A placebo‐controlled study of interaction between nabumetone and acenocoumarol
Aims The use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients treated with oral anticoagulants is generally discouraged due to the risk of interactions that could increase the risk of bleeding complications. Available data suggest the NSAID, nabumetone, does not produce such an interacti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of clinical pharmacology 1999-04, Vol.47 (4), p.441-444 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 444 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 441 |
container_title | British journal of clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Pardo García‐Losa Fernández‐Pavón Del Castillo Pascual‐García García‐Méndez Dal‐Ré |
description | Aims The use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients treated with oral anticoagulants is generally discouraged due to the risk of interactions that could increase the risk of bleeding complications. Available data suggest the NSAID, nabumetone, does not produce such an interaction. We investigated whether nabumetone would interact with acenocoumarol, an oral anticoagulant widely used in some European countries.
Methods A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study was conducted evaluating nabumetone (1–2 g daily for up to 4 weeks) in osteoarthritis patients with thromboembolic risk previously stabilized on acenocoumarol. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients whose International Normalized Ratio (INR) remained within established margins and whose acenocoumarol dose was not changed. Fifty‐six patients were randomized to receive nabumetone (n=27) or placebo (n=29).
Results Eighteen patients in each group (67% for nabumetone and 62% for placebo) completed the study without showing INR or acenocoumarol dose changes, and were considered as study successes. Nine patients (33%) with nabumetone and 11 (38%) with placebo were considered study failures in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (one patient on nabumetone and four on placebo did not complete the study due to reasons not related to INR and acenocoumarol dose changes). No significant differences were found between groups with regard to study successes. There were two minor bleeding complications, one in each group. Six patients per group presented with eight adverse experiences in each group.
Conclusions Treatment with nabumetone did not alter INR levels compared with placebo in patients stabilized on oral acenocoumarol who require NSAID therapy. These results suggest that nabumetone does not produce a clinically relevant interaction with acenocoumarol. In orally anticoagulated patients without other associated risk factors, treatment with nabumetone for up to 4 weeks does not require increased monitoring of INR levels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00916.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2014245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>BCP916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4986-519ea4f590485719e385617e6c10fce07cbf2eb13e656a45c905b2356a5512273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KAzEUhYMotv68gmThtmNuMsk0IEIt_oFgF7oOmfSOTpkmZWZq252P4DP6JKZWqu5c5YZ7zrmHjxAKLAGWqrNJAkLJHgcuE9BaJ4xpUMlyh3S3i13SZYKpnuQSOuSgaSaMgQAl90kHGBeCA-uS0YDOKuswDx9v7y74tg5VhWPatPPxioaClr7F2rq2DJ7m2C4QPfU2n0-xDR6p9WMa7T64MJ_aaD4ie4WtGjz-fg_J0_XV4_C2d_9wczcc3PdcqvuxFWi0aSE1S_syix_RlwoyVA5Y4ZBlLi845iBQSWVT6TSTORdxlhI4z8Qhudjkzub5FMexQlvbyszqMtZYmWBL83fjyxfzHF4NZ5DyVMaA_ibA1aFpaiy2XmBmTdlMzBqmWcM0a8rmi7JZRuvJ79u_jBusUXD6LbCNs1VRW-_K5keXSa5FGmXnG9mirHD17_vmcjiKg_gE9V-aLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A placebo‐controlled study of interaction between nabumetone and acenocoumarol</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Pardo ; García‐Losa ; Fernández‐Pavón ; Del Castillo ; Pascual‐García ; García‐Méndez ; Dal‐Ré</creator><creatorcontrib>Pardo ; García‐Losa ; Fernández‐Pavón ; Del Castillo ; Pascual‐García ; García‐Méndez ; Dal‐Ré</creatorcontrib><description>Aims The use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients treated with oral anticoagulants is generally discouraged due to the risk of interactions that could increase the risk of bleeding complications. Available data suggest the NSAID, nabumetone, does not produce such an interaction. We investigated whether nabumetone would interact with acenocoumarol, an oral anticoagulant widely used in some European countries.
Methods A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study was conducted evaluating nabumetone (1–2 g daily for up to 4 weeks) in osteoarthritis patients with thromboembolic risk previously stabilized on acenocoumarol. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients whose International Normalized Ratio (INR) remained within established margins and whose acenocoumarol dose was not changed. Fifty‐six patients were randomized to receive nabumetone (n=27) or placebo (n=29).
Results Eighteen patients in each group (67% for nabumetone and 62% for placebo) completed the study without showing INR or acenocoumarol dose changes, and were considered as study successes. Nine patients (33%) with nabumetone and 11 (38%) with placebo were considered study failures in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (one patient on nabumetone and four on placebo did not complete the study due to reasons not related to INR and acenocoumarol dose changes). No significant differences were found between groups with regard to study successes. There were two minor bleeding complications, one in each group. Six patients per group presented with eight adverse experiences in each group.
Conclusions Treatment with nabumetone did not alter INR levels compared with placebo in patients stabilized on oral acenocoumarol who require NSAID therapy. These results suggest that nabumetone does not produce a clinically relevant interaction with acenocoumarol. In orally anticoagulated patients without other associated risk factors, treatment with nabumetone for up to 4 weeks does not require increased monitoring of INR levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-5251</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00916.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10233210</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BCPHBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>acenocoumarol ; Acenocoumarol - pharmacology ; Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacology ; Anticoagulants - pharmacology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system ; Butanones - pharmacology ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Interaction ; Drug Interactions ; Female ; Humans ; interaction ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nabumetone ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1999-04, Vol.47 (4), p.441-444</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1999 Blackwell Science Ltd 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4986-519ea4f590485719e385617e6c10fce07cbf2eb13e656a45c905b2356a5512273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4986-519ea4f590485719e385617e6c10fce07cbf2eb13e656a45c905b2356a5512273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2125.1999.00916.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2125.1999.00916.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,1417,1433,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1752934$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10233210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Losa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐Pavón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Castillo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual‐García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Méndez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal‐Ré</creatorcontrib><title>A placebo‐controlled study of interaction between nabumetone and acenocoumarol</title><title>British journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Aims The use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients treated with oral anticoagulants is generally discouraged due to the risk of interactions that could increase the risk of bleeding complications. Available data suggest the NSAID, nabumetone, does not produce such an interaction. We investigated whether nabumetone would interact with acenocoumarol, an oral anticoagulant widely used in some European countries.
Methods A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study was conducted evaluating nabumetone (1–2 g daily for up to 4 weeks) in osteoarthritis patients with thromboembolic risk previously stabilized on acenocoumarol. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients whose International Normalized Ratio (INR) remained within established margins and whose acenocoumarol dose was not changed. Fifty‐six patients were randomized to receive nabumetone (n=27) or placebo (n=29).
Results Eighteen patients in each group (67% for nabumetone and 62% for placebo) completed the study without showing INR or acenocoumarol dose changes, and were considered as study successes. Nine patients (33%) with nabumetone and 11 (38%) with placebo were considered study failures in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (one patient on nabumetone and four on placebo did not complete the study due to reasons not related to INR and acenocoumarol dose changes). No significant differences were found between groups with regard to study successes. There were two minor bleeding complications, one in each group. Six patients per group presented with eight adverse experiences in each group.
Conclusions Treatment with nabumetone did not alter INR levels compared with placebo in patients stabilized on oral acenocoumarol who require NSAID therapy. These results suggest that nabumetone does not produce a clinically relevant interaction with acenocoumarol. In orally anticoagulated patients without other associated risk factors, treatment with nabumetone for up to 4 weeks does not require increased monitoring of INR levels.</description><subject>acenocoumarol</subject><subject>Acenocoumarol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system</subject><subject>Butanones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Interaction</subject><subject>Drug Interactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>interaction</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nabumetone</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0306-5251</issn><issn>1365-2125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1KAzEUhYMotv68gmThtmNuMsk0IEIt_oFgF7oOmfSOTpkmZWZq252P4DP6JKZWqu5c5YZ7zrmHjxAKLAGWqrNJAkLJHgcuE9BaJ4xpUMlyh3S3i13SZYKpnuQSOuSgaSaMgQAl90kHGBeCA-uS0YDOKuswDx9v7y74tg5VhWPatPPxioaClr7F2rq2DJ7m2C4QPfU2n0-xDR6p9WMa7T64MJ_aaD4ie4WtGjz-fg_J0_XV4_C2d_9wczcc3PdcqvuxFWi0aSE1S_syix_RlwoyVA5Y4ZBlLi845iBQSWVT6TSTORdxlhI4z8Qhudjkzub5FMexQlvbyszqMtZYmWBL83fjyxfzHF4NZ5DyVMaA_ibA1aFpaiy2XmBmTdlMzBqmWcM0a8rmi7JZRuvJ79u_jBusUXD6LbCNs1VRW-_K5keXSa5FGmXnG9mirHD17_vmcjiKg_gE9V-aLw</recordid><startdate>199904</startdate><enddate>199904</enddate><creator>Pardo</creator><creator>García‐Losa</creator><creator>Fernández‐Pavón</creator><creator>Del Castillo</creator><creator>Pascual‐García</creator><creator>García‐Méndez</creator><creator>Dal‐Ré</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199904</creationdate><title>A placebo‐controlled study of interaction between nabumetone and acenocoumarol</title><author>Pardo ; García‐Losa ; Fernández‐Pavón ; Del Castillo ; Pascual‐García ; García‐Méndez ; Dal‐Ré</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4986-519ea4f590485719e385617e6c10fce07cbf2eb13e656a45c905b2356a5512273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>acenocoumarol</topic><topic>Acenocoumarol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system</topic><topic>Butanones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Interaction</topic><topic>Drug Interactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>interaction</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nabumetone</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Losa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐Pavón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Castillo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual‐García</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Méndez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal‐Ré</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pardo</au><au>García‐Losa</au><au>Fernández‐Pavón</au><au>Del Castillo</au><au>Pascual‐García</au><au>García‐Méndez</au><au>Dal‐Ré</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A placebo‐controlled study of interaction between nabumetone and acenocoumarol</atitle><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1999-04</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>441-444</pages><issn>0306-5251</issn><eissn>1365-2125</eissn><coden>BCPHBM</coden><abstract>Aims The use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients treated with oral anticoagulants is generally discouraged due to the risk of interactions that could increase the risk of bleeding complications. Available data suggest the NSAID, nabumetone, does not produce such an interaction. We investigated whether nabumetone would interact with acenocoumarol, an oral anticoagulant widely used in some European countries.
Methods A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study was conducted evaluating nabumetone (1–2 g daily for up to 4 weeks) in osteoarthritis patients with thromboembolic risk previously stabilized on acenocoumarol. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients whose International Normalized Ratio (INR) remained within established margins and whose acenocoumarol dose was not changed. Fifty‐six patients were randomized to receive nabumetone (n=27) or placebo (n=29).
Results Eighteen patients in each group (67% for nabumetone and 62% for placebo) completed the study without showing INR or acenocoumarol dose changes, and were considered as study successes. Nine patients (33%) with nabumetone and 11 (38%) with placebo were considered study failures in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (one patient on nabumetone and four on placebo did not complete the study due to reasons not related to INR and acenocoumarol dose changes). No significant differences were found between groups with regard to study successes. There were two minor bleeding complications, one in each group. Six patients per group presented with eight adverse experiences in each group.
Conclusions Treatment with nabumetone did not alter INR levels compared with placebo in patients stabilized on oral acenocoumarol who require NSAID therapy. These results suggest that nabumetone does not produce a clinically relevant interaction with acenocoumarol. In orally anticoagulated patients without other associated risk factors, treatment with nabumetone for up to 4 weeks does not require increased monitoring of INR levels.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>10233210</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00916.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-5251 |
ispartof | British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1999-04, Vol.47 (4), p.441-444 |
issn | 0306-5251 1365-2125 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2014245 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | acenocoumarol Acenocoumarol - pharmacology Adult Aged Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacology Anticoagulants - pharmacology Biological and medical sciences Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system Butanones - pharmacology Double-Blind Method Drug Interaction Drug Interactions Female Humans interaction Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nabumetone Pharmacology. Drug treatments Prospective Studies |
title | A placebo‐controlled study of interaction between nabumetone and acenocoumarol |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A55%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20placebo%E2%80%90controlled%20study%20of%20interaction%20between%20nabumetone%20and%20acenocoumarol&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Pardo&rft.date=1999-04&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=441-444&rft.issn=0306-5251&rft.eissn=1365-2125&rft.coden=BCPHBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00916.x&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3EBCP916%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/10233210&rfr_iscdi=true |