Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set

Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2006-07, Vol.92 (7), p.905-909
Hauptverfasser: Bradshaw, P J, Ko, D T, Newman, A M, Donovan, L R, Tu, J V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 909
container_issue 7
container_start_page 905
container_title Heart (British Cardiac Society)
container_volume 92
creator Bradshaw, P J
Ko, D T
Newman, A M
Donovan, L R
Tu, J V
description Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Independent validation study based on clinical data collected retrospectively for a clinical trial in a community based population and record linkage to administrative databases. Setting: Study conducted among patients from the EFFECT (enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment) study from Ontario, Canada. Patients: Randomly selected men and women hospitalised for AMI between 1999 and 2001. Main outcome measure: Discriminatory capacity and calibration of the GRACE prediction model for death within six months of hospital discharge in the contemporaneous EFFECT AMI study population. Results: Post-discharge crude mortality at six months for the EFFECT study patients with AMI was 7.0%. The discriminatory capacity of the GRACE model was good overall (C statistic 0.80) and for patients with ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) (0.81) and non-STEMI (0.78). Observed and predicted deaths corresponded well in each stratum of risk at six months, although the risk was underestimated by up to 30% in the higher range of scores among patients with non-STEMI. Conclusions: In an independent validation the GRACE risk model had good discriminatory capacity for predicting post-discharge death at six months and was generally well calibrated, suggesting that it is suitable for clinical use in general populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/hrt.2005.073122
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1860727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4020691411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b588t-4e43d24b240aa0e0e32802e7913b3c986944258dd19734505048f16ddaa7dcfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktvEzEUhUcIRB-wZocsISpAmtQee8aeDVIUpSlSBaJAVXVjecZ3EocZO9hO1f4i_iZOE1pgw8aPez9fnSOfLHtB8IgQWh0vfBwVGJcjzCkpikfZPmGVyAtMLh-nMy3LvMKU72UHISwxxqwW1dNsj1RUcEHwfvbzQvVGm3iLXIfiAtDsfDyZojez3jWqR-cwNyH6u-64XUdAE-edVakyvQYbw1uk7srt73K4tdq7AdDKgzZtNM6iwWnoUec8CuYm3WxcoJULMdcmtAvl54A0qFQ0FimbVg0rSIuNSKuoUID4LHvSqT7A891-mH07mX6dnOZnn2YfJuOzvCmFiDkDRnXBmoJhpTBgoIXABfCa0Ia2yXzNWFEKrUnNKStxiZnoSKW1Uly3naKH2fvt3NW6GUC3SYNXvVx5MyR30ikj_-5Ys5Bzdy2JqDAveBpwtBvg3Y81hCiHZBL6Xllw6yArgXlFaJ3AV_-AS7f2NpmThAtccSpwmajjLdV6F4KH7l4KwXITAZkiIDcRkNsIpBcv_3TwwO_-PAGvd4AKreo7r2xrwgPHBaOCbgblWy4lAG7u-8p_l0kcL-XHi4m8qr-cis-XV_Ik8e-2fDMs_6vyFwV02H8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780673805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bradshaw, P J ; Ko, D T ; Newman, A M ; Donovan, L R ; Tu, J V</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, P J ; Ko, D T ; Newman, A M ; Donovan, L R ; Tu, J V</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Independent validation study based on clinical data collected retrospectively for a clinical trial in a community based population and record linkage to administrative databases. Setting: Study conducted among patients from the EFFECT (enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment) study from Ontario, Canada. Patients: Randomly selected men and women hospitalised for AMI between 1999 and 2001. Main outcome measure: Discriminatory capacity and calibration of the GRACE prediction model for death within six months of hospital discharge in the contemporaneous EFFECT AMI study population. Results: Post-discharge crude mortality at six months for the EFFECT study patients with AMI was 7.0%. The discriminatory capacity of the GRACE model was good overall (C statistic 0.80) and for patients with ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) (0.81) and non-STEMI (0.78). Observed and predicted deaths corresponded well in each stratum of risk at six months, although the risk was underestimated by up to 30% in the higher range of scores among patients with non-STEMI. Conclusions: In an independent validation the GRACE risk model had good discriminatory capacity for predicting post-discharge death at six months and was generally well calibrated, suggesting that it is suitable for clinical use in general populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-6037</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-201X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.073122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16387810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society</publisher><subject>ACS ; acute coronary syndrome ; Acute coronary syndromes ; acute myocardial infarction ; Aged ; AMI ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiovascular Medicine ; Confidence intervals ; Coronary heart disease ; EFFECT ; Electrocardiography ; enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment ; Enzymes ; Feedback ; Female ; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events ; GRACE ; Heart ; Heart Arrest - mortality ; Heart attacks ; Heart failure ; Heart rate ; Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction - mortality ; Ontario - epidemiology ; PCI ; percutaneous catheter based intervention ; Population ; population study ; Prognosis ; Risk Assessment - standards ; Risk Factors ; risk model ; Severity of Illness Index ; ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction ; STEMI ; Studies ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2006-07, Vol.92 (7), p.905-909</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by Heart</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 Copyright 2006 by Heart</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group and British Cardiovascular Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b588t-4e43d24b240aa0e0e32802e7913b3c986944258dd19734505048f16ddaa7dcfa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://heart.bmj.com/content/92/7/905.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://heart.bmj.com/content/92/7/905.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,723,776,780,881,3182,23551,27903,27904,53769,53771,77346,77377</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17843832$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16387810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, D T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, J V</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set</title><title>Heart (British Cardiac Society)</title><addtitle>Heart</addtitle><description>Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Independent validation study based on clinical data collected retrospectively for a clinical trial in a community based population and record linkage to administrative databases. Setting: Study conducted among patients from the EFFECT (enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment) study from Ontario, Canada. Patients: Randomly selected men and women hospitalised for AMI between 1999 and 2001. Main outcome measure: Discriminatory capacity and calibration of the GRACE prediction model for death within six months of hospital discharge in the contemporaneous EFFECT AMI study population. Results: Post-discharge crude mortality at six months for the EFFECT study patients with AMI was 7.0%. The discriminatory capacity of the GRACE model was good overall (C statistic 0.80) and for patients with ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) (0.81) and non-STEMI (0.78). Observed and predicted deaths corresponded well in each stratum of risk at six months, although the risk was underestimated by up to 30% in the higher range of scores among patients with non-STEMI. Conclusions: In an independent validation the GRACE risk model had good discriminatory capacity for predicting post-discharge death at six months and was generally well calibrated, suggesting that it is suitable for clinical use in general populations.</description><subject>ACS</subject><subject>acute coronary syndrome</subject><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>acute myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>AMI</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Medicine</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Coronary heart disease</subject><subject>EFFECT</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events</subject><subject>GRACE</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - mortality</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</subject><subject>Ontario - epidemiology</subject><subject>PCI</subject><subject>percutaneous catheter based intervention</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>population study</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - standards</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>risk model</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction</subject><subject>STEMI</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1355-6037</issn><issn>1468-201X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktvEzEUhUcIRB-wZocsISpAmtQee8aeDVIUpSlSBaJAVXVjecZ3EocZO9hO1f4i_iZOE1pgw8aPez9fnSOfLHtB8IgQWh0vfBwVGJcjzCkpikfZPmGVyAtMLh-nMy3LvMKU72UHISwxxqwW1dNsj1RUcEHwfvbzQvVGm3iLXIfiAtDsfDyZojez3jWqR-cwNyH6u-64XUdAE-edVakyvQYbw1uk7srt73K4tdq7AdDKgzZtNM6iwWnoUec8CuYm3WxcoJULMdcmtAvl54A0qFQ0FimbVg0rSIuNSKuoUID4LHvSqT7A891-mH07mX6dnOZnn2YfJuOzvCmFiDkDRnXBmoJhpTBgoIXABfCa0Ia2yXzNWFEKrUnNKStxiZnoSKW1Uly3naKH2fvt3NW6GUC3SYNXvVx5MyR30ikj_-5Ys5Bzdy2JqDAveBpwtBvg3Y81hCiHZBL6Xllw6yArgXlFaJ3AV_-AS7f2NpmThAtccSpwmajjLdV6F4KH7l4KwXITAZkiIDcRkNsIpBcv_3TwwO_-PAGvd4AKreo7r2xrwgPHBaOCbgblWy4lAG7u-8p_l0kcL-XHi4m8qr-cis-XV_Ik8e-2fDMs_6vyFwV02H8</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Bradshaw, P J</creator><creator>Ko, D T</creator><creator>Newman, A M</creator><creator>Donovan, L R</creator><creator>Tu, J V</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set</title><author>Bradshaw, P J ; Ko, D T ; Newman, A M ; Donovan, L R ; Tu, J V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b588t-4e43d24b240aa0e0e32802e7913b3c986944258dd19734505048f16ddaa7dcfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>ACS</topic><topic>acute coronary syndrome</topic><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>acute myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>AMI</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Medicine</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Coronary heart disease</topic><topic>EFFECT</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events</topic><topic>GRACE</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - mortality</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</topic><topic>Ontario - epidemiology</topic><topic>PCI</topic><topic>percutaneous catheter based intervention</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>population study</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - standards</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>risk model</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction</topic><topic>STEMI</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, D T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, J V</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Heart (British Cardiac Society)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradshaw, P J</au><au>Ko, D T</au><au>Newman, A M</au><au>Donovan, L R</au><au>Tu, J V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set</atitle><jtitle>Heart (British Cardiac Society)</jtitle><addtitle>Heart</addtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>905</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>905-909</pages><issn>1355-6037</issn><eissn>1468-201X</eissn><abstract>Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Independent validation study based on clinical data collected retrospectively for a clinical trial in a community based population and record linkage to administrative databases. Setting: Study conducted among patients from the EFFECT (enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment) study from Ontario, Canada. Patients: Randomly selected men and women hospitalised for AMI between 1999 and 2001. Main outcome measure: Discriminatory capacity and calibration of the GRACE prediction model for death within six months of hospital discharge in the contemporaneous EFFECT AMI study population. Results: Post-discharge crude mortality at six months for the EFFECT study patients with AMI was 7.0%. The discriminatory capacity of the GRACE model was good overall (C statistic 0.80) and for patients with ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) (0.81) and non-STEMI (0.78). Observed and predicted deaths corresponded well in each stratum of risk at six months, although the risk was underestimated by up to 30% in the higher range of scores among patients with non-STEMI. Conclusions: In an independent validation the GRACE risk model had good discriminatory capacity for predicting post-discharge death at six months and was generally well calibrated, suggesting that it is suitable for clinical use in general populations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society</pub><pmid>16387810</pmid><doi>10.1136/hrt.2005.073122</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-6037
ispartof Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2006-07, Vol.92 (7), p.905-909
issn 1355-6037
1468-201X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1860727
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects ACS
acute coronary syndrome
Acute coronary syndromes
acute myocardial infarction
Aged
AMI
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiology. Vascular system
Cardiovascular Medicine
Confidence intervals
Coronary heart disease
EFFECT
Electrocardiography
enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment
Enzymes
Feedback
Female
Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
GRACE
Heart
Heart Arrest - mortality
Heart attacks
Heart failure
Heart rate
Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mortality
Myocardial Infarction - mortality
Ontario - epidemiology
PCI
percutaneous catheter based intervention
Population
population study
Prognosis
Risk Assessment - standards
Risk Factors
risk model
Severity of Illness Index
ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
STEMI
Studies
Variables
title Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A48%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20the%20GRACE%20(Global%20Registry%20of%20Acute%20Coronary%20Events)%20acute%20coronary%20syndrome%20prediction%20model%20for%20six%20month%20post-discharge%20death%20in%20an%20independent%20data%20set&rft.jtitle=Heart%20(British%20Cardiac%20Society)&rft.au=Bradshaw,%20P%20J&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=905&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=905-909&rft.issn=1355-6037&rft.eissn=1468-201X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/hrt.2005.073122&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4020691411%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780673805&rft_id=info:pmid/16387810&rfr_iscdi=true