VF-14 item specific responses in patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery: can the length of the VF-14 be reduced?
Aims: To report the item specific responses of the VF-14 in a population of patients undergoing cataract surgery in their first eye and to determine whether or not the VF-14 can be reduced without compromising its performance as an index of cataract related visual impairment. Methods: The item speci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2002-08, Vol.86 (8), p.885-891 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 891 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 885 |
container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Friedman, D S Tielsch, J M Vitale, S Bass, E B Schein, O D Steinberg, E P |
description | Aims: To report the item specific responses of the VF-14 in a population of patients undergoing cataract surgery in their first eye and to determine whether or not the VF-14 can be reduced without compromising its performance as an index of cataract related visual impairment. Methods: The item specific responses to the VF-14 were analysed before (771 patients) and 4 months after (552 patients) cataract surgery in one eye to determine if the VF-14 index can be reduced without compromising its performance. Patients studied were selected from a cross sectional longitudinal study of patients undergoing cataract surgery in 72 ophthalmologist's offices located in three metropolitan regions of the United States. Results: Pairwise correlations between items in the VF-14 were all less than 0.6, indicating that no items could be removed solely on the basis of redundancy. 10 items correlated moderately with change in trouble, and 11 correlated moderately with change in satisfaction (r >0.15) at 4 months after cataract extraction. Eleven items demonstrated an effect size >0.4 at 4 months. These 11 items were either important for detecting cataract related functional disability or for quantifying the extent to which cataract impaired function. Additionally, 11 items were needed to detect adequately individuals with functional impairment. Three items (recognising people, cooking, and reading large print) were less responsive to cataract extraction and were more strongly associated with ocular comorbidities. Conclusions: While previous reports indicate that the VF-14 can be significantly shortened, our analysis only justifies removing three items. While the resulting VF-11 has properties similar to the VF-14, the limited time savings do not justify altering this already validated instrument. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjo.86.8.885 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1771229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A90511042</galeid><sourcerecordid>A90511042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b583t-edb059d69aabd3c7c0e184e2e3b83ce84f95de39b280ead291c3ec98acf378d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuP0zAQxiMEYsvCjTOyhIALKX4ksc0BtKooD60ACShHy3EmqbuJXewEbf97vLTaAlohH6yZ-embh74se0jwnBBWvag3fi6quZgLUd7KZqSoRE4xl7ezGcaY54RU5CS7F-MmhbQi_G52QigpMCV4ll2uljkpkB1hQHELxrbWoABx612EiKxDWz1acGNEk2sgdN66DrU2xBHBDpDRow7ajChOoYOwe5kyDo1rQD24blwj3_6O9m1qSNrNZKB5fT-70-o-woPDf5p9W775uniXn396-35xdp7XpWBjDk2NS9lUUuu6YYYbDEQUQIHVghkQRSvLBpisqcCgGyqJYWCk0KZlXDSYnWav9rrbqR6gMWmVoHu1DXbQYae8turvirNr1fmfinBOKJVJ4OlBIPgfE8RRDTYa6HvtwE9RcSILnGZK4ON_wI2fgkvLXWkJKauSl4l6vqc63YOyrvWpq-nAQWruHbQ2pc8kLgnBBU14fgOeXgODNTfxB3kTfIwB2utNCVZXflHJL0pUSqjkl4Q_-vM6R_hgkAQ8OQA6Gt23QTtj45FjXHJOxXFOG0e4vK7rcKEqznipPq4WisvPqy8fvhdqmfhne74eNv8f8Rd6iuTx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778996575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>VF-14 item specific responses in patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery: can the length of the VF-14 be reduced?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Friedman, D S ; Tielsch, J M ; Vitale, S ; Bass, E B ; Schein, O D ; Steinberg, E P</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedman, D S ; Tielsch, J M ; Vitale, S ; Bass, E B ; Schein, O D ; Steinberg, E P</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: To report the item specific responses of the VF-14 in a population of patients undergoing cataract surgery in their first eye and to determine whether or not the VF-14 can be reduced without compromising its performance as an index of cataract related visual impairment. Methods: The item specific responses to the VF-14 were analysed before (771 patients) and 4 months after (552 patients) cataract surgery in one eye to determine if the VF-14 index can be reduced without compromising its performance. Patients studied were selected from a cross sectional longitudinal study of patients undergoing cataract surgery in 72 ophthalmologist's offices located in three metropolitan regions of the United States. Results: Pairwise correlations between items in the VF-14 were all less than 0.6, indicating that no items could be removed solely on the basis of redundancy. 10 items correlated moderately with change in trouble, and 11 correlated moderately with change in satisfaction (r >0.15) at 4 months after cataract extraction. Eleven items demonstrated an effect size >0.4 at 4 months. These 11 items were either important for detecting cataract related functional disability or for quantifying the extent to which cataract impaired function. Additionally, 11 items were needed to detect adequately individuals with functional impairment. Three items (recognising people, cooking, and reading large print) were less responsive to cataract extraction and were more strongly associated with ocular comorbidities. Conclusions: While previous reports indicate that the VF-14 can be significantly shortened, our analysis only justifies removing three items. While the resulting VF-11 has properties similar to the VF-14, the limited time savings do not justify altering this already validated instrument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.8.885</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12140210</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cataract ; Cataract - rehabilitation ; Cataract Extraction ; Cataracts ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Clinical Science ; Disability Evaluation ; Eye surgery ; Female ; Health care policy ; Humans ; Large print ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medical sciences ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Reading ; Studies ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome ; Vision, Ocular</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2002-08, Vol.86 (8), p.885-891</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2002 Copyright 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © Copyright 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b583t-edb059d69aabd3c7c0e184e2e3b83ce84f95de39b280ead291c3ec98acf378d03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1771229/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1771229/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13797728$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12140210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedman, D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tielsch, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, E B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schein, O D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, E P</creatorcontrib><title>VF-14 item specific responses in patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery: can the length of the VF-14 be reduced?</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Aims: To report the item specific responses of the VF-14 in a population of patients undergoing cataract surgery in their first eye and to determine whether or not the VF-14 can be reduced without compromising its performance as an index of cataract related visual impairment. Methods: The item specific responses to the VF-14 were analysed before (771 patients) and 4 months after (552 patients) cataract surgery in one eye to determine if the VF-14 index can be reduced without compromising its performance. Patients studied were selected from a cross sectional longitudinal study of patients undergoing cataract surgery in 72 ophthalmologist's offices located in three metropolitan regions of the United States. Results: Pairwise correlations between items in the VF-14 were all less than 0.6, indicating that no items could be removed solely on the basis of redundancy. 10 items correlated moderately with change in trouble, and 11 correlated moderately with change in satisfaction (r >0.15) at 4 months after cataract extraction. Eleven items demonstrated an effect size >0.4 at 4 months. These 11 items were either important for detecting cataract related functional disability or for quantifying the extent to which cataract impaired function. Additionally, 11 items were needed to detect adequately individuals with functional impairment. Three items (recognising people, cooking, and reading large print) were less responsive to cataract extraction and were more strongly associated with ocular comorbidities. Conclusions: While previous reports indicate that the VF-14 can be significantly shortened, our analysis only justifies removing three items. While the resulting VF-11 has properties similar to the VF-14, the limited time savings do not justify altering this already validated instrument.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cataract</subject><subject>Cataract - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Clinical Science</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Large print</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vision, Ocular</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuP0zAQxiMEYsvCjTOyhIALKX4ksc0BtKooD60ACShHy3EmqbuJXewEbf97vLTaAlohH6yZ-embh74se0jwnBBWvag3fi6quZgLUd7KZqSoRE4xl7ezGcaY54RU5CS7F-MmhbQi_G52QigpMCV4ll2uljkpkB1hQHELxrbWoABx612EiKxDWz1acGNEk2sgdN66DrU2xBHBDpDRow7ajChOoYOwe5kyDo1rQD24blwj3_6O9m1qSNrNZKB5fT-70-o-woPDf5p9W775uniXn396-35xdp7XpWBjDk2NS9lUUuu6YYYbDEQUQIHVghkQRSvLBpisqcCgGyqJYWCk0KZlXDSYnWav9rrbqR6gMWmVoHu1DXbQYae8turvirNr1fmfinBOKJVJ4OlBIPgfE8RRDTYa6HvtwE9RcSILnGZK4ON_wI2fgkvLXWkJKauSl4l6vqc63YOyrvWpq-nAQWruHbQ2pc8kLgnBBU14fgOeXgODNTfxB3kTfIwB2utNCVZXflHJL0pUSqjkl4Q_-vM6R_hgkAQ8OQA6Gt23QTtj45FjXHJOxXFOG0e4vK7rcKEqznipPq4WisvPqy8fvhdqmfhne74eNv8f8Rd6iuTx</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Friedman, D S</creator><creator>Tielsch, J M</creator><creator>Vitale, S</creator><creator>Bass, E B</creator><creator>Schein, O D</creator><creator>Steinberg, E P</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>Copyright 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>VF-14 item specific responses in patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery: can the length of the VF-14 be reduced?</title><author>Friedman, D S ; Tielsch, J M ; Vitale, S ; Bass, E B ; Schein, O D ; Steinberg, E P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b583t-edb059d69aabd3c7c0e184e2e3b83ce84f95de39b280ead291c3ec98acf378d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cataract</topic><topic>Cataract - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Clinical Science</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Large print</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vision, Ocular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedman, D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tielsch, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, E B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schein, O D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, E P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedman, D S</au><au>Tielsch, J M</au><au>Vitale, S</au><au>Bass, E B</au><au>Schein, O D</au><au>Steinberg, E P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>VF-14 item specific responses in patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery: can the length of the VF-14 be reduced?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>885</spage><epage>891</epage><pages>885-891</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>Aims: To report the item specific responses of the VF-14 in a population of patients undergoing cataract surgery in their first eye and to determine whether or not the VF-14 can be reduced without compromising its performance as an index of cataract related visual impairment. Methods: The item specific responses to the VF-14 were analysed before (771 patients) and 4 months after (552 patients) cataract surgery in one eye to determine if the VF-14 index can be reduced without compromising its performance. Patients studied were selected from a cross sectional longitudinal study of patients undergoing cataract surgery in 72 ophthalmologist's offices located in three metropolitan regions of the United States. Results: Pairwise correlations between items in the VF-14 were all less than 0.6, indicating that no items could be removed solely on the basis of redundancy. 10 items correlated moderately with change in trouble, and 11 correlated moderately with change in satisfaction (r >0.15) at 4 months after cataract extraction. Eleven items demonstrated an effect size >0.4 at 4 months. These 11 items were either important for detecting cataract related functional disability or for quantifying the extent to which cataract impaired function. Additionally, 11 items were needed to detect adequately individuals with functional impairment. Three items (recognising people, cooking, and reading large print) were less responsive to cataract extraction and were more strongly associated with ocular comorbidities. Conclusions: While previous reports indicate that the VF-14 can be significantly shortened, our analysis only justifies removing three items. While the resulting VF-11 has properties similar to the VF-14, the limited time savings do not justify altering this already validated instrument.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>12140210</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.86.8.885</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 2002-08, Vol.86 (8), p.885-891 |
issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1771229 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Cataract Cataract - rehabilitation Cataract Extraction Cataracts Chi-Square Distribution Clinical Science Disability Evaluation Eye surgery Female Health care policy Humans Large print Male Medical personnel Medical sciences Patient satisfaction Patients Reading Studies Surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the eye and orbit Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment Outcome Vision, Ocular |
title | VF-14 item specific responses in patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery: can the length of the VF-14 be reduced? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T15%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=VF-14%20item%20specific%20responses%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20first%20eye%20cataract%20surgery:%20can%20the%20length%20of%20the%20VF-14%20be%20reduced?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Friedman,%20D%20S&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=885&rft.epage=891&rft.pages=885-891&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.86.8.885&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA90511042%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778996575&rft_id=info:pmid/12140210&rft_galeid=A90511042&rfr_iscdi=true |