Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress
Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2007-02, Vol.55 (2), p.215-224 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 224 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 215 |
container_title | Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Graves, Kristi D Arnold, Susanne M Love, Celia L Kirsh, Kenneth L Moore, Pamela G Passik, Steven D |
description | Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample of patients being seen in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic. Consecutive patients ( N = 333) were recruited from an outpatient multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic to complete the Distress Thermometer, an associated Problem Symptom List, and two questions about interest in receiving help for symptoms. Over half (61.6%) of patients reported distress at a clinically significant level, and 22.5% of patients indicated interest in receiving help with their distress and/or symptoms. Problems in the areas of family relationships, emotional functioning, lack of information about diagnosis/treatment, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning were associated with higher reports of distress. Specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain and fatigue were most predictive of distress. Younger age was also associated with higher levels of distress. Distress was not associated with other clinical variables, including stage of illness or medical treatment approach. Similar results were obtained when individuals who had not yet received a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer ( n = 134) were excluded from analyses; however, family problems and anxiety were no longer predictive of distress. Screening for distress in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic is feasible and a significant number of patients can be expected to meet clinical criteria for distress. Results also highlight younger age and specific physical and psychosocial symptoms as predictive of clinically significant distress. Identification of the presence and predictors of distress are the first steps toward appropriate referral and treatment of symptoms and problems that contribute to cancer patients’ distress. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1857305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0169500206005356</els_id><sourcerecordid>68922551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-f9518227edb6f8bd5334319f12f84a6274c35cb590b5314eac4b9e1121589f233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuP0zAQgC0EYrsLPwHkC9xS_IgTh8MitMtLWgkk4Gw5zri4pE7XTiqVX89EDSxw4WR5_HlmPJ8JecLZmjNevdiu-ylunI1rwViFsTVj_B5ZcV2LQksp7pMVck2hGBNn5DznLQI1Z81DcsZrpstSyxX5cR3ymCBnml0CiCFuaIjU0t3Uj6EL2YV9H6JNRzrXo1jQQaIOY8G9pJ8SHGwPGKM2dnSfoAtuHFKmg18g2_dHmsMmBo-bONJuqfiIPPC2z_B4WS_I17dvvly9L24-vvtw9fqmcFWlx8I3imshaujayuu2U1KWkjeeC69LW4m6dFK5VjWsVZKXYF3ZNsC54Eo3Xkh5QS5PefdTu4POQRyT7c0-hR0-yww2mL9PYvhmNsPBcK1qyRQmeL4kSMPtBHk0O5wL9L2NMEzZVLoRQimOoDqBLg05J_C_i3BmZmtmaxZrZrY2h1EK3nv6Z4d3txZNCDxbAJtxoD6hhZDvOF3WNdcauVcnDnCehwDJoL_ZThcSuNF0Q_hvK5f_ZPhl8TscIW-HKUWUZbjJwjDzef5i8w9jFcNJqUr-BHgf0JM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68922551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Graves, Kristi D ; Arnold, Susanne M ; Love, Celia L ; Kirsh, Kenneth L ; Moore, Pamela G ; Passik, Steven D</creator><creatorcontrib>Graves, Kristi D ; Arnold, Susanne M ; Love, Celia L ; Kirsh, Kenneth L ; Moore, Pamela G ; Passik, Steven D</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample of patients being seen in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic. Consecutive patients ( N = 333) were recruited from an outpatient multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic to complete the Distress Thermometer, an associated Problem Symptom List, and two questions about interest in receiving help for symptoms. Over half (61.6%) of patients reported distress at a clinically significant level, and 22.5% of patients indicated interest in receiving help with their distress and/or symptoms. Problems in the areas of family relationships, emotional functioning, lack of information about diagnosis/treatment, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning were associated with higher reports of distress. Specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain and fatigue were most predictive of distress. Younger age was also associated with higher levels of distress. Distress was not associated with other clinical variables, including stage of illness or medical treatment approach. Similar results were obtained when individuals who had not yet received a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer ( n = 134) were excluded from analyses; however, family problems and anxiety were no longer predictive of distress. Screening for distress in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic is feasible and a significant number of patients can be expected to meet clinical criteria for distress. Results also highlight younger age and specific physical and psychosocial symptoms as predictive of clinically significant distress. Identification of the presence and predictors of distress are the first steps toward appropriate referral and treatment of symptoms and problems that contribute to cancer patients’ distress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17084483</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LUCAE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer Care Facilities ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Distress Thermometer ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Kentucky - epidemiology ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - psychology ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Pneumology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Predictors ; Prevalence ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychological distress ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Pulmonary/Respiratory ; Regression Analysis ; Screening ; Stress, Psychological - epidemiology ; Stress, Psychological - etiology ; Tumors ; Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum</subject><ispartof>Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2007-02, Vol.55 (2), p.215-224</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-f9518227edb6f8bd5334319f12f84a6274c35cb590b5314eac4b9e1121589f233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-f9518227edb6f8bd5334319f12f84a6274c35cb590b5314eac4b9e1121589f233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18477188$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17084483$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graves, Kristi D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Susanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Celia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsh, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Pamela G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passik, Steven D</creatorcontrib><title>Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress</title><title>Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title><addtitle>Lung Cancer</addtitle><description>Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample of patients being seen in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic. Consecutive patients ( N = 333) were recruited from an outpatient multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic to complete the Distress Thermometer, an associated Problem Symptom List, and two questions about interest in receiving help for symptoms. Over half (61.6%) of patients reported distress at a clinically significant level, and 22.5% of patients indicated interest in receiving help with their distress and/or symptoms. Problems in the areas of family relationships, emotional functioning, lack of information about diagnosis/treatment, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning were associated with higher reports of distress. Specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain and fatigue were most predictive of distress. Younger age was also associated with higher levels of distress. Distress was not associated with other clinical variables, including stage of illness or medical treatment approach. Similar results were obtained when individuals who had not yet received a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer ( n = 134) were excluded from analyses; however, family problems and anxiety were no longer predictive of distress. Screening for distress in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic is feasible and a significant number of patients can be expected to meet clinical criteria for distress. Results also highlight younger age and specific physical and psychosocial symptoms as predictive of clinically significant distress. Identification of the presence and predictors of distress are the first steps toward appropriate referral and treatment of symptoms and problems that contribute to cancer patients’ distress.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer Care Facilities</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Distress Thermometer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kentucky - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Predictors</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Pulmonary/Respiratory</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - etiology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum</subject><issn>0169-5002</issn><issn>1872-8332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuP0zAQgC0EYrsLPwHkC9xS_IgTh8MitMtLWgkk4Gw5zri4pE7XTiqVX89EDSxw4WR5_HlmPJ8JecLZmjNevdiu-ylunI1rwViFsTVj_B5ZcV2LQksp7pMVck2hGBNn5DznLQI1Z81DcsZrpstSyxX5cR3ymCBnml0CiCFuaIjU0t3Uj6EL2YV9H6JNRzrXo1jQQaIOY8G9pJ8SHGwPGKM2dnSfoAtuHFKmg18g2_dHmsMmBo-bONJuqfiIPPC2z_B4WS_I17dvvly9L24-vvtw9fqmcFWlx8I3imshaujayuu2U1KWkjeeC69LW4m6dFK5VjWsVZKXYF3ZNsC54Eo3Xkh5QS5PefdTu4POQRyT7c0-hR0-yww2mL9PYvhmNsPBcK1qyRQmeL4kSMPtBHk0O5wL9L2NMEzZVLoRQimOoDqBLg05J_C_i3BmZmtmaxZrZrY2h1EK3nv6Z4d3txZNCDxbAJtxoD6hhZDvOF3WNdcauVcnDnCehwDJoL_ZThcSuNF0Q_hvK5f_ZPhl8TscIW-HKUWUZbjJwjDzef5i8w9jFcNJqUr-BHgf0JM</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Graves, Kristi D</creator><creator>Arnold, Susanne M</creator><creator>Love, Celia L</creator><creator>Kirsh, Kenneth L</creator><creator>Moore, Pamela G</creator><creator>Passik, Steven D</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress</title><author>Graves, Kristi D ; Arnold, Susanne M ; Love, Celia L ; Kirsh, Kenneth L ; Moore, Pamela G ; Passik, Steven D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-f9518227edb6f8bd5334319f12f84a6274c35cb590b5314eac4b9e1121589f233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer Care Facilities</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Distress Thermometer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kentucky - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Predictors</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Pulmonary/Respiratory</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - etiology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graves, Kristi D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Susanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Celia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsh, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Pamela G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passik, Steven D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graves, Kristi D</au><au>Arnold, Susanne M</au><au>Love, Celia L</au><au>Kirsh, Kenneth L</au><au>Moore, Pamela G</au><au>Passik, Steven D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress</atitle><jtitle>Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle><addtitle>Lung Cancer</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>215-224</pages><issn>0169-5002</issn><eissn>1872-8332</eissn><coden>LUCAE5</coden><abstract>Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample of patients being seen in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic. Consecutive patients ( N = 333) were recruited from an outpatient multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic to complete the Distress Thermometer, an associated Problem Symptom List, and two questions about interest in receiving help for symptoms. Over half (61.6%) of patients reported distress at a clinically significant level, and 22.5% of patients indicated interest in receiving help with their distress and/or symptoms. Problems in the areas of family relationships, emotional functioning, lack of information about diagnosis/treatment, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning were associated with higher reports of distress. Specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain and fatigue were most predictive of distress. Younger age was also associated with higher levels of distress. Distress was not associated with other clinical variables, including stage of illness or medical treatment approach. Similar results were obtained when individuals who had not yet received a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer ( n = 134) were excluded from analyses; however, family problems and anxiety were no longer predictive of distress. Screening for distress in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic is feasible and a significant number of patients can be expected to meet clinical criteria for distress. Results also highlight younger age and specific physical and psychosocial symptoms as predictive of clinically significant distress. Identification of the presence and predictors of distress are the first steps toward appropriate referral and treatment of symptoms and problems that contribute to cancer patients’ distress.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>17084483</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-5002 |
ispartof | Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2007-02, Vol.55 (2), p.215-224 |
issn | 0169-5002 1872-8332 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1857305 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Cancer Care Facilities Chi-Square Distribution Distress Thermometer Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Kentucky - epidemiology Lung cancer Lung Neoplasms - psychology Male Mass Screening - methods Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Pneumology Predictive Value of Tests Predictors Prevalence Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychological distress Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Pulmonary/Respiratory Regression Analysis Screening Stress, Psychological - epidemiology Stress, Psychological - etiology Tumors Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum |
title | Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T12%3A51%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distress%20screening%20in%20a%20multidisciplinary%20lung%20cancer%20clinic:%20Prevalence%20and%20predictors%20of%20clinically%20significant%20distress&rft.jtitle=Lung%20cancer%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Graves,%20Kristi%20D&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=215-224&rft.issn=0169-5002&rft.eissn=1872-8332&rft.coden=LUCAE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68922551%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68922551&rft_id=info:pmid/17084483&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0169500206005356&rfr_iscdi=true |