Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients
Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2006-05, Vol.90 (5), p.574-578 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 578 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 574 |
container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Easty, D L Nemeth-Wasmer, G Vounatsos, J-P Girard, B Besnainou, N Pouliquen, P Delval, L Rouland, J-F |
description | Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. Results: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjo.2005.080424 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1857071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012390821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-8355ecd4751de6f8deceeea08b517a91810a92d678edc4a7c51fc88c8c4424403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFrFDEUhYModq0--yYBKVhhtsnsTJJ5EWS1W6EohdXXkMnc2c06k0yTTHX_jz_ULLO0-qJPl3C_c88hB6GXlMwpXbCLeufmOSHlnAhS5MUjNKMFE1lOePUYzQghPKOU0RP0LIRdeuaM8qfohDKW50SwGfq1dP2gvAnOYtdiha2z2eAhgL-DBiebM7zOVtBh2APepPkmGLvpADcuAB6tief4h4nbJP23rB-7aA6ic2ySlx475fF2P4CPYINJ_so2eNOpUbteRTcGPKhowMbwHD1pVRfgxXGeoq-XH9fLq-z6y-rT8v11Vpd5HjOxKEvQTcFL2gBrRQMaABQRdUm5qqigRFV5w7iARheK65K2WggtdJH-riCLU_RuujuMdZ-Y5O1VJwdveuX30ikj_95Ys5UbdyepKDnhNB14fTzg3e0IIcqdG71NmSXlXFSUEbZI1MVEae9C8NDeO1AiD7XKVKs81CqnWpPi1Z_BHvhjjwk4OwIqaNW1XlltwgPHU7yKHA5lE2dChJ_3e-W_S8YXvJSfvy2luFmvPlzeEHmV-LcTX_e7_6b8DR4RyEM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778916063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Easty, D L ; Nemeth-Wasmer, G ; Vounatsos, J-P ; Girard, B ; Besnainou, N ; Pouliquen, P ; Delval, L ; Rouland, J-F</creator><creatorcontrib>Easty, D L ; Nemeth-Wasmer, G ; Vounatsos, J-P ; Girard, B ; Besnainou, N ; Pouliquen, P ; Delval, L ; Rouland, J-F</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. Results: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.080424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16622086</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use ; adverse events ; AEs ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Antihypertensive Agents - blood ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; BAK ; benzalkonium chloride ; Biological and medical sciences ; break up time ; BUT ; Clinical Science - Extended Report ; Confidence intervals ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug dosages ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Gels ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma and intraocular pressure ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy ; Humans ; Hydrogels ; Hypertension ; Hypotheses ; intraocular pressure ; Intraocular Pressure - drug effects ; IOP ; LOQ ; lower limit of quantification ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; multidose ; ocular hypertension ; Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy ; OHT ; Ophthalmic Solutions - therapeutic use ; Ophthalmology ; POAG ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - therapeutic use ; primary open angle glaucoma ; SDU ; single dose unit ; Studies ; Timolol - blood ; Timolol - therapeutic use ; timolol gel ; visual acuity</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2006-05, Vol.90 (5), p.574-578</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 Copyright 2006 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-8355ecd4751de6f8deceeea08b517a91810a92d678edc4a7c51fc88c8c4424403</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/90/5/574.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/90/5/574.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,723,776,780,881,3182,23551,27903,27904,53769,53771,77346,77377</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17707904$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16622086$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Easty, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemeth-Wasmer, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vounatsos, J-P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girard, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besnainou, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pouliquen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delval, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouland, J-F</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. Results: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>adverse events</subject><subject>AEs</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - blood</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>BAK</subject><subject>benzalkonium chloride</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>break up time</subject><subject>BUT</subject><subject>Clinical Science - Extended Report</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrogels</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>IOP</subject><subject>LOQ</subject><subject>lower limit of quantification</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>multidose</subject><subject>ocular hypertension</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy</subject><subject>OHT</subject><subject>Ophthalmic Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>POAG</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - therapeutic use</subject><subject>primary open angle glaucoma</subject><subject>SDU</subject><subject>single dose unit</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Timolol - blood</subject><subject>Timolol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>timolol gel</subject><subject>visual acuity</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVFrFDEUhYModq0--yYBKVhhtsnsTJJ5EWS1W6EohdXXkMnc2c06k0yTTHX_jz_ULLO0-qJPl3C_c88hB6GXlMwpXbCLeufmOSHlnAhS5MUjNKMFE1lOePUYzQghPKOU0RP0LIRdeuaM8qfohDKW50SwGfq1dP2gvAnOYtdiha2z2eAhgL-DBiebM7zOVtBh2APepPkmGLvpADcuAB6tief4h4nbJP23rB-7aA6ic2ySlx475fF2P4CPYINJ_so2eNOpUbteRTcGPKhowMbwHD1pVRfgxXGeoq-XH9fLq-z6y-rT8v11Vpd5HjOxKEvQTcFL2gBrRQMaABQRdUm5qqigRFV5w7iARheK65K2WggtdJH-riCLU_RuujuMdZ-Y5O1VJwdveuX30ikj_95Ys5UbdyepKDnhNB14fTzg3e0IIcqdG71NmSXlXFSUEbZI1MVEae9C8NDeO1AiD7XKVKs81CqnWpPi1Z_BHvhjjwk4OwIqaNW1XlltwgPHU7yKHA5lE2dChJ_3e-W_S8YXvJSfvy2luFmvPlzeEHmV-LcTX_e7_6b8DR4RyEM</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Easty, D L</creator><creator>Nemeth-Wasmer, G</creator><creator>Vounatsos, J-P</creator><creator>Girard, B</creator><creator>Besnainou, N</creator><creator>Pouliquen, P</creator><creator>Delval, L</creator><creator>Rouland, J-F</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients</title><author>Easty, D L ; Nemeth-Wasmer, G ; Vounatsos, J-P ; Girard, B ; Besnainou, N ; Pouliquen, P ; Delval, L ; Rouland, J-F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-8355ecd4751de6f8deceeea08b517a91810a92d678edc4a7c51fc88c8c4424403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>adverse events</topic><topic>AEs</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - blood</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>BAK</topic><topic>benzalkonium chloride</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>break up time</topic><topic>BUT</topic><topic>Clinical Science - Extended Report</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrogels</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>IOP</topic><topic>LOQ</topic><topic>lower limit of quantification</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>multidose</topic><topic>ocular hypertension</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy</topic><topic>OHT</topic><topic>Ophthalmic Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>POAG</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - therapeutic use</topic><topic>primary open angle glaucoma</topic><topic>SDU</topic><topic>single dose unit</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Timolol - blood</topic><topic>Timolol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>timolol gel</topic><topic>visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Easty, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemeth-Wasmer, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vounatsos, J-P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girard, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besnainou, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pouliquen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delval, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouland, J-F</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Easty, D L</au><au>Nemeth-Wasmer, G</au><au>Vounatsos, J-P</au><au>Girard, B</au><au>Besnainou, N</au><au>Pouliquen, P</au><au>Delval, L</au><au>Rouland, J-F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>574</spage><epage>578</epage><pages>574-578</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>Aim: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. Methods: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. Results: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>16622086</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.2005.080424</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 2006-05, Vol.90 (5), p.574-578 |
issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1857071 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use adverse events AEs Aged Analysis of Variance Antihypertensive Agents - blood Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use BAK benzalkonium chloride Biological and medical sciences break up time BUT Clinical Science - Extended Report Confidence intervals Drug Administration Schedule Drug dosages Drug Therapy, Combination Female Gels Glaucoma Glaucoma and intraocular pressure Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy Humans Hydrogels Hypertension Hypotheses intraocular pressure Intraocular Pressure - drug effects IOP LOQ lower limit of quantification Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous multidose ocular hypertension Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy OHT Ophthalmic Solutions - therapeutic use Ophthalmology POAG Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - therapeutic use primary open angle glaucoma SDU single dose unit Studies Timolol - blood Timolol - therapeutic use timolol gel visual acuity |
title | Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T00%3A32%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20non-preserved%200.1%25%20T-Gel%20eye%20gel%20(single%20dose%20unit)%20with%20a%20preserved%200.1%25%20T-Gel%20eye%20gel%20(multidose)%20in%20ocular%20hypertension%20and%20glaucomatous%20patients&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Easty,%20D%20L&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=574&rft.epage=578&rft.pages=574-578&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.2005.080424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4012390821%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778916063&rft_id=info:pmid/16622086&rfr_iscdi=true |