Authors’ response to Konstantopoulos et al

Authors’ response to Konstantopoulos et al

If we attempt to summarise data from our study, the Southampton Study and that by Berler to examine whether or not age greater than 88 is a risk factor for intraoperative complications using meta-analysis techniques, we find that there is significant inconsistency between the studies (test for heter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of ophthalmology 2007-09, Vol.91 (9), p.1254-1255
Hauptverfasser: Robbie, Scott J, Muhtaseb, Mohammed, Qureshi, Kashif, Bunce, Catey, Wen, Xing, Ionides, and Alex
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Mailbox
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1255
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1254
container_title British journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 91
creator Robbie, Scott J
Muhtaseb, Mohammed
Qureshi, Kashif
Bunce, Catey
Wen, Xing
Ionides, and Alex
description If we attempt to summarise data from our study, the Southampton Study and that by Berler to examine whether or not age greater than 88 is a risk factor for intraoperative complications using meta-analysis techniques, we find that there is significant inconsistency between the studies (test for heterogeneity Χ2 = 7.54, p = 0.02, I2 = 73.5%).
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bjo.2007.115519
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1954901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012423661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3079-1b3e2bc849a14a547ae2e8ec45b43525634b789375064c08b101bbc25b49959b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1OwzAUhS0EEqUws0ZiQ6T1Tew4XpCq8isqGPgRYrHs4NKUNA62g2DjNXg9ngRXqSoxMdlX57vn2AehfcADgDQbqrkZJBizMFEKfAP1gGR5nGDGN1EPByUGyGAb7Tg3D2OSAeuho1HrZ8a6n6_vyGrXmNrpyJvoKly8rL1pTFsZF2kfyWoXbU1l5fTe6uyj-7PTu_FFPLk5vxyPJrFKQ1oMKtWJKnLCJRBJCZM60bkuCFUkpQnNUqJYzlNGcUYKnCvAoFSRBJlzylXaR8edb9OqhX4udO2trERjy4W0n8LIUvxV6nImXsy7AE4JxxAMDlYG1ry12nkxN62tw5sFsBCd0JTiQA07qrDGOaun6wTAYtmpCJ2KZaei6zRsxN1G6bz-WOPSvoqMhf-I64exmJywpzx_vBVL_rDj1WL-r_kvICGGXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778925350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Authors’ response to Konstantopoulos et al</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>BMJ Journals Online Archive</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Robbie, Scott J ; Muhtaseb, Mohammed ; Qureshi, Kashif ; Bunce, Catey ; Wen, Xing ; Ionides, and Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Robbie, Scott J ; Muhtaseb, Mohammed ; Qureshi, Kashif ; Bunce, Catey ; Wen, Xing ; Ionides, and Alex</creatorcontrib><description>If we attempt to summarise data from our study, the Southampton Study and that by Berler to examine whether or not age greater than 88 is a risk factor for intraoperative complications using meta-analysis techniques, we find that there is significant inconsistency between the studies (test for heterogeneity Χ2 = 7.54, p = 0.02, I2 = 73.5%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.115519</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Mailbox</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2007-09, Vol.91 (9), p.1254-1255</ispartof><rights>2007 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright: 2007 2007 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/91/9/1254.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/91/9/1254.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,727,780,784,885,3196,23571,27924,27925,53791,53793,77472,77503</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robbie, Scott J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhtaseb, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Kashif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunce, Catey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionides, and Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Authors’ response to Konstantopoulos et al</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>If we attempt to summarise data from our study, the Southampton Study and that by Berler to examine whether or not age greater than 88 is a risk factor for intraoperative complications using meta-analysis techniques, we find that there is significant inconsistency between the studies (test for heterogeneity Χ2 = 7.54, p = 0.02, I2 = 73.5%).</description><subject>Mailbox</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1OwzAUhS0EEqUws0ZiQ6T1Tew4XpCq8isqGPgRYrHs4NKUNA62g2DjNXg9ngRXqSoxMdlX57vn2AehfcADgDQbqrkZJBizMFEKfAP1gGR5nGDGN1EPByUGyGAb7Tg3D2OSAeuho1HrZ8a6n6_vyGrXmNrpyJvoKly8rL1pTFsZF2kfyWoXbU1l5fTe6uyj-7PTu_FFPLk5vxyPJrFKQ1oMKtWJKnLCJRBJCZM60bkuCFUkpQnNUqJYzlNGcUYKnCvAoFSRBJlzylXaR8edb9OqhX4udO2trERjy4W0n8LIUvxV6nImXsy7AE4JxxAMDlYG1ry12nkxN62tw5sFsBCd0JTiQA07qrDGOaun6wTAYtmpCJ2KZaei6zRsxN1G6bz-WOPSvoqMhf-I64exmJywpzx_vBVL_rDj1WL-r_kvICGGXg</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Robbie, Scott J</creator><creator>Muhtaseb, Mohammed</creator><creator>Qureshi, Kashif</creator><creator>Bunce, Catey</creator><creator>Wen, Xing</creator><creator>Ionides, and Alex</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>Authors’ response to Konstantopoulos et al</title><author>Robbie, Scott J ; Muhtaseb, Mohammed ; Qureshi, Kashif ; Bunce, Catey ; Wen, Xing ; Ionides, and Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3079-1b3e2bc849a14a547ae2e8ec45b43525634b789375064c08b101bbc25b49959b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Mailbox</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robbie, Scott J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhtaseb, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Kashif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunce, Catey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionides, and Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robbie, Scott J</au><au>Muhtaseb, Mohammed</au><au>Qureshi, Kashif</au><au>Bunce, Catey</au><au>Wen, Xing</au><au>Ionides, and Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Authors’ response to Konstantopoulos et al</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1254</spage><epage>1255</epage><pages>1254-1255</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>If we attempt to summarise data from our study, the Southampton Study and that by Berler to examine whether or not age greater than 88 is a risk factor for intraoperative complications using meta-analysis techniques, we find that there is significant inconsistency between the studies (test for heterogeneity Χ2 = 7.54, p = 0.02, I2 = 73.5%).</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><doi>10.1136/bjo.2007.115519</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1161
ispartof British journal of ophthalmology, 2007-09, Vol.91 (9), p.1254-1255
issn 0007-1161
1468-2079
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1954901
source PubMed Central (Open Access); BMJ Journals Online Archive; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Mailbox
title Authors’ response to Konstantopoulos et al
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A10%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Authors%E2%80%99%20response%20to%20Konstantopoulos%20et%20al&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Robbie,%20Scott%20J&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1254&rft.epage=1255&rft.pages=1254-1255&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.2007.115519&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4012423661%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778925350&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true