Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients

Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of ophthalmology 2006-05, Vol.90 (5), p.574-578
Hauptverfasser: Easty, D L, Nemeth-Wasmer, G, Vounatsos, J-P, Girard, B, Besnainou, N, Pouliquen, P, Delval, L, Rouland, J-F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 578
container_issue 5
container_start_page 574
container_title British journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 90
creator Easty, D L
Nemeth-Wasmer, G
Vounatsos, J-P
Girard, B
Besnainou, N
Pouliquen, P
Delval, L
Rouland, J-F
description Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. Results: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bjo.2005.080424
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1857071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012390821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-8355ecd4751de6f8deceeea08b517a91810a92d678edc4a7c51fc88c8c4424403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFrFDEUhYModq0--yYBKVhhtsnsTJJ5EWS1W6EohdXXkMnc2c06k0yTTHX_jz_ULLO0-qJPl3C_c88hB6GXlMwpXbCLeufmOSHlnAhS5MUjNKMFE1lOePUYzQghPKOU0RP0LIRdeuaM8qfohDKW50SwGfq1dP2gvAnOYtdiha2z2eAhgL-DBiebM7zOVtBh2APepPkmGLvpADcuAB6tief4h4nbJP23rB-7aA6ic2ySlx475fF2P4CPYINJ_so2eNOpUbteRTcGPKhowMbwHD1pVRfgxXGeoq-XH9fLq-z6y-rT8v11Vpd5HjOxKEvQTcFL2gBrRQMaABQRdUm5qqigRFV5w7iARheK65K2WggtdJH-riCLU_RuujuMdZ-Y5O1VJwdveuX30ikj_95Ys5UbdyepKDnhNB14fTzg3e0IIcqdG71NmSXlXFSUEbZI1MVEae9C8NDeO1AiD7XKVKs81CqnWpPi1Z_BHvhjjwk4OwIqaNW1XlltwgPHU7yKHA5lE2dChJ_3e-W_S8YXvJSfvy2luFmvPlzeEHmV-LcTX_e7_6b8DR4RyEM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778916063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Easty, D L ; Nemeth-Wasmer, G ; Vounatsos, J-P ; Girard, B ; Besnainou, N ; Pouliquen, P ; Delval, L ; Rouland, J-F</creator><creatorcontrib>Easty, D L ; Nemeth-Wasmer, G ; Vounatsos, J-P ; Girard, B ; Besnainou, N ; Pouliquen, P ; Delval, L ; Rouland, J-F</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. Results: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.080424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16622086</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use ; adverse events ; AEs ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Antihypertensive Agents - blood ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; BAK ; benzalkonium chloride ; Biological and medical sciences ; break up time ; BUT ; Clinical Science - Extended Report ; Confidence intervals ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug dosages ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Gels ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma and intraocular pressure ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy ; Humans ; Hydrogels ; Hypertension ; Hypotheses ; intraocular pressure ; Intraocular Pressure - drug effects ; IOP ; LOQ ; lower limit of quantification ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; multidose ; ocular hypertension ; Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy ; OHT ; Ophthalmic Solutions - therapeutic use ; Ophthalmology ; POAG ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - therapeutic use ; primary open angle glaucoma ; SDU ; single dose unit ; Studies ; Timolol - blood ; Timolol - therapeutic use ; timolol gel ; visual acuity</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2006-05, Vol.90 (5), p.574-578</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 Copyright 2006 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-8355ecd4751de6f8deceeea08b517a91810a92d678edc4a7c51fc88c8c4424403</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/90/5/574.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/90/5/574.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,723,776,780,881,3182,23551,27903,27904,53769,53771,77346,77377</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17707904$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16622086$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Easty, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemeth-Wasmer, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vounatsos, J-P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girard, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besnainou, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pouliquen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delval, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouland, J-F</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. Results: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>adverse events</subject><subject>AEs</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - blood</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>BAK</subject><subject>benzalkonium chloride</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>break up time</subject><subject>BUT</subject><subject>Clinical Science - Extended Report</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrogels</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>IOP</subject><subject>LOQ</subject><subject>lower limit of quantification</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>multidose</subject><subject>ocular hypertension</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy</subject><subject>OHT</subject><subject>Ophthalmic Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>POAG</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - therapeutic use</subject><subject>primary open angle glaucoma</subject><subject>SDU</subject><subject>single dose unit</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Timolol - blood</subject><subject>Timolol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>timolol gel</subject><subject>visual acuity</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVFrFDEUhYModq0--yYBKVhhtsnsTJJ5EWS1W6EohdXXkMnc2c06k0yTTHX_jz_ULLO0-qJPl3C_c88hB6GXlMwpXbCLeufmOSHlnAhS5MUjNKMFE1lOePUYzQghPKOU0RP0LIRdeuaM8qfohDKW50SwGfq1dP2gvAnOYtdiha2z2eAhgL-DBiebM7zOVtBh2APepPkmGLvpADcuAB6tief4h4nbJP23rB-7aA6ic2ySlx475fF2P4CPYINJ_so2eNOpUbteRTcGPKhowMbwHD1pVRfgxXGeoq-XH9fLq-z6y-rT8v11Vpd5HjOxKEvQTcFL2gBrRQMaABQRdUm5qqigRFV5w7iARheK65K2WggtdJH-riCLU_RuujuMdZ-Y5O1VJwdveuX30ikj_95Ys5UbdyepKDnhNB14fTzg3e0IIcqdG71NmSXlXFSUEbZI1MVEae9C8NDeO1AiD7XKVKs81CqnWpPi1Z_BHvhjjwk4OwIqaNW1XlltwgPHU7yKHA5lE2dChJ_3e-W_S8YXvJSfvy2luFmvPlzeEHmV-LcTX_e7_6b8DR4RyEM</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Easty, D L</creator><creator>Nemeth-Wasmer, G</creator><creator>Vounatsos, J-P</creator><creator>Girard, B</creator><creator>Besnainou, N</creator><creator>Pouliquen, P</creator><creator>Delval, L</creator><creator>Rouland, J-F</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients</title><author>Easty, D L ; Nemeth-Wasmer, G ; Vounatsos, J-P ; Girard, B ; Besnainou, N ; Pouliquen, P ; Delval, L ; Rouland, J-F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-8355ecd4751de6f8deceeea08b517a91810a92d678edc4a7c51fc88c8c4424403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>adverse events</topic><topic>AEs</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - blood</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>BAK</topic><topic>benzalkonium chloride</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>break up time</topic><topic>BUT</topic><topic>Clinical Science - Extended Report</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrogels</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>IOP</topic><topic>LOQ</topic><topic>lower limit of quantification</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>multidose</topic><topic>ocular hypertension</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy</topic><topic>OHT</topic><topic>Ophthalmic Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>POAG</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - therapeutic use</topic><topic>primary open angle glaucoma</topic><topic>SDU</topic><topic>single dose unit</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Timolol - blood</topic><topic>Timolol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>timolol gel</topic><topic>visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Easty, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemeth-Wasmer, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vounatsos, J-P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girard, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besnainou, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pouliquen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delval, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouland, J-F</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Easty, D L</au><au>Nemeth-Wasmer, G</au><au>Vounatsos, J-P</au><au>Girard, B</au><au>Besnainou, N</au><au>Pouliquen, P</au><au>Delval, L</au><au>Rouland, J-F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>574</spage><epage>578</epage><pages>574-578</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. Results: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>16622086</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.2005.080424</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1161
ispartof British journal of ophthalmology, 2006-05, Vol.90 (5), p.574-578
issn 0007-1161
1468-2079
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1857071
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use
adverse events
AEs
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Antihypertensive Agents - blood
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
BAK
benzalkonium chloride
Biological and medical sciences
break up time
BUT
Clinical Science - Extended Report
Confidence intervals
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug dosages
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Gels
Glaucoma
Glaucoma and intraocular pressure
Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy
Humans
Hydrogels
Hypertension
Hypotheses
intraocular pressure
Intraocular Pressure - drug effects
IOP
LOQ
lower limit of quantification
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
multidose
ocular hypertension
Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy
OHT
Ophthalmic Solutions - therapeutic use
Ophthalmology
POAG
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - therapeutic use
primary open angle glaucoma
SDU
single dose unit
Studies
Timolol - blood
Timolol - therapeutic use
timolol gel
visual acuity
title Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T00%3A32%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20non-preserved%200.1%25%20T-Gel%20eye%20gel%20(single%20dose%20unit)%20with%20a%20preserved%200.1%25%20T-Gel%20eye%20gel%20(multidose)%20in%20ocular%20hypertension%20and%20glaucomatous%20patients&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Easty,%20D%20L&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=574&rft.epage=578&rft.pages=574-578&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.2005.080424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4012390821%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778916063&rft_id=info:pmid/16622086&rfr_iscdi=true