Mechanisms underlying variations in excitation–contraction coupling across the mouse left ventricular free wall
Ca2+ release during excitation–contraction (EC) coupling varies across the left ventricular free wall. Here, we investigated the mechanisms underlying EC coupling differences between mouse left ventricular epicardial (Epi) and endocardial (Endo) myocytes. We found that diastolic and systolic [Ca2+]i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of physiology 2006-04, Vol.572 (1), p.227-241 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 241 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 227 |
container_title | The Journal of physiology |
container_volume | 572 |
creator | Dilly, Keith W. Rossow, Charles F. Votaw, V. Scott Meabon, James S. Cabarrus, Jennifer L. Santana, Luis F. |
description | Ca2+ release during excitation–contraction (EC) coupling varies across the left ventricular free wall. Here, we investigated the mechanisms underlying EC coupling differences between mouse left ventricular epicardial (Epi) and endocardial (Endo) myocytes. We found that diastolic and systolic [Ca2+]i was higher in paced Endo than in Epi myocytes. Our data indicated that differences in action potential (AP) waveform between Epi and Endo cells only partially accounted for differences in [Ca2+]i. Rather, we found that the amplitude of the [Ca2+]i transient, but not its trigger – the Ca2+ current – was larger in Endo than in Epi cells. We also found that spontaneous Ca2+ spark activity was about 2.8‐fold higher in Endo than in Epi cells. Interestingly, ryanodine receptor type 2 (RyR2) protein expression was nearly 2‐fold higher in Endo than in Epi myocytes. Finally, we observed less Na+–Ca2+ exchanger function in Endo than in Epi cells, which was associated with decreased Ca2+ efflux during the AP; this contributed to higher diastolic [Ca2+]i and SR Ca2+ in Endo than in Epi cells during pacing. We propose that transmural differences in AP waveform, SR Ca2+ release, and Na+–Ca2+ exchanger function underlie differences in [Ca2+]i and EC coupling across the left ventricular free wall. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.102020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1779645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17124663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5531-c63ae0d2331a46a5849d9cfe35f95d2ee9f2d0b555b4d35658a543bfe14571533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi1ERbeFN0DIJ25ZPP6X-IKEqkJBreBQzpbXmXRdOcnWTrbsjXfgDXkSku7y7wTywRrNbz59Mx8hz4EtAUC8ut2sdzn0cckZU0tgfHqPyAKkNkVZGvGYLBjjvBClgmNykvMtYyCYMU_IMWjJRaX0gtxdoV-7LuQ207GrMcVd6G7o1qXghtB3mYaO4hcfhofy-9dvvu-G5PxcUd-Pmzjzzqc-Zzqskbb9mJFGbAa6xQkNfowu0SYh0nsX41Ny1LiY8dnhPyWf355fn10Ulx_fvT97c1l4pQQUXguHrOZCgJPaqUqa2vgGhWqMqjmiaXjNVkqplayF0qpySopVgyBVCUqIU_J6r7sZVy3Wfvbiot2k0Lq0s70L9u9OF9b2pt9amK6npZoEXh4EUn83Yh5sG7LHGF2H045WlxUvgf0bhBK41Hq2JPfgw7USNr_cALNzqPZnqHYO1e5DncZe_LnJ76FDihNg9sB9iLj7L1F7_eETiArED4U0txE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17124663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanisms underlying variations in excitation–contraction coupling across the mouse left ventricular free wall</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dilly, Keith W. ; Rossow, Charles F. ; Votaw, V. Scott ; Meabon, James S. ; Cabarrus, Jennifer L. ; Santana, Luis F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dilly, Keith W. ; Rossow, Charles F. ; Votaw, V. Scott ; Meabon, James S. ; Cabarrus, Jennifer L. ; Santana, Luis F.</creatorcontrib><description>Ca2+ release during excitation–contraction (EC) coupling varies across the left ventricular free wall. Here, we investigated the mechanisms underlying EC coupling differences between mouse left ventricular epicardial (Epi) and endocardial (Endo) myocytes. We found that diastolic and systolic [Ca2+]i was higher in paced Endo than in Epi myocytes. Our data indicated that differences in action potential (AP) waveform between Epi and Endo cells only partially accounted for differences in [Ca2+]i. Rather, we found that the amplitude of the [Ca2+]i transient, but not its trigger – the Ca2+ current – was larger in Endo than in Epi cells. We also found that spontaneous Ca2+ spark activity was about 2.8‐fold higher in Endo than in Epi cells. Interestingly, ryanodine receptor type 2 (RyR2) protein expression was nearly 2‐fold higher in Endo than in Epi myocytes. Finally, we observed less Na+–Ca2+ exchanger function in Endo than in Epi cells, which was associated with decreased Ca2+ efflux during the AP; this contributed to higher diastolic [Ca2+]i and SR Ca2+ in Endo than in Epi cells during pacing. We propose that transmural differences in AP waveform, SR Ca2+ release, and Na+–Ca2+ exchanger function underlie differences in [Ca2+]i and EC coupling across the left ventricular free wall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.102020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16423856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>9600 Garsington Road , Oxford , OX4 2DQ , UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - physiology ; Animals ; Calcium Signaling - physiology ; Cardiovascular ; Cells, Cultured ; Endocardium - cytology ; Endocardium - physiology ; Heart Conduction System - physiology ; Heart Ventricles - cytology ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Myocardial Contraction - physiology ; Myocytes, Cardiac - physiology ; Pericardium - cytology ; Pericardium - physiology ; Ventricular Function</subject><ispartof>The Journal of physiology, 2006-04, Vol.572 (1), p.227-241</ispartof><rights>2006 The Journal of Physiology © 2006 The Physiological Society</rights><rights>2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2006 The Physiological Society 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5531-c63ae0d2331a46a5849d9cfe35f95d2ee9f2d0b555b4d35658a543bfe14571533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5531-c63ae0d2331a46a5849d9cfe35f95d2ee9f2d0b555b4d35658a543bfe14571533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779645/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1779645/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16423856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dilly, Keith W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossow, Charles F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Votaw, V. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meabon, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabarrus, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Luis F.</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanisms underlying variations in excitation–contraction coupling across the mouse left ventricular free wall</title><title>The Journal of physiology</title><addtitle>J Physiol</addtitle><description>Ca2+ release during excitation–contraction (EC) coupling varies across the left ventricular free wall. Here, we investigated the mechanisms underlying EC coupling differences between mouse left ventricular epicardial (Epi) and endocardial (Endo) myocytes. We found that diastolic and systolic [Ca2+]i was higher in paced Endo than in Epi myocytes. Our data indicated that differences in action potential (AP) waveform between Epi and Endo cells only partially accounted for differences in [Ca2+]i. Rather, we found that the amplitude of the [Ca2+]i transient, but not its trigger – the Ca2+ current – was larger in Endo than in Epi cells. We also found that spontaneous Ca2+ spark activity was about 2.8‐fold higher in Endo than in Epi cells. Interestingly, ryanodine receptor type 2 (RyR2) protein expression was nearly 2‐fold higher in Endo than in Epi myocytes. Finally, we observed less Na+–Ca2+ exchanger function in Endo than in Epi cells, which was associated with decreased Ca2+ efflux during the AP; this contributed to higher diastolic [Ca2+]i and SR Ca2+ in Endo than in Epi cells during pacing. We propose that transmural differences in AP waveform, SR Ca2+ release, and Na+–Ca2+ exchanger function underlie differences in [Ca2+]i and EC coupling across the left ventricular free wall.</description><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Calcium Signaling - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Endocardium - cytology</subject><subject>Endocardium - physiology</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - physiology</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - cytology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Myocardial Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Myocytes, Cardiac - physiology</subject><subject>Pericardium - cytology</subject><subject>Pericardium - physiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Function</subject><issn>0022-3751</issn><issn>1469-7793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi1ERbeFN0DIJ25ZPP6X-IKEqkJBreBQzpbXmXRdOcnWTrbsjXfgDXkSku7y7wTywRrNbz59Mx8hz4EtAUC8ut2sdzn0cckZU0tgfHqPyAKkNkVZGvGYLBjjvBClgmNykvMtYyCYMU_IMWjJRaX0gtxdoV-7LuQ207GrMcVd6G7o1qXghtB3mYaO4hcfhofy-9dvvu-G5PxcUd-Pmzjzzqc-Zzqskbb9mJFGbAa6xQkNfowu0SYh0nsX41Ny1LiY8dnhPyWf355fn10Ulx_fvT97c1l4pQQUXguHrOZCgJPaqUqa2vgGhWqMqjmiaXjNVkqplayF0qpySopVgyBVCUqIU_J6r7sZVy3Wfvbiot2k0Lq0s70L9u9OF9b2pt9amK6npZoEXh4EUn83Yh5sG7LHGF2H045WlxUvgf0bhBK41Hq2JPfgw7USNr_cALNzqPZnqHYO1e5DncZe_LnJ76FDihNg9sB9iLj7L1F7_eETiArED4U0txE</recordid><startdate>200604</startdate><enddate>200604</enddate><creator>Dilly, Keith W.</creator><creator>Rossow, Charles F.</creator><creator>Votaw, V. Scott</creator><creator>Meabon, James S.</creator><creator>Cabarrus, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Santana, Luis F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200604</creationdate><title>Mechanisms underlying variations in excitation–contraction coupling across the mouse left ventricular free wall</title><author>Dilly, Keith W. ; Rossow, Charles F. ; Votaw, V. Scott ; Meabon, James S. ; Cabarrus, Jennifer L. ; Santana, Luis F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5531-c63ae0d2331a46a5849d9cfe35f95d2ee9f2d0b555b4d35658a543bfe14571533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Calcium Signaling - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Endocardium - cytology</topic><topic>Endocardium - physiology</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - physiology</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - cytology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Myocardial Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Myocytes, Cardiac - physiology</topic><topic>Pericardium - cytology</topic><topic>Pericardium - physiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Function</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dilly, Keith W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossow, Charles F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Votaw, V. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meabon, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabarrus, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Luis F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dilly, Keith W.</au><au>Rossow, Charles F.</au><au>Votaw, V. Scott</au><au>Meabon, James S.</au><au>Cabarrus, Jennifer L.</au><au>Santana, Luis F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanisms underlying variations in excitation–contraction coupling across the mouse left ventricular free wall</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of physiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Physiol</addtitle><date>2006-04</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>572</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>227-241</pages><issn>0022-3751</issn><eissn>1469-7793</eissn><abstract>Ca2+ release during excitation–contraction (EC) coupling varies across the left ventricular free wall. Here, we investigated the mechanisms underlying EC coupling differences between mouse left ventricular epicardial (Epi) and endocardial (Endo) myocytes. We found that diastolic and systolic [Ca2+]i was higher in paced Endo than in Epi myocytes. Our data indicated that differences in action potential (AP) waveform between Epi and Endo cells only partially accounted for differences in [Ca2+]i. Rather, we found that the amplitude of the [Ca2+]i transient, but not its trigger – the Ca2+ current – was larger in Endo than in Epi cells. We also found that spontaneous Ca2+ spark activity was about 2.8‐fold higher in Endo than in Epi cells. Interestingly, ryanodine receptor type 2 (RyR2) protein expression was nearly 2‐fold higher in Endo than in Epi myocytes. Finally, we observed less Na+–Ca2+ exchanger function in Endo than in Epi cells, which was associated with decreased Ca2+ efflux during the AP; this contributed to higher diastolic [Ca2+]i and SR Ca2+ in Endo than in Epi cells during pacing. We propose that transmural differences in AP waveform, SR Ca2+ release, and Na+–Ca2+ exchanger function underlie differences in [Ca2+]i and EC coupling across the left ventricular free wall.</abstract><cop>9600 Garsington Road , Oxford , OX4 2DQ , UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16423856</pmid><doi>10.1113/jphysiol.2005.102020</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3751 |
ispartof | The Journal of physiology, 2006-04, Vol.572 (1), p.227-241 |
issn | 0022-3751 1469-7793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1779645 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Action Potentials - physiology Animals Calcium Signaling - physiology Cardiovascular Cells, Cultured Endocardium - cytology Endocardium - physiology Heart Conduction System - physiology Heart Ventricles - cytology Mice Mice, Inbred BALB C Myocardial Contraction - physiology Myocytes, Cardiac - physiology Pericardium - cytology Pericardium - physiology Ventricular Function |
title | Mechanisms underlying variations in excitation–contraction coupling across the mouse left ventricular free wall |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A25%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanisms%20underlying%20variations%20in%20excitation%E2%80%93contraction%20coupling%20across%20the%20mouse%20left%20ventricular%20free%20wall&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20physiology&rft.au=Dilly,%20Keith%20W.&rft.date=2006-04&rft.volume=572&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=227-241&rft.issn=0022-3751&rft.eissn=1469-7793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.102020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E17124663%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17124663&rft_id=info:pmid/16423856&rfr_iscdi=true |