CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells

Researchers designing antitumor treatments have long focused on eliciting tumor-specific CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) because of their potent killing activity and their ability to reject transplanted organs. The resulting treatments, however, have generally been surprisingly poor at inducing co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2007-06, Vol.109 (12), p.5346-5354
Hauptverfasser: Perez-Diez, Ainhoa, Joncker, Nathalie T., Choi, Kyungho, Chan, William F.N., Anderson, Colin C., Lantz, Olivier, Matzinger, Polly
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5354
container_issue 12
container_start_page 5346
container_title Blood
container_volume 109
creator Perez-Diez, Ainhoa
Joncker, Nathalie T.
Choi, Kyungho
Chan, William F.N.
Anderson, Colin C.
Lantz, Olivier
Matzinger, Polly
description Researchers designing antitumor treatments have long focused on eliciting tumor-specific CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) because of their potent killing activity and their ability to reject transplanted organs. The resulting treatments, however, have generally been surprisingly poor at inducing complete tumor rejection, both in experimental models and in the clinic. Although a few scattered studies suggested that CD4 T “helper” cells might also serve as antitumor effectors, they have generally been studied mostly for their ability to enhance the activity of CTL. In this mouse study, we compared monoclonal populations of tumor-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells as effectors against several different tumors, and found that CD4 T cells eliminated tumors that were resistant to CD8-mediated rejection, even in cases where the tumors expressed major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules but not MHC class II. MHC class II expression on host tissues was critical, suggesting that the CD4 T cells act indirectly. Indeed, the CD4 T cells partnered with NK cells to obtain the maximal antitumor effect. These findings suggest that CD4 T cells can be powerful antitumor effector cells that can, in some cases, outperform CD8 T cells, which are the current “gold standard” effector cell in tumor immunotherapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1182/blood-2006-10-051318
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1890845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006497120414119</els_id><sourcerecordid>70588638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fc28f366b355c8aa4652cb86a562685ddd1fcd0868c963190c4072569e74fa5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwBgj5xC2wdmzHuSBVKX9SJS5wthzHoa7SuNhpJd6ehFYULpxW2p2Z3f0QuiRwQ4ikt2XjfZVQAJEQSICTlMgjNCacygSAwjEawzBkeUZG6CzGJQBhKeWnaESylGaM0DGaFjOGjW2aiI1ucWnxygeLbV0742zbYd3hbtP3cLBLazrnW9wtemUxkzvfOTqpdRPtxb5O0NvD_WvxlMxfHp-L6TwxTJAuqQ2VdSpEmXJupNZMcGpKKTQXVEheVRWpTQVSSJOLlORgGGSUi9xmrNa8TCfobpe73pQrW5n-uKAbtQ5upcOn8tqpv5PWLdS73yoic5CM9wHX-4DgPzY2dmrl4vCCbq3fRJUBl1KksheyndAEH2Ow9c8SAmpgr77Zq4H90Nqx721Xvw88mPawDx_YHtPW2aDiwNjYyoUeraq8-3_DF_JIlNo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70588638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Perez-Diez, Ainhoa ; Joncker, Nathalie T. ; Choi, Kyungho ; Chan, William F.N. ; Anderson, Colin C. ; Lantz, Olivier ; Matzinger, Polly</creator><creatorcontrib>Perez-Diez, Ainhoa ; Joncker, Nathalie T. ; Choi, Kyungho ; Chan, William F.N. ; Anderson, Colin C. ; Lantz, Olivier ; Matzinger, Polly</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers designing antitumor treatments have long focused on eliciting tumor-specific CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) because of their potent killing activity and their ability to reject transplanted organs. The resulting treatments, however, have generally been surprisingly poor at inducing complete tumor rejection, both in experimental models and in the clinic. Although a few scattered studies suggested that CD4 T “helper” cells might also serve as antitumor effectors, they have generally been studied mostly for their ability to enhance the activity of CTL. In this mouse study, we compared monoclonal populations of tumor-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells as effectors against several different tumors, and found that CD4 T cells eliminated tumors that were resistant to CD8-mediated rejection, even in cases where the tumors expressed major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules but not MHC class II. MHC class II expression on host tissues was critical, suggesting that the CD4 T cells act indirectly. Indeed, the CD4 T cells partnered with NK cells to obtain the maximal antitumor effect. These findings suggest that CD4 T cells can be powerful antitumor effector cells that can, in some cases, outperform CD8 T cells, which are the current “gold standard” effector cell in tumor immunotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-4971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-051318</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17327412</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; Histocompatibility Antigens Class I - immunology ; Histocompatibility Antigens Class II - immunology ; Immunobiology ; Immunotherapy ; Killer Cells, Natural - immunology ; Mice ; Mice, Transgenic ; Neoplasms - immunology ; T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic - immunology</subject><ispartof>Blood, 2007-06, Vol.109 (12), p.5346-5354</ispartof><rights>2007 American Society of Hematology</rights><rights>2007 by The American Society of Hematology 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fc28f366b355c8aa4652cb86a562685ddd1fcd0868c963190c4072569e74fa5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fc28f366b355c8aa4652cb86a562685ddd1fcd0868c963190c4072569e74fa5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17327412$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perez-Diez, Ainhoa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joncker, Nathalie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Kyungho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, William F.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Colin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lantz, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzinger, Polly</creatorcontrib><title>CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells</title><title>Blood</title><addtitle>Blood</addtitle><description>Researchers designing antitumor treatments have long focused on eliciting tumor-specific CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) because of their potent killing activity and their ability to reject transplanted organs. The resulting treatments, however, have generally been surprisingly poor at inducing complete tumor rejection, both in experimental models and in the clinic. Although a few scattered studies suggested that CD4 T “helper” cells might also serve as antitumor effectors, they have generally been studied mostly for their ability to enhance the activity of CTL. In this mouse study, we compared monoclonal populations of tumor-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells as effectors against several different tumors, and found that CD4 T cells eliminated tumors that were resistant to CD8-mediated rejection, even in cases where the tumors expressed major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules but not MHC class II. MHC class II expression on host tissues was critical, suggesting that the CD4 T cells act indirectly. Indeed, the CD4 T cells partnered with NK cells to obtain the maximal antitumor effect. These findings suggest that CD4 T cells can be powerful antitumor effector cells that can, in some cases, outperform CD8 T cells, which are the current “gold standard” effector cell in tumor immunotherapy.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>Histocompatibility Antigens Class I - immunology</subject><subject>Histocompatibility Antigens Class II - immunology</subject><subject>Immunobiology</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Killer Cells, Natural - immunology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Transgenic</subject><subject>Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic - immunology</subject><issn>0006-4971</issn><issn>1528-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwBgj5xC2wdmzHuSBVKX9SJS5wthzHoa7SuNhpJd6ehFYULpxW2p2Z3f0QuiRwQ4ikt2XjfZVQAJEQSICTlMgjNCacygSAwjEawzBkeUZG6CzGJQBhKeWnaESylGaM0DGaFjOGjW2aiI1ucWnxygeLbV0742zbYd3hbtP3cLBLazrnW9wtemUxkzvfOTqpdRPtxb5O0NvD_WvxlMxfHp-L6TwxTJAuqQ2VdSpEmXJupNZMcGpKKTQXVEheVRWpTQVSSJOLlORgGGSUi9xmrNa8TCfobpe73pQrW5n-uKAbtQ5upcOn8tqpv5PWLdS73yoic5CM9wHX-4DgPzY2dmrl4vCCbq3fRJUBl1KksheyndAEH2Ow9c8SAmpgr77Zq4H90Nqx721Xvw88mPawDx_YHtPW2aDiwNjYyoUeraq8-3_DF_JIlNo</recordid><startdate>20070615</startdate><enddate>20070615</enddate><creator>Perez-Diez, Ainhoa</creator><creator>Joncker, Nathalie T.</creator><creator>Choi, Kyungho</creator><creator>Chan, William F.N.</creator><creator>Anderson, Colin C.</creator><creator>Lantz, Olivier</creator><creator>Matzinger, Polly</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Society of Hematology</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070615</creationdate><title>CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells</title><author>Perez-Diez, Ainhoa ; Joncker, Nathalie T. ; Choi, Kyungho ; Chan, William F.N. ; Anderson, Colin C. ; Lantz, Olivier ; Matzinger, Polly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-fc28f366b355c8aa4652cb86a562685ddd1fcd0868c963190c4072569e74fa5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>Histocompatibility Antigens Class I - immunology</topic><topic>Histocompatibility Antigens Class II - immunology</topic><topic>Immunobiology</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Killer Cells, Natural - immunology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Transgenic</topic><topic>Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perez-Diez, Ainhoa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joncker, Nathalie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Kyungho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, William F.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Colin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lantz, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzinger, Polly</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Blood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perez-Diez, Ainhoa</au><au>Joncker, Nathalie T.</au><au>Choi, Kyungho</au><au>Chan, William F.N.</au><au>Anderson, Colin C.</au><au>Lantz, Olivier</au><au>Matzinger, Polly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells</atitle><jtitle>Blood</jtitle><addtitle>Blood</addtitle><date>2007-06-15</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5346</spage><epage>5354</epage><pages>5346-5354</pages><issn>0006-4971</issn><eissn>1528-0020</eissn><abstract>Researchers designing antitumor treatments have long focused on eliciting tumor-specific CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) because of their potent killing activity and their ability to reject transplanted organs. The resulting treatments, however, have generally been surprisingly poor at inducing complete tumor rejection, both in experimental models and in the clinic. Although a few scattered studies suggested that CD4 T “helper” cells might also serve as antitumor effectors, they have generally been studied mostly for their ability to enhance the activity of CTL. In this mouse study, we compared monoclonal populations of tumor-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells as effectors against several different tumors, and found that CD4 T cells eliminated tumors that were resistant to CD8-mediated rejection, even in cases where the tumors expressed major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules but not MHC class II. MHC class II expression on host tissues was critical, suggesting that the CD4 T cells act indirectly. Indeed, the CD4 T cells partnered with NK cells to obtain the maximal antitumor effect. These findings suggest that CD4 T cells can be powerful antitumor effector cells that can, in some cases, outperform CD8 T cells, which are the current “gold standard” effector cell in tumor immunotherapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17327412</pmid><doi>10.1182/blood-2006-10-051318</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-4971
ispartof Blood, 2007-06, Vol.109 (12), p.5346-5354
issn 0006-4971
1528-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1890845
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology
Histocompatibility Antigens Class I - immunology
Histocompatibility Antigens Class II - immunology
Immunobiology
Immunotherapy
Killer Cells, Natural - immunology
Mice
Mice, Transgenic
Neoplasms - immunology
T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic - immunology
title CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A00%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CD4%20cells%20can%20be%20more%20efficient%20at%20tumor%20rejection%20than%20CD8%20cells&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Perez-Diez,%20Ainhoa&rft.date=2007-06-15&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5346&rft.epage=5354&rft.pages=5346-5354&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft.eissn=1528-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182/blood-2006-10-051318&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70588638%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70588638&rft_id=info:pmid/17327412&rft_els_id=S0006497120414119&rfr_iscdi=true