The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work
This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Child development 2000-05, Vol.71 (3), p.543-562 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 562 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 543 |
| container_title | Child development |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Luthar, Suniya S. Cicchetti, Dante Becker, Bronwyn |
| description | This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at-risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-8624.00164 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1885202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ611889</ericid><jstor_id>1132374</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1132374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6954-dbbe3031a3afef777f0858b10b31642bc9105417c6e63db219341974a80e190c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFv0zAYxSMEYmVw5oKQBYhbNn-xY8cckKa0K6AKBBr0aDmOw9yl8bCTwf57HFJ1AwnNF8t-Pz99fi9JngI-griOgTKeFiyjRxgDo_eS2f7mfjLDGIuUiAwfJI9C2MRjxgR5mBwAFnm8J7Pk89m5QaXrQu8H3SPXoC8m2NaaTps36ASV3vZWqxYtrlQ7qN66DqmuRsvB1qa1nQmocR6dDv3gDVo7f_E4edCoNpgnu_0w-Xq6OCvfpatPy_flySrVTOQ0ravKEExAEdWYhnPe4CIvKsAViR_JKi0A5xS4ZoaRuspAEAqCU1VgAwJrcpi8nXwvh2pram263qtWXnq7Vf5aOmXl30pnz-V3dyWhKPIMZ9Hg9c7Aux-DCb3c2qBN26rOuCFIDjwvihjYXWDOGYGCQgRf_ANu3OC7mIIEEZ0oZXmEXv4XYoRixnMyWh1PlPYuBG-a_ccAy7F6ORYtx6Lln-rji-e387jFT11H4NUOUCE22njVaRtuOMoBGI_Yswkz3uq9uvjAIAY3hkEn-adtzfVdU8lyvvg2Tbdz3YTe-ZtnQDLCRzmdZBt682svK38h40g8l-uPS7mCEpbFei7n5DeHheQP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634067531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Luthar, Suniya S. ; Cicchetti, Dante ; Becker, Bronwyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Luthar, Suniya S. ; Cicchetti, Dante ; Becker, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at-risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-3920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00164</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10953923</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHDEAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adolescents ; At Risk Persons ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child clinical studies ; Child development ; Child psychology ; Child psychopathology ; Children ; Competence ; Definitions ; Developmental psychopathology ; Empirical evidence ; Guidelines ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Material resilience ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Miscellaneous ; Mothers ; Personality Development ; Personality Theories ; Prevention. Health policy. Planification ; Psychological Constructs ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reliability ; Research Methodology ; Research Needs ; Research Problems ; Resilience ; Resilience (Personality) ; Review and Commentary ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Theories ; Youths at risk</subject><ispartof>Child development, 2000-05, Vol.71 (3), p.543-562</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. May/Jun 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6954-dbbe3031a3afef777f0858b10b31642bc9105417c6e63db219341974a80e190c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1132374$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1132374$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,801,883,1414,27852,27907,27908,30982,30983,45557,45558,58000,58233</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ611889$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1471167$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10953923$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luthar, Suniya S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicchetti, Dante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><title>The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work</title><title>Child development</title><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><description>This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at-risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>At Risk Persons</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child clinical studies</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child psychology</subject><subject>Child psychopathology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Definitions</subject><subject>Developmental psychopathology</subject><subject>Empirical evidence</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Material resilience</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Personality Development</subject><subject>Personality Theories</subject><subject>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</subject><subject>Psychological Constructs</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research Needs</subject><subject>Research Problems</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Resilience (Personality)</subject><subject>Review and Commentary</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Youths at risk</subject><issn>0009-3920</issn><issn>1467-8624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFv0zAYxSMEYmVw5oKQBYhbNn-xY8cckKa0K6AKBBr0aDmOw9yl8bCTwf57HFJ1AwnNF8t-Pz99fi9JngI-griOgTKeFiyjRxgDo_eS2f7mfjLDGIuUiAwfJI9C2MRjxgR5mBwAFnm8J7Pk89m5QaXrQu8H3SPXoC8m2NaaTps36ASV3vZWqxYtrlQ7qN66DqmuRsvB1qa1nQmocR6dDv3gDVo7f_E4edCoNpgnu_0w-Xq6OCvfpatPy_flySrVTOQ0ravKEExAEdWYhnPe4CIvKsAViR_JKi0A5xS4ZoaRuspAEAqCU1VgAwJrcpi8nXwvh2pram263qtWXnq7Vf5aOmXl30pnz-V3dyWhKPIMZ9Hg9c7Aux-DCb3c2qBN26rOuCFIDjwvihjYXWDOGYGCQgRf_ANu3OC7mIIEEZ0oZXmEXv4XYoRixnMyWh1PlPYuBG-a_ccAy7F6ORYtx6Lln-rji-e387jFT11H4NUOUCE22njVaRtuOMoBGI_Yswkz3uq9uvjAIAY3hkEn-adtzfVdU8lyvvg2Tbdz3YTe-ZtnQDLCRzmdZBt682svK38h40g8l-uPS7mCEpbFei7n5DeHheQP</recordid><startdate>200005</startdate><enddate>200005</enddate><creator>Luthar, Suniya S.</creator><creator>Cicchetti, Dante</creator><creator>Becker, Bronwyn</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>University of Chicago Press for the Society for Research in Child Development, etc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200005</creationdate><title>The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work</title><author>Luthar, Suniya S. ; Cicchetti, Dante ; Becker, Bronwyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6954-dbbe3031a3afef777f0858b10b31642bc9105417c6e63db219341974a80e190c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>At Risk Persons</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child clinical studies</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child psychology</topic><topic>Child psychopathology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Definitions</topic><topic>Developmental psychopathology</topic><topic>Empirical evidence</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Material resilience</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Personality Development</topic><topic>Personality Theories</topic><topic>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</topic><topic>Psychological Constructs</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research Needs</topic><topic>Research Problems</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Resilience (Personality)</topic><topic>Review and Commentary</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Youths at risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luthar, Suniya S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cicchetti, Dante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Child development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luthar, Suniya S.</au><au>Cicchetti, Dante</au><au>Becker, Bronwyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ611889</ericid><atitle>The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work</atitle><jtitle>Child development</jtitle><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><date>2000-05</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>543-562</pages><issn>0009-3920</issn><eissn>1467-8624</eissn><coden>CHDEAW</coden><abstract>This paper presents a critical appraisal of resilience, a construct connoting the maintenance of positive adaptation by individuals despite experiences of significant adversity. As empirical research on resilience has burgeoned in recent years, criticisms have been levied at work in this area. These critiques have generally focused on ambiguities in definitions and central terminology; heterogeneity in risks experienced and competence achieved by individuals viewed as resilient; instability of the phenomenon of resilience; and concerns regarding the usefulness of resilience as a theoretical construct. We address each identified criticism in turn, proposing solutions for those we view as legitimate and clarifying misunderstandings surrounding those we believe to be less valid. We conclude that work on resilience possesses substantial potential for augmenting the understanding of processes affecting at-risk individuals. Realization of the potential embodied by this construct, however, will remain constrained without continued scientific attention to some of the serious conceptual and methodological pitfalls that have been noted by skeptics and proponents alike.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><pmid>10953923</pmid><doi>10.1111/1467-8624.00164</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0009-3920 |
| ispartof | Child development, 2000-05, Vol.71 (3), p.543-562 |
| issn | 0009-3920 1467-8624 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1885202 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source |
| subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Adolescents At Risk Persons Biological and medical sciences Child clinical studies Child development Child psychology Child psychopathology Children Competence Definitions Developmental psychopathology Empirical evidence Guidelines Guidelines as Topic Humans Material resilience Medical sciences Mental health Miscellaneous Mothers Personality Development Personality Theories Prevention. Health policy. Planification Psychological Constructs Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reliability Research Methodology Research Needs Research Problems Resilience Resilience (Personality) Review and Commentary Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry Theories Youths at risk |
| title | The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A00%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Construct%20of%20Resilience:%20A%20Critical%20Evaluation%20and%20Guidelines%20for%20Future%20Work&rft.jtitle=Child%20development&rft.au=Luthar,%20Suniya%20S.&rft.date=2000-05&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=543-562&rft.issn=0009-3920&rft.eissn=1467-8624&rft.coden=CHDEAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8624.00164&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E1132374%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634067531&rft_id=info:pmid/10953923&rft_ericid=EJ611889&rft_jstor_id=1132374&rfr_iscdi=true |