Effect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time
Aim: To assess the repeatability of Eger macular stressometer (EMS) measures of photostress recovery and determine their association with other measures of visual function. Methods: EMS photostress recovery time was measured in 90 patients with bilateral exudative age related macular degeneration (A...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2006-04, Vol.90 (4), p.432-434 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 434 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 432 |
| container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
| container_volume | 90 |
| creator | Wolffsohn, J S Anderson, S J Mitchell, J Woodcock, A Rubinstein, M Ffytche, T Browning, A Willbond, K Amoaku, W M Bradley, C |
| description | Aim: To assess the repeatability of Eger macular stressometer (EMS) measures of photostress recovery and determine their association with other measures of visual function. Methods: EMS photostress recovery time was measured in 90 patients with bilateral exudative age related macular degeneration (AMD), 19 with bilateral atrophic AMD and 47 with both forms of the condition (mean age 79 (SD 13) years). Measurements were made on two occasions separated by 1 year. Intrasession repeatability was assessed by repeating the measures after a 10 minute recovery period at the first visit. Distance visual acuity was measured with a logMAR chart, near visual acuity with a MNRead chart at 25 cm, contrast sensitivity with a Pelli-Robson chart, and the presence of central visual disturbance assessed with an Amsler grid. A questionnaire was used to assess self reported difficulties with glare recovery. Results: The average EMS recovery time was 11.0 (SD 8.9) seconds, decreasing by 1.6 (5.2) seconds on repeated measurement (p0.05). EMS photostress recovery time did not predict those whose vision decreased over the following year compared with those among whom it remained stable. Conclusions: The EMS test is not a useful tool in determining the severity or progression of AMD. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjo.2005.085787 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1856983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012385511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-6c007cc088665d9c7f535f56cdcc9fe2c28a5d62338816bf29adcf9cd99e64953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd2LEzEUxQdR3Lr67JsMiD4I081H8_UiSOn6teiDtfgWMpmbdurMpCaZZfe_N8uUrvoiBELu_eVwDqconmM0x5jyi3rv5wQhNkeSCSkeFDO84LIiSKiHxQwhJCqMOT4rnsS4z0_CsXhcnGHOFoISPCtg5RzYVHpXmi2UATqToCl7Y8fOhLKBLQwQTGr9UOaTdlCuthBOQEwBYvQ9pDw87Hzy0yQrWX8N4bZMbQ9Pi0fOdBGeHe_z4vvlar38UF19ff9x-e6qqhkhqeI2G7YWSck5a5QVjlHmGLeNtcoBsUQa1nBCqZSY144o01inbKMU8IVi9Lx4O-kexrqHxsKQgun0IbS9Cbfam1b_vRnand76a40l40rSLPD6KBD8rxFi0n0bLXSdGcCPUXMhmKIUZ_DlP-Dej2HI4TQWQirM2EJl6mKibPAxBnAnKxjpuwJ1LlDfFainAvOPF38muOePjWXg1REw0ZrOBTPYNt5z2Z8UXGaumrg2Jrg57U34mUNQwfSXzVJvfqzXG_z5k_6W-TcTX_f7_7r8DYtWwoY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778915549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wolffsohn, J S ; Anderson, S J ; Mitchell, J ; Woodcock, A ; Rubinstein, M ; Ffytche, T ; Browning, A ; Willbond, K ; Amoaku, W M ; Bradley, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolffsohn, J S ; Anderson, S J ; Mitchell, J ; Woodcock, A ; Rubinstein, M ; Ffytche, T ; Browning, A ; Willbond, K ; Amoaku, W M ; Bradley, C</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To assess the repeatability of Eger macular stressometer (EMS) measures of photostress recovery and determine their association with other measures of visual function. Methods: EMS photostress recovery time was measured in 90 patients with bilateral exudative age related macular degeneration (AMD), 19 with bilateral atrophic AMD and 47 with both forms of the condition (mean age 79 (SD 13) years). Measurements were made on two occasions separated by 1 year. Intrasession repeatability was assessed by repeating the measures after a 10 minute recovery period at the first visit. Distance visual acuity was measured with a logMAR chart, near visual acuity with a MNRead chart at 25 cm, contrast sensitivity with a Pelli-Robson chart, and the presence of central visual disturbance assessed with an Amsler grid. A questionnaire was used to assess self reported difficulties with glare recovery. Results: The average EMS recovery time was 11.0 (SD 8.9) seconds, decreasing by 1.6 (5.2) seconds on repeated measurement (p<0.05). EMS photostress recovery was not correlated with visual function measures or subjective difficulties with lights (p>0.05). EMS photostress recovery time did not predict those whose vision decreased over the following year compared with those among whom it remained stable. Conclusions: The EMS test is not a useful tool in determining the severity or progression of AMD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.085787</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16547321</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Ocular ; age related macular degeneration ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; AMD ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Science - Scientific Report ; Contrast Sensitivity ; Disease Progression ; Eger macular stressometer ; EMS ; Female ; Glare ; Humans ; Macular Degeneration - diagnosis ; Macular Degeneration - physiopathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; photostress recovery time ; Reproducibility of Results ; vision ; Vision Tests - methods ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2006-04, Vol.90 (4), p.432-434</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 Copyright 2006 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-6c007cc088665d9c7f535f56cdcc9fe2c28a5d62338816bf29adcf9cd99e64953</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/90/4/432.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bjo.bmj.com/content/90/4/432.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,723,776,780,881,3182,23551,27903,27904,53770,53772,77347,77378</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17598768$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16547321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolffsohn, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodcock, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinstein, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ffytche, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willbond, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amoaku, W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, C</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Aim: To assess the repeatability of Eger macular stressometer (EMS) measures of photostress recovery and determine their association with other measures of visual function. Methods: EMS photostress recovery time was measured in 90 patients with bilateral exudative age related macular degeneration (AMD), 19 with bilateral atrophic AMD and 47 with both forms of the condition (mean age 79 (SD 13) years). Measurements were made on two occasions separated by 1 year. Intrasession repeatability was assessed by repeating the measures after a 10 minute recovery period at the first visit. Distance visual acuity was measured with a logMAR chart, near visual acuity with a MNRead chart at 25 cm, contrast sensitivity with a Pelli-Robson chart, and the presence of central visual disturbance assessed with an Amsler grid. A questionnaire was used to assess self reported difficulties with glare recovery. Results: The average EMS recovery time was 11.0 (SD 8.9) seconds, decreasing by 1.6 (5.2) seconds on repeated measurement (p<0.05). EMS photostress recovery was not correlated with visual function measures or subjective difficulties with lights (p>0.05). EMS photostress recovery time did not predict those whose vision decreased over the following year compared with those among whom it remained stable. Conclusions: The EMS test is not a useful tool in determining the severity or progression of AMD.</description><subject>Adaptation, Ocular</subject><subject>age related macular degeneration</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>AMD</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Science - Scientific Report</subject><subject>Contrast Sensitivity</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Eger macular stressometer</subject><subject>EMS</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glare</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macular Degeneration - diagnosis</subject><subject>Macular Degeneration - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>photostress recovery time</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>vision</subject><subject>Vision Tests - methods</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd2LEzEUxQdR3Lr67JsMiD4I081H8_UiSOn6teiDtfgWMpmbdurMpCaZZfe_N8uUrvoiBELu_eVwDqconmM0x5jyi3rv5wQhNkeSCSkeFDO84LIiSKiHxQwhJCqMOT4rnsS4z0_CsXhcnGHOFoISPCtg5RzYVHpXmi2UATqToCl7Y8fOhLKBLQwQTGr9UOaTdlCuthBOQEwBYvQ9pDw87Hzy0yQrWX8N4bZMbQ9Pi0fOdBGeHe_z4vvlar38UF19ff9x-e6qqhkhqeI2G7YWSck5a5QVjlHmGLeNtcoBsUQa1nBCqZSY144o01inbKMU8IVi9Lx4O-kexrqHxsKQgun0IbS9Cbfam1b_vRnand76a40l40rSLPD6KBD8rxFi0n0bLXSdGcCPUXMhmKIUZ_DlP-Dej2HI4TQWQirM2EJl6mKibPAxBnAnKxjpuwJ1LlDfFainAvOPF38muOePjWXg1REw0ZrOBTPYNt5z2Z8UXGaumrg2Jrg57U34mUNQwfSXzVJvfqzXG_z5k_6W-TcTX_f7_7r8DYtWwoY</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Wolffsohn, J S</creator><creator>Anderson, S J</creator><creator>Mitchell, J</creator><creator>Woodcock, A</creator><creator>Rubinstein, M</creator><creator>Ffytche, T</creator><creator>Browning, A</creator><creator>Willbond, K</creator><creator>Amoaku, W M</creator><creator>Bradley, C</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Effect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time</title><author>Wolffsohn, J S ; Anderson, S J ; Mitchell, J ; Woodcock, A ; Rubinstein, M ; Ffytche, T ; Browning, A ; Willbond, K ; Amoaku, W M ; Bradley, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-6c007cc088665d9c7f535f56cdcc9fe2c28a5d62338816bf29adcf9cd99e64953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Ocular</topic><topic>age related macular degeneration</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>AMD</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Science - Scientific Report</topic><topic>Contrast Sensitivity</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Eger macular stressometer</topic><topic>EMS</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glare</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macular Degeneration - diagnosis</topic><topic>Macular Degeneration - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>photostress recovery time</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>vision</topic><topic>Vision Tests - methods</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolffsohn, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodcock, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubinstein, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ffytche, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willbond, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amoaku, W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolffsohn, J S</au><au>Anderson, S J</au><au>Mitchell, J</au><au>Woodcock, A</au><au>Rubinstein, M</au><au>Ffytche, T</au><au>Browning, A</au><au>Willbond, K</au><au>Amoaku, W M</au><au>Bradley, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>432</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>432-434</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>Aim: To assess the repeatability of Eger macular stressometer (EMS) measures of photostress recovery and determine their association with other measures of visual function. Methods: EMS photostress recovery time was measured in 90 patients with bilateral exudative age related macular degeneration (AMD), 19 with bilateral atrophic AMD and 47 with both forms of the condition (mean age 79 (SD 13) years). Measurements were made on two occasions separated by 1 year. Intrasession repeatability was assessed by repeating the measures after a 10 minute recovery period at the first visit. Distance visual acuity was measured with a logMAR chart, near visual acuity with a MNRead chart at 25 cm, contrast sensitivity with a Pelli-Robson chart, and the presence of central visual disturbance assessed with an Amsler grid. A questionnaire was used to assess self reported difficulties with glare recovery. Results: The average EMS recovery time was 11.0 (SD 8.9) seconds, decreasing by 1.6 (5.2) seconds on repeated measurement (p<0.05). EMS photostress recovery was not correlated with visual function measures or subjective difficulties with lights (p>0.05). EMS photostress recovery time did not predict those whose vision decreased over the following year compared with those among whom it remained stable. Conclusions: The EMS test is not a useful tool in determining the severity or progression of AMD.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>16547321</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.2005.085787</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
| ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 2006-04, Vol.90 (4), p.432-434 |
| issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1856983 |
| source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Adaptation, Ocular age related macular degeneration Aged Aged, 80 and over AMD Biological and medical sciences Clinical Science - Scientific Report Contrast Sensitivity Disease Progression Eger macular stressometer EMS Female Glare Humans Macular Degeneration - diagnosis Macular Degeneration - physiopathology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Ophthalmology Photic Stimulation - methods photostress recovery time Reproducibility of Results vision Vision Tests - methods Visual Acuity |
| title | Effect of age related macular degeneration on the Eger macular stressometer photostress recovery time |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A01%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20age%20related%20macular%20degeneration%20on%20the%20Eger%20macular%20stressometer%20photostress%20recovery%20time&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Wolffsohn,%20J%20S&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=432&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=432-434&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.2005.085787&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4012385511%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778915549&rft_id=info:pmid/16547321&rfr_iscdi=true |