Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress

Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2007-02, Vol.55 (2), p.215-224
Hauptverfasser: Graves, Kristi D, Arnold, Susanne M, Love, Celia L, Kirsh, Kenneth L, Moore, Pamela G, Passik, Steven D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 224
container_issue 2
container_start_page 215
container_title Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
container_volume 55
creator Graves, Kristi D
Arnold, Susanne M
Love, Celia L
Kirsh, Kenneth L
Moore, Pamela G
Passik, Steven D
description Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample of patients being seen in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic. Consecutive patients ( N = 333) were recruited from an outpatient multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic to complete the Distress Thermometer, an associated Problem Symptom List, and two questions about interest in receiving help for symptoms. Over half (61.6%) of patients reported distress at a clinically significant level, and 22.5% of patients indicated interest in receiving help with their distress and/or symptoms. Problems in the areas of family relationships, emotional functioning, lack of information about diagnosis/treatment, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning were associated with higher reports of distress. Specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain and fatigue were most predictive of distress. Younger age was also associated with higher levels of distress. Distress was not associated with other clinical variables, including stage of illness or medical treatment approach. Similar results were obtained when individuals who had not yet received a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer ( n = 134) were excluded from analyses; however, family problems and anxiety were no longer predictive of distress. Screening for distress in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic is feasible and a significant number of patients can be expected to meet clinical criteria for distress. Results also highlight younger age and specific physical and psychosocial symptoms as predictive of clinically significant distress. Identification of the presence and predictors of distress are the first steps toward appropriate referral and treatment of symptoms and problems that contribute to cancer patients’ distress.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1857305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0169500206005356</els_id><sourcerecordid>68922551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-f9518227edb6f8bd5334319f12f84a6274c35cb590b5314eac4b9e1121589f233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuP0zAQgC0EYrsLPwHkC9xS_IgTh8MitMtLWgkk4Gw5zri4pE7XTiqVX89EDSxw4WR5_HlmPJ8JecLZmjNevdiu-ylunI1rwViFsTVj_B5ZcV2LQksp7pMVck2hGBNn5DznLQI1Z81DcsZrpstSyxX5cR3ymCBnml0CiCFuaIjU0t3Uj6EL2YV9H6JNRzrXo1jQQaIOY8G9pJ8SHGwPGKM2dnSfoAtuHFKmg18g2_dHmsMmBo-bONJuqfiIPPC2z_B4WS_I17dvvly9L24-vvtw9fqmcFWlx8I3imshaujayuu2U1KWkjeeC69LW4m6dFK5VjWsVZKXYF3ZNsC54Eo3Xkh5QS5PefdTu4POQRyT7c0-hR0-yww2mL9PYvhmNsPBcK1qyRQmeL4kSMPtBHk0O5wL9L2NMEzZVLoRQimOoDqBLg05J_C_i3BmZmtmaxZrZrY2h1EK3nv6Z4d3txZNCDxbAJtxoD6hhZDvOF3WNdcauVcnDnCehwDJoL_ZThcSuNF0Q_hvK5f_ZPhl8TscIW-HKUWUZbjJwjDzef5i8w9jFcNJqUr-BHgf0JM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68922551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Graves, Kristi D ; Arnold, Susanne M ; Love, Celia L ; Kirsh, Kenneth L ; Moore, Pamela G ; Passik, Steven D</creator><creatorcontrib>Graves, Kristi D ; Arnold, Susanne M ; Love, Celia L ; Kirsh, Kenneth L ; Moore, Pamela G ; Passik, Steven D</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample of patients being seen in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic. Consecutive patients ( N = 333) were recruited from an outpatient multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic to complete the Distress Thermometer, an associated Problem Symptom List, and two questions about interest in receiving help for symptoms. Over half (61.6%) of patients reported distress at a clinically significant level, and 22.5% of patients indicated interest in receiving help with their distress and/or symptoms. Problems in the areas of family relationships, emotional functioning, lack of information about diagnosis/treatment, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning were associated with higher reports of distress. Specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain and fatigue were most predictive of distress. Younger age was also associated with higher levels of distress. Distress was not associated with other clinical variables, including stage of illness or medical treatment approach. Similar results were obtained when individuals who had not yet received a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer ( n = 134) were excluded from analyses; however, family problems and anxiety were no longer predictive of distress. Screening for distress in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic is feasible and a significant number of patients can be expected to meet clinical criteria for distress. Results also highlight younger age and specific physical and psychosocial symptoms as predictive of clinically significant distress. Identification of the presence and predictors of distress are the first steps toward appropriate referral and treatment of symptoms and problems that contribute to cancer patients’ distress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17084483</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LUCAE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer Care Facilities ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Distress Thermometer ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Kentucky - epidemiology ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - psychology ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Pneumology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Predictors ; Prevalence ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychological distress ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Pulmonary/Respiratory ; Regression Analysis ; Screening ; Stress, Psychological - epidemiology ; Stress, Psychological - etiology ; Tumors ; Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum</subject><ispartof>Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2007-02, Vol.55 (2), p.215-224</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-f9518227edb6f8bd5334319f12f84a6274c35cb590b5314eac4b9e1121589f233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-f9518227edb6f8bd5334319f12f84a6274c35cb590b5314eac4b9e1121589f233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18477188$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17084483$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graves, Kristi D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Susanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Celia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsh, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Pamela G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passik, Steven D</creatorcontrib><title>Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress</title><title>Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title><addtitle>Lung Cancer</addtitle><description>Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample of patients being seen in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic. Consecutive patients ( N = 333) were recruited from an outpatient multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic to complete the Distress Thermometer, an associated Problem Symptom List, and two questions about interest in receiving help for symptoms. Over half (61.6%) of patients reported distress at a clinically significant level, and 22.5% of patients indicated interest in receiving help with their distress and/or symptoms. Problems in the areas of family relationships, emotional functioning, lack of information about diagnosis/treatment, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning were associated with higher reports of distress. Specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain and fatigue were most predictive of distress. Younger age was also associated with higher levels of distress. Distress was not associated with other clinical variables, including stage of illness or medical treatment approach. Similar results were obtained when individuals who had not yet received a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer ( n = 134) were excluded from analyses; however, family problems and anxiety were no longer predictive of distress. Screening for distress in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic is feasible and a significant number of patients can be expected to meet clinical criteria for distress. Results also highlight younger age and specific physical and psychosocial symptoms as predictive of clinically significant distress. Identification of the presence and predictors of distress are the first steps toward appropriate referral and treatment of symptoms and problems that contribute to cancer patients’ distress.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer Care Facilities</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Distress Thermometer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kentucky - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Predictors</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Pulmonary/Respiratory</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - etiology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum</subject><issn>0169-5002</issn><issn>1872-8332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuP0zAQgC0EYrsLPwHkC9xS_IgTh8MitMtLWgkk4Gw5zri4pE7XTiqVX89EDSxw4WR5_HlmPJ8JecLZmjNevdiu-ylunI1rwViFsTVj_B5ZcV2LQksp7pMVck2hGBNn5DznLQI1Z81DcsZrpstSyxX5cR3ymCBnml0CiCFuaIjU0t3Uj6EL2YV9H6JNRzrXo1jQQaIOY8G9pJ8SHGwPGKM2dnSfoAtuHFKmg18g2_dHmsMmBo-bONJuqfiIPPC2z_B4WS_I17dvvly9L24-vvtw9fqmcFWlx8I3imshaujayuu2U1KWkjeeC69LW4m6dFK5VjWsVZKXYF3ZNsC54Eo3Xkh5QS5PefdTu4POQRyT7c0-hR0-yww2mL9PYvhmNsPBcK1qyRQmeL4kSMPtBHk0O5wL9L2NMEzZVLoRQimOoDqBLg05J_C_i3BmZmtmaxZrZrY2h1EK3nv6Z4d3txZNCDxbAJtxoD6hhZDvOF3WNdcauVcnDnCehwDJoL_ZThcSuNF0Q_hvK5f_ZPhl8TscIW-HKUWUZbjJwjDzef5i8w9jFcNJqUr-BHgf0JM</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Graves, Kristi D</creator><creator>Arnold, Susanne M</creator><creator>Love, Celia L</creator><creator>Kirsh, Kenneth L</creator><creator>Moore, Pamela G</creator><creator>Passik, Steven D</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress</title><author>Graves, Kristi D ; Arnold, Susanne M ; Love, Celia L ; Kirsh, Kenneth L ; Moore, Pamela G ; Passik, Steven D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-f9518227edb6f8bd5334319f12f84a6274c35cb590b5314eac4b9e1121589f233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer Care Facilities</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Distress Thermometer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kentucky - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Predictors</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Pulmonary/Respiratory</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - etiology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graves, Kristi D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Susanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Celia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsh, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Pamela G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passik, Steven D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graves, Kristi D</au><au>Arnold, Susanne M</au><au>Love, Celia L</au><au>Kirsh, Kenneth L</au><au>Moore, Pamela G</au><au>Passik, Steven D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress</atitle><jtitle>Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle><addtitle>Lung Cancer</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>215-224</pages><issn>0169-5002</issn><eissn>1872-8332</eissn><coden>LUCAE5</coden><abstract>Summary Screening for distress in cancer patients is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and a Distress Thermometer has previously been developed and empirically validated for this purpose. The present study sought to determine the rates and predictors of distress in a sample of patients being seen in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic. Consecutive patients ( N = 333) were recruited from an outpatient multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic to complete the Distress Thermometer, an associated Problem Symptom List, and two questions about interest in receiving help for symptoms. Over half (61.6%) of patients reported distress at a clinically significant level, and 22.5% of patients indicated interest in receiving help with their distress and/or symptoms. Problems in the areas of family relationships, emotional functioning, lack of information about diagnosis/treatment, physical functioning, and cognitive functioning were associated with higher reports of distress. Specific symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain and fatigue were most predictive of distress. Younger age was also associated with higher levels of distress. Distress was not associated with other clinical variables, including stage of illness or medical treatment approach. Similar results were obtained when individuals who had not yet received a definitive diagnosis of lung cancer ( n = 134) were excluded from analyses; however, family problems and anxiety were no longer predictive of distress. Screening for distress in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic is feasible and a significant number of patients can be expected to meet clinical criteria for distress. Results also highlight younger age and specific physical and psychosocial symptoms as predictive of clinically significant distress. Identification of the presence and predictors of distress are the first steps toward appropriate referral and treatment of symptoms and problems that contribute to cancer patients’ distress.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>17084483</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5002
ispartof Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2007-02, Vol.55 (2), p.215-224
issn 0169-5002
1872-8332
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1857305
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cancer Care Facilities
Chi-Square Distribution
Distress Thermometer
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Kentucky - epidemiology
Lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - psychology
Male
Mass Screening - methods
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Pneumology
Predictive Value of Tests
Predictors
Prevalence
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychological distress
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Pulmonary/Respiratory
Regression Analysis
Screening
Stress, Psychological - epidemiology
Stress, Psychological - etiology
Tumors
Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum
title Distress screening in a multidisciplinary lung cancer clinic: Prevalence and predictors of clinically significant distress
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T12%3A51%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distress%20screening%20in%20a%20multidisciplinary%20lung%20cancer%20clinic:%20Prevalence%20and%20predictors%20of%20clinically%20significant%20distress&rft.jtitle=Lung%20cancer%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Graves,%20Kristi%20D&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=215-224&rft.issn=0169-5002&rft.eissn=1872-8332&rft.coden=LUCAE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68922551%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68922551&rft_id=info:pmid/17084483&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0169500206005356&rfr_iscdi=true