Mercury Exposure from Domestic and Imported Estuarine and Marine Fish in the U.S. Seafood Market
Background: Methylmercury exposure causes a variety of adverse effects on human health. Per capita estimates of mercury exposure are critical for risk assessments and for developing effective risk management strategies. Objective: This study investigated the impact of natural stochasticity in mercur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental health perspectives 2007-02, Vol.115 (2), p.235-242 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 242 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | Environmental health perspectives |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | Sunderland, Elsie M |
description | Background: Methylmercury exposure causes a variety of adverse effects on human health. Per capita estimates of mercury exposure are critical for risk assessments and for developing effective risk management strategies. Objective: This study investigated the impact of natural stochasticity in mercury concentrations among fish and shellfish harvested from the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and foreign shores on estimated mercury exposures. Methods: Mercury concentrations and seafood consumption are grouped by supply region (Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and foreign shores). Distributions of intakes from this study are compared with values obtained using national FDA (Food and Drug Administration) mercury survey data to assess the significance of geographic variability in mercury concentrations on exposure estimates. Results: Per capita mercury intake rates calculated using FDA mercury data differ significantly from those based on mercury concentration data for each supply area and intakes calculated for the 90th percentile of mercury concentrations. Conclusions: Differences in reported mercury concentrations can significantly affect per capita mercury intake estimates, pointing to the importance of spatially refined mercury concentration data. This analysis shows that national exposure estimates are most influenced by reported concentrations in imported tuna, swordfish, and shrimp; Pacific pollock; and Atlantic crabs. Collecting additional mercury concentration data for these seafood categories would improve the accuracy of national exposure estimates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1289/ehp.9377 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1817718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4133122</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4133122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-f2ddc79e514cab2f12a335ae8036ace45d443071768762e10e69cfef5cfa584d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhS0EokNB4gcgZLFAbDL4-p0NEipTqNSKRenauM4Nk2ESBztB9N_jdkblsZmVr3w-nat7dAh5DmwJ3NZvcT0ua2HMA7IApXhV11w-JAvGaqi00eqIPMl5wxgDq_VjcgRGWGkMLMjXC0xhTjd09WuMeU5I2xR7-iH2mKcuUD809KwfY5qwoas8zT51A959X-zG0y6vaTfQaY30anm5pJfo2xjv9O84PSWPWr_N-Gz_HpOr09WXk0_V-eePZyfvz6ugmZ2qljdNMDUqkMFf8xa4F0J5tExoH1CqRkrBDBhtjeYIDHUdWmxVaL2yshHH5N3Od5yve2wCDlPyWzemrvfpxkXfuX-VoVu7b_GnAwslCVsMXu8NUvwxl-td3-WA260fMM7ZCcWNlBoOghxAguL6IAi1NqDhsCNIU1spZAFf_Qdu4pyGkqvjvGzkwvACvdlBIcWcE7b3IQBzt3VxpS7uti4Fffl3aH_AfT8K8GIHbPIU070uQQjgXPwG6u3Dtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222632372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mercury Exposure from Domestic and Imported Estuarine and Marine Fish in the U.S. Seafood Market</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sunderland, Elsie M</creator><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Elsie M</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Methylmercury exposure causes a variety of adverse effects on human health. Per capita estimates of mercury exposure are critical for risk assessments and for developing effective risk management strategies. Objective: This study investigated the impact of natural stochasticity in mercury concentrations among fish and shellfish harvested from the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and foreign shores on estimated mercury exposures. Methods: Mercury concentrations and seafood consumption are grouped by supply region (Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and foreign shores). Distributions of intakes from this study are compared with values obtained using national FDA (Food and Drug Administration) mercury survey data to assess the significance of geographic variability in mercury concentrations on exposure estimates. Results: Per capita mercury intake rates calculated using FDA mercury data differ significantly from those based on mercury concentration data for each supply area and intakes calculated for the 90th percentile of mercury concentrations. Conclusions: Differences in reported mercury concentrations can significantly affect per capita mercury intake estimates, pointing to the importance of spatially refined mercury concentration data. This analysis shows that national exposure estimates are most influenced by reported concentrations in imported tuna, swordfish, and shrimp; Pacific pollock; and Atlantic crabs. Collecting additional mercury concentration data for these seafood categories would improve the accuracy of national exposure estimates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9377</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17384771</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</publisher><subject>Animals ; Brackish ; Decapoda ; Diet ; Environmental agencies ; Environmental Exposure ; Fishery economics ; Fishes - metabolism ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Geographic regions ; Geography ; Humans ; Marine ; Marine fishes ; Mercury - analysis ; Ocean fisheries ; Oceans ; Risk Assessment ; Seafood - analysis ; Seafoods ; Shellfish ; Supply ; Thunnus ; Tuna ; United States ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 2007-02, Vol.115 (2), p.235-242</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Feb 2007</rights><rights>2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-f2ddc79e514cab2f12a335ae8036ace45d443071768762e10e69cfef5cfa584d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-f2ddc79e514cab2f12a335ae8036ace45d443071768762e10e69cfef5cfa584d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4133122$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4133122$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,805,866,887,27931,27932,53798,53800,58024,58257</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17384771$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Elsie M</creatorcontrib><title>Mercury Exposure from Domestic and Imported Estuarine and Marine Fish in the U.S. Seafood Market</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>Background: Methylmercury exposure causes a variety of adverse effects on human health. Per capita estimates of mercury exposure are critical for risk assessments and for developing effective risk management strategies. Objective: This study investigated the impact of natural stochasticity in mercury concentrations among fish and shellfish harvested from the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and foreign shores on estimated mercury exposures. Methods: Mercury concentrations and seafood consumption are grouped by supply region (Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and foreign shores). Distributions of intakes from this study are compared with values obtained using national FDA (Food and Drug Administration) mercury survey data to assess the significance of geographic variability in mercury concentrations on exposure estimates. Results: Per capita mercury intake rates calculated using FDA mercury data differ significantly from those based on mercury concentration data for each supply area and intakes calculated for the 90th percentile of mercury concentrations. Conclusions: Differences in reported mercury concentrations can significantly affect per capita mercury intake estimates, pointing to the importance of spatially refined mercury concentration data. This analysis shows that national exposure estimates are most influenced by reported concentrations in imported tuna, swordfish, and shrimp; Pacific pollock; and Atlantic crabs. Collecting additional mercury concentration data for these seafood categories would improve the accuracy of national exposure estimates.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Fishery economics</subject><subject>Fishes - metabolism</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Geographic regions</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Mercury - analysis</subject><subject>Ocean fisheries</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Seafood - analysis</subject><subject>Seafoods</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Supply</subject><subject>Thunnus</subject><subject>Tuna</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhS0EokNB4gcgZLFAbDL4-p0NEipTqNSKRenauM4Nk2ESBztB9N_jdkblsZmVr3w-nat7dAh5DmwJ3NZvcT0ua2HMA7IApXhV11w-JAvGaqi00eqIPMl5wxgDq_VjcgRGWGkMLMjXC0xhTjd09WuMeU5I2xR7-iH2mKcuUD809KwfY5qwoas8zT51A959X-zG0y6vaTfQaY30anm5pJfo2xjv9O84PSWPWr_N-Gz_HpOr09WXk0_V-eePZyfvz6ugmZ2qljdNMDUqkMFf8xa4F0J5tExoH1CqRkrBDBhtjeYIDHUdWmxVaL2yshHH5N3Od5yve2wCDlPyWzemrvfpxkXfuX-VoVu7b_GnAwslCVsMXu8NUvwxl-td3-WA260fMM7ZCcWNlBoOghxAguL6IAi1NqDhsCNIU1spZAFf_Qdu4pyGkqvjvGzkwvACvdlBIcWcE7b3IQBzt3VxpS7uti4Fffl3aH_AfT8K8GIHbPIU070uQQjgXPwG6u3Dtg</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Sunderland, Elsie M</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</general><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Mercury Exposure from Domestic and Imported Estuarine and Marine Fish in the U.S. Seafood Market</title><author>Sunderland, Elsie M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-f2ddc79e514cab2f12a335ae8036ace45d443071768762e10e69cfef5cfa584d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Fishery economics</topic><topic>Fishes - metabolism</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Geographic regions</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Mercury - analysis</topic><topic>Ocean fisheries</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Seafood - analysis</topic><topic>Seafoods</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Supply</topic><topic>Thunnus</topic><topic>Tuna</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sunderland, Elsie M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sunderland, Elsie M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mercury Exposure from Domestic and Imported Estuarine and Marine Fish in the U.S. Seafood Market</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>235-242</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>Background: Methylmercury exposure causes a variety of adverse effects on human health. Per capita estimates of mercury exposure are critical for risk assessments and for developing effective risk management strategies. Objective: This study investigated the impact of natural stochasticity in mercury concentrations among fish and shellfish harvested from the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and foreign shores on estimated mercury exposures. Methods: Mercury concentrations and seafood consumption are grouped by supply region (Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, and foreign shores). Distributions of intakes from this study are compared with values obtained using national FDA (Food and Drug Administration) mercury survey data to assess the significance of geographic variability in mercury concentrations on exposure estimates. Results: Per capita mercury intake rates calculated using FDA mercury data differ significantly from those based on mercury concentration data for each supply area and intakes calculated for the 90th percentile of mercury concentrations. Conclusions: Differences in reported mercury concentrations can significantly affect per capita mercury intake estimates, pointing to the importance of spatially refined mercury concentration data. This analysis shows that national exposure estimates are most influenced by reported concentrations in imported tuna, swordfish, and shrimp; Pacific pollock; and Atlantic crabs. Collecting additional mercury concentration data for these seafood categories would improve the accuracy of national exposure estimates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</pub><pmid>17384771</pmid><doi>10.1289/ehp.9377</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-6765 |
ispartof | Environmental health perspectives, 2007-02, Vol.115 (2), p.235-242 |
issn | 0091-6765 1552-9924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1817718 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Brackish Decapoda Diet Environmental agencies Environmental Exposure Fishery economics Fishes - metabolism Food Contamination - analysis Geographic regions Geography Humans Marine Marine fishes Mercury - analysis Ocean fisheries Oceans Risk Assessment Seafood - analysis Seafoods Shellfish Supply Thunnus Tuna United States Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis |
title | Mercury Exposure from Domestic and Imported Estuarine and Marine Fish in the U.S. Seafood Market |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T23%3A18%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mercury%20Exposure%20from%20Domestic%20and%20Imported%20Estuarine%20and%20Marine%20Fish%20in%20the%20U.S.%20Seafood%20Market&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Sunderland,%20Elsie%20M&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=235-242&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.9377&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E4133122%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222632372&rft_id=info:pmid/17384771&rft_jstor_id=4133122&rfr_iscdi=true |