The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study
Objective: The 97.5th percentile for vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) has been proposed as a useful tool to assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in population studies. Previous reports of VCDR percentiles have either not been adjusted for disc size or have been calculated by regression analysis from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2004-06, Vol.88 (6), p.766-770 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 770 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 766 |
container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Crowston, J G Hopley, C R Healey, P R Lee, A Mitchell, P |
description | Objective: The 97.5th percentile for vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) has been proposed as a useful tool to assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in population studies. Previous reports of VCDR percentiles have either not been adjusted for disc size or have been calculated by regression analysis from small hospital based cohorts. The authors’ aim was to generate VCDR percentiles in a large, population based sample. Methods: Data were collected from 3654 individuals, aged 49 years or older, living in the Blue Mountains, west of Sydney. Vertical disc diameter and VCDR were determined by planimetry from stereo optic disc photographs. The distribution of VCDR and percentiles (95th, 97.5th, 99th) were calculated. Results: 6678 eyes were included in the analysis. Median cup to disc ratio, 95th, 97.5th, and 99th percentile increased with vertical optic disc diameter in a linear fashion. An increase of 0.2 in median VCDR (0.35 to 0.55) was observed between small (1.1–1.3 mm) and large (1.8–2.0 mm) optic discs. An equivalent increase of 0.2 (0.59 to 0.74) was observed for the 97.5th percentile from small to large discs. Conclusion: VCDR percentiles for a “normal” population, adjusted for vertical optic disc diameter are presented. One quarter of all discs fell within the small or large disc categories highlighting the importance for estimating optic disc size. These data may assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in clinical practice as well as providing a normative database. Sole use of VCDR percentile cut offs in defining glaucoma cases in population surveys requires further validation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjo.2003.028548 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1772203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012371931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b520t-3cb7a2b7d3d83080c37aa7c71202b4327fcea974b9a5ff9e4addb0cbf8c67ca73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2P1CAYxhujccfVszdDYvRg0lk-OoV6MHEn68dmHRMdvRKgbx3GtlSgG-cf8O-WppN19eIFAs-Ph_flIcseE7wkhJVneu-WFGO2xFSsCnEnW5CiFDnFvLqbLTDGPCekJCfZgxD2aUlLwu9nJ2RFCkFxtch-bXeAoGnAROQa5IZoDaptmAbVQQSPXI-uwad91SIzDii6GfAqWocG8Ab6aFsIyPZIocENYztJPdIqQI2M2zkfX6KYbjpvR0Af3NhHZfuALg6APsexPjzM7jWqDfDoOJ9mX95cbNfv8quPb9-vX1_lekVxzJnRXFHNa1YLhgU2jCvFDScUU10wyhsDquKFrtSqaSooVF1rbHQjTMmN4uw0ezX7DqPuoJ4q96qVg7ed8gfplJV_K73dyW_uWhLOKcUsGTw_Gnj3Y4QQZZfeAtpW9eDGIDmpWEVLkcCn_4B7N_o-NTd5iYpgQYtEnc2U8S4ED81NKQTLKWGZEpZTwnJOOJ14cruDP_wx0gQ8OwIqpMgar3pjwy1OFOlHTFw-czZE-HmjK_9dlpzxldx8XcvL801xuS0_yU3iX8y87vb_rfI3OUzNjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778910824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Crowston, J G ; Hopley, C R ; Healey, P R ; Lee, A ; Mitchell, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Crowston, J G ; Hopley, C R ; Healey, P R ; Lee, A ; Mitchell, P ; Blue Mountains Eye Study</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The 97.5th percentile for vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) has been proposed as a useful tool to assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in population studies. Previous reports of VCDR percentiles have either not been adjusted for disc size or have been calculated by regression analysis from small hospital based cohorts. The authors’ aim was to generate VCDR percentiles in a large, population based sample. Methods: Data were collected from 3654 individuals, aged 49 years or older, living in the Blue Mountains, west of Sydney. Vertical disc diameter and VCDR were determined by planimetry from stereo optic disc photographs. The distribution of VCDR and percentiles (95th, 97.5th, 99th) were calculated. Results: 6678 eyes were included in the analysis. Median cup to disc ratio, 95th, 97.5th, and 99th percentile increased with vertical optic disc diameter in a linear fashion. An increase of 0.2 in median VCDR (0.35 to 0.55) was observed between small (1.1–1.3 mm) and large (1.8–2.0 mm) optic discs. An equivalent increase of 0.2 (0.59 to 0.74) was observed for the 97.5th percentile from small to large discs. Conclusion: VCDR percentiles for a “normal” population, adjusted for vertical optic disc diameter are presented. One quarter of all discs fell within the small or large disc categories highlighting the importance for estimating optic disc size. These data may assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in clinical practice as well as providing a normative database. Sole use of VCDR percentile cut offs in defining glaucoma cases in population surveys requires further validation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.028548</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15148209</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blue Mountains Eye Study ; Clinical Science - Scientific Reports ; cup to disc ratio ; Fundus Oculi ; glaucoma ; Glaucoma and intraocular pressure ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Optic Disk - anatomy & histology ; optic nerve ; percentiles ; Reference Values ; Retina - anatomy & histology ; Tonometry, Ocular - methods ; VCDR ; VDD ; vertical cup to disc ratio ; vertical disc diameter ; Visual Fields</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2004-06, Vol.88 (6), p.766-770</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2004 Copyright 2004 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © Copyright 2004 British Journal of Ophthalmology 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b520t-3cb7a2b7d3d83080c37aa7c71202b4327fcea974b9a5ff9e4addb0cbf8c67ca73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1772203/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1772203/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15841619$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15148209$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crowston, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopley, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healey, P R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blue Mountains Eye Study</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Objective: The 97.5th percentile for vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) has been proposed as a useful tool to assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in population studies. Previous reports of VCDR percentiles have either not been adjusted for disc size or have been calculated by regression analysis from small hospital based cohorts. The authors’ aim was to generate VCDR percentiles in a large, population based sample. Methods: Data were collected from 3654 individuals, aged 49 years or older, living in the Blue Mountains, west of Sydney. Vertical disc diameter and VCDR were determined by planimetry from stereo optic disc photographs. The distribution of VCDR and percentiles (95th, 97.5th, 99th) were calculated. Results: 6678 eyes were included in the analysis. Median cup to disc ratio, 95th, 97.5th, and 99th percentile increased with vertical optic disc diameter in a linear fashion. An increase of 0.2 in median VCDR (0.35 to 0.55) was observed between small (1.1–1.3 mm) and large (1.8–2.0 mm) optic discs. An equivalent increase of 0.2 (0.59 to 0.74) was observed for the 97.5th percentile from small to large discs. Conclusion: VCDR percentiles for a “normal” population, adjusted for vertical optic disc diameter are presented. One quarter of all discs fell within the small or large disc categories highlighting the importance for estimating optic disc size. These data may assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in clinical practice as well as providing a normative database. Sole use of VCDR percentile cut offs in defining glaucoma cases in population surveys requires further validation.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blue Mountains Eye Study</subject><subject>Clinical Science - Scientific Reports</subject><subject>cup to disc ratio</subject><subject>Fundus Oculi</subject><subject>glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Optic Disk - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>optic nerve</subject><subject>percentiles</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Retina - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - methods</subject><subject>VCDR</subject><subject>VDD</subject><subject>vertical cup to disc ratio</subject><subject>vertical disc diameter</subject><subject>Visual Fields</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks2P1CAYxhujccfVszdDYvRg0lk-OoV6MHEn68dmHRMdvRKgbx3GtlSgG-cf8O-WppN19eIFAs-Ph_flIcseE7wkhJVneu-WFGO2xFSsCnEnW5CiFDnFvLqbLTDGPCekJCfZgxD2aUlLwu9nJ2RFCkFxtch-bXeAoGnAROQa5IZoDaptmAbVQQSPXI-uwad91SIzDii6GfAqWocG8Ab6aFsIyPZIocENYztJPdIqQI2M2zkfX6KYbjpvR0Af3NhHZfuALg6APsexPjzM7jWqDfDoOJ9mX95cbNfv8quPb9-vX1_lekVxzJnRXFHNa1YLhgU2jCvFDScUU10wyhsDquKFrtSqaSooVF1rbHQjTMmN4uw0ezX7DqPuoJ4q96qVg7ed8gfplJV_K73dyW_uWhLOKcUsGTw_Gnj3Y4QQZZfeAtpW9eDGIDmpWEVLkcCn_4B7N_o-NTd5iYpgQYtEnc2U8S4ED81NKQTLKWGZEpZTwnJOOJ14cruDP_wx0gQ8OwIqpMgar3pjwy1OFOlHTFw-czZE-HmjK_9dlpzxldx8XcvL801xuS0_yU3iX8y87vb_rfI3OUzNjQ</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Crowston, J G</creator><creator>Hopley, C R</creator><creator>Healey, P R</creator><creator>Lee, A</creator><creator>Mitchell, P</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>Copyright 2004 British Journal of Ophthalmology</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study</title><author>Crowston, J G ; Hopley, C R ; Healey, P R ; Lee, A ; Mitchell, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b520t-3cb7a2b7d3d83080c37aa7c71202b4327fcea974b9a5ff9e4addb0cbf8c67ca73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blue Mountains Eye Study</topic><topic>Clinical Science - Scientific Reports</topic><topic>cup to disc ratio</topic><topic>Fundus Oculi</topic><topic>glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Optic Disk - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>optic nerve</topic><topic>percentiles</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Retina - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - methods</topic><topic>VCDR</topic><topic>VDD</topic><topic>vertical cup to disc ratio</topic><topic>vertical disc diameter</topic><topic>Visual Fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crowston, J G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopley, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healey, P R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blue Mountains Eye Study</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crowston, J G</au><au>Hopley, C R</au><au>Healey, P R</au><au>Lee, A</au><au>Mitchell, P</au><aucorp>Blue Mountains Eye Study</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>766</spage><epage>770</epage><pages>766-770</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>Objective: The 97.5th percentile for vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) has been proposed as a useful tool to assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in population studies. Previous reports of VCDR percentiles have either not been adjusted for disc size or have been calculated by regression analysis from small hospital based cohorts. The authors’ aim was to generate VCDR percentiles in a large, population based sample. Methods: Data were collected from 3654 individuals, aged 49 years or older, living in the Blue Mountains, west of Sydney. Vertical disc diameter and VCDR were determined by planimetry from stereo optic disc photographs. The distribution of VCDR and percentiles (95th, 97.5th, 99th) were calculated. Results: 6678 eyes were included in the analysis. Median cup to disc ratio, 95th, 97.5th, and 99th percentile increased with vertical optic disc diameter in a linear fashion. An increase of 0.2 in median VCDR (0.35 to 0.55) was observed between small (1.1–1.3 mm) and large (1.8–2.0 mm) optic discs. An equivalent increase of 0.2 (0.59 to 0.74) was observed for the 97.5th percentile from small to large discs. Conclusion: VCDR percentiles for a “normal” population, adjusted for vertical optic disc diameter are presented. One quarter of all discs fell within the small or large disc categories highlighting the importance for estimating optic disc size. These data may assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in clinical practice as well as providing a normative database. Sole use of VCDR percentile cut offs in defining glaucoma cases in population surveys requires further validation.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>15148209</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.2003.028548</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 2004-06, Vol.88 (6), p.766-770 |
issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1772203 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Blue Mountains Eye Study Clinical Science - Scientific Reports cup to disc ratio Fundus Oculi glaucoma Glaucoma and intraocular pressure Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis Humans Linear Models Medical sciences Middle Aged Ophthalmology Optic Disk - anatomy & histology optic nerve percentiles Reference Values Retina - anatomy & histology Tonometry, Ocular - methods VCDR VDD vertical cup to disc ratio vertical disc diameter Visual Fields |
title | The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A10%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20optic%20disc%20diameter%20on%20vertical%20cup%20to%20disc%20ratio%20percentiles%20in%20a%20population%20based%20cohort:%20the%20Blue%20Mountains%20Eye%20Study&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Crowston,%20J%20G&rft.aucorp=Blue%20Mountains%20Eye%20Study&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=766&rft.epage=770&rft.pages=766-770&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.2003.028548&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4012371931%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778910824&rft_id=info:pmid/15148209&rfr_iscdi=true |