Quantitative evaluation of the corneal endothelium in the mouse after grafting

Background/aim: Corneal graft survival depends critically on the quality of the endothelium. In this study the authors aimed to evaluate corneal endothelium in mice at different times after transplantation and to correlate endothelial integrity with corneal graft survival. Methods: Syngeneic and all...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of ophthalmology 2004-09, Vol.88 (9), p.1209-1216
Hauptverfasser: Plskova, J, Kuffova, L, Filipec, M, Holan, V, Forrester, J V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1216
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1209
container_title British journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 88
creator Plskova, J
Kuffova, L
Filipec, M
Holan, V
Forrester, J V
description Background/aim: Corneal graft survival depends critically on the quality of the endothelium. In this study the authors aimed to evaluate corneal endothelium in mice at different times after transplantation and to correlate endothelial integrity with corneal graft survival. Methods: Syngeneic and allogeneic corneal grafts at various times (days 0–60) after engraftment were examined in flat mount preparation by confocal microscopy, by evaluating the hexagonal pattern of the endothelial monolayer using actin staining of the cell cortex. Corneas from untreated mice and from mice, who were grafted after removal of draining lymph nodes served as controls. Results: In control corneas, more than 90% of the posterior surface was covered by endothelium. Syngeneic grafts were always covered by 54–99% of endothelium. In contrast, the posterior surface of corneal allografts showed great variation in the degree of endothelial cell coverage (0–98%). In addition, clinical opacity grading measure was not a reliable predictor of endothelial coverage. Conclusion: In corneal allografts there is progressive loss of endothelium over time, unlike with syngeneic grafts. However, in the early stages of allograft rejection, the grade of graft opacity does not accurately reflect the degree of endothelial cell coverage. Although corneal opacity grade is considered the main determinant of graft rejection, the data suggest that both the grade of corneal opacity plus a sufficient post-graft time duration (>8 weeks in the mouse) are required for the diagnosis of irreversible graft rejection.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bjo.2003.038703
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1772317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012374491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-2ae7ed34cd6c7a924382bd9807beb6af05a6c694b2cdd0f5bd1f74b4e7edebf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0EotvCmRuKhOBQKVs7TmznUomuKEVqFyEBV8t2JlsviV3sZFX--zpk1Q8unGZG85uneXoIvSF4SQhlJ3rrlwXGdImp4Jg-QwtSMpEXmNfP0QJjzHNCGDlAhzFu01gwwl-iA1JRwjkRC7T-Nio32EENdgcZ7FQ3pta7zLfZcA2Z8cGB6jJwjU9zZ8c-s-7vqvdjhEy1A4RsE1K1bvMKvWhVF-H1vh6hH-efvq8u8suvn7-sPl7muhJsyAsFHBpamoYZruqipKLQTS0w16CZanGlmGF1qQvTNLitdENaXupyugLdVvQInc66N6PuoTHghqA6eRNsr8If6ZWVTzfOXsuN38lku0jek8CHvUDwv0eIg-xtNNB1ykHyJRnjteBcJPDdP-DWj8Elc5OWqAkpRJ2ok5kywccYoL1_hWA5JSVTUnJKSs5JpYu3jx088PtoEvB-D6hoVNcG5YyNDxzDDHM6CeUzZ-MAt_d7FX5Jximv5PrnSq6vyquzi_MzOb16PPO63_73yztEwLpr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778911289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative evaluation of the corneal endothelium in the mouse after grafting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Plskova, J ; Kuffova, L ; Filipec, M ; Holan, V ; Forrester, J V</creator><creatorcontrib>Plskova, J ; Kuffova, L ; Filipec, M ; Holan, V ; Forrester, J V</creatorcontrib><description>Background/aim: Corneal graft survival depends critically on the quality of the endothelium. In this study the authors aimed to evaluate corneal endothelium in mice at different times after transplantation and to correlate endothelial integrity with corneal graft survival. Methods: Syngeneic and allogeneic corneal grafts at various times (days 0–60) after engraftment were examined in flat mount preparation by confocal microscopy, by evaluating the hexagonal pattern of the endothelial monolayer using actin staining of the cell cortex. Corneas from untreated mice and from mice, who were grafted after removal of draining lymph nodes served as controls. Results: In control corneas, more than 90% of the posterior surface was covered by endothelium. Syngeneic grafts were always covered by 54–99% of endothelium. In contrast, the posterior surface of corneal allografts showed great variation in the degree of endothelial cell coverage (0–98%). In addition, clinical opacity grading measure was not a reliable predictor of endothelial coverage. Conclusion: In corneal allografts there is progressive loss of endothelium over time, unlike with syngeneic grafts. However, in the early stages of allograft rejection, the grade of graft opacity does not accurately reflect the degree of endothelial cell coverage. Although corneal opacity grade is considered the main determinant of graft rejection, the data suggest that both the grade of corneal opacity plus a sufficient post-graft time duration (&gt;8 weeks in the mouse) are required for the diagnosis of irreversible graft rejection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.038703</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15317718</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>actin ; Animals ; Antibiotics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cell Death - physiology ; Cell growth ; Colleges &amp; universities ; confocal microscopy ; Cornea ; corneal endothelial cells ; Corneal Opacity - pathology ; corneal transplantation ; Corneal Transplantation - methods ; Diseases of cornea, anterior segment and sclera ; eGFP ; Endothelial Cells - pathology ; Endothelium ; Endothelium, Corneal - pathology ; enhanced green fluorescence protein ; Female ; Graft Survival - physiology ; Immunohistochemistry - methods ; Laboratory Science - Extended Reports ; LNR ; Lymph Node Excision ; lymph node removal ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Microscopy, Confocal - methods ; Molecular weight ; Ophthalmology ; paraformaldehyde ; PBS ; PFA ; phosphate buffered saline ; Rodents ; tissue plasminogen activator ; tPA ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplantation, Isogeneic ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2004-09, Vol.88 (9), p.1209-1216</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2004 Copyright 2004 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © Copyright 2004 British Journal of Ophthalmology 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-2ae7ed34cd6c7a924382bd9807beb6af05a6c694b2cdd0f5bd1f74b4e7edebf53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1772317/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1772317/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16060733$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15317718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plskova, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuffova, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipec, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holan, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, J V</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative evaluation of the corneal endothelium in the mouse after grafting</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background/aim: Corneal graft survival depends critically on the quality of the endothelium. In this study the authors aimed to evaluate corneal endothelium in mice at different times after transplantation and to correlate endothelial integrity with corneal graft survival. Methods: Syngeneic and allogeneic corneal grafts at various times (days 0–60) after engraftment were examined in flat mount preparation by confocal microscopy, by evaluating the hexagonal pattern of the endothelial monolayer using actin staining of the cell cortex. Corneas from untreated mice and from mice, who were grafted after removal of draining lymph nodes served as controls. Results: In control corneas, more than 90% of the posterior surface was covered by endothelium. Syngeneic grafts were always covered by 54–99% of endothelium. In contrast, the posterior surface of corneal allografts showed great variation in the degree of endothelial cell coverage (0–98%). In addition, clinical opacity grading measure was not a reliable predictor of endothelial coverage. Conclusion: In corneal allografts there is progressive loss of endothelium over time, unlike with syngeneic grafts. However, in the early stages of allograft rejection, the grade of graft opacity does not accurately reflect the degree of endothelial cell coverage. Although corneal opacity grade is considered the main determinant of graft rejection, the data suggest that both the grade of corneal opacity plus a sufficient post-graft time duration (&gt;8 weeks in the mouse) are required for the diagnosis of irreversible graft rejection.</description><subject>actin</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cell Death - physiology</subject><subject>Cell growth</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>confocal microscopy</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>corneal endothelial cells</subject><subject>Corneal Opacity - pathology</subject><subject>corneal transplantation</subject><subject>Corneal Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Diseases of cornea, anterior segment and sclera</subject><subject>eGFP</subject><subject>Endothelial Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Endothelium</subject><subject>Endothelium, Corneal - pathology</subject><subject>enhanced green fluorescence protein</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival - physiology</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry - methods</subject><subject>Laboratory Science - Extended Reports</subject><subject>LNR</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>lymph node removal</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal - methods</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>paraformaldehyde</subject><subject>PBS</subject><subject>PFA</subject><subject>phosphate buffered saline</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>tissue plasminogen activator</subject><subject>tPA</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Transplantation, Isogeneic</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0EotvCmRuKhOBQKVs7TmznUomuKEVqFyEBV8t2JlsviV3sZFX--zpk1Q8unGZG85uneXoIvSF4SQhlJ3rrlwXGdImp4Jg-QwtSMpEXmNfP0QJjzHNCGDlAhzFu01gwwl-iA1JRwjkRC7T-Nio32EENdgcZ7FQ3pta7zLfZcA2Z8cGB6jJwjU9zZ8c-s-7vqvdjhEy1A4RsE1K1bvMKvWhVF-H1vh6hH-efvq8u8suvn7-sPl7muhJsyAsFHBpamoYZruqipKLQTS0w16CZanGlmGF1qQvTNLitdENaXupyugLdVvQInc66N6PuoTHghqA6eRNsr8If6ZWVTzfOXsuN38lku0jek8CHvUDwv0eIg-xtNNB1ykHyJRnjteBcJPDdP-DWj8Elc5OWqAkpRJ2ok5kywccYoL1_hWA5JSVTUnJKSs5JpYu3jx088PtoEvB-D6hoVNcG5YyNDxzDDHM6CeUzZ-MAt_d7FX5Jximv5PrnSq6vyquzi_MzOb16PPO63_73yztEwLpr</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Plskova, J</creator><creator>Kuffova, L</creator><creator>Filipec, M</creator><creator>Holan, V</creator><creator>Forrester, J V</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>Copyright 2004 British Journal of Ophthalmology</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Quantitative evaluation of the corneal endothelium in the mouse after grafting</title><author>Plskova, J ; Kuffova, L ; Filipec, M ; Holan, V ; Forrester, J V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b586t-2ae7ed34cd6c7a924382bd9807beb6af05a6c694b2cdd0f5bd1f74b4e7edebf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>actin</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cell Death - physiology</topic><topic>Cell growth</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>confocal microscopy</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>corneal endothelial cells</topic><topic>Corneal Opacity - pathology</topic><topic>corneal transplantation</topic><topic>Corneal Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Diseases of cornea, anterior segment and sclera</topic><topic>eGFP</topic><topic>Endothelial Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Endothelium</topic><topic>Endothelium, Corneal - pathology</topic><topic>enhanced green fluorescence protein</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival - physiology</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry - methods</topic><topic>Laboratory Science - Extended Reports</topic><topic>LNR</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>lymph node removal</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal - methods</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>paraformaldehyde</topic><topic>PBS</topic><topic>PFA</topic><topic>phosphate buffered saline</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>tissue plasminogen activator</topic><topic>tPA</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Transplantation, Isogeneic</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plskova, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuffova, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipec, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holan, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, J V</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plskova, J</au><au>Kuffova, L</au><au>Filipec, M</au><au>Holan, V</au><au>Forrester, J V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative evaluation of the corneal endothelium in the mouse after grafting</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1209</spage><epage>1216</epage><pages>1209-1216</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>Background/aim: Corneal graft survival depends critically on the quality of the endothelium. In this study the authors aimed to evaluate corneal endothelium in mice at different times after transplantation and to correlate endothelial integrity with corneal graft survival. Methods: Syngeneic and allogeneic corneal grafts at various times (days 0–60) after engraftment were examined in flat mount preparation by confocal microscopy, by evaluating the hexagonal pattern of the endothelial monolayer using actin staining of the cell cortex. Corneas from untreated mice and from mice, who were grafted after removal of draining lymph nodes served as controls. Results: In control corneas, more than 90% of the posterior surface was covered by endothelium. Syngeneic grafts were always covered by 54–99% of endothelium. In contrast, the posterior surface of corneal allografts showed great variation in the degree of endothelial cell coverage (0–98%). In addition, clinical opacity grading measure was not a reliable predictor of endothelial coverage. Conclusion: In corneal allografts there is progressive loss of endothelium over time, unlike with syngeneic grafts. However, in the early stages of allograft rejection, the grade of graft opacity does not accurately reflect the degree of endothelial cell coverage. Although corneal opacity grade is considered the main determinant of graft rejection, the data suggest that both the grade of corneal opacity plus a sufficient post-graft time duration (&gt;8 weeks in the mouse) are required for the diagnosis of irreversible graft rejection.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>15317718</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.2003.038703</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1161
ispartof British journal of ophthalmology, 2004-09, Vol.88 (9), p.1209-1216
issn 0007-1161
1468-2079
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1772317
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects actin
Animals
Antibiotics
Biological and medical sciences
Cell Death - physiology
Cell growth
Colleges & universities
confocal microscopy
Cornea
corneal endothelial cells
Corneal Opacity - pathology
corneal transplantation
Corneal Transplantation - methods
Diseases of cornea, anterior segment and sclera
eGFP
Endothelial Cells - pathology
Endothelium
Endothelium, Corneal - pathology
enhanced green fluorescence protein
Female
Graft Survival - physiology
Immunohistochemistry - methods
Laboratory Science - Extended Reports
LNR
Lymph Node Excision
lymph node removal
Male
Medical sciences
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Microscopy, Confocal - methods
Molecular weight
Ophthalmology
paraformaldehyde
PBS
PFA
phosphate buffered saline
Rodents
tissue plasminogen activator
tPA
Transplantation, Autologous
Transplantation, Isogeneic
Transplants & implants
title Quantitative evaluation of the corneal endothelium in the mouse after grafting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T12%3A41%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20evaluation%20of%20the%20corneal%20endothelium%20in%20the%20mouse%20after%20grafting&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Plskova,%20J&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1209&rft.epage=1216&rft.pages=1209-1216&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.2003.038703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4012374491%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778911289&rft_id=info:pmid/15317718&rfr_iscdi=true