Changing visual standards in driving: but a high proportion of eye patients still drive illegally

In particular, patients with static long term field defects, particularly those who have a safe driving history who would previously have failed to meet the field requirements, may still be considered for a licence. 2 This prospective clinic based audit is the first to use the licence plate test at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of ophthalmology 2002-12, Vol.86 (12), p.1454-1455
Hauptverfasser: Burton, B J L, Joseph, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1455
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1454
container_title British journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 86
creator Burton, B J L
Joseph, J
description In particular, patients with static long term field defects, particularly those who have a safe driving history who would previously have failed to meet the field requirements, may still be considered for a licence. 2 This prospective clinic based audit is the first to use the licence plate test at 20.5 metres rather than a Snellen chart to quantify the size of the problem in a typical ophthalmology clinic in a district general hospital. [...]drivers with binocular field defects have been estimated to have twice the normal rate of driving accidents in some studies. 7- 10 What is worrying is that patients who attend an eye clinic seem unlikely to have been spontaneously warned to stop driving and doctors should be more aware of their role in protecting both their patients and society from road traffic accidents.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bjo.86.12.1454
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1771421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72728792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b448t-d799b1a6e35621a0eda2d4eee78f272f36ac508a8465d122d9930890037d538c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2r1DAUxYMovvHp1qUEBMFFa26a5sPFAxn8ggdudB3SJu1kyDQ1aQfmvzfjDH5tXOWG-zuHczkIPQdSAzT8TbePteQ10BpYyx6gDTAuK0qEeog2hBBRAXC4QU9y3pcv5SAeoxugjPFGqQ0y252ZRj-N-OjzagLOi5msSTZjP2Gb_LHs3uJuXbDBOz_u8JziHNPi44TjgN3J4dks3k1LLlofwk-Rw2Vyownh9BQ9GkzI7tn1vUXfPrz_uv1U3X_5-Hn77r7qGJNLZYVSHRjumpZTMMRZQy1zzgk5UEGHhpu-JdJIxlsLlFqlGiIVIY2wbSP75hbdXXzntTs425dEyQQ9J38w6aSj8frvzeR3eoxHDUIAo1AMXl0NUvy-urzog8-9C8FMLq5ZixJDCkUL-PIfcB_XNJXjzl4lUyO4KlR9ofoUc05u-BUFiD53p0t3WnINVJ-7K4IXfx7wG7-WVYDXF6A77P9n9gPLp6M-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778903769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing visual standards in driving: but a high proportion of eye patients still drive illegally</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Burton, B J L ; Joseph, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Burton, B J L ; Joseph, J</creatorcontrib><description>In particular, patients with static long term field defects, particularly those who have a safe driving history who would previously have failed to meet the field requirements, may still be considered for a licence. 2 This prospective clinic based audit is the first to use the licence plate test at 20.5 metres rather than a Snellen chart to quantify the size of the problem in a typical ophthalmology clinic in a district general hospital. [...]drivers with binocular field defects have been estimated to have twice the normal rate of driving accidents in some studies. 7- 10 What is worrying is that patients who attend an eye clinic seem unlikely to have been spontaneously warned to stop driving and doctors should be more aware of their role in protecting both their patients and society from road traffic accidents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.12.1454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12446399</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Automobile Driving - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Automobile Driving - standards ; Clinics ; Female ; Field study ; Glaucoma ; Humans ; Letter ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Traffic accidents &amp; safety ; United Kingdom ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2002-12, Vol.86 (12), p.1454-1455</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright: 2002 Copyright 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © Copyright 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b448t-d799b1a6e35621a0eda2d4eee78f272f36ac508a8465d122d9930890037d538c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1771421/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1771421/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12446399$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burton, B J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, J</creatorcontrib><title>Changing visual standards in driving: but a high proportion of eye patients still drive illegally</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>In particular, patients with static long term field defects, particularly those who have a safe driving history who would previously have failed to meet the field requirements, may still be considered for a licence. 2 This prospective clinic based audit is the first to use the licence plate test at 20.5 metres rather than a Snellen chart to quantify the size of the problem in a typical ophthalmology clinic in a district general hospital. [...]drivers with binocular field defects have been estimated to have twice the normal rate of driving accidents in some studies. 7- 10 What is worrying is that patients who attend an eye clinic seem unlikely to have been spontaneously warned to stop driving and doctors should be more aware of their role in protecting both their patients and society from road traffic accidents.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - standards</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Letter</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Traffic accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2r1DAUxYMovvHp1qUEBMFFa26a5sPFAxn8ggdudB3SJu1kyDQ1aQfmvzfjDH5tXOWG-zuHczkIPQdSAzT8TbePteQ10BpYyx6gDTAuK0qEeog2hBBRAXC4QU9y3pcv5SAeoxugjPFGqQ0y252ZRj-N-OjzagLOi5msSTZjP2Gb_LHs3uJuXbDBOz_u8JziHNPi44TjgN3J4dks3k1LLlofwk-Rw2Vyownh9BQ9GkzI7tn1vUXfPrz_uv1U3X_5-Hn77r7qGJNLZYVSHRjumpZTMMRZQy1zzgk5UEGHhpu-JdJIxlsLlFqlGiIVIY2wbSP75hbdXXzntTs425dEyQQ9J38w6aSj8frvzeR3eoxHDUIAo1AMXl0NUvy-urzog8-9C8FMLq5ZixJDCkUL-PIfcB_XNJXjzl4lUyO4KlR9ofoUc05u-BUFiD53p0t3WnINVJ-7K4IXfx7wG7-WVYDXF6A77P9n9gPLp6M-</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>Burton, B J L</creator><creator>Joseph, J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>Copyright 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>Changing visual standards in driving: but a high proportion of eye patients still drive illegally</title><author>Burton, B J L ; Joseph, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b448t-d799b1a6e35621a0eda2d4eee78f272f36ac508a8465d122d9930890037d538c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - standards</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Letter</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Traffic accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burton, B J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burton, B J L</au><au>Joseph, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changing visual standards in driving: but a high proportion of eye patients still drive illegally</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1454</spage><epage>1455</epage><pages>1454-1455</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>In particular, patients with static long term field defects, particularly those who have a safe driving history who would previously have failed to meet the field requirements, may still be considered for a licence. 2 This prospective clinic based audit is the first to use the licence plate test at 20.5 metres rather than a Snellen chart to quantify the size of the problem in a typical ophthalmology clinic in a district general hospital. [...]drivers with binocular field defects have been estimated to have twice the normal rate of driving accidents in some studies. 7- 10 What is worrying is that patients who attend an eye clinic seem unlikely to have been spontaneously warned to stop driving and doctors should be more aware of their role in protecting both their patients and society from road traffic accidents.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>12446399</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.86.12.1454</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1161
ispartof British journal of ophthalmology, 2002-12, Vol.86 (12), p.1454-1455
issn 0007-1161
1468-2079
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1771421
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Age
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Automobile Driving - legislation & jurisprudence
Automobile Driving - standards
Clinics
Female
Field study
Glaucoma
Humans
Letter
Male
Middle Aged
Patients
Prospective Studies
Traffic accidents & safety
United Kingdom
Visual Acuity
title Changing visual standards in driving: but a high proportion of eye patients still drive illegally
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T02%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20visual%20standards%20in%20driving:%20but%20a%20high%20proportion%20of%20eye%20patients%20still%20drive%20illegally&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Burton,%20B%20J%20L&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1454&rft.epage=1455&rft.pages=1454-1455&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.86.12.1454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72728792%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778903769&rft_id=info:pmid/12446399&rfr_iscdi=true