Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy

Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) carries a substantial risk of recurrent choledocholithiasis but retreatment with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is safe and feasible. However, long term results of repeat ERCP and risk factors for late complications are largely unknow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2004-12, Vol.53 (12), p.1856-1859
Hauptverfasser: Sugiyama, M, Suzuki, Y, Abe, N, Masaki, T, Mori, T, Atomi, Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1859
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1856
container_title Gut
container_volume 53
creator Sugiyama, M
Suzuki, Y
Abe, N
Masaki, T
Mori, T
Atomi, Y
description Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) carries a substantial risk of recurrent choledocholithiasis but retreatment with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is safe and feasible. However, long term results of repeat ERCP and risk factors for late complications are largely unknown. Aims: To investigate the long term outcome of repeat ERCP for recurrent bile duct stones after ES and to identify risk factors predicting late choledochal complications. Methods: Eighty four patients underwent repeat ERCP, combined with ES in 69, for post-ES recurrent choledocholithiasis. Long term outcomes of repeat ERCP were retrospectively investigated and factors predicting late complications were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results: Complete stone clearance was achieved in all patients. Forty nine patients had no visible evidence of prior sphincterotomy. Two patients experienced early complications. During a follow up period of 2.2–26.0 years (median 10.9 years), 31 patients (37%) developed late complications, including stone recurrence (n = 26), acute acalculous cholangitis(n = 4), and acute cholecystitis (n = 1). There were neither biliary malignancies nor deaths attributable to biliary disease. Multivariate analysis identified three independent risk factors for choledochal complications: interval between initial ES and repeat ERCP ⩽5 years, bile duct diameter ⩾15 mm, and periampullary diverticulum. Choledochal complications were successfully treated with repeat ERCP in 29 patients. Conclusions: Choledochal complications after repeat ERCP are relatively frequent but are endoscopically manageable. Careful follow up is necessary, particularly for patients with a dilated bile duct, periampullary diverticulum, or early recurrence. Repeat ERCP is a reasonable treatment even for recurrent choledocholithiasis after ES.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gut.2004.041020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1774317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4014110271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b490t-fc1ef7bb1691a00b396ee8c35f5d9d556d8a4990c8e5c33d3516a12fb8a4952c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFrFDEUxoModrt69iYLggdhti-TZJJcBFnaKl0rgnoNmUymm3VmsiYZsf-9GWZprZeeXl7eL1--x4fQKwxrjEl1djOmdQlA10AxlPAELTCtREFKIZ6iBQDmBeNUnqDTGPcAIITEz9EJZoyWrBQLtD0fGh-NPzizCjYFq1Nvh7TybW7NGMLUmJ3vbOOn4tLO6ejiSrfJhlU87Nxg8skn39--QM9a3UX78liX6PvF-bfNx2L75fLT5sO2qKmEVLQG25bXNa4k1gA1kZW1whDWskY2jFWN0FRKMMIyQ0hDGK40Ltt6umalIUv0ftY9jHVvG5M9Bt2pQ3C9DrfKa6ceTga3Uzf-t8KcU4J5Fnh7FAj-12hjUr2LxnadHqwfo6o4VIIDzeCb_8C9H8OQl5u0JCkZyzks0dlMmeBjDLa9s4JBTTmpnJOaclJzTvnF6383uOePwWSgmAEXk_1zN9fhZzZHOFPXPzbq-oJ9Zdurjfqc-XczX_f7R3__C85JrPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779325511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sugiyama, M ; Suzuki, Y ; Abe, N ; Masaki, T ; Mori, T ; Atomi, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, M ; Suzuki, Y ; Abe, N ; Masaki, T ; Mori, T ; Atomi, Y</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) carries a substantial risk of recurrent choledocholithiasis but retreatment with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is safe and feasible. However, long term results of repeat ERCP and risk factors for late complications are largely unknown. Aims: To investigate the long term outcome of repeat ERCP for recurrent bile duct stones after ES and to identify risk factors predicting late choledochal complications. Methods: Eighty four patients underwent repeat ERCP, combined with ES in 69, for post-ES recurrent choledocholithiasis. Long term outcomes of repeat ERCP were retrospectively investigated and factors predicting late complications were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results: Complete stone clearance was achieved in all patients. Forty nine patients had no visible evidence of prior sphincterotomy. Two patients experienced early complications. During a follow up period of 2.2–26.0 years (median 10.9 years), 31 patients (37%) developed late complications, including stone recurrence (n = 26), acute acalculous cholangitis(n = 4), and acute cholecystitis (n = 1). There were neither biliary malignancies nor deaths attributable to biliary disease. Multivariate analysis identified three independent risk factors for choledochal complications: interval between initial ES and repeat ERCP ⩽5 years, bile duct diameter ⩾15 mm, and periampullary diverticulum. Choledochal complications were successfully treated with repeat ERCP in 29 patients. Conclusions: Choledochal complications after repeat ERCP are relatively frequent but are endoscopically manageable. Careful follow up is necessary, particularly for patients with a dilated bile duct, periampullary diverticulum, or early recurrence. Repeat ERCP is a reasonable treatment even for recurrent choledocholithiasis after ES.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1458-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gut.2004.041020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15542528</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GUTTAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacterial infections ; Bile ; bile duct stones ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects ; Choledocholithiasis - surgery ; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ; endoscopic sphincterotomy ; Endoscopy ; ERCP ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gallbladder diseases ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Long term ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motility ; Multivariate analysis ; Pancreas and Biliary ; Patients ; Recurrence ; recurrent choledocholithiasis ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2004-12, Vol.53 (12), p.1856-1859</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 by Gut</rights><rights>Copyright: 2004 Copyright 2004 by Gut</rights><rights>Copyright © Copyright 2004 by Gut 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b490t-fc1ef7bb1691a00b396ee8c35f5d9d556d8a4990c8e5c33d3516a12fb8a4952c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1774317/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1774317/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15542528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masaki, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atomi, Y</creatorcontrib><title>Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) carries a substantial risk of recurrent choledocholithiasis but retreatment with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is safe and feasible. However, long term results of repeat ERCP and risk factors for late complications are largely unknown. Aims: To investigate the long term outcome of repeat ERCP for recurrent bile duct stones after ES and to identify risk factors predicting late choledochal complications. Methods: Eighty four patients underwent repeat ERCP, combined with ES in 69, for post-ES recurrent choledocholithiasis. Long term outcomes of repeat ERCP were retrospectively investigated and factors predicting late complications were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results: Complete stone clearance was achieved in all patients. Forty nine patients had no visible evidence of prior sphincterotomy. Two patients experienced early complications. During a follow up period of 2.2–26.0 years (median 10.9 years), 31 patients (37%) developed late complications, including stone recurrence (n = 26), acute acalculous cholangitis(n = 4), and acute cholecystitis (n = 1). There were neither biliary malignancies nor deaths attributable to biliary disease. Multivariate analysis identified three independent risk factors for choledochal complications: interval between initial ES and repeat ERCP ⩽5 years, bile duct diameter ⩾15 mm, and periampullary diverticulum. Choledochal complications were successfully treated with repeat ERCP in 29 patients. Conclusions: Choledochal complications after repeat ERCP are relatively frequent but are endoscopically manageable. Careful follow up is necessary, particularly for patients with a dilated bile duct, periampullary diverticulum, or early recurrence. Repeat ERCP is a reasonable treatment even for recurrent choledocholithiasis after ES.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Bile</subject><subject>bile duct stones</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects</subject><subject>Choledocholithiasis - surgery</subject><subject>endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography</subject><subject>endoscopic sphincterotomy</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>ERCP</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gallbladder diseases</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long term</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Pancreas and Biliary</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>recurrent choledocholithiasis</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><issn>1458-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFrFDEUxoModrt69iYLggdhti-TZJJcBFnaKl0rgnoNmUymm3VmsiYZsf-9GWZprZeeXl7eL1--x4fQKwxrjEl1djOmdQlA10AxlPAELTCtREFKIZ6iBQDmBeNUnqDTGPcAIITEz9EJZoyWrBQLtD0fGh-NPzizCjYFq1Nvh7TybW7NGMLUmJ3vbOOn4tLO6ejiSrfJhlU87Nxg8skn39--QM9a3UX78liX6PvF-bfNx2L75fLT5sO2qKmEVLQG25bXNa4k1gA1kZW1whDWskY2jFWN0FRKMMIyQ0hDGK40Ltt6umalIUv0ftY9jHVvG5M9Bt2pQ3C9DrfKa6ceTga3Uzf-t8KcU4J5Fnh7FAj-12hjUr2LxnadHqwfo6o4VIIDzeCb_8C9H8OQl5u0JCkZyzks0dlMmeBjDLa9s4JBTTmpnJOaclJzTvnF6383uOePwWSgmAEXk_1zN9fhZzZHOFPXPzbq-oJ9Zdurjfqc-XczX_f7R3__C85JrPg</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Sugiyama, M</creator><creator>Suzuki, Y</creator><creator>Abe, N</creator><creator>Masaki, T</creator><creator>Mori, T</creator><creator>Atomi, Y</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>Copyright 2004 by Gut</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy</title><author>Sugiyama, M ; Suzuki, Y ; Abe, N ; Masaki, T ; Mori, T ; Atomi, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b490t-fc1ef7bb1691a00b396ee8c35f5d9d556d8a4990c8e5c33d3516a12fb8a4952c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Bile</topic><topic>bile duct stones</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects</topic><topic>Choledocholithiasis - surgery</topic><topic>endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography</topic><topic>endoscopic sphincterotomy</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>ERCP</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gallbladder diseases</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long term</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Pancreas and Biliary</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>recurrent choledocholithiasis</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masaki, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atomi, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sugiyama, M</au><au>Suzuki, Y</au><au>Abe, N</au><au>Masaki, T</au><au>Mori, T</au><au>Atomi, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1856</spage><epage>1859</epage><pages>1856-1859</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><eissn>1458-3288</eissn><coden>GUTTAK</coden><abstract>Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) carries a substantial risk of recurrent choledocholithiasis but retreatment with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is safe and feasible. However, long term results of repeat ERCP and risk factors for late complications are largely unknown. Aims: To investigate the long term outcome of repeat ERCP for recurrent bile duct stones after ES and to identify risk factors predicting late choledochal complications. Methods: Eighty four patients underwent repeat ERCP, combined with ES in 69, for post-ES recurrent choledocholithiasis. Long term outcomes of repeat ERCP were retrospectively investigated and factors predicting late complications were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results: Complete stone clearance was achieved in all patients. Forty nine patients had no visible evidence of prior sphincterotomy. Two patients experienced early complications. During a follow up period of 2.2–26.0 years (median 10.9 years), 31 patients (37%) developed late complications, including stone recurrence (n = 26), acute acalculous cholangitis(n = 4), and acute cholecystitis (n = 1). There were neither biliary malignancies nor deaths attributable to biliary disease. Multivariate analysis identified three independent risk factors for choledochal complications: interval between initial ES and repeat ERCP ⩽5 years, bile duct diameter ⩾15 mm, and periampullary diverticulum. Choledochal complications were successfully treated with repeat ERCP in 29 patients. Conclusions: Choledochal complications after repeat ERCP are relatively frequent but are endoscopically manageable. Careful follow up is necessary, particularly for patients with a dilated bile duct, periampullary diverticulum, or early recurrence. Repeat ERCP is a reasonable treatment even for recurrent choledocholithiasis after ES.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><pmid>15542528</pmid><doi>10.1136/gut.2004.041020</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2004-12, Vol.53 (12), p.1856-1859
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
1458-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1774317
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bacterial infections
Bile
bile duct stones
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - adverse effects
Choledocholithiasis - surgery
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
endoscopic sphincterotomy
Endoscopy
ERCP
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gallbladder diseases
Hospitals
Humans
Long term
Male
Middle Aged
Motility
Multivariate analysis
Pancreas and Biliary
Patients
Recurrence
recurrent choledocholithiasis
Reoperation - methods
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic
Treatment Outcome
title Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A49%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoscopic%20retreatment%20of%20recurrent%20choledocholithiasis%20after%20sphincterotomy&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Sugiyama,%20M&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1856&rft.epage=1859&rft.pages=1856-1859&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft.coden=GUTTAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gut.2004.041020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4014110271%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779325511&rft_id=info:pmid/15542528&rfr_iscdi=true