The age-related eye disease study (AREDS) system for classifying cataracts from photographs: AREDS report no. 4

PURPOSE: To describe the system for grading cataracts from photographs in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). METHODS: The system for grading cataracts in AREDS uses photographs taken in a standardized fashion with specially modified cameras at 11 clinical centers. The photographs are evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2001-02, Vol.131 (2), p.167-175
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 175
container_issue 2
container_start_page 167
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 131
description PURPOSE: To describe the system for grading cataracts from photographs in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). METHODS: The system for grading cataracts in AREDS uses photographs taken in a standardized fashion with specially modified cameras at 11 clinical centers. The photographs are evaluated by graders for quality and cataract severity at a central reading center. The area of lens involvement is used to assess the severity of cortical and posterior subcapsular opacities. Optical density of nuclear opacity is graded against a series of seven standard photographs. Contemporaneous variability in grading is evaluated periodically by having a second examiner regrade a subset of the photographs. Temporal variability is assessed by annually regrading a subset of photographs. RESULTS: Photographs of 925 eyes, most with no or early lens opacities, were regraded to assess intergrader reliability. For cortical opacities, there was an absolute difference of 10% or greater of area involved in 1.9% of the replicate gradings. For posterior subcapsular opacities an absolute difference of 5% of area involved was noted in 2.8% of the regraded photographs. For nuclear opacities, absolute differences of 1.5 or more steps were observed in 0.6% of eyes. There was little evidence of temporal drift in grading any of the three types of opacity during four annual regrades. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated a high degree of reliability in grading the severity of lens opacities in a large study cohort with mostly early lens changes, the type of cohort most likely to be entered in clinical trials involving cataract prevention. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study System for Classifying Cataracts From Photographs could be useful in studies where there is a need to standardize data collection over time and across different data collection sites. Limitations of the system include the cost of implementation and, currently, the limited amount of data on grading reproducibility for more advanced lens opacities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00732-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2032014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002939400007327</els_id><sourcerecordid>70646387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-83f78b9a76b9762b8c991adc15f10758b2b2cd40803863c15009c7faee7d96553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd1q3DAQhUVpaTZpH6FFUCjJhdORZFtSL1pCmv5AoNCk10KWx7sqtuVI2oDfPs5mu7RXw8x8cw7MIeQNg3MGrP5wAwC80EKXpwBnAFLwQj4jK6akLpjS7DlZHZAjcpzSn6WtZSlfkiPGOFdcsxUJtxukdo1FxN5mbCnOSFuf0CakKW_bmZ5e_Lr6cnNG05wyDrQLkbrepuS72Y9r6my20bqcaBfDQKdNyGEd7bRJH-nukkacQsx0DOe0fEVedLZP-HpfT8jvr1e3l9-L65_fflxeXBdOaJULJTqpGm1l3WhZ80Y5rZltHas6BrJSDW-4a0tQIFQtljGAdrKziLLVdVWJE_LpSXfaNgO2DsccbW-m6AcbZxOsN_9vRr8x63BvOAgOrFwE3u8FYrjbYspm8Mlh39sRwzYZCXVZCyUX8O2_TgeLvz9egHd7wCZn-y7a0fl04JQuecUX6vMThctX7j1Gk5zH0WHrI7ps2uANA_OYvdllbx6DNQBml72R4gGyi5_n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70646387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The age-related eye disease study (AREDS) system for classifying cataracts from photographs: AREDS report no. 4</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creatorcontrib>the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group ; Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE: To describe the system for grading cataracts from photographs in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). METHODS: The system for grading cataracts in AREDS uses photographs taken in a standardized fashion with specially modified cameras at 11 clinical centers. The photographs are evaluated by graders for quality and cataract severity at a central reading center. The area of lens involvement is used to assess the severity of cortical and posterior subcapsular opacities. Optical density of nuclear opacity is graded against a series of seven standard photographs. Contemporaneous variability in grading is evaluated periodically by having a second examiner regrade a subset of the photographs. Temporal variability is assessed by annually regrading a subset of photographs. RESULTS: Photographs of 925 eyes, most with no or early lens opacities, were regraded to assess intergrader reliability. For cortical opacities, there was an absolute difference of 10% or greater of area involved in 1.9% of the replicate gradings. For posterior subcapsular opacities an absolute difference of 5% of area involved was noted in 2.8% of the regraded photographs. For nuclear opacities, absolute differences of 1.5 or more steps were observed in 0.6% of eyes. There was little evidence of temporal drift in grading any of the three types of opacity during four annual regrades. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated a high degree of reliability in grading the severity of lens opacities in a large study cohort with mostly early lens changes, the type of cohort most likely to be entered in clinical trials involving cataract prevention. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study System for Classifying Cataracts From Photographs could be useful in studies where there is a need to standardize data collection over time and across different data collection sites. Limitations of the system include the cost of implementation and, currently, the limited amount of data on grading reproducibility for more advanced lens opacities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00732-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11228291</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aging - pathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cataract - classification ; Cataract - diagnosis ; Cohort Studies ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological ; Humans ; Lens diseases ; Lens, Crystalline - pathology ; Medical sciences ; Ophthalmology ; Photography - classification ; Photography - instrumentation ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2001-02, Vol.131 (2), p.167-175</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-83f78b9a76b9762b8c991adc15f10758b2b2cd40803863c15009c7faee7d96553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00732-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=894252$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11228291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group</creatorcontrib><title>The age-related eye disease study (AREDS) system for classifying cataracts from photographs: AREDS report no. 4</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>PURPOSE: To describe the system for grading cataracts from photographs in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). METHODS: The system for grading cataracts in AREDS uses photographs taken in a standardized fashion with specially modified cameras at 11 clinical centers. The photographs are evaluated by graders for quality and cataract severity at a central reading center. The area of lens involvement is used to assess the severity of cortical and posterior subcapsular opacities. Optical density of nuclear opacity is graded against a series of seven standard photographs. Contemporaneous variability in grading is evaluated periodically by having a second examiner regrade a subset of the photographs. Temporal variability is assessed by annually regrading a subset of photographs. RESULTS: Photographs of 925 eyes, most with no or early lens opacities, were regraded to assess intergrader reliability. For cortical opacities, there was an absolute difference of 10% or greater of area involved in 1.9% of the replicate gradings. For posterior subcapsular opacities an absolute difference of 5% of area involved was noted in 2.8% of the regraded photographs. For nuclear opacities, absolute differences of 1.5 or more steps were observed in 0.6% of eyes. There was little evidence of temporal drift in grading any of the three types of opacity during four annual regrades. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated a high degree of reliability in grading the severity of lens opacities in a large study cohort with mostly early lens changes, the type of cohort most likely to be entered in clinical trials involving cataract prevention. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study System for Classifying Cataracts From Photographs could be useful in studies where there is a need to standardize data collection over time and across different data collection sites. Limitations of the system include the cost of implementation and, currently, the limited amount of data on grading reproducibility for more advanced lens opacities.</description><subject>Aging - pathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cataract - classification</subject><subject>Cataract - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lens diseases</subject><subject>Lens, Crystalline - pathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Photography - classification</subject><subject>Photography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd1q3DAQhUVpaTZpH6FFUCjJhdORZFtSL1pCmv5AoNCk10KWx7sqtuVI2oDfPs5mu7RXw8x8cw7MIeQNg3MGrP5wAwC80EKXpwBnAFLwQj4jK6akLpjS7DlZHZAjcpzSn6WtZSlfkiPGOFdcsxUJtxukdo1FxN5mbCnOSFuf0CakKW_bmZ5e_Lr6cnNG05wyDrQLkbrepuS72Y9r6my20bqcaBfDQKdNyGEd7bRJH-nukkacQsx0DOe0fEVedLZP-HpfT8jvr1e3l9-L65_fflxeXBdOaJULJTqpGm1l3WhZ80Y5rZltHas6BrJSDW-4a0tQIFQtljGAdrKziLLVdVWJE_LpSXfaNgO2DsccbW-m6AcbZxOsN_9vRr8x63BvOAgOrFwE3u8FYrjbYspm8Mlh39sRwzYZCXVZCyUX8O2_TgeLvz9egHd7wCZn-y7a0fl04JQuecUX6vMThctX7j1Gk5zH0WHrI7ps2uANA_OYvdllbx6DNQBml72R4gGyi5_n</recordid><startdate>20010201</startdate><enddate>20010201</enddate><creator>the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group</creator><creator>Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010201</creationdate><title>The age-related eye disease study (AREDS) system for classifying cataracts from photographs: AREDS report no. 4</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-83f78b9a76b9762b8c991adc15f10758b2b2cd40803863c15009c7faee7d96553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aging - pathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cataract - classification</topic><topic>Cataract - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lens diseases</topic><topic>Lens, Crystalline - pathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Photography - classification</topic><topic>Photography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><aucorp>the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group</aucorp><aucorp>Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The age-related eye disease study (AREDS) system for classifying cataracts from photographs: AREDS report no. 4</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2001-02-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>167-175</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>PURPOSE: To describe the system for grading cataracts from photographs in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). METHODS: The system for grading cataracts in AREDS uses photographs taken in a standardized fashion with specially modified cameras at 11 clinical centers. The photographs are evaluated by graders for quality and cataract severity at a central reading center. The area of lens involvement is used to assess the severity of cortical and posterior subcapsular opacities. Optical density of nuclear opacity is graded against a series of seven standard photographs. Contemporaneous variability in grading is evaluated periodically by having a second examiner regrade a subset of the photographs. Temporal variability is assessed by annually regrading a subset of photographs. RESULTS: Photographs of 925 eyes, most with no or early lens opacities, were regraded to assess intergrader reliability. For cortical opacities, there was an absolute difference of 10% or greater of area involved in 1.9% of the replicate gradings. For posterior subcapsular opacities an absolute difference of 5% of area involved was noted in 2.8% of the regraded photographs. For nuclear opacities, absolute differences of 1.5 or more steps were observed in 0.6% of eyes. There was little evidence of temporal drift in grading any of the three types of opacity during four annual regrades. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated a high degree of reliability in grading the severity of lens opacities in a large study cohort with mostly early lens changes, the type of cohort most likely to be entered in clinical trials involving cataract prevention. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study System for Classifying Cataracts From Photographs could be useful in studies where there is a need to standardize data collection over time and across different data collection sites. Limitations of the system include the cost of implementation and, currently, the limited amount of data on grading reproducibility for more advanced lens opacities.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11228291</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00732-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2001-02, Vol.131 (2), p.167-175
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2032014
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aging - pathology
Biological and medical sciences
Cataract - classification
Cataract - diagnosis
Cohort Studies
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Humans
Lens diseases
Lens, Crystalline - pathology
Medical sciences
Ophthalmology
Photography - classification
Photography - instrumentation
Reproducibility of Results
title The age-related eye disease study (AREDS) system for classifying cataracts from photographs: AREDS report no. 4
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A56%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20age-related%20eye%20disease%20study%20(AREDS)%20system%20for%20classifying%20cataracts%20from%20photographs:%20AREDS%20report%20no.%204&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.aucorp=the%20Age-Related%20Eye%20Disease%20Study%20Research%20Group&rft.date=2001-02-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=167-175&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00732-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70646387%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70646387&rft_id=info:pmid/11228291&rft_els_id=S0002939400007327&rfr_iscdi=true