Evaluation criteria for the district health management information systems: lessons from the Ministry of Health, Kenya

The District Health Management Information Systems (DHMISs) were established by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Kenya more than two decades ago. Since then, no comprehensive evaluation has been undertaken. This can partly be attributed to lack of defined criteria for evaluating them. To propose eval...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:African health sciences 2005-03, Vol.5 (1), p.59-64
Hauptverfasser: Odhiambo-Otieno, George W, Odero, Wilson W O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 64
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title African health sciences
container_volume 5
creator Odhiambo-Otieno, George W
Odero, Wilson W O
description The District Health Management Information Systems (DHMISs) were established by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Kenya more than two decades ago. Since then, no comprehensive evaluation has been undertaken. This can partly be attributed to lack of defined criteria for evaluating them. To propose evaluation criteria for assessing the design, implementation and impact of DHMIS in the management of the District Health System (DHS) in Kenya. A descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in three DHSs in Kenya: Bungoma, Murang'a and Uasin Gishu districts. Data was collected through focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and documents' review. The respondents, purposely selected from the Ministry of Health headquarters and the three DHS districts, included designers, managers and end-users of the systems. A set of evaluation criteria for DHMISs was identified for each of the three phases of implementation: pre-implementation evaluation criteria (categorised as policy and objectives, technical feasibility, financial viability, political viability and administrative operability) to be applied at the design stage; concurrent implementation evaluation criteria to be applied during implementation of the new system; and post-implementation evaluation criteria (classified as internal - quality of information; external - resources and managerial support; ultimate - systems impact) to be applied after implementation of the system for at least three years. In designing a DHMIS model there is need to have built-in these three sets of evaluation criteria which should be used in a phased manner. Pre-implementation evaluation criteria should be used to evaluate the system's viability before more resources are committed to it; concurrent (operational) - implementation evaluation criteria should be used to monitor the process; and post-implementation evaluation criteria should be applied to assess the system's effectiveness.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1831895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67757686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-1d2e242f14e52e36970e349954d12f830595f8807745fe21a37c0fdcbeda4e613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtKxDAQhosoHlZfQQKCVxZyaE5eCCKrKyre6HXJthM30iZrki7s21t1FfVqBuabj3-YrWKfSKpLzDHbHnuhcCk05nvFQUqvGFNBNNkt9ghXFSOM7Rer6cp0g8kueNRElyE6g2yIKC8AtS7l6JqMFmC6vEC98eYFevAZOT9C_ddeWqcMfTpHHaQUfEI2hv5T8OD8h2KNgkWzT8cZugO_NofFjjVdgqNNnRTP19Onq1l5_3hze3V5Xy4plrkkLQVaUUsq4BSY0BIDq7TmVUuoVQxzza1SWMqKW6DEMNlg2zZzaE0FgrBJcfHlXQ7zHtpmjB5NVy-j601c18G4-u_Eu0X9ElY1UYwozUfB6UYQw9sAKde9Sw10nfEQhlQLKbkUSozgyT_wNQzRj8fVlCshNdaVHKnj33l-gnw_hL0Dz5iKhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586790947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation criteria for the district health management information systems: lessons from the Ministry of Health, Kenya</title><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Bioline International</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Odhiambo-Otieno, George W ; Odero, Wilson W O</creator><creatorcontrib>Odhiambo-Otieno, George W ; Odero, Wilson W O</creatorcontrib><description>The District Health Management Information Systems (DHMISs) were established by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Kenya more than two decades ago. Since then, no comprehensive evaluation has been undertaken. This can partly be attributed to lack of defined criteria for evaluating them. To propose evaluation criteria for assessing the design, implementation and impact of DHMIS in the management of the District Health System (DHS) in Kenya. A descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in three DHSs in Kenya: Bungoma, Murang'a and Uasin Gishu districts. Data was collected through focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and documents' review. The respondents, purposely selected from the Ministry of Health headquarters and the three DHS districts, included designers, managers and end-users of the systems. A set of evaluation criteria for DHMISs was identified for each of the three phases of implementation: pre-implementation evaluation criteria (categorised as policy and objectives, technical feasibility, financial viability, political viability and administrative operability) to be applied at the design stage; concurrent implementation evaluation criteria to be applied during implementation of the new system; and post-implementation evaluation criteria (classified as internal - quality of information; external - resources and managerial support; ultimate - systems impact) to be applied after implementation of the system for at least three years. In designing a DHMIS model there is need to have built-in these three sets of evaluation criteria which should be used in a phased manner. Pre-implementation evaluation criteria should be used to evaluate the system's viability before more resources are committed to it; concurrent (operational) - implementation evaluation criteria should be used to monitor the process; and post-implementation evaluation criteria should be applied to assess the system's effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1680-6905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1729-0503</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15843133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Uganda: Makerere Medical School</publisher><subject>African studies ; Archives &amp; records ; Biomedical Technology - organization &amp; administration ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Health and Medicine ; Health Services Administration ; Health Services Research - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Information technology ; Kenya ; Management Information Systems ; Medical records ; Original ; Science and Technology ; Systems design</subject><ispartof>African health sciences, 2005-03, Vol.5 (1), p.59-64</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Makerere Medical School, Uganda 2005 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1831895/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1831895/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15843133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Odhiambo-Otieno, George W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odero, Wilson W O</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation criteria for the district health management information systems: lessons from the Ministry of Health, Kenya</title><title>African health sciences</title><addtitle>Afr Health Sci</addtitle><description>The District Health Management Information Systems (DHMISs) were established by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Kenya more than two decades ago. Since then, no comprehensive evaluation has been undertaken. This can partly be attributed to lack of defined criteria for evaluating them. To propose evaluation criteria for assessing the design, implementation and impact of DHMIS in the management of the District Health System (DHS) in Kenya. A descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in three DHSs in Kenya: Bungoma, Murang'a and Uasin Gishu districts. Data was collected through focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and documents' review. The respondents, purposely selected from the Ministry of Health headquarters and the three DHS districts, included designers, managers and end-users of the systems. A set of evaluation criteria for DHMISs was identified for each of the three phases of implementation: pre-implementation evaluation criteria (categorised as policy and objectives, technical feasibility, financial viability, political viability and administrative operability) to be applied at the design stage; concurrent implementation evaluation criteria to be applied during implementation of the new system; and post-implementation evaluation criteria (classified as internal - quality of information; external - resources and managerial support; ultimate - systems impact) to be applied after implementation of the system for at least three years. In designing a DHMIS model there is need to have built-in these three sets of evaluation criteria which should be used in a phased manner. Pre-implementation evaluation criteria should be used to evaluate the system's viability before more resources are committed to it; concurrent (operational) - implementation evaluation criteria should be used to monitor the process; and post-implementation evaluation criteria should be applied to assess the system's effectiveness.</description><subject>African studies</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Biomedical Technology - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Health and Medicine</subject><subject>Health Services Administration</subject><subject>Health Services Research - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Management Information Systems</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Science and Technology</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><issn>1680-6905</issn><issn>1729-0503</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtKxDAQhosoHlZfQQKCVxZyaE5eCCKrKyre6HXJthM30iZrki7s21t1FfVqBuabj3-YrWKfSKpLzDHbHnuhcCk05nvFQUqvGFNBNNkt9ghXFSOM7Rer6cp0g8kueNRElyE6g2yIKC8AtS7l6JqMFmC6vEC98eYFevAZOT9C_ddeWqcMfTpHHaQUfEI2hv5T8OD8h2KNgkWzT8cZugO_NofFjjVdgqNNnRTP19Onq1l5_3hze3V5Xy4plrkkLQVaUUsq4BSY0BIDq7TmVUuoVQxzza1SWMqKW6DEMNlg2zZzaE0FgrBJcfHlXQ7zHtpmjB5NVy-j601c18G4-u_Eu0X9ElY1UYwozUfB6UYQw9sAKde9Sw10nfEQhlQLKbkUSozgyT_wNQzRj8fVlCshNdaVHKnj33l-gnw_hL0Dz5iKhg</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Odhiambo-Otieno, George W</creator><creator>Odero, Wilson W O</creator><general>Makerere Medical School</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Evaluation criteria for the district health management information systems: lessons from the Ministry of Health, Kenya</title><author>Odhiambo-Otieno, George W ; Odero, Wilson W O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-1d2e242f14e52e36970e349954d12f830595f8807745fe21a37c0fdcbeda4e613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>African studies</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Biomedical Technology - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Health and Medicine</topic><topic>Health Services Administration</topic><topic>Health Services Research - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Management Information Systems</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Science and Technology</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Odhiambo-Otieno, George W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odero, Wilson W O</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>African health sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Odhiambo-Otieno, George W</au><au>Odero, Wilson W O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation criteria for the district health management information systems: lessons from the Ministry of Health, Kenya</atitle><jtitle>African health sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Afr Health Sci</addtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>59-64</pages><issn>1680-6905</issn><eissn>1729-0503</eissn><abstract>The District Health Management Information Systems (DHMISs) were established by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Kenya more than two decades ago. Since then, no comprehensive evaluation has been undertaken. This can partly be attributed to lack of defined criteria for evaluating them. To propose evaluation criteria for assessing the design, implementation and impact of DHMIS in the management of the District Health System (DHS) in Kenya. A descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in three DHSs in Kenya: Bungoma, Murang'a and Uasin Gishu districts. Data was collected through focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and documents' review. The respondents, purposely selected from the Ministry of Health headquarters and the three DHS districts, included designers, managers and end-users of the systems. A set of evaluation criteria for DHMISs was identified for each of the three phases of implementation: pre-implementation evaluation criteria (categorised as policy and objectives, technical feasibility, financial viability, political viability and administrative operability) to be applied at the design stage; concurrent implementation evaluation criteria to be applied during implementation of the new system; and post-implementation evaluation criteria (classified as internal - quality of information; external - resources and managerial support; ultimate - systems impact) to be applied after implementation of the system for at least three years. In designing a DHMIS model there is need to have built-in these three sets of evaluation criteria which should be used in a phased manner. Pre-implementation evaluation criteria should be used to evaluate the system's viability before more resources are committed to it; concurrent (operational) - implementation evaluation criteria should be used to monitor the process; and post-implementation evaluation criteria should be applied to assess the system's effectiveness.</abstract><cop>Uganda</cop><pub>Makerere Medical School</pub><pmid>15843133</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1680-6905
ispartof African health sciences, 2005-03, Vol.5 (1), p.59-64
issn 1680-6905
1729-0503
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1831895
source African Journals Online (Open Access); MEDLINE; Bioline International; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects African studies
Archives & records
Biomedical Technology - organization & administration
Cross-Sectional Studies
Health and Medicine
Health Services Administration
Health Services Research - organization & administration
Humans
Information technology
Kenya
Management Information Systems
Medical records
Original
Science and Technology
Systems design
title Evaluation criteria for the district health management information systems: lessons from the Ministry of Health, Kenya
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20criteria%20for%20the%20district%20health%20management%20information%20systems:%20lessons%20from%20the%20Ministry%20of%20Health,%20Kenya&rft.jtitle=African%20health%20sciences&rft.au=Odhiambo-Otieno,%20George%20W&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=59-64&rft.issn=1680-6905&rft.eissn=1729-0503&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67757686%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586790947&rft_id=info:pmid/15843133&rfr_iscdi=true