Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set
Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2006-07, Vol.92 (7), p.905-909 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 909 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 905 |
container_title | Heart (British Cardiac Society) |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Bradshaw, P J Ko, D T Newman, A M Donovan, L R Tu, J V |
description | Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Independent validation study based on clinical data collected retrospectively for a clinical trial in a community based population and record linkage to administrative databases. Setting: Study conducted among patients from the EFFECT (enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment) study from Ontario, Canada. Patients: Randomly selected men and women hospitalised for AMI between 1999 and 2001. Main outcome measure: Discriminatory capacity and calibration of the GRACE prediction model for death within six months of hospital discharge in the contemporaneous EFFECT AMI study population. Results: Post-discharge crude mortality at six months for the EFFECT study patients with AMI was 7.0%. The discriminatory capacity of the GRACE model was good overall (C statistic 0.80) and for patients with ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) (0.81) and non-STEMI (0.78). Observed and predicted deaths corresponded well in each stratum of risk at six months, although the risk was underestimated by up to 30% in the higher range of scores among patients with non-STEMI. Conclusions: In an independent validation the GRACE risk model had good discriminatory capacity for predicting post-discharge death at six months and was generally well calibrated, suggesting that it is suitable for clinical use in general populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/hrt.2005.073122 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1860727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4020691411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b588t-4e43d24b240aa0e0e32802e7913b3c986944258dd19734505048f16ddaa7dcfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktvEzEUhUcIRB-wZocsISpAmtQee8aeDVIUpSlSBaJAVXVjecZ3EocZO9hO1f4i_iZOE1pgw8aPez9fnSOfLHtB8IgQWh0vfBwVGJcjzCkpikfZPmGVyAtMLh-nMy3LvMKU72UHISwxxqwW1dNsj1RUcEHwfvbzQvVGm3iLXIfiAtDsfDyZojez3jWqR-cwNyH6u-64XUdAE-edVakyvQYbw1uk7srt73K4tdq7AdDKgzZtNM6iwWnoUec8CuYm3WxcoJULMdcmtAvl54A0qFQ0FimbVg0rSIuNSKuoUID4LHvSqT7A891-mH07mX6dnOZnn2YfJuOzvCmFiDkDRnXBmoJhpTBgoIXABfCa0Ia2yXzNWFEKrUnNKStxiZnoSKW1Uly3naKH2fvt3NW6GUC3SYNXvVx5MyR30ikj_-5Ys5Bzdy2JqDAveBpwtBvg3Y81hCiHZBL6Xllw6yArgXlFaJ3AV_-AS7f2NpmThAtccSpwmajjLdV6F4KH7l4KwXITAZkiIDcRkNsIpBcv_3TwwO_-PAGvd4AKreo7r2xrwgPHBaOCbgblWy4lAG7u-8p_l0kcL-XHi4m8qr-cis-XV_Ik8e-2fDMs_6vyFwV02H8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780673805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bradshaw, P J ; Ko, D T ; Newman, A M ; Donovan, L R ; Tu, J V</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, P J ; Ko, D T ; Newman, A M ; Donovan, L R ; Tu, J V</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Independent validation study based on clinical data collected retrospectively for a clinical trial in a community based population and record linkage to administrative databases. Setting: Study conducted among patients from the EFFECT (enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment) study from Ontario, Canada. Patients: Randomly selected men and women hospitalised for AMI between 1999 and 2001. Main outcome measure: Discriminatory capacity and calibration of the GRACE prediction model for death within six months of hospital discharge in the contemporaneous EFFECT AMI study population. Results: Post-discharge crude mortality at six months for the EFFECT study patients with AMI was 7.0%. The discriminatory capacity of the GRACE model was good overall (C statistic 0.80) and for patients with ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) (0.81) and non-STEMI (0.78). Observed and predicted deaths corresponded well in each stratum of risk at six months, although the risk was underestimated by up to 30% in the higher range of scores among patients with non-STEMI. Conclusions: In an independent validation the GRACE risk model had good discriminatory capacity for predicting post-discharge death at six months and was generally well calibrated, suggesting that it is suitable for clinical use in general populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-6037</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-201X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.073122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16387810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society</publisher><subject>ACS ; acute coronary syndrome ; Acute coronary syndromes ; acute myocardial infarction ; Aged ; AMI ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiovascular Medicine ; Confidence intervals ; Coronary heart disease ; EFFECT ; Electrocardiography ; enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment ; Enzymes ; Feedback ; Female ; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events ; GRACE ; Heart ; Heart Arrest - mortality ; Heart attacks ; Heart failure ; Heart rate ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Myocardial Infarction - mortality ; Ontario - epidemiology ; PCI ; percutaneous catheter based intervention ; Population ; population study ; Prognosis ; Risk Assessment - standards ; Risk Factors ; risk model ; Severity of Illness Index ; ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction ; STEMI ; Studies ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2006-07, Vol.92 (7), p.905-909</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by Heart</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 Copyright 2006 by Heart</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group and British Cardiovascular Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b588t-4e43d24b240aa0e0e32802e7913b3c986944258dd19734505048f16ddaa7dcfa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://heart.bmj.com/content/92/7/905.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://heart.bmj.com/content/92/7/905.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,723,776,780,881,3182,23551,27903,27904,53769,53771,77346,77377</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17843832$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16387810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, D T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, J V</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set</title><title>Heart (British Cardiac Society)</title><addtitle>Heart</addtitle><description>Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Independent validation study based on clinical data collected retrospectively for a clinical trial in a community based population and record linkage to administrative databases. Setting: Study conducted among patients from the EFFECT (enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment) study from Ontario, Canada. Patients: Randomly selected men and women hospitalised for AMI between 1999 and 2001. Main outcome measure: Discriminatory capacity and calibration of the GRACE prediction model for death within six months of hospital discharge in the contemporaneous EFFECT AMI study population. Results: Post-discharge crude mortality at six months for the EFFECT study patients with AMI was 7.0%. The discriminatory capacity of the GRACE model was good overall (C statistic 0.80) and for patients with ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) (0.81) and non-STEMI (0.78). Observed and predicted deaths corresponded well in each stratum of risk at six months, although the risk was underestimated by up to 30% in the higher range of scores among patients with non-STEMI. Conclusions: In an independent validation the GRACE risk model had good discriminatory capacity for predicting post-discharge death at six months and was generally well calibrated, suggesting that it is suitable for clinical use in general populations.</description><subject>ACS</subject><subject>acute coronary syndrome</subject><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>acute myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>AMI</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Medicine</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Coronary heart disease</subject><subject>EFFECT</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events</subject><subject>GRACE</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - mortality</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</subject><subject>Ontario - epidemiology</subject><subject>PCI</subject><subject>percutaneous catheter based intervention</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>population study</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - standards</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>risk model</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction</subject><subject>STEMI</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1355-6037</issn><issn>1468-201X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktvEzEUhUcIRB-wZocsISpAmtQee8aeDVIUpSlSBaJAVXVjecZ3EocZO9hO1f4i_iZOE1pgw8aPez9fnSOfLHtB8IgQWh0vfBwVGJcjzCkpikfZPmGVyAtMLh-nMy3LvMKU72UHISwxxqwW1dNsj1RUcEHwfvbzQvVGm3iLXIfiAtDsfDyZojez3jWqR-cwNyH6u-64XUdAE-edVakyvQYbw1uk7srt73K4tdq7AdDKgzZtNM6iwWnoUec8CuYm3WxcoJULMdcmtAvl54A0qFQ0FimbVg0rSIuNSKuoUID4LHvSqT7A891-mH07mX6dnOZnn2YfJuOzvCmFiDkDRnXBmoJhpTBgoIXABfCa0Ia2yXzNWFEKrUnNKStxiZnoSKW1Uly3naKH2fvt3NW6GUC3SYNXvVx5MyR30ikj_-5Ys5Bzdy2JqDAveBpwtBvg3Y81hCiHZBL6Xllw6yArgXlFaJ3AV_-AS7f2NpmThAtccSpwmajjLdV6F4KH7l4KwXITAZkiIDcRkNsIpBcv_3TwwO_-PAGvd4AKreo7r2xrwgPHBaOCbgblWy4lAG7u-8p_l0kcL-XHi4m8qr-cis-XV_Ik8e-2fDMs_6vyFwV02H8</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Bradshaw, P J</creator><creator>Ko, D T</creator><creator>Newman, A M</creator><creator>Donovan, L R</creator><creator>Tu, J V</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set</title><author>Bradshaw, P J ; Ko, D T ; Newman, A M ; Donovan, L R ; Tu, J V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b588t-4e43d24b240aa0e0e32802e7913b3c986944258dd19734505048f16ddaa7dcfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>ACS</topic><topic>acute coronary syndrome</topic><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>acute myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>AMI</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Medicine</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Coronary heart disease</topic><topic>EFFECT</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events</topic><topic>GRACE</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - mortality</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</topic><topic>Ontario - epidemiology</topic><topic>PCI</topic><topic>percutaneous catheter based intervention</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>population study</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - standards</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>risk model</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction</topic><topic>STEMI</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, D T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, J V</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Heart (British Cardiac Society)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradshaw, P J</au><au>Ko, D T</au><au>Newman, A M</au><au>Donovan, L R</au><au>Tu, J V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set</atitle><jtitle>Heart (British Cardiac Society)</jtitle><addtitle>Heart</addtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>905</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>905-909</pages><issn>1355-6037</issn><eissn>1468-201X</eissn><abstract>Objective: To determine the validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) prediction model for death six months after discharge in all forms of acute coronary syndrome in an independent dataset of a community based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design: Independent validation study based on clinical data collected retrospectively for a clinical trial in a community based population and record linkage to administrative databases. Setting: Study conducted among patients from the EFFECT (enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment) study from Ontario, Canada. Patients: Randomly selected men and women hospitalised for AMI between 1999 and 2001. Main outcome measure: Discriminatory capacity and calibration of the GRACE prediction model for death within six months of hospital discharge in the contemporaneous EFFECT AMI study population. Results: Post-discharge crude mortality at six months for the EFFECT study patients with AMI was 7.0%. The discriminatory capacity of the GRACE model was good overall (C statistic 0.80) and for patients with ST segment elevation AMI (STEMI) (0.81) and non-STEMI (0.78). Observed and predicted deaths corresponded well in each stratum of risk at six months, although the risk was underestimated by up to 30% in the higher range of scores among patients with non-STEMI. Conclusions: In an independent validation the GRACE risk model had good discriminatory capacity for predicting post-discharge death at six months and was generally well calibrated, suggesting that it is suitable for clinical use in general populations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society</pub><pmid>16387810</pmid><doi>10.1136/hrt.2005.073122</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-6037 |
ispartof | Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2006-07, Vol.92 (7), p.905-909 |
issn | 1355-6037 1468-201X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1860727 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | ACS acute coronary syndrome Acute coronary syndromes acute myocardial infarction Aged AMI Biological and medical sciences Cardiology. Vascular system Cardiovascular Medicine Confidence intervals Coronary heart disease EFFECT Electrocardiography enhanced feedback for effective cardiac treatment Enzymes Feedback Female Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events GRACE Heart Heart Arrest - mortality Heart attacks Heart failure Heart rate Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data Hospitals Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Mortality Myocardial Infarction - mortality Ontario - epidemiology PCI percutaneous catheter based intervention Population population study Prognosis Risk Assessment - standards Risk Factors risk model Severity of Illness Index ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction STEMI Studies Variables |
title | Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A48%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20the%20GRACE%20(Global%20Registry%20of%20Acute%20Coronary%20Events)%20acute%20coronary%20syndrome%20prediction%20model%20for%20six%20month%20post-discharge%20death%20in%20an%20independent%20data%20set&rft.jtitle=Heart%20(British%20Cardiac%20Society)&rft.au=Bradshaw,%20P%20J&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=905&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=905-909&rft.issn=1355-6037&rft.eissn=1468-201X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/hrt.2005.073122&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4020691411%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780673805&rft_id=info:pmid/16387810&rfr_iscdi=true |