a minimum 6 h interval between fractions. Toxicity was assessed using Karnofsky performance status scale and in the later part of the study with the Barthel index. Survival data were compared with a control group treated with 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions in a previous MRC study, matched for known prognostic factors. The median survival of 116 patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy was 10 months. Survival comparison of accelerated patients with matched controls treated with conventional fractionation demonstrated a hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.85-1.51; P = 0.39). Early treatment toxicity was acceptable, with only seven patients developing transient decrease in performance status. The accelerated radiotherapy regimen was logistically feasible and acceptable to patients, carers and staff. Treatment time was reduced without apparent increase in early toxicity and there was no loss of survival benefit. The effectiveness and convenience of a short accelerated regimen makes this a suitable alternative to a 6 week course of radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma. However, a full randomised trial comparing conventional and accelerated radiotherapy may be required as proof of equivalence.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/bjc.1995.258
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2033859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7779733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1892fbb561793badc58c35bfcfe61f9cd09cfdcf8015ecb1d9b3ecb6caf5be8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFrHCEYxaU0pNu0t1wLHnrMbHSsq-YQCCFtA4FemrPop84aZsbBcQP7N_SfjpvdLM3pQ997v095CJ1TsqSEyUv7BEuqFF-2XH5AC8pZ21DZio9oQQgRDVEt-YQ-z_NTPSoixSk6FUIowdgC_bsfppye49jhsvbYAPipGBv7WLY4BbyO3bpxafY4GxdT9WQzbbHd4uzdBt5ybpNNiWncRUr2pgx-LPjqldfXSPHuPSCOe3RXbz3u-pgG8wWdBNPP_uthnqHHn3d_b383D39-3d_ePDTwg8hS_6baYC1fUaGYNQ64BMZtgOBXNChwREFwECSh3IOlTllW5wpM4NZX7xm63nOnjR28g_rUbHo95TiYvNXJRP1eGeNad-lZt4QxyVUFXOwBkNM8Zx-OWUr0rhNdO9G7TnTtpNq__b_vaD6UUPXvB93MYPqQzQhxPtoY51JQxV4AxuybEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving the acceptability of high-dose radiotherapy by reducing the duration of treatment : accelerated radiotherapy in high-grade glioma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>BRADA, M ; THOMAS, G ; ELYAN, S ; JAMES, N ; HINES, F ; ASHLEY, S ; MARSH, H ; BELL, B. A ; STENNING, S</creator><creatorcontrib>BRADA, M ; THOMAS, G ; ELYAN, S ; JAMES, N ; HINES, F ; ASHLEY, S ; MARSH, H ; BELL, B. A ; STENNING, S</creatorcontrib><description>Radiotherapy, although clearly beneficial in patients with high-grade glioma, is largely palliative, and a protracted course of treatment may not be the most appropriate approach in the context of limited survival. We therefore assessed the feasibility, toxicity and survival results of a short accelerated radiotherapy regimen given twice daily over a period of 3 weeks. A total of 116 patients with high-grade glioma were treated with radiotherapy in a prospective study using an accelerated fractionation regimen. The total dose of 55 Gy was given in 32-36 fractions of 1.72-1.53 Gy, twice daily 5 days a week, with a minimum 6 h interval between fractions. Toxicity was assessed using Karnofsky performance status scale and in the later part of the study with the Barthel index. Survival data were compared with a control group treated with 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions in a previous MRC study, matched for known prognostic factors. The median survival of 116 patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy was 10 months. Survival comparison of accelerated patients with matched controls treated with conventional fractionation demonstrated a hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.85-1.51; P = 0.39). Early treatment toxicity was acceptable, with only seven patients developing transient decrease in performance status. The accelerated radiotherapy regimen was logistically feasible and acceptable to patients, carers and staff. Treatment time was reduced without apparent increase in early toxicity and there was no loss of survival benefit. The effectiveness and convenience of a short accelerated regimen makes this a suitable alternative to a 6 week course of radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma. However, a full randomised trial comparing conventional and accelerated radiotherapy may be required as proof of equivalence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7779733</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCAAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basingstoke: Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Actuarial Analysis ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Brain Neoplasms - mortality ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Diseases of the nervous system ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Glioma - mortality ; Glioma - pathology ; Glioma - radiotherapy ; Glioma - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>British journal of cancer, 1995-06, Vol.71 (6), p.1330-1334</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1892fbb561793badc58c35bfcfe61f9cd09cfdcf8015ecb1d9b3ecb6caf5be8c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033859/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2033859/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3558719$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7779733$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRADA, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELYAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAMES, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HINES, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASHLEY, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSH, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BELL, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STENNING, S</creatorcontrib><title>Improving the acceptability of high-dose radiotherapy by reducing the duration of treatment : accelerated radiotherapy in high-grade glioma</title><title>British journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><description>Radiotherapy, although clearly beneficial in patients with high-grade glioma, is largely palliative, and a protracted course of treatment may not be the most appropriate approach in the context of limited survival. We therefore assessed the feasibility, toxicity and survival results of a short accelerated radiotherapy regimen given twice daily over a period of 3 weeks. A total of 116 patients with high-grade glioma were treated with radiotherapy in a prospective study using an accelerated fractionation regimen. The total dose of 55 Gy was given in 32-36 fractions of 1.72-1.53 Gy, twice daily 5 days a week, with a minimum 6 h interval between fractions. Toxicity was assessed using Karnofsky performance status scale and in the later part of the study with the Barthel index. Survival data were compared with a control group treated with 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions in a previous MRC study, matched for known prognostic factors. The median survival of 116 patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy was 10 months. Survival comparison of accelerated patients with matched controls treated with conventional fractionation demonstrated a hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.85-1.51; P = 0.39). Early treatment toxicity was acceptable, with only seven patients developing transient decrease in performance status. The accelerated radiotherapy regimen was logistically feasible and acceptable to patients, carers and staff. Treatment time was reduced without apparent increase in early toxicity and there was no loss of survival benefit. The effectiveness and convenience of a short accelerated regimen makes this a suitable alternative to a 6 week course of radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma. However, a full randomised trial comparing conventional and accelerated radiotherapy may be required as proof of equivalence.</description><subject>Actuarial Analysis</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Diseases of the nervous system</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glioma - mortality</subject><subject>Glioma - pathology</subject><subject>Glioma - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Glioma - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0007-0920</issn><issn>1532-1827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFrHCEYxaU0pNu0t1wLHnrMbHSsq-YQCCFtA4FemrPop84aZsbBcQP7N_SfjpvdLM3pQ997v095CJ1TsqSEyUv7BEuqFF-2XH5AC8pZ21DZio9oQQgRDVEt-YQ-z_NTPSoixSk6FUIowdgC_bsfppye49jhsvbYAPipGBv7WLY4BbyO3bpxafY4GxdT9WQzbbHd4uzdBt5ybpNNiWncRUr2pgx-LPjqldfXSPHuPSCOe3RXbz3u-pgG8wWdBNPP_uthnqHHn3d_b383D39-3d_ePDTwg8hS_6baYC1fUaGYNQ64BMZtgOBXNChwREFwECSh3IOlTllW5wpM4NZX7xm63nOnjR28g_rUbHo95TiYvNXJRP1eGeNad-lZt4QxyVUFXOwBkNM8Zx-OWUr0rhNdO9G7TnTtpNq__b_vaD6UUPXvB93MYPqQzQhxPtoY51JQxV4AxuybEg</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>BRADA, M</creator><creator>THOMAS, G</creator><creator>ELYAN, S</creator><creator>JAMES, N</creator><creator>HINES, F</creator><creator>ASHLEY, S</creator><creator>MARSH, H</creator><creator>BELL, B. A</creator><creator>STENNING, S</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>Improving the acceptability of high-dose radiotherapy by reducing the duration of treatment : accelerated radiotherapy in high-grade glioma</title><author>BRADA, M ; THOMAS, G ; ELYAN, S ; JAMES, N ; HINES, F ; ASHLEY, S ; MARSH, H ; BELL, B. A ; STENNING, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1892fbb561793badc58c35bfcfe61f9cd09cfdcf8015ecb1d9b3ecb6caf5be8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Actuarial Analysis</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Diseases of the nervous system</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glioma - mortality</topic><topic>Glioma - pathology</topic><topic>Glioma - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Glioma - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRADA, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELYAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAMES, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HINES, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ASHLEY, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSH, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BELL, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STENNING, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRADA, M</au><au>THOMAS, G</au><au>ELYAN, S</au><au>JAMES, N</au><au>HINES, F</au><au>ASHLEY, S</au><au>MARSH, H</au><au>BELL, B. A</au><au>STENNING, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving the acceptability of high-dose radiotherapy by reducing the duration of treatment : accelerated radiotherapy in high-grade glioma</atitle><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1330</spage><epage>1334</epage><pages>1330-1334</pages><issn>0007-0920</issn><eissn>1532-1827</eissn><coden>BJCAAI</coden><abstract>Radiotherapy, although clearly beneficial in patients with high-grade glioma, is largely palliative, and a protracted course of treatment may not be the most appropriate approach in the context of limited survival. We therefore assessed the feasibility, toxicity and survival results of a short accelerated radiotherapy regimen given twice daily over a period of 3 weeks. A total of 116 patients with high-grade glioma were treated with radiotherapy in a prospective study using an accelerated fractionation regimen. The total dose of 55 Gy was given in 32-36 fractions of 1.72-1.53 Gy, twice daily 5 days a week, with a minimum 6 h interval between fractions. Toxicity was assessed using Karnofsky performance status scale and in the later part of the study with the Barthel index. Survival data were compared with a control group treated with 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions in a previous MRC study, matched for known prognostic factors. The median survival of 116 patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy was 10 months. Survival comparison of accelerated patients with matched controls treated with conventional fractionation demonstrated a hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.85-1.51; P = 0.39). Early treatment toxicity was acceptable, with only seven patients developing transient decrease in performance status. The accelerated radiotherapy regimen was logistically feasible and acceptable to patients, carers and staff. Treatment time was reduced without apparent increase in early toxicity and there was no loss of survival benefit. The effectiveness and convenience of a short accelerated regimen makes this a suitable alternative to a 6 week course of radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma. However, a full randomised trial comparing conventional and accelerated radiotherapy may be required as proof of equivalence.</abstract><cop>Basingstoke</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub><pmid>7779733</pmid><doi>10.1038/bjc.1995.258</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0920
ispartof British journal of cancer, 1995-06, Vol.71 (6), p.1330-1334
issn 0007-0920
1532-1827
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2033859
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Nature Journals Online; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Actuarial Analysis
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Brain Neoplasms - mortality
Brain Neoplasms - pathology
Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Brain Neoplasms - surgery
Diseases of the nervous system
Feasibility Studies
Female
Glioma - mortality
Glioma - pathology
Glioma - radiotherapy
Glioma - surgery
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
title Improving the acceptability of high-dose radiotherapy by reducing the duration of treatment : accelerated radiotherapy in high-grade glioma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A43%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20the%20acceptability%20of%20high-dose%20radiotherapy%20by%20reducing%20the%20duration%20of%20treatment%20:%20accelerated%20radiotherapy%20in%20high-grade%20glioma&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=BRADA,%20M&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1330&rft.epage=1334&rft.pages=1330-1334&rft.issn=0007-0920&rft.eissn=1532-1827&rft.coden=BJCAAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/bjc.1995.258&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E7779733%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/7779733&rfr_iscdi=true