Evaluating the Equivalence of Health Care Ratings by Whites and Hispanics

PURPOSE. This study was designed to assess the equivalence of a health care ratings scale administered to non-Hispanic white and Hispanic survey respondents. Methods. We sent 18,840 questionnaires to a random sample of patients receiving medical care from a physician group association concentrated i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care 2000-05, Vol.38 (5), p.517-527
Hauptverfasser: Morales, Leo S., Reise, Steve P., Hays, Ron D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSE. This study was designed to assess the equivalence of a health care ratings scale administered to non-Hispanic white and Hispanic survey respondents. Methods. We sent 18,840 questionnaires to a random sample of patients receiving medical care from a physician group association concentrated in the western United States; 7,093 were returned (59% adjusted response rate). Approximately 90% of survey respondents self-identified as white/Caucasian (n = 5,508) or Hispanic/Latino (n = 713). Interpersonal and technical aspects of medical care were assessed with 9 items, all administered with a 7-point response format: the best, excellent, very good, good, fair, poor, and very poor, with a "not applicable" option. Item response theory procedures were used to test for differential item functioning between white and Hispanic respondents. Results. Hispanics were found to be significantly more dissatisfied with care than whites (effect size=0.27; P
ISSN:0025-7079
1537-1948
DOI:10.1097/00005650-200005000-00008