Qualitative differences between naïve and memory T cells

Mature T cells are produced in the thymus and released into the bloodstream in low numbers. These cells are considered to be immunologically naive until such time as they encounter MHC-peptide complexes for which their T-cell receptors (TCR) have high affinity. Recognition of antigen in appropriate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Immunology 2002-06, Vol.106 (2), p.127-138
Hauptverfasser: Berard, Marion, Tough, David F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 2
container_start_page 127
container_title Immunology
container_volume 106
creator Berard, Marion
Tough, David F.
description Mature T cells are produced in the thymus and released into the bloodstream in low numbers. These cells are considered to be immunologically naive until such time as they encounter MHC-peptide complexes for which their T-cell receptors (TCR) have high affinity. Recognition of antigen in appropriate form, i.e. in association with costimulatory signals on the surface of professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), leads to extensive T-cell proliferation and differentiation into effector cells. Once the infection has been cleared, it is no longer of benefit to the host to maintain high numbers of effector cells and most of the activated T cells die by apoptosis. However, a proportion of these cells survive, leaving the frequency of cells specific for the priming antigen much higher among memory T cells than that which existed among naive T cells. This difference in frequency makes a major contribution to the nature of the secondary response, which is typically faster and of greater magnitude than the primary response. In addition, T cells may also carry a true `memory' of a prior response to antigen, exhibiting differences from naive T cells at the single cell level. Here we provide a brief overview of the qualitative differences that have been reported to exist between naive and memory T cells and evidence that memory T cells themselves are functionally heterogeneous.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01447.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1782715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18427476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5287-6be32841ae01b80008c03e96039ec9dbe57d0ff408d5b11a493ed53297354aa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1O3DAQx62Kqiy0r4CiHrgljL9i-1AkhCisxKqqRM-Wk0xKVvkAO1nYp-Ih-mIk7GpbuNCTbc1v_prxj5CIQkJBpCfLhPJUxkymKmEALAEqhEoeP5DZrrBHZgDUxEyD3CcHISzHJwcpP5F9ykAoJdiMmJ-Dq6ve9dUKo6IqS_TY5hiiDPsHxDZq3Z-nseTaImqw6fw6uolyrOvwmXwsXR3wy_Y8JL--X9ycX8XXPy7n52fXcS6ZVnGaIWdaUIdAMw0AOgeOJgVuMDdFhlIVUJYCdCEzSp0wHAvJmVFcCudSfkhON7l3Q9ZgkWPbe1fbO181zq9t5yr7utJWt_Z3t7JUaaaoHAOOtwG-ux8w9LapwrSCa7EbglUjKCV_H6RaMCXUNNLXN-CyG3w7_oKlxnBlOBMjpDdQ7rsQPJa7kSnYyaJd2kmWnWTZyaJ9sWgfx9ajf1f-27jVNgLfNsBDVeP6v4PtfLGYbvwZJ_2rDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199379324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Qualitative differences between naïve and memory T cells</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Berard, Marion ; Tough, David F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berard, Marion ; Tough, David F.</creatorcontrib><description>Mature T cells are produced in the thymus and released into the bloodstream in low numbers. These cells are considered to be immunologically naive until such time as they encounter MHC-peptide complexes for which their T-cell receptors (TCR) have high affinity. Recognition of antigen in appropriate form, i.e. in association with costimulatory signals on the surface of professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), leads to extensive T-cell proliferation and differentiation into effector cells. Once the infection has been cleared, it is no longer of benefit to the host to maintain high numbers of effector cells and most of the activated T cells die by apoptosis. However, a proportion of these cells survive, leaving the frequency of cells specific for the priming antigen much higher among memory T cells than that which existed among naive T cells. This difference in frequency makes a major contribution to the nature of the secondary response, which is typically faster and of greater magnitude than the primary response. In addition, T cells may also carry a true `memory' of a prior response to antigen, exhibiting differences from naive T cells at the single cell level. Here we provide a brief overview of the qualitative differences that have been reported to exist between naive and memory T cells and evidence that memory T cells themselves are functionally heterogeneous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-2805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2567</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01447.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12047742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Chemotaxis, Leukocyte - immunology ; Humans ; Immunologic Memory ; Immunophenotyping ; Lymphocyte Activation ; Review ; T-Lymphocyte Subsets - immunology</subject><ispartof>Immunology, 2002-06, Vol.106 (2), p.127-138</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. Jun 2002</rights><rights>2002 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5287-6be32841ae01b80008c03e96039ec9dbe57d0ff408d5b11a493ed53297354aa63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5287-6be32841ae01b80008c03e96039ec9dbe57d0ff408d5b11a493ed53297354aa63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1782715/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1782715/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12047742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berard, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tough, David F.</creatorcontrib><title>Qualitative differences between naïve and memory T cells</title><title>Immunology</title><addtitle>Immunology</addtitle><description>Mature T cells are produced in the thymus and released into the bloodstream in low numbers. These cells are considered to be immunologically naive until such time as they encounter MHC-peptide complexes for which their T-cell receptors (TCR) have high affinity. Recognition of antigen in appropriate form, i.e. in association with costimulatory signals on the surface of professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), leads to extensive T-cell proliferation and differentiation into effector cells. Once the infection has been cleared, it is no longer of benefit to the host to maintain high numbers of effector cells and most of the activated T cells die by apoptosis. However, a proportion of these cells survive, leaving the frequency of cells specific for the priming antigen much higher among memory T cells than that which existed among naive T cells. This difference in frequency makes a major contribution to the nature of the secondary response, which is typically faster and of greater magnitude than the primary response. In addition, T cells may also carry a true `memory' of a prior response to antigen, exhibiting differences from naive T cells at the single cell level. Here we provide a brief overview of the qualitative differences that have been reported to exist between naive and memory T cells and evidence that memory T cells themselves are functionally heterogeneous.</description><subject>Chemotaxis, Leukocyte - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunologic Memory</subject><subject>Immunophenotyping</subject><subject>Lymphocyte Activation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>T-Lymphocyte Subsets - immunology</subject><issn>0019-2805</issn><issn>1365-2567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1O3DAQx62Kqiy0r4CiHrgljL9i-1AkhCisxKqqRM-Wk0xKVvkAO1nYp-Ih-mIk7GpbuNCTbc1v_prxj5CIQkJBpCfLhPJUxkymKmEALAEqhEoeP5DZrrBHZgDUxEyD3CcHISzHJwcpP5F9ykAoJdiMmJ-Dq6ve9dUKo6IqS_TY5hiiDPsHxDZq3Z-nseTaImqw6fw6uolyrOvwmXwsXR3wy_Y8JL--X9ycX8XXPy7n52fXcS6ZVnGaIWdaUIdAMw0AOgeOJgVuMDdFhlIVUJYCdCEzSp0wHAvJmVFcCudSfkhON7l3Q9ZgkWPbe1fbO181zq9t5yr7utJWt_Z3t7JUaaaoHAOOtwG-ux8w9LapwrSCa7EbglUjKCV_H6RaMCXUNNLXN-CyG3w7_oKlxnBlOBMjpDdQ7rsQPJa7kSnYyaJd2kmWnWTZyaJ9sWgfx9ajf1f-27jVNgLfNsBDVeP6v4PtfLGYbvwZJ_2rDg</recordid><startdate>200206</startdate><enddate>200206</enddate><creator>Berard, Marion</creator><creator>Tough, David F.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200206</creationdate><title>Qualitative differences between naïve and memory T cells</title><author>Berard, Marion ; Tough, David F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5287-6be32841ae01b80008c03e96039ec9dbe57d0ff408d5b11a493ed53297354aa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Chemotaxis, Leukocyte - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunologic Memory</topic><topic>Immunophenotyping</topic><topic>Lymphocyte Activation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>T-Lymphocyte Subsets - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berard, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tough, David F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berard, Marion</au><au>Tough, David F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Qualitative differences between naïve and memory T cells</atitle><jtitle>Immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Immunology</addtitle><date>2002-06</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>127-138</pages><issn>0019-2805</issn><eissn>1365-2567</eissn><abstract>Mature T cells are produced in the thymus and released into the bloodstream in low numbers. These cells are considered to be immunologically naive until such time as they encounter MHC-peptide complexes for which their T-cell receptors (TCR) have high affinity. Recognition of antigen in appropriate form, i.e. in association with costimulatory signals on the surface of professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), leads to extensive T-cell proliferation and differentiation into effector cells. Once the infection has been cleared, it is no longer of benefit to the host to maintain high numbers of effector cells and most of the activated T cells die by apoptosis. However, a proportion of these cells survive, leaving the frequency of cells specific for the priming antigen much higher among memory T cells than that which existed among naive T cells. This difference in frequency makes a major contribution to the nature of the secondary response, which is typically faster and of greater magnitude than the primary response. In addition, T cells may also carry a true `memory' of a prior response to antigen, exhibiting differences from naive T cells at the single cell level. Here we provide a brief overview of the qualitative differences that have been reported to exist between naive and memory T cells and evidence that memory T cells themselves are functionally heterogeneous.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>12047742</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01447.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-2805
ispartof Immunology, 2002-06, Vol.106 (2), p.127-138
issn 0019-2805
1365-2567
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1782715
source MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Chemotaxis, Leukocyte - immunology
Humans
Immunologic Memory
Immunophenotyping
Lymphocyte Activation
Review
T-Lymphocyte Subsets - immunology
title Qualitative differences between naïve and memory T cells
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A18%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Qualitative%20differences%20between%20na%C3%AFve%20and%20memory%20T%20cells&rft.jtitle=Immunology&rft.au=Berard,%20Marion&rft.date=2002-06&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=127-138&rft.issn=0019-2805&rft.eissn=1365-2567&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01447.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E18427476%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199379324&rft_id=info:pmid/12047742&rfr_iscdi=true