Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2
This second best practice review examines five series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) laboratory testing for allergy, (2) diagnosis and monitoring of menopause, (3) the use of urine cytology, (4) the usefulness of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and (5) the investiga...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical pathology 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.113-120 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 120 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 113 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical pathology |
| container_volume | 59 |
| creator | Smellie, W S Forth, J O McNulty, C A M Hirschowitz, L Lilic, D Gosling, R Bareford, D Logan, E Kerr, K G Spickett, G P Hoffman, J Galloway, A Bloxham, C A |
| description | This second best practice review examines five series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) laboratory testing for allergy, (2) diagnosis and monitoring of menopause, (3) the use of urine cytology, (4) the usefulness of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and (5) the investigation of possible urinary tract infection. The review is presented in a question–answer format. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents, and evidence based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jcp.2005.031526 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1860327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4022523621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b395t-8807509034ccf8403256111f6ae9f5fc50ead3dc4b90e9912142fcd5f097f9983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks1vEzEQxa2qqE1Lz9yqlSp6QNow4881BySIoEWqyqFQ9WY5jt063ewGe1Pof4-jhBY4zUjz05s3o0fIK4QxIpNv5245pgBiDAwFlTtkhFzRmiOXu2QEQLHWist9cpDzHACZQrZH9lFyzhTlI4IffR6qZbJuiM5XsSt9XNj0WDmbfLW0w13f9reP76rkH6L_WdGX5EWwbfZH23pIvn_-9G1yXl98Pfsy-XBRT5kWQ900oARoYNy50HBgVEhEDNJ6HURwArydsZnjUw1ea6TIaXAzEUCroHXDDsn7je5yNV34mfPdkGxrtvZMb6P5d9LFO3PbPxhsZNmmisDpViD1P1blTLOI2fm2tZ3vV9koKM-gFAt48h8471epK8cZVA0ClaxZyx3_7efJyJ9fFuD1FrDZ2TYk27mYnznFqQJNC1dvuJgH_-tpbtO9kYopYS6vJ-b8-rK5Oru5MqLwbzb8dDF_VgOzDoApATDrAJhNANhvCI-doA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781026387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Smellie, W S ; Forth, J O ; McNulty, C A M ; Hirschowitz, L ; Lilic, D ; Gosling, R ; Bareford, D ; Logan, E ; Kerr, K G ; Spickett, G P ; Hoffman, J ; Galloway, A ; Bloxham, C A</creator><creatorcontrib>Smellie, W S ; Forth, J O ; McNulty, C A M ; Hirschowitz, L ; Lilic, D ; Gosling, R ; Bareford, D ; Logan, E ; Kerr, K G ; Spickett, G P ; Hoffman, J ; Galloway, A ; Bloxham, C A</creatorcontrib><description>This second best practice review examines five series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) laboratory testing for allergy, (2) diagnosis and monitoring of menopause, (3) the use of urine cytology, (4) the usefulness of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and (5) the investigation of possible urinary tract infection. The review is presented in a question–answer format. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents, and evidence based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.031526</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16443724</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPAAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</publisher><subject>American Urological Association ; appropriateness ; AUA ; best practice ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Sedimentation ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; follicle stimulating hormone ; FSH ; General Medical Services ; GMS ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - diagnosis ; interdisciplinary ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Menopause ; microscopic haematuria ; Pathology, Clinical - methods ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Patient Selection ; primary care ; Primary Health Care - methods ; radioallergosorbent testing ; RAST ; Review ; Urinalysis ; urinary tract infection ; Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis ; UTI</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical pathology, 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.113-120</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Journal of Clinical Pathology</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 Copyright 2006 Journal of Clinical Pathology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 The BMJ Publishing Group and the Association of Clinical Pathologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jcp.bmj.com/content/59/2/113.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jcp.bmj.com/content/59/2/113.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,313,314,723,776,780,788,881,23552,27901,27903,27904,53769,53771,77346,77377</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17427092$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16443724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smellie, W S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forth, J O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, C A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschowitz, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilic, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosling, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bareford, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logan, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, K G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spickett, G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloxham, C A</creatorcontrib><title>Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2</title><title>Journal of clinical pathology</title><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>This second best practice review examines five series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) laboratory testing for allergy, (2) diagnosis and monitoring of menopause, (3) the use of urine cytology, (4) the usefulness of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and (5) the investigation of possible urinary tract infection. The review is presented in a question–answer format. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents, and evidence based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.</description><subject>American Urological Association</subject><subject>appropriateness</subject><subject>AUA</subject><subject>best practice</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Sedimentation</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>follicle stimulating hormone</subject><subject>FSH</subject><subject>General Medical Services</subject><subject>GMS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>interdisciplinary</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Menopause</subject><subject>microscopic haematuria</subject><subject>Pathology, Clinical - methods</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>radioallergosorbent testing</subject><subject>RAST</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Urinalysis</subject><subject>urinary tract infection</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>UTI</subject><issn>0021-9746</issn><issn>1472-4146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks1vEzEQxa2qqE1Lz9yqlSp6QNow4881BySIoEWqyqFQ9WY5jt063ewGe1Pof4-jhBY4zUjz05s3o0fIK4QxIpNv5245pgBiDAwFlTtkhFzRmiOXu2QEQLHWist9cpDzHACZQrZH9lFyzhTlI4IffR6qZbJuiM5XsSt9XNj0WDmbfLW0w13f9reP76rkH6L_WdGX5EWwbfZH23pIvn_-9G1yXl98Pfsy-XBRT5kWQ900oARoYNy50HBgVEhEDNJ6HURwArydsZnjUw1ea6TIaXAzEUCroHXDDsn7je5yNV34mfPdkGxrtvZMb6P5d9LFO3PbPxhsZNmmisDpViD1P1blTLOI2fm2tZ3vV9koKM-gFAt48h8471epK8cZVA0ClaxZyx3_7efJyJ9fFuD1FrDZ2TYk27mYnznFqQJNC1dvuJgH_-tpbtO9kYopYS6vJ-b8-rK5Oru5MqLwbzb8dDF_VgOzDoApATDrAJhNANhvCI-doA</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Smellie, W S</creator><creator>Forth, J O</creator><creator>McNulty, C A M</creator><creator>Hirschowitz, L</creator><creator>Lilic, D</creator><creator>Gosling, R</creator><creator>Bareford, D</creator><creator>Logan, E</creator><creator>Kerr, K G</creator><creator>Spickett, G P</creator><creator>Hoffman, J</creator><creator>Galloway, A</creator><creator>Bloxham, C A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2</title><author>Smellie, W S ; Forth, J O ; McNulty, C A M ; Hirschowitz, L ; Lilic, D ; Gosling, R ; Bareford, D ; Logan, E ; Kerr, K G ; Spickett, G P ; Hoffman, J ; Galloway, A ; Bloxham, C A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b395t-8807509034ccf8403256111f6ae9f5fc50ead3dc4b90e9912142fcd5f097f9983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>American Urological Association</topic><topic>appropriateness</topic><topic>AUA</topic><topic>best practice</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Sedimentation</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>follicle stimulating hormone</topic><topic>FSH</topic><topic>General Medical Services</topic><topic>GMS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>interdisciplinary</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Menopause</topic><topic>microscopic haematuria</topic><topic>Pathology, Clinical - methods</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>radioallergosorbent testing</topic><topic>RAST</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Urinalysis</topic><topic>urinary tract infection</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>UTI</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smellie, W S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forth, J O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNulty, C A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschowitz, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilic, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosling, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bareford, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logan, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, K G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spickett, G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloxham, C A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smellie, W S</au><au>Forth, J O</au><au>McNulty, C A M</au><au>Hirschowitz, L</au><au>Lilic, D</au><au>Gosling, R</au><au>Bareford, D</au><au>Logan, E</au><au>Kerr, K G</au><au>Spickett, G P</au><au>Hoffman, J</au><au>Galloway, A</au><au>Bloxham, C A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>113-120</pages><issn>0021-9746</issn><eissn>1472-4146</eissn><coden>JCPAAK</coden><abstract>This second best practice review examines five series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) laboratory testing for allergy, (2) diagnosis and monitoring of menopause, (3) the use of urine cytology, (4) the usefulness of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and (5) the investigation of possible urinary tract infection. The review is presented in a question–answer format. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents, and evidence based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Association of Clinical Pathologists</pub><pmid>16443724</pmid><doi>10.1136/jcp.2005.031526</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9746 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical pathology, 2006-02, Vol.59 (2), p.113-120 |
| issn | 0021-9746 1472-4146 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1860327 |
| source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | American Urological Association appropriateness AUA best practice Biological and medical sciences Blood Sedimentation Evidence-Based Medicine Female follicle stimulating hormone FSH General Medical Services GMS Humans Hypersensitivity - diagnosis interdisciplinary Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Menopause microscopic haematuria Pathology, Clinical - methods Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Patient Selection primary care Primary Health Care - methods radioallergosorbent testing RAST Review Urinalysis urinary tract infection Urinary Tract Infections - diagnosis UTI |
| title | Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A38%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20practice%20in%20primary%20care%20pathology:%20review%202&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Smellie,%20W%20S&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=113-120&rft.issn=0021-9746&rft.eissn=1472-4146&rft.coden=JCPAAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jcp.2005.031526&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4022523621%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781026387&rft_id=info:pmid/16443724&rfr_iscdi=true |